Terrible Tuesday: Donald Trump to deport Elon Musk? The real reason Tesla stock has sunk
Tesla stock took a sharp hit on Tuesday, dropping nearly 5%, after President Donald Trump reignited a heated feud with Elon Musk, threatening to cut government subsidies to Musk's companies, including Tesla (TSLA) and SpaceX. The renewed clash comes just days after Musk criticized Trump's massive tax and spending bill, calling it 'insane and destructive.'
In a post on Truth Social, President Trump claimed,
'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa.'
He added,
'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE.'
Trump's comments, and the ongoing political drama, are sparking real market consequences. Here's a closer look at what's going on and why Tesla investors are growing increasingly uneasy.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
See the Latest Apartment Deals in Kotalipara (Take a Look)
Apartments for rent | Search Ads
Learn More
Why did Trump threaten Tesla's government subsidies?
President Trump's remarks were in direct response to Elon Musk's strong criticism of the administration's new spending bill. The bill, which cleared the Senate on Tuesday, includes a surprise move to eliminate
EV tax credits
earlier than expected—a decision that could significantly hurt Tesla customers and the company's bottom line.
Musk slammed the bill on his platform X, calling it a handout to 'industries of the past' and warning that it would 'severely damage industries of the future.'
Live Events
The legislation would add $1 trillion to the original spending plan and potentially cut $1.2 billion from Tesla's annual profit by removing tax incentives for electric vehicles.
Trump, doubling down on his stance, reminded the public,
'Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate.'
How much has Tesla actually received in federal support?
While Tesla's EV tax credit program has faced scrutiny, it's SpaceX that has benefited more directly from government funds. According to U.S. federal spending data, SpaceX has received over $21 billion in government contracts over the years—covering rocket launches, satellite programs, and space missions.
Musk's growing influence and heavy reliance on federal support have made his businesses a lightning rod in today's political debates.
What impact is the Trump-Musk feud having on Tesla's stock?
Tesla shares fell nearly 5% on Tuesday, following a 1.9% drop on Monday when the Senate first began voting on amendments to the spending bill. These losses come on top of a previous $150 billion wipeout in Tesla's market value in early June, when Trump and Musk first began trading blows online.
Musk's latest post—a viral image of Pinocchio with 'liar' stamped across it—accused lawmakers of abandoning promises to reduce government spending.
'Anyone who campaigned on the PROMISE of REDUCING SPENDING, but continues to vote on the BIGGEST DEBT ceiling increase in HISTORY will see their face on this poster in the primary next year,'
Musk warned on X.
Wedbush analyst Dan Ives cautioned investors Tuesday, writing:
'Tesla investors want Musk to focus on driving Tesla and stop this political angle … At the end of the day, being on Trump's bad side will not turn out well.'
Tesla Stock Today
Current Price:
$301.73, down around 5% intraday
Daily Range:
$293.75 – $305.78
Trading Volume:
~102 million share
Expected Q2 Deliveries:
Down 11% year-over-year
Total
SpaceX Government Contracts
:
$21+ billion
Tesla Regulatory Credit Earnings in 2024:
$2.8 billion
How is Tesla stock reacting to the Trump-Musk feud?
Tesla's shares fell
4.8% on Tuesday
, after a
1.9% dip on Monday
, as the Senate moved forward with the controversial bill. The sell-off reflects rising investor anxiety—not only over policy changes but also Musk's increasingly political behavior, which many feel is distracting from Tesla's business performance.
The conflict isn't new. Earlier in June, a similar war of words between Trump and Musk wiped out
$150 billion in Tesla's market value in a single day
.
How much federal funding have Tesla and SpaceX received?
SpaceX alone has secured
over $21 billion
in U.S. government contracts over the years. Tesla, meanwhile, has benefited from
EV incentives
, clean energy subsidies, and regulatory credits. In 2024, Tesla earned an estimated
$2.8 billion
just from these credits.
Altogether, Musk's companies have gained tens of billions in support from federal programs, raising concerns among critics who argue about fair competition and spending efficiency.
Are Tesla's global sales also declining?
