logo
A Lot More Russian Troops Are Attacking In Compact Cars, Vans And Golf Carts

A Lot More Russian Troops Are Attacking In Compact Cars, Vans And Golf Carts

Forbes24-03-2025
A drone strike on an assault Lada.
Ukrainian defense ministry capture.
Armored trucks and civilian vehicles such as vans, compact cars and all-terrain vehicles—that is, golf carts—now account for around 70 percent of Russian losses, according to one recent survey.
But the growing proportion of civilian-style vehicles in the wreckage of Russia's 37-month wider war on Ukraine doesn't mean there are fewer Russian tanks and fighting vehicles—the traditional mounts for mechanized troops—along the 700-mile front line.
No, there are actually more destroyed and abandoned tanks and fighting vehicles dotting the line of contact today than there were a year ago, even as these purpose-made armored vehicles represent a smaller proportion of Russian losses.
The growing abundance of vehicles of all sorts—unarmored and armored—speaks to the intensity of the overlapping Russian offensives that have kicked off along multiple sectors in eastern Ukraine and western Russia in the last 18 months.
Until recently, the Russians were attacking almost everywhere, in large numbers, in whatever vehicles they could source from official or unofficial channels.
But Russian losses rose in proportion to Russian assaults, and stocks of traditional tanks and infantry fighting vehicles ran low, compelling regiments and brigades to switch to golf carts, Lada compact cars and Bukhanka vans in order to lend mobility to increasingly frequent attacks.
The numbers tell the story. As illustrated by analyst Chris Jones, armored tanks and fighting vehicles accounted for around half of the roughly 375 vehicles Russia lost in February 2024.
A year later this February, Russia lost around 1,100 vehicles—and 250 were tanks and fighting vehicles. Fully half of Russian losses that month were civilian vehicles or armored trucks. But the half that included tanks and fighting vehicles still represented a raw increase in the number of these vehicles appearing along the front line.
A Russian soldier on horseback.
VIA ANTON GERASHCHENKO
Russian industry builds maybe 200 new BMP-3 fighting vehicles and 90 new T-90M tanks annually as well as a few hundred other new armored vehicles, including BTR-82 wheeled fighting vehicles.
Since Russian mechanized regiments have been losing armored vehicles at an annualized rate of 6,000 a year, or 500 a month—largely to Ukrainian mines, artillery and drones—there's a shortfall.
Growing desperate for battlefield mobility as early as 2022, the Russians opened up vast storage bases that once sheltered tens of thousand of obsolete Cold War vehicles.
But even these old vehicles couldn't fully equip front-line regiments, given the accelerating pace of the regiments' operations. Open-source analyst Jompy explained it best in January, taking BTR wheeled fighting vehicles as a case study. 'It looks like Russia still has overall 2,358 stored BTR-60/70/80s out of the 3,673 it had in storage before the war,' Jompy wrote.
Looks can be deceiving. 'In reality, most of the vehicles are older BTR-60s and -70s, and in poor condition' and all but impossible to reactivate, Jompy explained.
Civilian-style vehicles were the last resort. But it was a last resort that became normal. 'I guess this Lada storming is the norm now?' open-source analyst Moklasen mused as they scrutinized yet another video feed from a Ukrainian drone unit blowing up Russian compact cars attacking Ukrainian positions in late January.
Two months later, the norm is entrenched. So many Russians are attacking in so many unarmored civilian vehicles that these vehicles now account for more than two-thirds of losses.
But there are still plenty of tanks and fighting vehicles in the mix. More and more, in fact.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

State Department approves $322 million in proposed weapons sales to Ukraine
State Department approves $322 million in proposed weapons sales to Ukraine

