
Schumer taken to hospital for dehydration amid DC heat wave
Schumer was treated for dehydration, according to a spokesperson for the Democratic leader, and returned to the Capitol for work.
'Leader Schumer was at the Senate gym this morning and got lightheaded,' the spokesperson said in a statement. 'Out of an abundance of caution, he went to the hospital to be treated for dehydration and is now back at work in the Capitol.'
'He wants to remind everyone to drink some water and stay out of the heat,' the spokesperson added.
The nation's capital is experiencing an intense heat wave this week, with temperatures hovering near triple digits in recent days and not set to dip until Friday.
The hospital visit comes amid a key week at the Capitol as Democrats are fighting Republican leaders to keep key provisions out of their mammoth tax package through meetings with the Senate parliamentarian.
Schumer's episode also marks the first health-related incident for a Senate leader this year after Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) experienced multiple falls and freeze-ups during his final years atop the Senate GOP conference.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
18 minutes ago
- Business Wire
AHF Applauds Congress for Backing PEPFAR Funding in Bipartisan Vote
WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) today praised the U.S. Senate for its bipartisan decision to preserve funding for the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a program credited with saving over 25 million lives globally since it was launched under President George W. Bush. 'The Senate's restoration of PEPFAR funding is a powerful reminder that compassion can prevail over partisanship." - AHF President Michael Weinstein Share Lawmakers removed a proposed $400 million cut to PEPFAR. The move demonstrates that even amid significant political differences, protecting life-saving global health programs remains a shared priority. 'This is a powerful reminder that compassion can prevail over partisanship,' said AHF President Michael Weinstein. 'Congress deserves real credit for recognizing PEPFAR's unmatched impact and ensuring its continued strength.' The revised Senate amendment also safeguards funding for other essential global health programs, including those addressing malaria, maternal health, tuberculosis, and nutrition. These protections help ensure continued U.S. leadership in advancing global health security and humanitarian aid. This marks an important step toward preserving U.S. investments in global health, but the measure still requires final approval by the House of Representatives before the July 18 deadline. AHF urges the House to follow Senate's example and act to uphold this vital funding commitment. AHF has been a strong and consistent supporter of PEPFAR under every U.S. administration since the program's founding. As the world's largest HIV/AIDS organization, AHF has long recognized PEPFAR as a model of global health diplomacy, and lifesaving impact. AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF), the world's largest HIV/AIDS healthcare organization, provides cutting-edge medicine and advocacy to more than 2.4 million individuals across 48 countries, including the U.S. and in Africa, Latin America/Caribbean, the Asia/Pacific Region, and Eastern Europe. In January 2025, AHF received the MLK, Jr. Social Justice Award, The King Center's highest recognition for an organization leading work in the social justice arena. To learn more about AHF, visit us online at find us on Facebook, and follow us on Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tina Smith hospitalized overnight for observation amid rescissions vote-a-rama
Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) was hospitalized Wednesday, likely putting Democrats down a vote during the vote-a-rama on the rescissions package that is expected to last into the evening. Smith's staff revealed on social media that the 67-year-old senator felt unwell while at the Capitol earlier Wednesday and subsequently went to George Washington University Hospital for treatment and is expected to be held for observation overnight. 'While at work at the Capitol today, Sen. Smith started to not feel well,' according to the post. 'She went to the Capitol physician who recommended she undergo more thorough examination at GW hospital.' 'Out of an abundance of caution, they are keeping her overnight for observation,' the post continued. 'She expects to be back at work very soon.' Her absence means that Democrats likely will not be at full attendance throughout the vote-a-rama. It also means Vice President Vance is unlikely to be needed to break a tie on the proposal, having been forced to do so Tuesday night on a procedural vote to advance to the vote-a-rama. Smith announced earlier this year she would not run for reelection in 2026. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Congress targeted Planned Parenthood, but also affected Maine healthcare provider
