Does your politics matter on a dating app? Love should be about discovery
While it's been around for a few years, the trend appears to have solidified with the victory of Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic primary ahead of the New York City mayoral election later this year. In Mamdani's story about meeting his wife on a dating app, many see hope of finding their own perfect matches. This practical approach to relationships, with the elimination of an entire area of potential conflict, may seem admirable, especially in these polarised times. But does it offer any room for the spontaneous combustion known as love?
Because no matter how many heartbreaks it might cause, friction is essential if sparks are to fly. And while the good common sense of laying out the terms and conditions of a relationship right at the outset is undeniable, so is the fact that love is a journey of acceptance and discovery. It is neither a contract to be signed, nor a checklist to be filled. As William Faulkner once wrote, love happens 'despite', not 'because'. It unfolds in bits and pieces, in arguments and conversations. This age-old process may lead to a broken heart or two, some unmet expectations and dashed illusions. But when a clash of wills results in a meeting of minds and hearts, it is a price well worth paying.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's DOJ Sidesteps Norms to Boost Ally Alina Habba as US Attorney
President Donald Trump's administration sidestepped tradition this week and criticized judges who sought to bypass his ally as the top federal prosecutor in New Jersey — a pattern that may repeat itself in other Democratic-leaning states. The actions of the Justice Department to shield interim US Attorney Alina Habba, Trump's former personal attorney, could foreshadow other fights over chief federal prosecutors holding temporary posts in blue states like California, New York and Nevada. Federal judges in New Jersey said Tuesday they would not extend Habba's four-month tenure, the longest she could serve without US Senate confirmation. When the judges bypassed Habba to pick her deputy, Attorney General Pam Bondi then slammed 'politically minded judges' for overstepping their authority. She fired the judges' choice, Desiree Grace, hours later. Habba's term is set to expire at the end of the week, and what happens next is anyone's guess. But Trump and his appointees have routinely assailed judges who resist him in court cases, and they've shown a recent willingness to push the boundaries of statutes on appointment to protect their choices. 'It's a little unclear as to how this will all shake out,' said Jennifer Selin, an associate law professor at Arizona State University who researches US attorney appointments. The law on appointing interim US attorneys wouldn't prevent Trump from naming Habba as the interim again, but it's 'definitely on the fringes of law,' Selin said. Spokespersons for the Justice Department and the US Attorney's Office in New Jersey declined to comment. US attorneys typically serve four-year terms after they are approved by the US Senate, and they leave en masse with the change of a presidential administration. Under Senate custom, if a home-state senator opposes a president's US attorney nominee, the full body won't confirm their appointment. More than 20 states have two Democratic senators but disputes may arise soon in Nevada, Illinois and California, where interim appointments are set to expire soon. Trump has nominated Habba for a four-year term, but she's drawn strong opposition from New Jersey's two Democratic senators, Cory Booker and Andy Kim. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, has also vowed to hold up all Justice Department nominees over Trump receiving a gifted jet from the Qatari government. District judges can appoint a US attorney until a vacancy is filled, but that is prompting pushback from the Trump administration. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche accused New Jersey's judges of 'a left-wing agenda, not the rule of law' and acting like partisans and activists. Such a posture is not a long-term recipe for success, said Daniel Richman, a law professor at Columbia University. Every US attorney's office investigates and prosecutes criminal cases and represents the US in civil litigation. Its lawyers appear regularly in court before federal judges. 'An office that relies on the cooperation of judges to do its work usually doesn't get ahead by making war on them,' Richman said. In the Northern District of New York, the Trump administration tested the bounds of its appointment authority this month after federal judges declined to extend the 120-day term of John Sarcone, the chief prosecutor. Bondi appointed Sarcone as 'Special Attorney to the Attorney General' and 'First Assistant US Attorney,' making him the acting leader under the federal law governing vacancies. Sarcone is authorized to conduct the same legal proceedings as US attorneys may conduct, according to records that say his appointment is 'indefinite but may be terminated at any time.' He could serve more than 600 days as an acting official under the vacancy statute, effectively bypassing the Senate, said Selin. Acting officials may serve under the vacancy law for up to 210 days, followed by up to two more 210-day stints if nominations for the seat fail in the Senate. Trump's administration also named two successive interim leaders to serve as US attorney in Washington, DC, tapping Jeanine Pirro for a 120-day term after her predecessor, Ed Martin, lacked the Senate votes to advance. 'The Trump administration has been very strategic in using acting positions to navigate difficulties in the Senate,' Selin said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Harvard under investigation for role in US visa programme for foreign researchers
The US Department of State has opened a formal investigation into Harvard University's participation in the federal Exchange Visitor Programme, raising questions about the Ivy League institution's compliance with national security protocols and programme enquiry will assess whether Harvard remains eligible to serve as a sponsor in the programme, which brings thousands of international students and scholars to the United States annually for academic and cultural has come under increasing pressure from Washington since it refused to comply with demands from a federal antisemitism task force in April. The university is now suing for over $2.6 billion in federal funding cuts, accusing the Trump administration of carrying out a campaign of retaliation. 'All sponsors participating in this programme are required to fully comply with exchange visitor regulations, transparency in reporting, and a demonstrated commitment to fostering the principles of cultural exchange and mutual understanding upon which the programme was founded,' the State Department said in a department emphasised that sponsors must not conduct activities that 'undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States.'While the agency has not disclosed what triggered the investigation, the announcement marks a rare public scrutiny of one of the country's most prestigious American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe conditions for all students. "The investigation will ensure that State Department programs do not run contrary to our nation's interests," the department spokesperson Jason Newton said the investigation was 'another retaliatory step' taken by the administration. 'Harvard continues to enrol and sponsor international scholars, researchers, and students, and will protect its international community and support them as they apply for US visas and travel to campus this fall,' Newton said in a statement. He said the school is committed to complying with the programme's Bruen, a former director of global engagement under Democratic President Barack Obama, said there is no justification for the administration's action.'It not only damages Harvard, but American higher education & industry that depend on the best & brightest wanting to come here,' Bruen said in a post on Exchange Visitor Programme, also known as the J-1 visa programme, has long been seen as a soft power tool for US diplomacy, building goodwill through academic and cultural ties.- EndsInputs from Associated PressTune InMust Watch
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump can fire Democrat CPSC members: SCOTUS backs US president; overturns lower court order
Representational image In a 6–3 ruling on Wednesday, the US supreme court sided with president Donald Trump in a case concerning the removal of three Democratic members from the consumer product safety commission (CPSC). The ruling allows Trump to go ahead with the dismissals, overturning earlier decisions from a federal judge and an appeals court that had reinstated the board members. The three officials Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric, and Richard Trumka Jr, were removed from the CPSC by the Trump administration. They were later reinstated by US district judge Matthew Maddox, who ruled the firings unlawful. Maddox, a Biden appointee, said that the structure of the independent agency did not violate Trump's constitutional powers under Article II. Trump's legal team challenged the ruling in the supreme court, arguing that the president had the authority to remove members of independent boards. The administration cited a recent decision involving other federal bodies the national labour relations board (NLRB) and the merit systems protection board (MSPB) to claim the precedent applied here too. The three ousted members opposed the emergency appeal, pointing out that their sudden removal would harm the functioning of the CPSC and lacked any clear urgency, especially since the administration had waited four months to act. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the ruling.
