Failures in compensation scheme for infected blood laid bare in new report
The latest report of the inquiry concludes:
– There was a 'missed opportunity' to consult with people impacted by the scandal.
– There has been a 'repetition of mistakes in the past' in the way both the Conservative and Labour governments have responded.
– Trust in the Infected Blood Compensation Authority (IBCA) has been 'lost' by many members of the infected blood community.
– People impacted by the scandal have expressed a 'grave concern' over the delay in compensation and a 'lack' of clear timescales as to when it will be delivered.
– The report raises concerns about how the regulations underpinning the compensation authority have created a 'liability window' which mean people infected with HIV with contaminated blood or blood products before 1982 will not be compensated which is 'illogical and profoundly unjust'.
– The impacts of a hepatitis infection are not being 'fully recognised' in the compensation scheme, including the impact of early treatment for the virus which has been linked to severe side effects.
The main report of the Infected Blood Inquiry was published in May 2024 (PA)
Campaign group Tainted Blood has estimated that at least 100 people have died while waiting for compensation since the main report was published last year.
Writing in the 210-page report, Sir Brian said: 'Trust has not yet been regained but instead has been further damaged and that people have been harmed yet further by the way in which they have been treated.'
He said that he felt the need to hold special hearings of the inquiry earlier this year due to 'increasingly desperate' concerns raised to him about the compensation scheme, including some saying that decisions were being made 'behind closed doors'.
Sir Brian added: 'Trust in government has only a tenuous hold; it was weakened further by the failures recounted here, to give people the dignity and the respect they deserve.'
He went on in a statement: 'For decades people who suffered because of infected blood have not been listened to.
'Once again decisions have been made behind closed doors leading to obvious injustices.
'The UK government has known for years that compensation for thousands of people was inevitable and had identified many of those who should have it – but only 460 have received compensation so far and many, many more have not even been allowed to begin the process.
'It is not too late to get this right. We are calling for compensation to be faster, and more than that, fairer.'
More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after they were given contaminated blood and blood products between the 1970s and early 1990s.
And more than 3,000 people have died as a result, and survivors are living with life-long health implications.
The latest report into the scandal states that 'the impacts of infection with hepatitis are not being fully recognised (or applied) in the scheme as it stands'.
Glenn Wilkinson, from the Contaminated Blood Campaign, told the PA news agency: 'It's not about the speed of compensation, it's about the adequacy of compensation.
'What's the point in delivering a compensation scheme quickly if it's going to fail the majority of people?
'As it stands, those in the hepatitis C community are going to be compensated at the very least 50% less compared to those with HIV when the death toll within the hepatitis C community is far greater than that of the HIV community. There's no justice to this.'
He said that people with hepatitis C feel forced to stay on support schemes as a result of the current compensation scheme which mean they are 'effectively tied to our abuser for the rest of our lives'.
The latest report states: 'Anyone who has read the Inquiry Report of May 2024 will recognise that there has been a repetition of the mistakes of the past in the way in which government (both before and after the general election) has responded.
'The harm which all this has caused is evident in everything that has been said by people infected and affected.'
It adds: 'Although efforts have rightly been made by IBCA to meet and communicate with people infected and affected, what is fundamentally lacking is a formal, significant and influential role for people infected or affected within IBCA.
'Such a lack of involvement both exacerbates mistrust in IBCA and perpetuates the harm which people have suffered over decades.'
The Infected Blood Inquiry published its main report on the scandal in May last year, and a compensation scheme was announced a day later.
But in the same week a general election was called and officials from the IBCA have described how in the early days of the organisation it consisted of two men, a laptop and a phone.
We've published our latest compensation figures today – these are accurate as of 1 July 2025.
We will continue to publish updated figures every two weeks.
Click the link to see the latest figures: https://t.co/CISQSHwRQ0 pic.twitter.com/KRWbpXunBg
— Infected Blood Compensation Authority (@IBCA_UK) July 3, 2025
Some £11.8 billion has been allocated to compensate victims, administered by the IBCA.
