Hong Kong court to hear appeals by jailed democracy campaigners
Critics including the United States, Britain and the European Union said the case showed how a Beijing-imposed national security law has eroded freedoms and quashed peaceful opposition in Hong Kong.
Ex-lawmakers "Long Hair" Leung Kwok-hung, Lam Cheuk-ting, Helena Wong and Raymond Chan are among those contesting their convictions and sentences in hearings that are scheduled to last 10 days.
Owen Chow, a 28-year-old activist who was sentenced to seven years and nine months in jail -- the harshest penalty among the 13 -- has also lodged an appeal.
Some of the appellants have already spent more than four years behind bars.
Amnesty International's China director Sarah Brooks said the appeal will be a "pivotal test" for free expression in the Chinese finance hub.
"Only by overturning these convictions can Hong Kong's courts begin to restore the city's global standing as a place where rights are respected and where people are allowed to peacefully express their views without fear of arrest," Brooks said.
Morning raids
Prosecutors will concurrently challenge on Monday the lower court's acquittal of lawyer Lawrence Lau, one of two people found not guilty from an original group of 47 accused.
Activist Tam Tak-chi, who pleaded guilty in the subversion case, had also indicated he would appeal against his sentence but withdrew.
Beijing has remoulded Hong Kong in its authoritarian image after imposing a sweeping national security law in 2020 following months of huge, and sometimes violent, pro-democracy demonstrations.
Authorities arrested figures from a broad cross-section of the city's opposition in morning raids in 2021, a group later dubbed the "Hong Kong 47".
The group, aged between 27 and 69, included democratically elected lawmakers and district councillors, as well as unionists, academics and others with political stances ranging from modest reformists to radical localists.
They were accused of organising or taking part in an unofficial primary election, which aimed to improve the chances of pro-democracy parties of winning a majority in the legislature.
The activists had hoped to force the government to accede to demands such as universal suffrage by threatening to indiscriminately veto the budget.
Three senior judges handpicked by the government to try security cases said the plan would have caused a "constitutional crisis".
Beijing and Hong Kong officials have defended the national security law as being necessary to restore order following the 2019 protests.
Opposition party the League of Social Democrats -- co-founded by Leung -- announced its disbandment last month, citing "immense political pressure".
Eight of the jailed campaigners, including journalist and lawmaker Claudia Mo and LGBTQ activist Jimmy Sham, have been released in recent weeks after completing their sentences.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
35 minutes ago
- Euronews
WATCH Europe Today: China and EU - has summit restored trust?-
After the one-day EU-China summit, the European Union announced on Thursday a tentative agreement with China to alleviate restrictions the country had placed on critical exports of rare earths. How soon might this agreement yield results? What more progress can be expected ahead to ease the lingering trade and political tensions between the two sides? Euronews reporters will explain the upshot of the Beijing meeting on Euronews' Europe Today special summit edition. Anchor Mared Gwyn Jones also quizzes electric vehicle boss Lothar Schuppert, the acting CEO of China's Zeekr, about how EU tariffs are affecting his company's expansion plans. Are they slowing things down? Meanwhile, Austrian EPP MEP Lukas Mandl and Irish liberal Cynthia Ní Mhurchú go face to face on China-EU relations: Is the EU striking the right balance with the Asian giant on security? Watch Euronews' Europe Today here at 8am on Friday.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
French court to rule on Assad immunity in chemical attack case
Rights activists say that if the Court of Cassation confirms Assad does not enjoy immunity due to the severity of the accusations, it could set a major precedent in international law towards holding war criminals to account. But if the reasoning is that the warrant is valid because France did not consider Assad to be a legitimate ruler at the time of the alleged crimes, it would not have the same impact. French authorities issued the warrant against Assad in November 2023 over his alleged role in the chain of command for a sarin gas attack that killed more than 1,000 people, according to US intelligence, on August 4 and 5, 2013 in Adra and Douma outside Damascus. Assad is accused of complicity in war crimes and crimes against humanity in the case, though Syrian authorities at the time denied involvement and blamed rebels. The French judiciary tackled the case under the principle of universal jurisdiction, whereby a court may prosecute individuals for serious crimes committed in other countries. An investigation -- based on testimonies of survivors and military defectors, as well as photos and video footage -- led to warrants for the arrest of Assad, his brother Maher who headed an elite army unit, and two generals. Public prosecutors approved three of the warrants, but issued an appeal against the one targeting Assad, arguing he should have immunity as a head of state. The Paris Court of Appeal in June last year however upheld it, and prosecutors again appealed. Assad's circumstances have since changed. He and his family fled to Russia, according to Russian authorities, after Islamist-led rebels toppled him in December last year. Assad immunity issue Agnes Callamard, a French human rights activist and the secretary general of Amnesty International, said the court's decision could "pave the way for a major precedent in international law" if it decided immunity should be lifted in certain cases. "A ruling lifting Bashar al-Assad's immunity would help strengthen the founding principles of international law in its fight against the impunity of war criminals," she wrote in the newspaper Liberation on Thursday. Callamard however noted that it was unlikely any arrest warrant would lead to Assad being detained as he was protected by Russia. The high court's prosecutor has recommended the arrest warrant be upheld, but on the grounds that France had not recognised Assad as the legitimate ruler of Syria since 2012. Mazen Darwish, a prominent Syrian lawyer who heads the Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression, a civil party to the case, said the prosecutor's argument was "very clever". But it "undermines the moral foundation" according to which "immunity should not apply" in cases of war crimes and crimes against humanity, he said. The reasoning "also grants a single foreign government the power to decide who is or is not a legitimate head of state, which sets an extremely dangerous precedent", he said. French investigating magistrates in January issued a second arrest warrant against Assad for suspected complicity in war crimes for a bombing in the Syrian city of Deraa in 2017 that killed a French-Syrian civilian. Friday's hearing is scheduled to start at 1300 GMT.
