Court: Mental illness no bar to custody unless danger to kid
MUMBAI: Observing that a parent suffering from mental illness is not per se disqualified from custody unless it is shown to endanger the child's welfare, a sessions court dismissed a man's plea to take custody of his 16-year-old son. The man had filed an appeal against a magistrate awarding custody to the mother.
"...It is evident that the magistrate interacted with the child, considered the best interest and welfare of the minor, and directed the parties to undergo mediation before passing the order. The magistrate, while granting temporary custody, considered the curriculum course of the child and the natural affection of the mother in the right prospect," the judge said.
The judge said it is well settled in matters of custody that a minor's welfare is paramount and not parents' legal rights. "...The minor is nearing adulthood, and the order is only for temporary custody...The magistrate did not commit any jurisdictional error or perversity warranting interference."
The mother had filed a complaint against the father under Domestic Violence (DV) Act in 2022. In March and April this year, orders were issued granting temporary custody of the son to the mother till May 15, and the father was directed to present him in court in Mumbai every month after visitation. A production warrant was also issued following the father's alleged failure to produce the child.
The father's counsel said the magistrate's order was passed without giving him a fair opportunity to be heard, thus violating the principle of natural justice. The appeal also said the lower court failed to prioritise the child's welfare, who was already in the father's care in Patna, where he is studying in Class 11. The father's counsel questioned the magistrate's jurisdiction under DV Act to issue such custody orders and said there was no change in circumstances warranting a transfer of custody. Concerns were also raised about a potential trauma to the child due to the sudden change in custody without proper assessment.
The mother's advocate highlighted the father's alleged non-compliance with the initial custody order and that he filed the appeal only after the production warrant was issued. Allegations regarding the mother's mental health were dismissed as unsubstantiated and defamatory, with a medical report presented as evidence of her sound mental state. The court was also told that the father had previously filed a transfer application before the chief metropolitan magistrate, which was rejected in Dec 2024, and that he had not complied with similar custody directions in the past.
The sessions court found no evidence to support the father's claims that the magistrate ignored the child's academic commitments or that the mother has a mental illness.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Form committees to probe sexual harassment complaints, construction firms told
All business establishments, companies, factories and construction firms in the four southern districts have been instructed to form internal complaints committees (ICC) in their workplaces immediately to probe sexual harassment complaints and display details of the ICC prominently in their firms, the Department of Industrial Safety and Health has said. In a statement, Joint director of Industrial Safety and Health, Tirunelveli, P. Tamizhselvan said the internal complaints committee for probing sexual harassment in workplaces should be displayed conspicuously in factories and other establishments in Tirunelveli, Tenkasi, Kanniyakumari and Thoothukudi districts. The establishments carrying out construction in the four districts also should constitute ICC in their workplaces and comply with the regulations stipulated under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. Names of the members of the Internal Complaints Committee and grievance redressal mechanism of the factory or establishment should be displayed in conspicuous locations and be kept visible to all employees. The Act had been enacted with the objective to provide protection against sexual harassment of women at workplace and for the redressal of such complaints. It mandated the constitution of Internal Complaints Committee by employers of all establishments employing 10 or more workers to conduct inquiry related to complaints on sexual harassment at the workplace received from their women employees. Any non-compliance on the part of the employer with respect to the provisions of the Act would entail penalty of up to ₹50,000, cautioned the note. The standard operation procedures for the establishments to deal with issued on sexual harassment had been framed by the government and, hence, all employers were instructed to strictly adhere to the guidelines, Mr. Tamizhselvan said.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Sebi again terms dabba trading illegal; cautions investors to remain vigilant
New Delhi, Jul 21 (PTI) Markets regulator Sebi on Monday reiterated that dabba trading is illegal and cautioned investors to remain vigilant and not deal with any entity offering illegal trading services. In market parlance, dabba trading refers to illegal and unregulated off-market trading that operates outside the purview of recognised stock exchanges and regulatory oversight. Such activities pose significant risks to investors and are in violation of various provisions of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (SCRA), the Sebi Act, 1992, and the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, Sebi said in a statement. 'It is reiterated that dabba trading is illegal, and Sebi is committed to safeguarding investor interests through regulatory enforcement, awareness, and coordination with law enforcement agencies. Investors are advised to remain vigilant and not to deal with any entity offering illegal trading services," the regulator said. The statement came after the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) took serious note of an advertisement promoting dabba trading activities published in a daily newspaper last week. Following the advertisement, Sebi, along with NSE, has taken several actions. A complaint has also been lodged with the cyber police, seeking appropriate legal action against the entity and other entities involved, the regulator said. Also, the matter has been brought to the attention of the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) to assess violations of advertising standards and ensure appropriate corrective steps, it added. Additionally, the National Stock Exchange (NSE) issued an investor caution alerting the public about this specific instance and the entities involved, reiterating the dangers of engaging in dabba trading. The caution highlighted that investors should only trade through Sebi-registered brokers and recognised stock exchanges. PTI SP BAL BAL view comments First Published: July 21, 2025, 19:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Who is Kusum, the drug queen of Delhi's Sultanpuri?