As of July 1, some 2,043 people have been asked to make a claim, and 460 people have had their compensation paid totalling more than £326 million, according to IBCA figures.
On Sunday, the Cabinet Office said that it will 'reduce the administration and process delays' victims are facing, meaning the IBCA will 'be able to deliver services quickly, and require different supporting information from claimants'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour opens door to new Rachel Reeves tax raid as minister hints that middle-class earners will bear the brunt
Labour opened the door to a tax raid on middle-class workers yesterday, with one minister saying only those on 'modest incomes' would be spared. The party looks set to launch a fresh tax grab this autumn, having refused to rule out extending stealth taxes or a levy on wealth. Yesterday Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander again failed to deny that Labour is looking to hike taxes, but said the Government would be guided by 'fairness'. She told Sky News that Cabinet ministers did not 'directly' talk about the idea of a wealth tax during an away day at the Prime Minister's Chequers country estate on Friday. But she added: 'I think your viewers would be surprised if we didn't recognise that, at the Budget, the Chancellor will need to look at the [Office for Budget Responsibility] forecast that is given to her, and will make decisions in line with the fiscal rules that she has set out. 'We made a commitment in our manifesto not to be putting up taxes on people on modest incomes, working people. We have stuck to that.' Pressed on whether there would be tax rises this autumn, she refused to speculate but said: 'When it comes to taxation, fairness is going to be our guiding principle.' Huge rise in jobseekers The number of people looking for work has seen the biggest increase since the pandemic as employers scarred by tax rises step up redundancies. A poll of recruitment firms showed an 'accelerated decline' in activity – evidence that Labour's £25 billion National Insurance raid, combined with global political turbulence including Donald Trump's trade war and conflict in the Middle East, is taking its toll on growth. The figures from accountants KPMG and the Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC) come after it was revealed last week that the economy shrank by 0.1 per cent in May, the second month of decline. Labour's general election manifesto promised not to increase taxes on 'working people', including national insurance, income tax or VAT, but ministers have struggled to define what a 'working person' is ever since. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has refused to rule out tax rises at the Budget since the Government was forced into a humiliating U-turn on welfare reforms that would have saved £5 billion. Fiscal watchdog the OBR last week warned that the UK's state finances are on an 'unsustainable' path due to a raft of public spending promises the Government 'cannot afford' in the longer term. Meanwhile, economists have warned that Ms Reeves' fiscal headroom could be eroded by unexpected economic turns. She is under pressure from Labour MPs, unions and senior figures to impose a wealth tax in order to balance the books. She could also increase business rates for department stores and supermarkets in a bid to raise £1.7billion, the Telegraph reported. Ms Reeves will tomorrow unveil plans for a Thatcher-style 'Big Bang' in the City by slashing red tape. In her Mansion House speech, she will pledge to reduce excessive regulation to make the UK 'the best place in the world to do business'.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Labour accused of 'crocodile tears' over junior doctors strike as ministers criticise medical union for low turnout in ballot - but Rayner's flagship Bill will make walkouts even EASIER
Labour was last night accused of crying 'crocodile tears' over planned strikes by junior doctors as it prepares to make walkouts even easier. Angela Rayner 's radical workers' rights Bill will soon scrap the 50 per cent turnout threshold which unions must meet to hold legal strike action. Yet the Government has repeatedly criticised the British Medical Association for achieving only a 55 per cent turnout in its ballot to trigger walkouts this month. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has said that the 'majority' of BMA resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – did not vote to strike and has called the forthcoming action 'completely unreasonable'. But Labour's Employment Rights Bill repeals the minimum turnout requirement in trade union law which was introduced under the Tories – making future strike action even easier. Last night Conservative business spokesman Andrew Griffith told the Mail the Government's comments were 'totally hypocritical'. He said: 'The unions are already licking their lips at the Employment Bill, which will unleash waves of low threshold strikes. By reducing the turnout required to trigger a strike, Labour are guaranteeing even more strikes. They are effectively giving unions the whip hand at the worst possible time. 