South Africa's municipal workers gain surrogacy leave rights
Image: File
Municipal workers in surrogacy arrangements are now entitled to three months' paid leave, like biological and adoptive mothers, following an agreement reached at the SA Local Government Bargaining Council (SALGBC).
Parties to the SALGBC – the SA Local Government Association, SA Municipal Workers' Union, and the Independent Municipal and Allied Trade Union (Imatu) – concluded the agreement providing for parents in surrogacy arrangements.
In terms of the agreement, parents in surrogacy arrangements will be entitled to the same leave as biological and adoptive parents.
According to the bargaining council, the agreement will be applicable retrospectively from October 2023, when the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, Deputy Judge President Roland Sutherland declared invalid some provisions of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act and corresponding provisions of the Unemployment Insurance Fund Act.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The judge found parts of both acts invalid because of inconsistency with the Constitution to the extent that the provisions unfairly discriminated between mothers and fathers, and between one set of parents and another based on whether their children were born of the mother, were conceived by surrogacy, or were adopted.
Judge Sutherland also ruled that any employee who is a commissioning parent in a surrogate motherhood agreement is entitled to leave.
Earlier this month, the SALGBC advised municipalities to take all necessary steps to give effect to the amendment and display the circular sent by the bargaining council general secretary, Bill Govender.
The agreement on maternity, adoption, and surrogacy leave states that employees adopting a child under three months as well as those who are commissioning parents in surrogacy motherhood arrangements are entitled to three months paid maternity, adoption, or surrogacy leave with no limit to the number of confinements, adoptions, or surrogacy confinements.
'This leave provision shall also apply to an employee whose child is stillborn. Maternity, adoption, or surrogacy leave may commence four weeks before confinement,' reads the agreement.
Imatu, which represents over 110,000 employees in the local government sector, described the fully paid surrogacy leave as a groundbreaking victory for women's rights.
The union said this breakthrough recognised the evolving nature of parenthood and affirms the principle of equality in the workplace, regardless of the path to motherhood.
Imatu initiated two separate urgent Labour Court applications involving its members who were commissioning mothers in surrogacy arrangements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Appointment of the acting minister Cachalia: A matter of presidential authority and constitutional compliance
Anda Mbikwana is a PhD candidate and a municipal finance and leadership in governance expect, he writes in his personal capacity. President Cyril Ramaphosa's appointment of Professor Firoz Cachalia as Acting Minister of Police, following the placement of Senzo Mchunu on special leave, presents a significant constitutional law question that warrants careful examination. The central issue is whether the President's action complies with the constitutional framework governing ministerial appointments, particularly the distinction between regular ministerial appointments and the delegation of ministerial functions. Section 91(3)(c) of the Constitution provides the President with the authority to "select no more than two Ministers from outside the National Assembly." This provision establishes a clear numerical limitation and procedural requirement for appointing individuals who are not Members of Parliament to ministerial positions. Section 98 states: "The President may assign to a Minister any power or function of another Minister who is absent or otherwise unable to fulfil the functions of office." This section contemplates the temporary reallocation of ministerial responsibilities between existing Ministers. The constitutional analysis reveals a potential lacuna in the framework. Section 91(3)(c) makes no express provision for "Acting Ministers" - it only addresses substantive ministerial appointments. Section 98, conversely, only permits the assignment of functions to existing Ministers, not to individuals outside the cabinet structure. Professor Cachalia's appointment presents several constitutional challenges: Absence of Constitutional Authority: There is no explicit constitutional provision authorising the appointment of an "Acting Minister" who is not already a substantive Minister. Misapplication of Section 98: The section requires the assignment of functions to "a Minister" - a constitutional office that Cachalia does not hold. Circumvention of Section 91(3)(c): The appointment appears to bypass the formal requirements for appointing Ministers from outside the National Assembly. The constitutional concern is compounded by an institutional presumption of legality. The legal fraternity's assumption that presidential decisions are inherently constitutional represents a classic appeal to authority fallacy. Constitutional supremacy requires that all exercises of public power, including presidential appointments, conform to constitutional requirements regardless of the office holder's status. The appointment raises broader questions about the separation of powers and the rule of law. If the President can effectively create ministerial positions without following constitutional procedures, it undermines the constitutional framework designed to limit and structure executive power. For the appointment to achieve constitutional compliance, the following procedure should be followed: Formal Ministerial Appointment: Cachalia should be appointed as a Minister under Section 91(3)(c), either to an existing portfolio or to a specifically created ministry. Function Assignment: Once properly appointed as a Minister, the President could then assign him the functions and duties of the Police Ministry under Section 98. Allowing this appointment to stand without a proper constitutional foundation could create a problematic precedent, potentially enabling future presidents to circumvent constitutional limitations on ministerial appointments through the device of "Acting" positions. Most constitutional democracies with similar Westminster-derived systems maintain strict distinctions between substantive and acting appointments, typically requiring either explicit constitutional authorisation or limiting acting appointments to existing office holders. The Constitutional Court's emphasis on constitutional supremacy and the rule of law suggests that informal or assumed powers cannot substitute for explicit constitutional authority. The Court's approach in cases involving executive power has consistently emphasised adherence to constitutional procedures. Immediate Considerations Legal Challenge: The appointment presents grounds for constitutional challenge, particularly regarding the scope of presidential power and constitutional compliance. Parliamentary Oversight: Parliament should exercise its oversight function to examine the constitutional basis for the appointment. Academic Scrutiny: Legal scholars should engage with this issue to clarify the constitutional framework governing ministerial appointments. Long-term Implications Constitutional Amendment: Consider whether the Constitution requires amendment to provide clear authority for acting ministerial appointments. Judicial