Vanessa Shields-Haas, a nurse practitioner, said the organization's clinics have been seeing all patients as usual and completing Medicaid paperwork for visits, but not submitting it because it appears the provision took effect as soon as the law was signed. 'Knowing how hard it is to access care in this state, not allowing these community members to access their care, it's cruel,' Shields-Haas said. Advertisement Maine clinics appear to be only others included in cuts Republican lawmakers targeted Planned Parenthood in one piece of what President Donald Trump dubbed the 'big beautiful' bill that Congress passed and Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up While advocates focused on Planned Parenthood, the bill did not mention it by name. Instead, it cut off reimbursements for organizations that are primarily engaged in family planning services — which generally include things such as contraception, abortion, and pregnancy tests — and received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023. The US Senate's parliamentarian rejected a 2017 effort to defund Planned Parenthood because it was written to exclude all other providers by barring payments only to groups that received more than $350 million a year in Medicaid funds. The non-profit Maine organization asserts in its legal challenge that the threshold was lowered to $800,000 this time around to make sure Planned Parenthood would not be the only affected entity. Advertisement It is the only other organization that has come forward publicly to say that its funding is at risk, too. Federal law already bars taxpayer money from covering most abortions. Instead, the money in question involves other health services, such as cancer screenings and tests, and treatment for sexually transmitted infections. Proponents of that wrinkle in the law say abortion providers use Medicaid money for other services to subsidize abortion. 'This has never been just about Planned Parenthood,' Autumn Christensen, vice president of public policy for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said in a statement. 'It's about any Big Abortion business or network that performs abortions. Taxpayers should never be forced to prop up an industry that profits from ending human lives.' The US Department of Health and Human Services, which is named in the lawsuit, declined to comment because it's a legal matter. Maine Family Planning goes beyond abortion Maine Family Planning operates 18 clinics across the state. In 2024, it had about 7,200 family planning patients, plus another 645 who obtained abortions. Services include pregnancy testing, contraception, family planning counseling, breast exams, cancer screenings, and treatment of sexually transmitted infections. Some of the sites also offer primary care services, where there are another 600 or so patients. There are about 800 gender-affirming care patients and about 200 who use its upstart mobile clinic, said George Hill, the president and CEO of the organization. Hill said that for about two-thirds of its patients, Maine Family Planning is the only place they get medical care in a typical year. Advertisement About half of the patients not seeking abortions are enrolled in Medicaid, and the clinics have been receiving about $1.9 million a year in reimbursements, which accounts for about one-fourth of the organization's budget. 'It's a difficult state to provide care in, and now we're facing this,' Hill said. In its lawsuit, the group says it has enough reserves to keep seeing patients covered by Medicaid without reimbursement only through October. Finding health care can be a struggle in this rural state Maine Family Planning says that if it had to turn away patients, it would be more complicated for them than simply finding another provider. There aren't enough in rural areas, the group notes — and many don't accept Medicaid. One patient, Ashley Smith, said she started going to Maine Family Planning about five years ago when she could not find other health care she could afford. While she's not enrolled in Medicaid, she fears clinics could be shuttered because of cuts. 'I am so worried that if my clinic closes, I don't know what I'll do or if I'll be able to see another provider,' Smith said. Maine Family Planning also supports care at more than 40 other health care facilities. Other than the Planned Parenthood locations that receive money from Maine Family Planning, those other providers don't stand to lose their Medicaid reimbursements. But, Hill said, the loss of Medicaid funding for Maine Family Planning would mean the group would have less to send to partners. The Maine clinics say the law violates their right to equal protection The Center for Reproductive Rights, which is representing Maine Family Planning in the challenge, says in its legal filing that the defunding denies it equal protection under the law because it would have funding cut off, but organizations that provide similar services would not. Advertisement 'The administration would rather topple a statewide safety network than let a patient get a cancer screening at a facility that also offers abortion care,' Meetra Mehdizadeh, a Center for Reproductive Rights lawyer, said in an interview.