Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. Galaxy S25+
With the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge slotting between the Samsung Galaxy S25+ and the S25 Ultra, it's only natural to wonder which one of the three to get. Especially in markets like India and the US, where the Edge is just $100/INR 10,000 more expensive than the S25+. Even if the two devices are built for different users, it's always advisable to get the best hardware for your hard-earned money.
However, European consumers have it easy. The Plus model goes for about €400 less than the Edge. So is it worth the Edge's price premium? Let's find out. Table of Contents: Design
Display
Battery Life
Charging
Speaker Test
Performance
Cameras
Verdict
For starters, you can compare the complete specs sheets or directly continue with our editor's assessment in the following text. Size comparison Samsung
Galaxy S25 Edge Samsung
Galaxy S25+
Even though the two handsets share roughly the same design, sans the camera island, and the same screen diagonal, the S25 Edge has a clear advantage. It's considerably lighter, slimmer and even negligibly shorter and narrower. So when it comes to portability, the S25 Edge is the clear choice.
As far as build quality is concerned, the Edge is again superior. The handset features a tougher Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 protective panel on the front, and a lighter and stronger titanium frame. Display comparison Samsung
Galaxy S25 Edge Samsung
Galaxy S25+
There is absolutely no discrepancy in the display department. The Galaxy S25 Edge and the S25+ share the same display technology, size, features and resolution. Both screens were able to boost a little over 1,400 nits, which is perfectly fine for outdoor use even on a bright sunny day. Battery life
With the Galaxy S25 Edge having a significantly lower battery capacity than the S25+, it's no surprise that it offers inferior battery life. The Plus model outperforms the Edge in every battery test, but we are surprised to see the Edge getting pretty close to the S25+ in the video playback test. Charging speed Samsung
Galaxy S25 Edge
3900 mAh Samsung
Galaxy S25+
4900 mAh
The Galaxy S25+'s charging is capped at 45W using a Power Delivery charger that supports Samsung's proprietary PPS, while the S25 Edge settles for a 25W charge. In theory, the S25+ should be considerably faster, but that's not really the case.
The two phones have comparable charging times from 0 to 100%. Samsung has been pretty conservative with its charging speeds and its Galaxy S phones usually take about the same time to charge fully.
Still, the S25+ gives you more charge in the first 15 to 30 minutes of the charging cycle, which is more practical in our books. Almost no one charges their phone from 0 to 100% when in a hurry, so we consider the S25+'s charging curve better suited for real-world scenarios. Speaker test
While the sound tuning is similar, the Galaxy S25+ comes out on top with fuller sound and more prominent bass. The loudspeakers on the Plus are also a tad louder.
This is somewhat expected given the S25 Edge's size. Smaller phones, or thinner ones in this case, find it harder to produce strong bass and are generally quieter. Performance
The Galaxy S25+ and the S25 Edge share the same chipset - the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy. The "for Galaxy" suffix means the CPU and GPU are overclocked. More specifically, the main two CPU cores run at higher clock speeds compared to the standard SD 8 Elite. Samsung
Galaxy S25 Edge Samsung
Galaxy S25+
The available memory configurations are identical. Both devices are offered in 12GB/256GB and 12GB/512GB variants. Whichever memory options you choose, you get UFS 4.0 storage. Benchmark performance
As one would expect, there is hardly a performance difference. The S25+ outperforms the S25 Edge by 2-3% at best and even falls behind in the combined AnTuTu 10 test. No surprises here. Camera comparison
The Galaxy S25 Edge uses Samsung's flagship 200MP sensor for its primary camera, borrows the Galaxy S25/S25+ ultrawide unit and skips the telephoto camera entirely. The S25+, on the other hand, gets a smaller 50MP main sensor, a full-fledged 3x zoom unit and the same 12MP ultrawide camera as the Edge. The only difference is that the Edge's ultrawide camera has autofocus.
The selfie cameras are identical. Image quality
We are surprised to see the Galaxy S25+'s main camera producing images with relatively the same quality. Aside from some minor differences in processing, which are trivial at best, the Galaxy S25 Edge and the S25+ seem to capture near-identical photos with their main cameras. The same goes for the ultrawide shots, where the Edge gains a slight advantage due to the autofocus, which helps produce slightly sharper images.
Galaxy S25 Edge: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 3x
Galaxy S25+: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 3x
We were expecting slightly better 2x zoom crops from the Edge, given the larger 200MP sensor, but we struggle to find any meaningful difference. Same goes for the 3x zoom comparison, where the 200MP camera's crop matches the dedicated 3x telephoto camera on the S25+.