'Labour is crying crocodile tears over the BMA strike action, given what Angela Rayner has planned. It is totally hypocritical. 'Rayner will grind this country to a halt and take us back to the 1970s. If they remotely cared about growth or our public services and the people that use them, they would rip up this extreme union charter at once.' Cabinet ministers are divided over the workers' rights Bill, with the Department for Health and the Treasury said to be 'quite worried' about the impact on public services. But Ms Rayner's department for Housing, Communities and Local Government believes that the threshold requirement makes it harder for unions to engage to settle disputes. The Department for Health has been at pains to point out that only around one third of resident doctors voted for strike action. The BMA, which announced last week that resident doctors in England would walk out for five consecutive days from 7am on July 25 over pay, has seen turnout fall in the past couple of years. Some 90 per cent of voting resident doctors backed the fresh strike action, with the BMA reporting a turnout of 55 per cent. But this is down from 61.9 per cent in 2024, 71.3 per cent in June-August 2023, and 77.5 per cent in January-February 2023. The union is demanding a 29.2 per cent rise for resident doctors to reverse 'pay erosion' since 2008-09. In September, BMA members voted to accept a Government pay deal worth 22.3 per cent on average over two years. The strike action lays bare a growing rift between Labour and its union paymasters, with Unite last week suspending Ms Rayner's membership. General secretary Sharon Graham said members 'don't believe that Labour defends workers in the way we thought they would'. But allies of Ms Rayner point to the Employment Rights Bill, which returns to Parliament today, as evidence of the Government seeking to 'make work pay'. Research by the Mail identified more than a dozen instances when the law now being repealed prevented strikes going ahead. Unions in the public and private sectors held ballots which found support for industrial action – but they could not take place because turnout was below the 50 per cent required by the now-doomed Trade Union Act 2016. A Government spokesman said: 'The old strike laws clearly didn't work, with the UK losing more days to industrial action than any year since the 1980s. 'Our Employment Rights Bill is fundamental to delivering our Plan for Change, with the biggest upgrade to workers' rights in a generation and ensuring people get a fair wage for their hard work. 'Instead of confrontation, we are ushering in a new era of partnership that sees employers, unions and government work together in cooperation and through negotiation.' Analysis of previous NHS walkouts suggests the strikes will send waiting lists soaring, with backlogs predicted to rise by up to 10,000 a day to 7.4 million. A Whitehall source told the Telegraph, which carried out the analysis, that the strike risks 'sending a wrecking ball through the NHS' and will be a major blow to Labour's pledge to turn the health service around. And hospitals will find it harder to plan to cover the strikes after Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, co-leader of the BMA's resident doctors committee, reminded members that they do not have a legal responsibility to tell their NHS trust whether they are striking. Mr Streeting will meet BMA representatives this week in an effort to avoid strike action.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Miliband says UK's way of life ‘under threat' amid extremes of heat and rainfall
The latest state of the UK climate report, published in the Royal Meteorological Society's International Journal of Climatology, shows the impact of human-caused global warming on the UK's weather, seas, people and wildlife. From earlier spring events in nature to record warm periods in 2024, which have already been beaten again this year, Met Office experts say the UK's climate is 'notably different' from just a few decades ago. Ed Miliband and Steve Reed at the Ock and Thame Farmers floodplain restoration project in Oxfordshire (Jonathan Brady/PA) The report details the climate in 2024, and over the longer term, highlighting how the UK has warmed at a rate of about 0.25C a decade and is now about 1.24C warmer than from 1961 to 1990. For the first time, the report also found UK sea levels to be rising faster than the global average. The Energy Secretary called the findings 'a stark warning' to take action on climate and nature. 