logo
Azalina: CJ, Court of Appeal appointments to follow constitutional process, public concerns noted

Azalina: CJ, Court of Appeal appointments to follow constitutional process, public concerns noted

Malay Mail6 days ago
KUALA LUMPUR, July 10 — The government has stressed that the vacancies for the positions of Chief Justice and President of the Court of Appeal will be filled in full compliance with the Federal Constitution and relevant laws.
Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said the vacancies for both positions would be filled in accordance with Article 122B of the Federal Constitution, which stipulates that appointments shall be made by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, on the advice of the Prime Minister, after consulting the Conference of Rulers.
'This matter is in line with the Federal Constitution, which is the supreme law of the country and must be upheld by all parties. It also reflects the principle of constitutional monarchy, which forms the foundation of the country's administration,' she said in a statement yesterday.
Azalina said, in this regard, the Conference of Rulers is scheduled to convene for its 269th meeting from July 15 to 17.
She also said the Cabinet had discussed the vacancies for the positions during its meeting yesterday and had taken full note of public concerns regarding the matter.
Azalina said the government understood the people's concerns about the importance of preserving the continuity and integrity of the judiciary, which served as the pillar of the rule of law.
She said the Madani Government remained committed to strengthening public confidence in the judicial institution, including through long-term improvement measures aimed at enhancing its transparency and independence.
'The government also calls on all parties to give space for the process outlined in the Federal Constitution to proceed smoothly and appropriately in the interest of the country, the rule of law and institutional stability,' she said.
Meanwhile, Azalina said Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim is exercising the powers and duties of the office of the Chief Justice (including those under the Constitution) until the position is filled.
She said this was in accordance with Article 131A of the Federal Constitution, as well as paragraph 9(1)(b) and subsection 9(3) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, to ensure continuity in the administration of justice in the country.
The Chief Justice position became vacant following the mandatory retirement of Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, the country's first woman to serve in the role, on July 2, while Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim retired as President of the Court of Appeal on July 3. — Bernama
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Open letter to Agong: Upholding the integrity of the judiciary in the appointment of top judges
Open letter to Agong: Upholding the integrity of the judiciary in the appointment of top judges

Focus Malaysia

timean hour ago

  • Focus Malaysia

Open letter to Agong: Upholding the integrity of the judiciary in the appointment of top judges

Letter to editor WITH the utmost respect and loyalty, I write to Your Majesty as a concerned citizen deeply invested in the preservation of justice, rule of law and institutional integrity within our beloved Malaysia. The Judiciary stands as the final bastion of hope for justice, equity, and constitutional governance. However, recent developments have cast a troubling shadow over public confidence in this vital institution. Allegations of judicial misconduct, procedural irregularities and claims of external interference – whether substantiated or under investigation – have raised legitimate concerns about the health of our judicial system. In such a climate, the process of appointing top judges assumes even greater importance. The weight of this responsibility lies not only with those who nominate but ultimately with Your Majesty whose constitutional discretion serves as a safeguard against the erosion of judicial independence. Editor's Note: The Conference of Rulers is expected to decide and announce the appointment of the new Chief Justice today (July 16), according to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. It is respectfully urged that, in considering appointments to the highest offices of the judiciary, Your Majesty: Insist on transparent and meritorious selection: Candidates must be evaluated based on integrity, independence and a demonstrated commitment to constitutional values, free from political or external influence. Candidates must be evaluated based on integrity, independence and a demonstrated commitment to constitutional values, free from political or external influence. Encourage full disclosure: In light of recent allegations, it is vital that any concerns surrounding nominees be publicly addressed and cleared through transparent mechanisms before confirmation. In light of recent allegations, it is vital that any concerns surrounding nominees be publicly addressed and cleared through transparent mechanisms before confirmation. Uphold the constitutional spirit: The Judiciary must not only be impartial but be seen to be so. Confidence in judicial impartiality is crucial to national stability, investor confidence and the moral fabric of our society. Your Majesty's unique role as the protector of the Federal Constitution and symbol of national unity is especially vital in times of uncertainty. Malaysians look to the Throne not only for guidance but for assurance that justice shall never be compromised by expediency or hidden interests. May Allah continue to grant Your Majesty wisdom, strength and compassion in the service of the nation. Daulat Tuanku. Member of Public@CITIZEN Kuala Lumpur The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Images credit: Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar/Facebook

