Brits warned of £5,000 fine for making footwear mistake while driving
Over the last weeks of summer, motorists are being warned about getting behind the wheel whilst barefoot, in flip-flops, or wearing sandals. Whilst it might not be against the law in every instance, failing to wear suitable footwear whilst driving breaches Rule 97 of the Highway Code.
This could result in being deemed as driving without due care and attention. The penalties can be as costly as they are severe. To help motorists, the RAC has put together a list of footwear to steer clear of when behind the wheel.
This list encompasses sandals, flip-flops and driving barefoot. Bulky hiking boots and towering stiletto heels are also deemed dangerous. It comes after UK drivers were warned over 'avoiding' a road instead of having to follow a new rule.
Rule 97 of the Highway Code declares that you must wear footwear and clothing that won't stop you from using your vehicle's controls correctly. This means that if you're caught up in a crash and officers spot that you're sporting flip-flops or have no shoes on whatsoever, you could be hit with "driving without due care and attention", reports Chronicle Live.
This charge brings a £100 immediate fine and three points on your licence. Should it reach court, the penalties could soar dramatically to £5,000 and lead to nine penalty points. You might also be slapped with a total driving ban.
Selim Cavanagh, from insurance firm Ingenie, explained: "[Flip-flops] slip off, slide under the pedals, get caught between your feet and the pedals, and if your feet are wet, they'll affect your ability to brake if you need to. Driving in flip-flops can create a dangerous driving environment and put you, your passengers, and other road users at risk."
The RAC states: "While light, flimsy and impractical footwear can be dangerous, so can sturdy, robust shoes, such as walking or snow boots.
"It's important to have a good base and grip to apply pressure to the pedals, but you need a certain degree of finesse to manipulate the controls. If not, you could strike the brake and accelerator together, producing a heart-in-mouth incident."
However, it clarifies that "you can get behind the wheel of a vehicle barefoot or while wearing flip-flops, provided you are able to operate the controls safely. If you do so with wet feet, for example, you might be putting yourself, your passengers, and other road users at risk by not being able to drive the car safely.
"This is illegal. And while it's not illegal to drive without shoes on, that doesn't mean it's right."
The Driving Standards Agency, which oversees UK driving tests, warns: "suitable shoes are particularly important behind the wheel. We would not recommend driving barefoot because you don't have the same braking force with bare feet as you do with shoes on." The RAC has issued guidelines on the appropriate footwear to wear whilst driving.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
19 hours ago
- Sky News
RAC owners plot route to £5bn sale or stock market listing
The owners of the RAC roadside recovery service are preparing to offload the company in a deal which could value it at up to £5bn. Sky News has learnt that CVC Capital Partners, the Singaporean sovereign investment fund GIC and Silver Lake Partners have been in discussions about plans to launch an auction or a stock market listing of the company. The RAC, which was founded in 1897, is one of the world's oldest roadside assistance companies. It now has about 14 million members, making it nearly as large in customer terms as the AA, its biggest rival. A precise valuation of the business was unclear on Thursday, although insiders said a range of between £4bn and £5bn was reasonable. The AA is also backed by private equity investors who have begun exploring an exit. Sky News revealed earlier this year that Towerbrook Capital Partners, Warburg Pincus and Stonepeak have appointed JP Morgan and Rothschild to conduct a review of the AA's strategic options. The RAC's shareholders are at an earlier stage of deliberations, with investment banks yet to be appointed. People close to the situation said any decision about a transaction would not be made until next year, although it is possible that advisers will be hired in the next few months. The RAC was sold by Aviva, the insurer, to buyout firm Carlyle for £1bn in 2011 in order to focus on its core insurance operations. Carlyle then brought in GIC as a co-investor three years later in a move which derailed plans for a stock market flotation. CVC - a former joint owner of the AA - bought out Carlyle in 2015 through a deal involving its longer-term Strategic Opportunities Fund. Silver Lake, the technology-focused private equity firm, came on board in 2021. The RAC employs thousands of people and is one of Britain's most recognisable consumer brands. It is chaired by the former Debenhams chief Rob Templeman and run by chief executive Dave Hobday. The company's profitability has surged from roughly £170m at the point at which CVC invested to more than £300m. Bankers believe the RAC's owners will b keen to take it public if market conditions allow, but are open to a private sale of the business. The AA has also seen a major improvement in its performance, with it having recorded four consecutive years of customer, revenue and earnings growth. It has also been through a succession of owners during the last 25 years. In 1999, the AA was bought by Centrica, the owner of British Gas, for £1.1bn. It was then sold five years later to CVC and Permira, two buyout firms, for £1.75bn, and sat under the corporate umbrella Acromas alongside Saga for a decade. The AA listed on the London Stock Exchange in 2014, but its shares endured a miserable run, being taken private nearly seven years later at little more than 15% of its value on flotation.