Yes. Adding to the pressure, Tesla's performance in Europe continues to decline. June marked the sixth straight month of falling sales in countries like Sweden and Denmark. Meanwhile, deliveries in China have also slipped, and global delivery numbers—due this week—are expected to show an 11% year-over-year drop.
Analysts forecast around
366,000 global deliveries
for Q2, compared to over
406,000
in the same quarter last year.
Are Tesla's sales also slipping in other markets?
Adding to the pressure, Tesla is facing ongoing sales declines in Europe. In June, the company posted its sixth consecutive monthly drop in Sweden and Denmark. This adds to growing concerns ahead of Tesla's upcoming global delivery report due Wednesday, where Wall Street is expecting an 11% year-over-year decline in deliveries.
This data paints a challenging picture for Tesla in both the domestic and global markets, with investor focus now shifting to performance figures amid political volatility.
What's at stake for Elon Musk and Tesla going forward?
Musk's political involvement continues to be a wildcard for Tesla investors. While he remains one of the most innovative and influential figures in tech, his battles with President Trump and controversial statements are proving to be more than just distractions.
Calls for Musk to refocus on business, rather than political rivalries, are growing louder among investors. Meanwhile, Trump's control over fiscal policy and his push to defund EV programs puts Tesla in a vulnerable position—especially with billions in federal incentives at stake.
As the feud unfolds, Tesla's future may depend on how well it can navigate both political threats and economic headwinds.
Tesla stock dropped 4.8% Tuesday after Trump threatened to cut subsidies to Musk-led companies.
SpaceX has received over $21 billion in U.S. government contracts to date.
The Senate-approved spending bill could remove EV tax credits earlier than expected, costing Tesla up to $1.2 billion annually.
Tesla deliveries are expected to fall 11%, with drops reported in Sweden and Denmark for six straight months.
Analysts warn that Musk's political battles could hurt Tesla's long-term investor confidence.
FAQs:
Q1: Why did Tesla stock drop after Trump's subsidy threat?
Trump's plan to end subsidies could slash Tesla's profits, causing investor panic.
Q2: How much government funding has SpaceX received so far?
SpaceX has received over
$21 billion
in U.S. federal contracts
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump's Vietnam deal signals China tariffs unlikely to ease further
Chinese goods face 55% tariffs, likely through August. Under the Vietnam deal, the US will impose 20% tariffs on Vietnamese exports and 40% on transshipped goods to curb Chinese tariff evasion Bloomberg President Donald Trump's new trade deal with Vietnam sends a clear signal about where US tariffs on Chinese goods might ultimately land, as talks between Washington and Beijing continue following their recent truce. Chinese goods currently face tariffs of around 55 per cent, a level expected to remain through August. But under the latest Vietnam agreement, the US will slap a 20 per cent tariff on Vietnamese exports to the US and a steeper 40 per cent levy on goods deemed to be transshipped — the latter targeting a well-worn backdoor used by Chinese exporters since the first China-US trade war to dodge American tariffs. By closing the loopholes, the Trump administration is signaling what any future deal with China might look like. The 40 per cent tariff on transshipped goods suggests that even if tariffs on China are eventually reduced, they're unlikely to fall significantly below that threshold. 'The 40 per cent figure in the Vietnam deal might reflect a broader conviction in the Trump administration about the appropriate tariff level on China, which would be similarly reflected in other bilateral deals,' said Gabriel Wildau, a managing director at Teneo focused on political risk analysis in China. 'However, I am skeptical that Trump has a specific red line for minimum tariffs on China.' Beijing and Washington reached a trade framework last month following talks in London, which remains in effect through mid-August. As part of the deal, China agreed to resume shipments of rare earths — key inputs for wind turbines, electric vehicles and military hardware. In return, the US offered to ease some export restrictions on ethane, chip-design software and jet engine components. US tariffs on Chinese goods have been cut back to around 55 per cent, down from as high as 145 per cent in early April. But 20 per cent tariffs tied to fentanyl remain in place. Beijing has since tightened controls on two precursor chemicals used to make the drug — one of the few obvious avenues it has to win further tariff relief. 