On September 11, 2008, Kusum (40), a resident of E Block in Outer Delhi's Sultanpuri, was arrested by the Delhi Police Crime Branch Narcotics unit for allegedly supplying smack in the neighbourhood. Kusum told the police that her husband, Manoj, was unemployed — and high on smack, all day and every day. Desperate to support herself and her four children, she contacted Manoj's supplier and got into the local drug business. Seventeen years and 11 cases later, Kusum is back in the news. On Saturday, the Delhi Police seized property worth Rs 4 crore belonging to her and her family in Sultanpuri and Rohini areas. Seven of these were in Sultanpuri, including a 'mini mansion' from where Kusum ran her drug supply chain network — which now included heroin, ganja, and tramadol tablets. Kusum, however, is missing. She has been on the run since March. Born in 1968 in Uttar Pradesh's Bulandshahr, Kusum never went to school. When she was 16 years old, her parents married her off to a man named Raju aka Surender, a worker-for-hire. He later moved to Sultanpuri with Kusum, a police officer said. In the early 1990s, Raju passed away due to a chronic illness. In 1992, Kusum married Manoj. A smack addict, he couldn't hold down a steady job, the officer said. The same year, the couple had their first of four children, Pooja, her dossier noted. Kusum would then give birth to Deepa in 1995, Amit in 1998, and Cheeku in 2001, another police officer said. Due to Manoj's deteriorating health, he started staying home for long periods. The family of six soon had no source of income. In 2002, Kusum obtained the contact of a local smack supplier through her husband and began dealing for him in Outer Delhi. By 2003, she was controlling the smack supply in three-four blocks of Sultanpuri. In June that year, she was booked for the time under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. In September 2008, Kusum was arrested for the first time by the Narcotics division of the Crime Branch. She was released on bail in the same month, her dossier said. She would go on to expand her drugs business to include heroin. A senior police officer said that Kusum's brother, 'Danny', was also involved in the drug business. He would frequently travel between Bulandshahr and Outer Delhi, and would put Kusum in contact with Ashfaq, an alleged heroin supplier from Bareilly, the officer said. Kusum's dossier mentions Ashfaq as one of her key associates. Throughout the 2010s, Kusum's drug business expanded and she started acquiring property across Rohini and Outer Delhi to park her money, a police officer said. Her Sultanpuri home, a cluster of modest shabby three-floor buildings from the outside, was connected to form a 'mini-mansion' from the inside, the officer said. 'Suppliers would come near the buildings on two-wheelers to take their order. Juveniles working for her would come to the windows, put pouches of heroin and smack in a basket, and lower it using ropes. The supplier would take his order, put cash in the basket, which was then pulled back up,' the officer said. As suppliers went in and out of her now 'iconic' E Block den, a team of policemen and CCTVs across the block began to watch their every movement. After years of surveillance and based on specific inputs, police raided the establishment in March this year and arrested her son Amit, 26, allegedly a key part of Kusum's operation and her heir apparent. More than 500 packets of heroin, tramadol tablets, Rs 14 lakh in cash and a black Scorpio SUV were recovered. Kusum and her three daughters, police said, went on the run. On Saturday, police reported that approximately Rs 2 crore in cash had been transferred into the accounts of both Pooja and Deepa over the past 18 months. According to Kusum's dossier, Amit and Pooja were her most frequent visitors during her stints in judicial custody, the most recent being in March 2024. 'It's extremely difficult to keep her behind bars and collect evidence. She has an army of chartered accountants and lawyers working for her. Even during the raid this year, about 12 lawyers reached the building to try and halt it,' a senior police officer said.