But as the light drops, the Edge's 200MP main camera shows somewhat cleaner and sharper 2x and 3x zoom photos. So, at the end of the day, the lack of a 3x zoom camera doesn't seem to be an issue with the Edge. At least in this context.
Galaxy S25 Edge: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 3x
Galaxy S25+: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 3x
We also noticed a slight difference in post-processing of low-light images from the main cameras. The Galaxy S25 Edge's shots offer more contrast and slightly darker, more natural shadows. Video quality
Below we have a few framegrabs from the videos taken by the two phones at each focal length, so it's easier to compare to one another.
Galaxy S25 Edge 4K screengrabs: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 3x
Galaxy S25+ 4K screengrabs: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 3x
As for the videos, there's virtually no difference between the Edge and the Plus. Still, we would prefer the S25+ given that the 3x zoom video is slightly cleaner than the Edge's 3x zoom crop. The gap widens as the light drops, as the S25+'s telephoto unit produces considerably less noisy and more detailed videos. Verdict
At first glance, the Galaxy S25 Edge sacrifices a lot in favor of design. It surely is the better choice when it comes to portability, compared to the S25+. But the latter will give you longer battery life, faster charging and nicer speakers.
On paper, the Galaxy S25+'s camera system is also more versatile, but that's not the case in real-world scenarios. The S25 Edge's main sensor can deliver 3x telephoto-like images.
So, while the Edge seems like a good choice, given the small price difference between the two handsets in the US, the Galaxy S25+ makes much more sense out of the two in India and Europe, where it undercuts the Edge significantly. You just have to decide whether you prioritize form over function or vice versa.
The slim and lightweight design.
The roughly the same camera experience.
The more premium build.
The better battery life and faster charging.
The slightly better speakers.
The lower price tag.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
Metro rep sells a customer on the "Great" Revvl 7 5G. You can probably guess what happened next
If you're at a store looking to buy a new phone, always try to do some instant research. By that, I mean you should ask to see a working model of the phone the rep wants to sell you. How does it feel in your hand? How's the build? You want to see if the phone is zippy or if it lags. They might throw out the name of the processor under the hood and you might think it sounds impressive when in reality it is a slower and older application processor. What you are trying to avoid is the experience that some unfortunate consumer recently had at a Metro store. This guy already had a phone for work and wanted one for personal calls and texts. He did the right thing by articulating to the rep what he wanted. He told the rep that he was looking for something "decent" and while he didn't need a top-of-the-line phone, he didn't mind spending a little bit of money. He did tell the salesman that he spends a lot of time on his phone and didn't want something cheap. The rep told the customer that every model he wanted to hold in his hand was out of stock. That included several mid-range Samsung phones that the customer apparently had an interest in. Not having any of those models in stock was a definite red flag that foreshadowed what happened next. The customer told the rep that he would check out another Metro store even though he really didn't want to because the closest one was 30 minutes away. Not wanting to let this fish off the hook, the rep all of a sudden let the customer know about a great phone he had in the back, the T-Mobile Revvl 7 5G. The rep said it was a great phone and the customer was going to love it. As many of you know, the Revvl 7 is the latest iteration of T-Mobile 's in-house smartphone line and is equipped with only 128GB of storage, 6GB of RAM (on the very low end these days), 2TB of expandable storage, and a triple camera setup (50 MP primary, 2 MP Depth, 2 MP Macro). There is an 8 MP front-facing camera for selfies and video chats. A 5000 mAh battery keeps the lights on. The display weighs in at 6.58 inches with an FHD+ resolution of 1080 x 2048. So you can see by the specs that this could be considered a "cheap" phone and not what the customer wanted. However, not knowing anything about the Revvl 7, the customer was sold on the device by the rep who even threw in a "free" tablet. Knowing that he'd have to pay for activation and the monthly fee, he declined the "free" tablet on the spot. The customer explains what happened next. "I get home and the phone is trash. Super slow. Terrible quality and horrible camera. Again, I should have done my research but still, it pissed me off. I mean come on, the Revvl 7? I should have known better. This phone might as well have been a piece of toilet paper." Most PhoneArena readers would have known that the Revvl 7 5G was not the "great" phone the rep characterized it as being. When the customer went back to the store four days later, boy did the Metro rep try to gaslight him. They first told the customer he couldn't return it because they had a 24 hour return policy. That was a dumb lie considering that the receipt showed the 14-day return policy and customer service confirmed that. The customer ended up getting a phone he wanted, the Samsung Galaxy A36 which was back in stock after four days. Not that the rep cared. Such is the nature of the phone sales business these days that reps can pile one outrageous lie on top of another and not only don't they care, neither does the company that pays him to pull fast ones on innocent victims. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