'The 20 per cent is really the focal point where all the attention is centered right now,' said Christopher Beddor, deputy China research director at Gavekal Research. 'The thinking is that the Chinese government is very willing to do a deal on something related to fentanyl. They've been telegraphing that for months.'' Still, those efforts are unlikely to bring Chinese tariffs below the 40 per cent rate now applied to Vietnam. If China's duties were to fall to 35 per cent, for instance, it would restore a competitive edge to China and encourage firms to shift operations back, running counter to the Trump administration's broader objectives. 'If China ends up with a lower tariff level than Vietnam that would certainly shift the competitiveness calculations somewhat, but keep in mind that moving production facilities is not as easy as flipping a light switch on and off,' said Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator now with the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. 'From the perspective of Chinese companies, there is zero confidence that once Trump sets a tariff level that it will remain at that level.' For now, there are signs both sides are following through on the terms of the London agreement and displaying signs of goodwill. The Trump administration has lifted recent export license requirements for chip design software sales in China, and approved US ethane exports to China without additional approvals. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Chinese rare earth magnets are flowing, although they haven't yet bounced back to the levels seen before China imposed export curbs in early April. The US remains hopeful that China will further ease restrictions on those exports after their London deal, he said in an interview Tuesday on Fox News. Meanwhile, a senior Chinese official on Thursday delivered one of Beijing's most positive messages about his nation's ties with the US in weeks. Liu Jianchao, head of the Communist Party's International Department, said at the World Peace Forum that he was 'optimistic' about future relations. China is keenly aware of what it's gained from China-US cooperation,' Liu said 'Our cooperation is mutually beneficial. The act of putting up barriers will hurt the other and ourselves as well.' Other negotiations Apart from Vietnam, Beijing is growing increasingly cautious about US efforts to strike trade deals that could isolate China. With a July 9 deadline approaching, when Trump's higher 'reciprocal' tariffs are set to take effect, American officials are ramping up negotiations with key partners in Asia and Europe. What Bloomberg Economics says... 'The looming question now is how China will respond. Beijing has made clear that it would respond to deals that came at the expense of Chinese interests and the decision to agree to a higher tariff on goods deemed to be 'transshipped' through Vietnam may fall in that category. Given China's position as Vietnam's largest trading partner and key source of inputs for domestic production, any retaliatory steps could have an outsized impact on Vietnam's economy.' — Rana Sajedi and Adam Farrar. Click here to read the full report. Beijing on Thursday said it's taken note of the US-Vietnam trade deal and is currently assessing the situation. 'We're happy to see all parties resolve trade conflicts with the US through equal negotiations, but firmly oppose any party striking a deal at the expense of China's interests,' He Yongqian, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Commerce, said at a briefing. 'If such a situation arises, China will firmly strike back to protect its own legitimate rights and interests,' she added, repeating a familiar warning. Olson cautioned against relying too much on the US-Vietnam trade agreement as a blueprint for assessing Washington's approach to China. The stakes in US-China negotiations are significantly higher, shaped by strategic rivalry and a wider set of geopolitical considerations. There is also much less of a power discrepancy in the US-China discussions. 'One important takeaway for China from both the Vietnam deal and the previous deal with the UK is that the US intends to use these negotiations to apply pressure on China,' Olson said. 'This could lead China to a much more sober assessment of what it might be possible to achieve with the US in these negotiations.'
