Labour tears itself apart over trans rights as biological man 'breaks party rules' and stands to become women's officer
The Trans Rights Alliance, a newly-formed organisation seeking to change Labour's approach to gender issues, has put forward a number of candidates for election on July 19.
One of them includes Steph Richards - a transgender woman in possession of a gender recognition certificate - who is standing for women's officer.
However, a gender critical group within the party, Labour LGB, said the move breaks party rules by 'putting a man forward to be a women's officer'.
Sharing the list of candidates, the group posted on X: 'Many people say that trans ideology is a men's rights movement.
'The 'Trans Alliance' (seeking to take over the once-great LGBT+ Labour) has set out to prove this.
'Also breaking party rules by putting a man forward to be Women's Officer.'
However, Ms Richards has pushed back at claims she does not have a right to stand for the position.
She told Labour List: 'I am legally female, other than in regards to the Equality Act and the Equality Act does not apply to the position within LGBT+ Labour so I am thoroughly within my legal right and my moral right to be able to stand.'
The row is the latest example of how Labour has been torn apart by the trans rights issue following a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court earlier this year.
Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of 'flip-flopping' on the judgement which determined that the word sex in the Equality Act does not refer to gender identity.
The Labour leader, who now says he accepts the Supreme Court ruling, previously said he believed that trans women were women.
It comes after Labour decided to scrap its women's conference rather than face legal challenges and protests if it continued to admit transgender women.
Background papers said there was a 'significant risk of legal challenge to the event as it currently operates' and warned: 'There may be protests and heightened security risks to staff and attendees should the event go ahead.'
A Labour Party spokesman said: 'Labour must ensure all party procedures comply with the Supreme Court's clear ruling.
'Labour is clear that everyone in our society deserves to be treated with dignity and respect.'
Meanwhile, proposed women's officer Ms Richards previously caused controversy after she said trans women's 'breastmilk' was 'suitable for infant feeding'.
Posting on X, Ms Richards wrote: 'Sorry...but regarding the ongoing discussion of whether trans women can express milk to satisfy a baby, these two scientific papers suggest they can, albeit there is some doubt as to the quantity of milk that can be produced.
'The milk produced by trans women has been found to contain high protein levels and other nutrients, making it suitable for infant feeding. While the overall composition may vary slightly, it can still benefit the infant significantly.'
Ms Richards has previously claimed trans people can change their biological sex 'a little bit' and boasted about running a 'safe space' where men could dress up as women in secret, including as 'schoolgirls'.
Last year, she faced fierce criticism after being appointed chief executive of Hampshire-based charity, Endometriosis South Coast, in a move women's rights campaigners branded 'worrying and insulting'.
The appointment of Ms Richards, who uses the pronouns she and her and has undergone £30,000 in treatment and surgery to transition, was met with anger from women's rights campaigners.
Despite hitting back at her critics, saying 'my birth sex doesn't come into it - my CV does', Ms Richards later stepped down from the top role at the charity in May, amid claims she had received 'transphobic abuse' following her appointment.
Her latest comments about breastfeeding were branded 'absolute lunacy' by some online, with one person saying: 'Women don't even breastfeed when there's any doubt about their ability to nourish their babies properly.
'It's horrible to think of a parent so indifferent to the well-being of their child that they would skate on such thin ice just to satisfy the fantasies of the parent.'
But speaking to MailOnline, Ms Richards said: 'My post contained two links to scientific papers, and I tagged in a person I knew was interested in the subject.
'My skin is far too thick to worry about the reactions from people who propagate a culture war and practice prejudice and discrimination against trans people.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
The significant sum spent by Glasgow on hotels for homeless
That amounts covers April 1, 2025 to June 1, 2025, and therefore the annual sum will be significantly higher. Private companies running the hotels were paid in excess of £122 million over the last five years. The city spent £36,122,088 in the 2024-25 financial year up to February 2025, according to the Glasgow Times. That is more than double the £16,320,680 spent by council officials in 2021-22. So, what is behind the hefty cost? Read more: Simply put, Glasgow City Council does not have enough homes to use as emergency accommodation, but the authority is duty bound to help those impacted by homelessness. The council told The Herald it uses more than 50 hotels to accommodate those who fall under this criteria, while also using in excess of 2,600 places of emergency accommodation within temporary accommodation and supported accommodation. Freedom of information data requested by the Scottish Tenants' Association found that 2,117 homeless people were living in a hotel or B&B on June 9, 2025. That includes 322 women and 86 families with children. But it also includes 1,527 refugees who have been given 'leave to remain' in the UK. Leave to remain allows non-UK citizens to reside in the UK indefinitely. Read more: Local authorities across the country have faced intense housing demands in recent years following changes to the UK Government's asylum system. Once a leave to remain decision is granted to an asylum applicant, they must leave Home Office funded accommodation and must present to the council as homeless. Glasgow alone witnessed a 96% increase in homelessness applications from households granted leave, up from 1,300 in 2022-23 to 2,600 in 2023-24. However, that has a knock-on effect on housing supply, leading the local authority to rely on hotel accommodation, which can be classed as unsuitable. The use of hotels meant Glasgow City Council has breached the unsuitable accommodation order 1,465 times between January 1 2025 and June 9 2025. However the reliance on hotels more widely is caused by a shortage of housing in Scotland, with the government declaring a national housing emergency in May 2024. Guidance from Shelter Scotland suggests hotel use for homeless individuals should be limited to seven days. Unsuitable accommodation can include overcrowding or leaving residents with limited space and limited or shared access to kitchen, toilet and living space. Glasgow City Council told The Herald it was "duty bound" to provide temporary accommodation however the authority admitted that increased demand mean there "are times when we haven't been able to do so". A spokeswoman said: "This happens when there is no accommodation available despite using more than 50 hotels to accommodate those who we have a duty for. 'We purchase a high number of hotel and bed & breakfast accommodation as we attempt to meet the extraordinarily high demand for accommodation to avoid people having to sleep rough. We also use in excess of 2600 places of emergency accommodation within temporary furnished flats and supported accommodation. 'There is no quick alternative. We are in continual dialogue with both Governments about these challenges and to seek the additional resources necessary to address the challenges we are facing.'