Daily Record
20 hours ago
- Daily Record
Motorists warned of £200 fine for using headlights in harmless way
You might think you are being courteous, but you could end up in trouble with one common action Motorists could face a hefty fine for warning other motorists of speed cameras. Most drivers think they're being courteous when they flash their headlights to alert others of speed cameras, give way at junctions, or to even signal "thanks" to fellow motorists. However, these friendly flashes are actually illegal under Highway Code Rule 110 and could result in fines of up to £200 and penalty points. Even more alarmingly, drivers who flash their lights to warn others of police presence face potentially devastating penalties of up to £1,000 for obstructing police duties. Highway Code Rule 110 states that drivers should "only flash your headlights to let other road users know that you are there." It explicitly warns: "Do not flash your headlights to convey any other message or intimidate other road users." This means virtually every common use of headlight flashing is technically breaking the law, including warning other drivers of speed cameras, giving way at junctions, signalling "thank you," or expressing frustration. The penalties depend on exactly why drivers flashed their lights, creating a confusing two-tier system most motorists are unaware of. Car finance expert and owner of Simple PCP Claims, Tom Riley, said: "Most drivers flash their lights with good intentions, thinking they're being helpful. But the law is crystal clear, you can only flash your headlights to alert others to your presence. Anything else could technically land you in hot water." The regulations stem from the Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989. While Highway Code breaches aren't directly criminal, police can issue penalties when misuse creates danger or impedes law enforcement. The Crown Prosecution Service specifically lists "giving a warning to other motorists of a police speed trap ahead" as an example of obstructing police duties, making it clear that authorities actively target this common practice. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. While prosecution for everyday "polite" flashing remains relatively rare, the legal framework exists to catch drivers who step outside legally acceptable bounds. Traffic officers are particularly vigilant about drivers warning others of speed cameras. The confusion arises because headlight flashing has become ingrained in British driving culture. Many drivers assume it's perfectly legal, having learned these habits during lessons or from experienced drivers. Tom Riley adds: "The £200 fine might not sound enormous, but add penalty points and you're looking at a serious hit to your driving record. For drivers who warn others about speed traps, that £1,000 maximum penalty could be financially devastating. The safest approach is simple, only flash when you genuinely need to alert someone to your presence." With road traffic enforcement becoming increasingly sophisticated, drivers using headlights as a communication tool are playing a dangerous game with potentially expensive consequences.
North Wales Live
2 days ago
- North Wales Live
Expert debunks '10% speed camera myth' and explains how fines are determined
A motoring expert has revealed how speed cameras operate and whether there's a 10% leeway for speeding penalties. They have also clarified the legislation and explained what speed actually activates a camera. With nearly 350 individuals losing their lives on Britain's roads annually, speed enforcement continues to be a crucial element of road safety. Now vehicle valuation specialists at are cautioning motorists against depending on misconceptions or speculation regarding speed restrictions. A spokesperson said: "We regularly speak with drivers who think there's a guaranteed buffer. But the truth is, as soon as you exceed the speed limit, you're technically breaking the law." How speed cameras actually work Speed cameras work using radar or road markings to monitor a vehicle's speed and capture evidence of any offence. While older cameras used film, most modern devices are fully digital and can even track your average speed over many miles. 'Not all cameras flash anymore,' explains the expert. 'Some operate silently, and some mobile units are manually operated – so relying on a flash as a warning is a risky game.' These digital systems record: Vehicle speed Time and location of the offence Vehicle registration Road speed limit In some cases, they even capture a clear image of the driver and passenger. What speed triggers a camera? Contrary to common belief, there's no universal '10% + 2mph' rule baked into law. 'The idea that you're safe doing 35mph in a 30 zone is one of the biggest myths we hear,' the spokesperson says. 'Technically, you're liable for a fine the moment you go even 1mph over the limit.' While the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) does recommend a '10% plus 2' margin to allow for officer discretion, this is not a legal threshold and can vary depending on the enforcement area or the officer reviewing the case, the Chronicle Live reported. Mobile cameras vs fixed cameras Fixed cameras typically have a set trigger speed, though the exact threshold is rarely published. Mobile cameras, on the other hand, are operated manually – and decisions to issue fines can depend on how far over the limit you are and the circumstances. 'Mobile speed units are particularly unpredictable,' says 'They're often deployed in accident-prone zones, so officers tend to take a tougher stance.' Don't risk it With speeding fines ranging from fixed penalties to points on your licence and even court appearances, the best strategy is simple. 'Don't gamble with the grey area,' warns the team. 'If you're even slightly over the limit, you're putting your licence, insurance, and safety at risk. No journey is worth that.'