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
CUET UG 2025 results to be announced today on cuet.nta.nic.in for over 13 lakh students
CUET UG 2025 scores to guide admissions in 243 universities including DU and JNU CUET UG 2025 results: The results of the Common University Entrance Test for undergraduate admissions (CUET UG) 2025 are expected to be released today on the official website – More than 13 lakh students across India are awaiting their results, which will determine their eligibility for admission to numerous undergraduate courses in over 240 universities. The CUET UG 2025 is a centralised entrance examination conducted by the National Testing Agency (NTA) to streamline undergraduate admissions across various institutions. This year, 243 universities—including central, state, private, deemed, and other government institutions—will use CUET scores for counselling and admissions. Among the top institutions accepting CUET UG 2025 scores are the University of Delhi, Banaras Hindu University, Jawaharlal Nehru University, and Aligarh Muslim University. CUET UG 2025 to follow normalisation for fairness Due to the large number of applicants, the CUET UG 2025 was held in multiple shifts using different sets of question papers. To ensure fairness, NTA will apply a normalisation method based on percentiles. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Each candidate's performance will be assessed in relation to their peers from the same shift, and all results will be compiled into a common percentile-based ranking. The exam covered 37 subjects, including 13 languages, 23 domain-specific subjects, and one general aptitude test. This marked a significant change from the previous year when students had more flexibility in selecting papers. In CUET UG 2025, candidates were limited to choosing a maximum of five papers, regardless of their Class 12 subject combinations. Exam format revised and cities reduced This year also saw changes in the examination pattern and logistics. All papers were conducted in computer-based test (CBT) mode, with 50 mandatory questions in each paper. The number of exam centres was also reduced from 354 cities last year to 285 cities across India. These adjustments aimed to improve operational efficiency and reduce logistical challenges faced during the examination. Delayed subject papers included in results The final CUET UG 2025 results will include the accountancy/book keeping paper and the Tamil and Urdu language papers, which were initially postponed and later rescheduled by NTA. This ensures that no student is left behind due to administrative delays and that all subject scores are considered in the final rankings. Limited use of CUET scores in certain institutions While CUET UG is being adopted widely, a few institutions continue to use alternative admission methods. For instance, Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) only accepts CUET scores for select undergraduate courses. Programmes such as B.A. (Hons.) Political Science, BBA, and BSc Mathematics at JMI still rely on other entrance examinations or Class 12 results for admission. Students are advised to regularly check the official website for updates and detailed scorecards. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
If you take a gun to culture, you kill the human spirit
A woman in a town near Kyiv photographs Ukrainian poet Taras Shevchenko's statue, which was damaged in the early days of the war with Russia Art and culture are both among the first casualties of war. Conflict not only makes people more parochial, it also breeds myths and misconceptions. It damages the soul and impedes evolution of the human spirit and mind. Artists and their works are victims of this destructive process. But so too are ordinary people, cities, places and shared cultural history. Ukraine: A Deeply Cultural War Many believe that the ongoing war in Ukraine is not just about territory but also about culture. That Russia is trying to erase Ukraine's identity. There's some evidence to show that Moscow has been targeting Ukrainian cultural elements. More than 1,000 Ukrainian heritage sites have been damaged and destroyed during the war. But this destruction is also a self-inflicted wound for Russian society itself. Before the war began in 2014 — the fullscale war commenced in 2022 — there was much intermingling between Ukrainian and Russian cultures. Russian language was spoken by many Ukrainian families due to the legacy of the Soviet Union, and joint cultural collaborations and projects were routine. In fact, Zelensky, who was formerly an actor and comedian, used to regularly perform in Russia, in Russian. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo In his early years as a comedian, he would take part in the biggest comedy competition in the Russian-speaking world called the KVN championships. It was the most influential cultural product coming out of Russia, connecting all the former Soviet republics. But war has severed all those connections today. And Zelensky, like many of his countrymen, no longer speaks Russian. The Othering War weaponises differences while deliberately ignoring shared experiences and enriched intermingling. Moses Maimonides was a 12th century Jewish philosopher, considered one of the greatest Jewish intellectuals of all time. He even rose to be the court physician of Sultan Saladin. His seminal work, Mishneh Torah, a 14-volume text on Jewish law, would not have been possible without Arab-Muslim interpretations of Aristotle and Plato. For logic, he relied on Arab scholar Al-Farabi. Yet, today this shared history between Jews and Muslims is largely forgotten in the din of conflict. Narratives have gained ground that sees Jews and Arab-Muslims as separate people, without any shared constructive history. Even sectarian conflicts within a religion can lead to extreme othering. During the civil war in Iraq in the last decade, a common myth among Sunnis, incredibly, was that Shias have 'tails'. This othering completely ignores the fact that Shias and Sunnis have lived together for centuries, contributing to each other's cultural and material life. The same is true for North and South Korea, where years of conflict and separation are witnessing the common Korean language diverge. Some Hope? But thanks to the internet, during recent conflicts, people from warring countries like Israel and Iran have been connecting via online platforms to engage outside govt communications. This raises hope that online connectivity can mitigate cultural schisms wrought by conflict. But with govts acquiring tools to 'guide' online discourse, this window can also be shut, locking societies into reductive silos.