'Our British way of life is under threat,' Mr Miliband told the PA news agency. Heavy rain in September last year caused flooding in some areas (Joe Giddens/PA) 'Whether it is extreme heat, droughts, flooding, we can see it actually with our own eyes, that it's already happening, and we need to act. 'That's why the Government has a central mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower and tackle the climate crisis.' On those who oppose Labour's green policies, he said: '(U)nless, we act on the cause of what is happening, the cause of what is changing our climate, then we will be betraying future generations.' He spoke during a visit to a project restoring a rare alkaline fen at Hinksey Heights, Oxfordshire, with Environment Secretary Steve Reed, ahead of the report's release. Conservationists told the ministers how the fen, which is part of a national effort to expand the country's best freshwater habitats, was helping to boost wetland biodiversity and sequester planet-heating carbon in the atmosphere. Environment Secretary Steve Reed speaks to the media at the Ock and Thame Farmers floodplain restoration project (Jonathan Brady/PA) Responding to the report, Mr Reed told PA it 'lays absolutely bare the damaging impact of climate change on people living in this country'. But he said that through projects like the fen, 'we're tackling the problem of nature loss and also we're tackling the problem of climate change at the same time'. One year in, Labour has been fiercely criticised over its approach to the environment, including concerns around planning reforms sidelining nature in pursuit of growth. The Environment Secretary defended the Government's actions, pointing to boosting funding for sustainable farming and developing the nature restoration fund so that money from house builders goes towards more impactful landscape-scale projects. 'We'd become one of the most nature-depleted countries on earth,' he said. 'This Government is calling time on that decline.' Elsewhere, the report said that the last three years have been in the top five warmest on record for the UK. Last year was the fourth warmest in records dating back to 1884, while the year had the warmest May and warmest spring on record – already beaten by 2025's record hot spring. But Mike Kendon, Met Office climate scientist and lead author of the report, said: 'It's the extremes of temperature and rainfall that is changing the most, and that's of profound concern, and that's going to continue in the future.' The hottest summer days have warmed about twice as much as average summer days have in the past decade in some parts of the UK, according to new analysis in the report. And as the UK's climate warms, it is also getting wetter, with extremes of rainfall, floods and storms in 2024, as in recent years. England and Wales had the wettest winter from October 2023 to March 2024 on record in more than 250 years, as floods hit Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, the West Midlands and eastern Scotland. But while red warnings were issued for storm Isha in January and storm Darragh in December, observations do not currently suggest the UK is becoming stormier or windier. Overall, however, the country's weather is changing because of rising greenhouse gases pushing up global temperature, Mr Kendon said, with records being broken 'very frequently'. Floods in Loughborough, Leicestershire (Joe Giddens/PA) 'Every year that goes by is another upward step on the warming trajectory our climate is on,' he said. 'Observations show that our climate in the UK is now notably different to what it was just a few decades ago.' The report also said tide gauge records since the 1900s show sea level rise around the UK is speeding up, with two-thirds of the rise of that time taking place in just the last three decades. Dr Svetlana Jevrejeva, from the National Oceanography Centre, said the UK's coasts would start to see more events where rising sea levels combined with high tides would lead to coastal inundation, even without storms. 'This extra sea level rise contribution is leading to an increase in the frequency of extreme sea levels and an intensification of coastal hazards,' she said. To highlight the impact of the UK's warming climate on wildlife, the report drew on Nature's Calendar, a volunteer-fed database of the natural signs of the changing seasons managed by the Woodland Trust. Records for 2024 show that spring was earlier than average for 12 of the 13 spring events monitored, and the earliest in the data running back to 1999 for frogspawn appearing and blackbirds nesting. The period of the year in which leaves were on trees from spring to autumn was also longer than average, mostly because of the earlier spring in 2024. Chief executive of the Royal Meteorological Society, Professor Liz Bentley, said the report reinforced the 'clear and urgent signals of our changing climate'.
