logo
The Real Reason Hydrogen Fuel Isn't More Popular

The Real Reason Hydrogen Fuel Isn't More Popular

Yahoo2 days ago
In the effort to reduce climate change and eliminate the abundance of fossil fuels, one particular element has been identified as so promising that it could be the future of clean fuels. That element is hydrogen. Earth has a massive supply of hydrogen. It can be burned in the same way we use oil or gas, but instead of polluting the air, it only emits water. So if there is plenty of it and it's so clean, why isn't it more popular?
There's no chemical element more abundant than hydrogen in the universe, but it's still difficult to obtain in a pure and ready-to-use form. To use it in the same way we use oil and gas, we must manufacture it. The problem is that the manufacturing process itself usually releases significant climate-warming emissions. There is little point in using clean hydrogen energy if the process to create it negates its benefits.
Read more: What's Happening To Earth Right Now Can't Be Explained By Climate Models
The Problems With Manufacturing Hydrogen
Data from the International Energy Agency (IEA), shows that 96% of hydrogen fuel production around the world uses fossil fuels -- releasing at least nine tons of carbon dioxide (CO₂) per ton of hydrogen, and even up to twelve tons. The various production processes used impact the levels of CO₂ emitted.
Most of the hydrogen used today -- including around 95% of projects in the U.S. -- is known as gray hydrogen; made by breaking down natural gas using high heat. While this process does produce hydrogen, it also releases about 12 kilograms of CO₂ for every single kilogram of hydrogen. A cleaner option is blue hydrogen, which uses the same method but adds carbon capture technology to trap some of the emissions. Even then, it still releases three to five kilograms of CO₂ per kilogram of hydrogen.
As part of a team researching new ways of creating hydrogen, without direct CO₂ emissions, Professor Graham Hutchings of Cardiff University stated, "Finding sustainable ways of creating the products we need for everyday life and to meet net zero ambitions for the future is a key challenge facing the chemical industry. Hydrogen is widely regarded as one way of achieving these ambitions because it is made from natural gas. However, it is extremely energy intensive and, of course, when created through traditional methods, it produces large amounts of carbon dioxide limiting its environmental benefits."
Research Into Cleaner Ways To Produce Hydrogen
One potential process which would be safer for our climate, is an option referred to as green hydrogen. This utilizes clean and renewable energy, like wind or solar power, to manufacture the hydrogen. The process can emit one kilogram or less of harmful emissions, which is significantly less than the current processes in place for gray and blue hydrogen.
Researching the concept at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Energy Initiative, a key stumbling block is the cost of the electrolyzers that are used to split the hydrogen from water. Furthermore, wind and solar power aren't reliable enough for a continuous manufacturing process. That leaves the options of either stopping production when conditions are not ideal, or having to rely on more traditional methods of producing hydrogen, which is counterintuitive.
Principal research scientist at the MIT Energy Initiative, Emre Gençer, explained, "If we get cheaper electrolyzers, you will definitely see more green hydrogen coming online ... The reason we are talking about hydrogen today [is] because there are hard to abate sectors with electrification or other decarbonization options, and that's why we see hydrogen as a solution. But that completely depends on how clean our hydrogen production is."
Read the original article on BGR.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ATAI Life Sciences (ATAI) Stock Plunge on Trial Failure News
ATAI Life Sciences (ATAI) Stock Plunge on Trial Failure News

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ATAI Life Sciences (ATAI) Stock Plunge on Trial Failure News

July 28 - Atai Life Sciences (NASDAQ:ATAI) shares slid 9% in pre?market trading on Monday after Recognify Life Sciences, an Atai?backed company, reported its Phase 2b trial of inidascamine for cognitive impairment linked to schizophrenia missed its primary endpoint. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with ATAI. The oral compound, engineered to modulate multiple neurotransmitter pathways for pro?cognitive effects, failed to outperform placebo on key cognitive measures. Recognify said the results fell short of statistical significance. Atai's CEO acknowledged the setback but highlighted inidascamine's potential in CIAS and other indications. He added that Atai will redirect its efforts toward its wholly?owned psychedelic programs focused on affective disorders. Investors have been closely watching Atai's broader pipeline, which includes compounds targeting depression, PTSD and Alzheimer's disease. This latest trial disappointment adds to a string of mid?stage readouts that have tested market sentiment around biotech firms pivoting to next?generation neuroscience therapies. Despite today's drop, Atai's management reiterated its commitment to advancing its lead psychedelic candidates through upcoming Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials. Based on the one year price targets offered by 6 analysts, the average target price for ATAI Life Sciences NV is $9.83 with a high estimate of $12.00 and a low estimate of $7.00. The average target implies a upside of +175.44% from the current price of $3.57. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

OpenEvidence's Meteoric Rise Is Huge For Doctors
OpenEvidence's Meteoric Rise Is Huge For Doctors