How tariffs and taxes could derail Malaysia's climate ambitions — Mogesh Sababathy
How tariffs and taxes could derail Malaysia's climate ambitions — Mogesh Sababathy

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

How tariffs and taxes could derail Malaysia's climate ambitions — Mogesh Sababathy

JULY 16 — At a time when Malaysia must accelerate its climate transition, can we afford foreign and domestic policy shocks that destabilize our climate finance and green technology agenda? The recent announcement by the US President Donald Trump to impose a sweeping 25 per cent tariff on 'any and all Malaysian products' starting August 1, 2025, has jolted Malaysia's economy and potentially, its entire energy transition trajectory. This move, posted not only threatens our US$80 billion annual trade relationship with the US, but risks undercutting the financial and industrial scaffolding needed to meet our net-zero ambitions by 2050. For a country that has pledged a 45 per cent reduction in carbon intensity by 2030, this is not just an economic setback but also a stress test of our climate governance, resilience, and readiness. The potential impact is immense. Sectors like electrical and electronics (E&E) which comprise nearly 40 per cent of our exports stand particularly exposed. With the Green Technology Master Plan relying heavily on E&E to drive decarbonised manufacturing, this development places our climate-linked industrial strategy in jeopardy. At the same time, Malaysia's expanded Sales and Service Tax (SST) which came into effect July 1, 2025 adds pressure from within. Over 4,800 previously exempt items, including industrial equipment and low-emission machinery, are now taxed at 8 per cent, up from the previous 6 per cent. While the SST expansion is projected to yield RM3 billion in additional revenue, its timing couldn't be worse. The Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) warns that these cascading tax burdens will inflate costs, shrink margins, and deter future investment especially in capital-intensive green infrastructure. The National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR), launched in 2023, sets ambitious targets: increasing renewable energy in the national mix to 70 per cent by 2050, developing CCUS (Carbon Capture, Utilisation & Storage), and attracting RM435 billion in investment. But these goals rely on a strong private sector, foreign direct investment, and investor confidence. Reduced export earnings due to tariffs, paired with higher domestic operating costs from the SST, could stall clean energy adoption, battery storage scaling, and smart grid investments. Small and medium green-tech enterprises already navigating tight financing margins may pivot to survival mode, postponing R&D or abandoning green upgrades entirely. This fiscal constriction directly threatens the creation of 23,000 green jobs forecasted under NETR, and it risks reducing Malaysia's contribution to global clean energy supply chains at a time when demand is rising. On the other hand, Malaysia's Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM), launched via the Bursa Carbon Exchange (BCX) in late 2022, was one of Southeast Asia's most promising climate finance innovations. With a projected market value of US$237 million by 2030, it was expected to fund reforestation, conservation, and industrial decarbonisation projects. However, the VCM and the upcoming carbon tax and Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) under the National Climate Change Bill (Ruupin) are all sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. Historically, economic downturns or trade disruptions often lead governments to delay carbon pricing reforms in the name of economic recovery. Malaysia is no exception. Unless insulated, our carbon governance mechanisms may stall or regress under fiscal and political pressure just when they're needed to drive long-term decarbonisation and attract green capital. Climate change disproportionately affects the poorest and most vulnerable communities in Malaysia from coastal erosion in Sabah to urban flooding in KL. But so too will economic instability. Tariff-related export losses could result in job cuts in key industrial areas, while SST inflation will raise living costs. When people are forced to choose between short-term survival and long-term sustainability, the environment always loses. Without targeted support, our vision of a 'just transition' risks becoming rhetorical. The Ruupin framework, which emphasizes equity and protection for vulnerable populations, must be backed by resilient fiscal policy and progressive social safety nets not sacrificed in budget cuts driven by external shocks. Unless insulated, our carbon governance mechanisms may stall or regress under fiscal and political pressure just when they're needed to drive long-term decarbonisation and attract green capital. — Picture by Ahmad Zamzahuri In this regard, what can Malaysia do? Firstly, Malaysia must demand clarity on the tariff scope and seek exclusions for clean technology, solar components, and environmental goods, aligning with WTO environmental exceptions. Next, allocate funds from the new SST intake to fund VCM capacity-building, CCUS pilots, and green job retraining programs. SST exemptions or rebates for low-emission equipment, energy-efficient machinery, and carbon audit services must also be provided to incentivise clean industrial investments. Also, as the Chair of Asean this year, we also have an upper hand in using this moment to lead within Asean, pushing for regional carbon border adjustments and green mutual recognition agreements that support decarbonised exports. Lastly, fast-track funding for climate policy education, especially in carbon markets, climate law, and environmental economics, to prepare the next generation of climate experts. In conclusion, economic shocks will come and go. But the climate crisis is permanent and intensifying. As floods grow more frequent, air pollution worsens, and biodiversity collapses, the cost of inaction grows steeper each year. Trade policy and tax policy must serve, not sabotage our climate goals. Malaysia must not retreat from climate ambition in the face of tariffs or taxes. We must instead use these shocks to recalibrate our economic tools, reaffirm our global leadership in climate governance, and build a greener, more resilient Malaysia that doesn't trade short-term relief for long-term collapse. * Mogesh Sababathy is a National Consultative Panel Member to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability of Malaysia and a PhD Candidate at Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.