Clarity: The courts may need to guide the scope of presidential appointment powers and the requirements for temporary ministerial arrangements. Institutional Safeguards: Develop clearer protocols for ensuring constitutional compliance in executive appointments. Conclusion The Cachalia appointment highlights a significant gap between constitutional requirements and executive practice. While the President's intention to ensure continuity in police leadership during a period of crisis is understandable, constitutional compliance cannot be sacrificed for administrative convenience. The legal fraternity must engage with this issue to uphold constitutional supremacy and ensure that all exercises of public power conform to constitutional requirements. The case serves as a reminder that in a constitutional democracy, even well-intentioned executive actions must comply with constitutional procedures. The assumption that presidential decisions are inherently legal represents a dangerous departure from constitutional principles that could undermine the rule of law if left unchallenged. This matter requires urgent attention from the legal profession, Parliament, and potentially the courts to ensure that South Africa's constitutional framework is properly implemented and respected. Anda Mbikwana is a PhD candidate and a municipal finance and leadership in governance expert, he writes in his personal capacity.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Incoming acting police minister blasts 'corruption in ANC'
Professor Firoz Cachalia , the incoming acting Minister of Police, has strongly criticised corruption within the ANC, calling it 'an enormous source of shame.' In an interview with Newzroom Afrika, Kachalia said his political loyalties will not stop him from tackling wrongdoing. He pledged to act even if it involves members of his own party. 'My ANC conscience requires that I tackle these challenges with principles and a clear commitment to the country's democratic institutions,' he said. 'Corruption in the ANC is an enormous source of shame to me and to many of us.' Kachalia said he accepted President Cyril Ramaphosa's offer 'without a second's hesitation,' describing the role as an extension of his lifelong work in defending South Africa's democracy. The presidency announced the appointment will take effect from 1 August, after his academic term at the University of the Witwatersrand ends. The appointment has drawn political fire. The Economic Freedom Fighters and the MK Party claim the move violates Section 98 of the Constitution. They argue the president cannot assign ministerial functions to someone outside Cabinet. Kachalia defended the decision, noting that the president can appoint two ministers who are not Members of Parliament. 'These are political and ethical questions, not legal ones,' he said. 'The president had to act.' Asked about his approach to cleaning up the police ministry amid allegations of political interference and criminal infiltration. Kachalia said he would start by consulting senior police leadership and listening to their views. He also welcomed the formation of a judicial commission of inquiry, calling it a valuable fact-finding tool that will assist his office. 'The process that I need to follow is quite clear,' he said. 'I'm going to have the benefit of an objective, reliable process conducted by experienced judges.' Kachalia also chairs the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council, which recently submitted a midterm and closeout report to the presidency. The reports highlight deep structural failures in SAPS crime intelligence and recommend urgent reforms, including the creation of a new anti-corruption agency. While the presidency has not yet made the report public or acted on its proposals, Kachalia said he now has an opportunity to bring those ideas into the Ministry of Police. He admitted the processing of the report 'has taken too long' and emphasised the urgency of implementing reforms. Kachalia will perform his duties in full for as long as the president retains him, despite the post being described as 'acting.' 'Once I'm sworn in, I'm the Minister of Police until the president says otherwise,' he said. 'And if he allows me to continue, I will.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Labour law expert challenges Police Minister Mchunu's paid leave
A labour law expert says Police Minister Senzo Mchunu's paid leave may be unconstitutional and may constitute a wasteful expenditure. Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers A labour law expert, Advocate Bo Dlamini, said President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place the embattled Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on paid leave may be unconstitutional and wasteful. The expert was weighing in on a continued public debate on whether the president did not violate the Constitution when giving a minister a leave of absence instead of a suspension. Dlamini said since ministers are not appointed under Public Service Act, it is unclear where the president based his decision to give Mchunu a leave of absence, saying it was even worse that the leave may take up to a year, which is unusual for ministers and it can constitute a wasteful expenditure. He further stated that although ministers' appointments are not regulated by labour laws, the president, in a supervisor-subordinate relationship, could have suspended the minister instead of granting him a leave. 'Ramaphosa was supposed to suspend Mr Mchunu and appoint an independent tribunal to investigate the two violations of the Constitution within three months and make a report with recommendations,' said Dlamini. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ He said Mchunu may have violated Section 207 of the Constitution, which deals with roles of the National Commissioners and Provincial Commissioners in controlling and managing the SAPS, adding that this clause clearly forbids Mchunu from disbanding the political task team unit which could have been done by the National Police Commissioner, Lieutenant-General Fannie Masemola. Dlamini further stated that there is another piece of prima facie evidence that Mchunu lied in Parliament by stating that he didn't know Brown Mogotsi, but later on admitted knowing only as a "comrade". On a possible wasteful expenditure, Dlamini said another minister should have been appointed to act in Mchunu's place to protect taxpayers' money instead of appointing a new acting minister, Firoz Cachalia, who will enjoy added benefits while Mchunu enjoys the same perks sitting at home. With the Police Ministry already bloated with two deputy ministers and costing taxpayers millions of rand in salaries and ministerial perks, there has been a public outcry over the president's decision to place Mchunu on a long paid leave and appointing acting Minister outside the Cabinet. This means taxpayers will foot the bill for four political heads of one department. Opposition parties also questioned the president's decision to appoint commissions instead of utilising the existing crime fighting state institutions such as the Special Investigations Unit. Addressing the nation on Sunday, the president defended his decision to appoint a non-Cabinet member to act by quoting Section 91(3)(c) of the Constitution, which allows the president to appoint not more than two ministers outside the National Assembly. However, the same Section is silent on appointing acting minister outside the National Assembly. Deputy ministers could not also be appointed to act since they are not part of the Cabinet.