Sky News
4 hours ago
- Sky News
Starmer aims to break cabinet away day curse
Sir Keir Starmer was hoping to break the curse of the cabinet away day as he summoned his ministers to Chequers for the launch of a summer "refresh" of his troubled government. The aim: to plot a course for a recovery during Labour's second year in power after a first 12 months blighted by economic woes, rows over freebies, humiliating U-turns and rebellions. In the past, the away day rules from the No 10 high command have included no woolly jumpers and no sandwiches. This time, the rule to ministers was: "Don't call it a reset." The curse of this away day could turn out to be the threat of a looming ministerial reshuffle, which some MPs predict could come as early as next week. Could some of those present face the axe? According to the official readout of Sir Keir's away day, the prime minister chaired a session on how the government will use AI "to turbocharge its Plan for Change". But that was just a small part of the discussions. Top of the agenda for a "political cabinet", without civil servants, were the storm clouds over the economy and the options for Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her make-or-break autumn budget. And based on the experience of previous cabinet away days, from Sir Tony Blair and Gordon Brown to Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, the omens were not good. Away days may seem like a good idea at the time, but most end badly. The idea of Chequers away days has been to hold a brainstorming session in the privacy of the Buckinghamshire countryside without distractions or prying photographers, reporters or TV crews. But over the years, like most family get-togethers, there have been personality clashes, squabbles about what to eat and what to wear, disputes about who takes centre stage, and even backstabbing and walkouts. The last Chequers cabinet away day, held by Mr Sunak in January 2023, took place with two senior figures facing official investigations. Tory chair Nadhim Zahawi was engulfed in a tax scandal and deputy prime minister Dominic Raab was facing bullying allegations. Mr Zahawi was out within a week after this away day and Mr Rabb within three months. Without doubt, the most disastrous cabinet awayday at Chequers was in July 2018, when Ms May thought she'd persuaded her cabinet to back her Brexit deal. Then, as now, the heat was sweltering. But two days later, David Davis quit as Brexit secretary and Mr Johnson - who was said to have proposed a champagne toast to the prime minister at Chequers - resigned as foreign secretary the following day. Ms May thought she had a deal that would keep the UK closely tied to the EU's customs union and single market. But it was doomed even during that away day. It was reported that ministers were warned that anyone who resigned would have to walk a mile down the drive and get a lift home with the local taxi firm, whose cards had been left in the foyer. When he resigned, Mr Davis was said to have been livid about hostile briefing from senior figures in Downing Street about how the Brexiters would be treated at Chequers, including the taxi threat. And Mr Johnson not only launched a "Chuck Chequers" campaign opposing Ms May's deal, but also a campaign to chuck her out of Downing Street and seize her job for himself. As prime minister, he also held a cabinet awayday, not at Chequers, but at a pottery in the heart of the "red wall" in Stoke-on-Trent, in 2022. The venue might have been different, but that was cursed too. Just weeks later Mr Johnson's cabinet shattered like broken Wedgwood china following the resignations of Mr Sunak and Sajid Javid. The modern trend for cabinet away days was started by Sir Tony - who else? - in 1998. The rules for ministers were laid down by his chief of staff Jonathan Powell, now Sir Keir's national security adviser. In a memo to cabinet ministers attending, he wrote: "TV will film people arriving and going, so there can be no woolly jumpers." Mr Powell was rebuffed by Sir Tony, however, when he suggested in a memo to the prime minister that Mr Brown should start the meeting with a discussion on the economy. "No," Sir Tony replied bluntly in a handwritten note. Peter Mandelson, now Britain's ambassador in Washington, demanded "something nicer than sandwiches" for lunch and got his wish when a buffet was laid on. Sir Keir's Chequers away day also began with lunch, then the short formal cabinet meeting with the discussion about AI, then the political cabinet, which was the real reason for the away day. No need for woolly jumpers in the 32C heat. Just don't call it a "refresh".
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN GLOVER: Britain is broken. Wherever you look the State is failing. In many ways the mess is worse than in the 1970s - when Labour last ruined the country
Nearly 40 years have passed since Norman Tebbit, who died this week, was a power in the land. He was one of a handful of outstanding Conservative Cabinet ministers who gave Margaret Thatcher vital support in her crusade to save Britain from the depredations of socialism. Tebbit wasn't an intellectual. He didn't even go to university. But he understood with greater clarity than grander Tories with Oxbridge degrees how militant trade unions were destroying this country. His greatest achievement was to curb their excesses.