Judicial picks expected today
Judicial picks expected today

The Star

time3 hours ago

  • The Star

Judicial picks expected today

PUTRAJAYA: An announcement regarding judicial appointments is expected today, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said. He acknowledged delays and public unease over certain appointments but assured them all processes have been carried out fairly and transparently. Anwar said he had a lengthy discussion with the Conference of Rulers yesterday morning. 'I think let them decide and tomorrow (today), hopefully, there will be an announcement that will clearly dispel the so-called negative perceptions,' he said in his speech at Malaysia's International Conference on Integrity and Governance here yesterday. Anwar, who is also Finance Minister, stressed that the government fully upholds judicial independence and has not interfered in any court proceedings or decisions during his tenure. 'I rest my case, and I hope when the announcement is made, it will prove this government is committed to reform, including the principle of judicial independence,' he said, as reported by Bernama. Meanwhile, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said noted that the government will review the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Act 2009 amid public confusion over the recent Chief Justice appointment process. She said a special committee will be set up, comprising members of the Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara, as well as constitutional experts, legal practitioners and academics. 'We have to improve because what is happening now is that there is a lot of confusion. (There's) no clarity from the public perspective. But then this particular JAC, which was passed and established in 2009, is responsible for the appointment of five Chief Justices. It has never been an issue. 'Sadly, now there is an issue, so we have to study it. Where did the non-clarity or confusion come in? Is it the processes, or is it the wording of the Act?' she said to reporters after attending the International Conference on Integrity and Governance here yesterday. She said the government had announced the implementation of a Comparative Study of the Judicial Appointment System by the Legal Affairs Division of the Prime Minister's Department last week, as part of efforts to enhance transparency in the appointment procedure of superior court judges She said the study aims to provide a clearer understanding of the JAC's role and to also address issues raised by the Malaysian Bar. 'The government is always open to the views of all parties, including the Malaysian Bar, who will also be invited to join in this study, to ensure a more transparent, integrity-based and trusted judicial appointment system for the people. 'In addition, issues raised by the Malaysian Bar should be considered within the framework of the Federal Constitution, the Judicial Appointments Commis­sion Act and other laws in force,' she said in a statement. On Monday, Azalina clarified that the JAC does not have binding authority in judicial appointments. She explained the JAC's primary role is to screen, assess and recommend candidates to the Prime Minister, while appointments to the Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Court must ultimately comply with Article 122B of the Federal Constitution.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store