Forbes

time19 minutes ago

  • Forbes

OpenEvidence's Meteoric Rise Is Huge For Doctors

Medical research and science has never been easier to access. OpenEvidence has raised hundreds of millions of dollars. In its most recent funding round, it raised a $210 million Series B from prominent investors such as Google Ventures and Kleiner Perkins, bringing the company's valuation to nearly $3.5 billion. The company's goal is straightforward and incredibly ambitious: to collate the entire corpus of medical knowledge and research developments in a way that is easily accessible to physicians and thereby, improve health outcomes. The service is aiming to provide a similar 'touch and feel' as other generative AI services such as Chat GPT or Google's Gemini—except, its target audience is primarily doctors. Medical science is a rapidly evolving field with a perpetually expanding sea of knowledge, especially as research and development across the fields of disease, therapeutics and human sciences continue to grow. In fact, as Sequoia Capital notes, 'a new PubMed article [which is often the flagship resource for peer-reviewed science studies]The value of this type of technology is increasingly being recognized. The latest models for OpenAI's ChatGPT (GPT 4.1 and o3) have displayed incredible efficacy in taking command of medical knowledge; in May, the company published its work with HealthBench, proposing a rubric for model performance in healthcare and also indicating that GPT's latest models performed at par or even better than standard physician evaluations. Even Google's Gemini family of models has made significant progress in this space; its MedLM suite, for example, is a highly tuned model that can aid the entire healthcare workflow, ranging from answering medical questions to deciphering unstructured health data. Why is all of this important? There are a few different reasons. First and foremost, this technology is aiming to democratize medical knowledge in a way that is easy to access. Furthermore, it comes at a time when the healthcare system, and its respective workforce, is facing unprecedented headwinds. Studies have repeatedly indicated that physician burnout and attrition are incredibly concerning problems for health systems and organizations of all sizes; physicians simply do not have the bandwidth to fulfill all of their patient care duties in addition to the increasingly prevalent administrative, compliance and regulatory burdens placed on them. This also means that there is less time for professional development and continuing education. These technologies can serve as a major advantage to the physician workflow as they provide an opportunity to easily query, fact-check and understand the latest science that is involved with a condition. Carry this even further with tools such as OpenEvidence DeepConsult, which gives physicians access to PhD-level AI agents that can conduct medical research, or Gemini's foundation models that can rapidly decipher medical images, or even AI scribing technology that can rapidly generate patient-physician encounter notes, and soon, hours can be saved from a physician's daily workflow. This translates not only to millions of dollars saved annually in system costs, but also to more time available to spend with patients, improved access to care, and ultimately, increased efficacy and quality of care provided.

The new Prime Video trailer you have to see to believe? Ice Cube fighting aliens on Zoom, of course
The new Prime Video trailer you have to see to believe? Ice Cube fighting aliens on Zoom, of course

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The new Prime Video trailer you have to see to believe? Ice Cube fighting aliens on Zoom, of course

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. New Prime Video movie War of the Worlds is coming to the streaming service on July 30, and out of everything new on Prime Video in July 2025, this just might be the most bizarre. I'm talking about the same 'War of the Worlds' as H.G. Wells' epic sci-fi novel, and later the 1978 Jeff Wayne musical with the giant spider robot now synonymous with the IP. There was even a 2005 movie with Tom Cruise, which looked much more like the traditional action movie we'd expect. Here's what we know about the 2025 version: The movie will follow Will Radford (Ice Cube), a top cyber-security analyst for Homeland Security, who 'spends his days tracking potential threats to national security through a mass surveillance program, until an attack by an unknown entity leads him to question whether the government is hiding something from him … and the rest of the world.'With the tagline 'your data is deadly,' this lesson in an unmanageable digital footprint is about to hit us in the face with all the tact of a mandatory school assembly. The more I watch the War of the Worlds trailer – and trust me, I can't stop – the more I'm dumbfounded that this is what our collective creativity has come to. Is the new Prime Video movie going to set the world on fire? Probably not, and that's bad news for Gen Z. New Prime Video movie War of the Worlds is really just Ice Cube fighting aliens on Zoom Culturally, we love to find someone to blame. For example, if things significantly change in a well-known franchise, fans are likely to blame certain audiences or social demographics as the reason why. As far as Prime Video's War of the Worlds is concerned, it looks like a cheap ploy to make the once complex lore of a science-fiction classic more palatable to younger viewers. Whether that's even what they want to see almost doesn't matter… young'uns will be responsible for a bad film if there's even a sniff of modern technology used. As you can see from the trailer above, War of the Worlds is going to be entirely set on a computer screen. At no point does the action deviate from Zoom calls, YouTube clips, or any amount of open and closed tabs on a desktop. This is far from a new concept, with horror movies like Megan is Missing and Missing (weirdly, a theme here) regularly pivoting to digital means of storytelling. But to not have any grounding in reality at all is more rarely seen, and honestly? I don't think it serves a purpose at all. Aside from the laziness I've already discussed, I also don't think the concept does the original story any justice. When you think of War of the Worlds, you think of dynamic action on an incredulous scale, complete with grandiose set pieces and earth-shattering worldbuilding. Wells' story is something that's bigger than you can ever comprehend, even if the far-off premise genuinely feels like it could happen one day. Reduce all of that to explosions on a screen, and what magic do you have left? Ice Cube could completely take me by surprise and pull the best new Prime Video movie of 2025 out of his back pocket, but I highly doubt it. If we're being honest, there's no real reason why this War of the Worlds should exist, only strengthening the argument that more movies should be based on original ideas. You might also like Stand ready for Invincible season 5's arrival, worm: Amazon confirms the hit Prime Video show's fourth chapter won't be its last Ballard season 2 would have a 'very exciting' arc says Maggie Q – but the Bosch spin-off might not return, despite being Prime Video's #1 show New to Prime Video? Here are 5 movies and TV shows with over 90% on Rotten Tomatoes to get you started Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store