Hamilton Spectator

time33 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

State Department approves $322 million in proposed weapons sales to Ukraine

The State Department said Wednesday that it has approved $322 million in proposed weapons sales to Ukraine to enhance its air defense capabilities and provide armored combat vehicles, coming as the country works to fend off escalating Russian attacks. The potential sales, which the department said were notified to Congress, include $150 million for the supply, maintenance, repair and overhaul of U.S. armored vehicles, and $172 million for surface-to-air missile systems. The approvals come weeks after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directed a pause on other weapons shipments to Ukraine to allow the Pentagon to assess its weapons stockpiles, in a move that caught the White House by surprise. President Donald Trump then made an abrupt change in posture , pledging publicly earlier this month to continue to send weapons to Ukraine. 'We have to,' Trump said. 'They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now. We're going to send some more weapons — defensive weapons primarily.' Trump recently endorsed a plan to have European allies buy U.S. military equipment that can then be transferred to Ukraine . It was not immediately clear how the latest proposed sales related to that arrangement. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the U.S. has provided more than $67 billion in weapons and security assistance to Kyiv. Since Trump came back into office, his administration has gone back and forth about providing more military aid to Ukraine, with political pressure to stop U.S. funding of foreign wars coming from the isolationists inside the Trump administration and on Capitol Hill. Over the course of the war, the U.S. has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defense systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia. ___ Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOJ "to assess evidence" of "alleged weaponization" in intel community
DOJ "to assess evidence" of "alleged weaponization" in intel community

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

DOJ "to assess evidence" of "alleged weaponization" in intel community

The Department of Justice announced Wednesday it's forming a strike force "to assess evidence" Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard raised about the "alleged weaponization of the intelligence community." The big picture: The DOJ statement did not specify which evidence she publicized that it was responding to, but Gabbard accused former President Obama's administration earlier Wednesday of a "manipulation of intelligence" around Russian interference in the 2016 election.

AI bots deliver garbage based on Wikipedia
AI bots deliver garbage based on Wikipedia

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

AI bots deliver garbage based on Wikipedia

Here's alarming news: AI bots rely heavily on Wikipedia, which feed them a diet of half-truths, ideological bias and leftist lies — and then pass along the propaganda to millions of unsuspecting readers. A new study from Axios reveals that ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude — three of the most popular AI bots — use Wikipedia extensively for training their Large Language Models. Yet 'Wokepedia,' the user-maintained online encyclopedia, is so slanted to the left, it's in danger of tipping over. Advertisement The result is the public gets a perversely skewed view of the world. Indeed, Wikipedia actually keeps a blacklist of sources editors can't cite. Want to guess which outlets are redlined as 'unreliable'? That's right: conservative sources like Fox News, the Daily Wire, the Daily Caller and even The Post. Advertisement Which get the green light? Leftist outlets like AP, Vox, The Guardian, The Nation and — hold on while we spit out our tea — MSNBC. All the outlets, that is, that promoted the Russia hoax, blamed Trump for COVID and dismissed The Post's 100% accurate Hunter Biden-laptop story Russian disinfo. Yet the biased material Wikipedia spreads is used to train AI bots to answer billions of questions from people outsourcing their minds to Big Tech, misinforming millions. Advertisement AI's leftist bias is obvious to anyone who asks it questions about, say, January 6, gun control or some other hot-button issue. But don't take our word for it. The British Centre for Policy Studies also found consistent bias, especially on housing, free-speech and energy issues. Even AI bots themselves will tell you they have a leftist bias. Part of the problem is that the culture of Silicon Valley skews left. Advertisement The techies designing the AI algorithms are more liberal than the average American, so their bias works its way through the system. 'Garbage in, garbage out' is an old saying in computer programming. Meaning, computers are dumb. They process what we give them. If LLMs keep feeding off the same biased sources, then future content will reflect that bias, and continue to feed LLMs in a recursive loop. We will be stuck in a conceptual world that has no outside reference. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters This is exactly what George Orwell warned about. President Donald Trump just released an 'action plan' that puts Big Tech on alert. AI companies will need to feed their LLMs a balanced diet of information or risk losing federal contracts. But the companies should be look to reform voluntarily, if they care about their credibility. If they insist on using lefty sources like Wikipedia, the least they can do is provide a warning with every answer they supply.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store