France 24
9 hours ago
- France 24
Taiwan's opposition protests ahead of recall vote
Supporters of Lai's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are seeking to unseat 31 Kuomintang (KMT) lawmakers who they accuse of being pro-China and a threat to national security. The KMT, which advocates closer ties with Beijing, controls parliament with the help of the Taiwan People's Party (TPP) and has slammed the recall effort as undermining the self-ruled island's democracy. Two dozen KMT lawmakers could lose their seats on Saturday in a legal process that allows the public to oust elected officials before the end of their term. Another seven face recall elections on August 23. The DPP needs a minimum of 12 KMT lawmakers to be recalled to give it a "temporary functional majority" in parliament, political analyst Wen-Ti Sung told AFP. It would then need to flip six seats in by-elections later this year to secure control of the 113-seat legislature. Started by civic groups this year, the recall campaigns have dominated Taiwanese politics, newspaper headlines and social media feeds for months. The DPP lost its parliamentary majority in the 2024 elections that swept Lai, who is detested by Beijing, to the presidency. Since then, the KMT and TPP have joined forces to stymie Lai's agenda and cut the government's budget. A series of opposition bills, including reforms expanding parliament's powers and freezing the constitutional court, sparked brawls in the legislature and massive street protests last year. 'Unprecedented' The scale of the recall campaign was "unprecedented" in Taiwan, Dafydd Fell, an expert on Taiwan politics at the University of London's School of Oriental and African Studies, told AFP. It reflected the "strengths of Taiwanese civil society, which has responded to what it perceives as a serious threat to Taiwan's democracy and sovereignty," he said. For a KMT lawmaker to lose their seat, the number of votes in favour of recalling them must exceed those against and also be more than 25 percent of the total number of registered voters in the electorate. A KMT bid to have 15 DPP lawmakers recalled failed. With turnout critical, DPP supporters have been standing outside subway stations, in public parks and at food markets for weeks urging people to vote "yes". Thousands of people gathered in the rain near the Presidential Office Building on Thursday night in a show of support for the recalls. KMT legislators fighting for their political lives have also taken to the streets to persuade voters to oppose the recall. Their supporters are expected to protest on Friday, hours before polling stations open across the island. With many recall votes happening in KMT strongholds, Fell said it would be difficult for the DPP to win control of the parliament. "Even if some of the KMT legislators are recalled, other KMT politicians might win the seats back in the resulting by-elections," he said. - China looms large - National Taipei University political scientist Liu Chia-wei said the recall vote had become an "ideological duel" between the DPP and KMT, as China loomed large. Taiwan's top policy body on China said this week there was "visible evidence" Beijing was trying to "interfere" in the election process. China insists Taiwan is part of its territory and has ramped up military and political pressure on the island to press its claim of sovereignty. Lai's government has repeatedly warned of the growing threat from Chinese espionage, disinformation and cyberattacks that it says are aimed at weakening the island's defences. Public opinion on the recalls is divided. Aaron Yu, 32, said he supported the campaign because "most of the bills passed by KMT lawmakers are pro-China". But restaurant worker Sharon Chen criticised it as a waste of money, saying voters had already made their decisions in last year's elections. "Just because a certain party lost, they can't accept the result and now want to recall someone the people chose, I think that's just senseless," the 65-year-old said. © 2025 AFP