5 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Google says you must disable this setting now to stop attacks from malicious texts
Google has issued a warning for smartphone users and you need to take this seriously. One reason is because this warning comes from Google and the second reason is because of how these attacks work. Imagine criminals able to send you malicious SMS text messages directly to your phone bypassing the mobile network. You might be wondering how such an attack is even possible and what you can do to prevent it from happening to you. These attacks use something called SMS Blasters which trick phones into making a direct connection with an attacker's radio device by making it seem as though it is a real network access point. Since attackers aren't using a mobile network to send their malicious texts to victims, they don't need a list of phone numbers belonging to potential victims to target. Instead, the cyber crooks pick a specific area to target. This is most likely a high-income area with plenty of wealthy phone owners. With one tap you can give your Android phone greater protection. | Image credit-PhoneArena Recently an SMS Blaster-wielding attacker was caught in the U.K. His capture led police in the U.K. to warn that these criminals will try "to bypass fraud prevention measures designed to protect consumers [to] steal personal and financial information, so it's important that customers are alert to potential threats of fraud, particularly text messages." Google points out, as we did earlier, that injecting text messages directly into victims' phones bypasses the victim's carrier network. As a result, all of the fancy anti-spam features and anti-scam filters offered by a carrier will basically do nothing and offer no protection. Google says thyat smartphone users should disable 2G connectivity on their devices. | Image credit-Google Google says that it has seen the "SMS Blaster fraud" in multiple countries. Additionally, Google says that there is evidence "of the exploitation of weaknesses in cellular communication standards leveraging cell-site simulators." The company says that the first thing you need to do to save yourself from becoming a victim of these attacks is to disable 2G networks on your phone. 2G is so insecure compared to more recent networks, even 3G. 2G is disabled by default if you have Android 16's new Advanced Protection Mode enabled. The police also advise you to disable 2G on your phone. Here is the thing you need to be on the lookout for. Even in areas where 2G has been completely disconnected, your phone will still connect to a fake cell access point if it has 2G enabled. To disable 2G on your Android 16 -powered phone go to Settings > Security & privacy > Advanced protection . From the Advanced Protection page, toggle on Device protection. This one toggle will detect suspicious activity indicating your phone has been stolen. When the device is locked, it limits new UBS connections for charging only. It also will force your phone to reboot if it's locked for 72 hours. It also prevents 2G calls (except in emergency situations). Unlike Android, the only way to disable 2G on the iPhone is to use Apple's nuclear Lockdown Mode option which is designed for those who are targeted by attackers because of who they are. This mode, when enabled, severely limits your iPhone's functionality to help protect the user. While the SMS Blaster could be a major problem if you find yourself in the range of one, Trend Micro said in its latest report that the number one threat on smartphones last month remained "cybercriminals using their regular tactics in trying to scam consumers, with scammers impersonating well known brands such as PayPal, Netflix, Mater Lotteries, Toyota and Google." Trend Micro reminds you that "the golden rule of any scam, online or otherwise, is that if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is." Trend Micro says to watch out for an "Unexpected contact." The firm says, "Remember, genuine organizations don't contact you out of the blue, asking you to disclose personal or financial details via a text message." Also, watch for spelling and grammatical errors. "If a message doesn't look professional, that's a red flag that it's probably a scam. Legitimate organizations rarely make glaring spelling or grammatical errors in customer communications." Lastly, if a message isn't relevant to you, it is probably a scam. If you aren't waiting for a package to be delivered, texts about a parcel are bogus. If you didn't enter a sweepstakes or a contest, texts related to those are fake. If a message is about a gift card, did you buy one from the retailer mentioned in the text? If not, well, you know what I am going to say. Many Pixel users don't know what features they have to help them fight back against malicious messages. To help, Google is reportedly looking to integrate Scam Detection and Call Screen features into the Pixel setup process helping Pixel users know what features need to be enabled for their protection. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
GSM Arena
7 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Ai+ will launch its smartphones on July 8
We've been aware of the new Ai+ smartphone brand for some time now. It is part of NxtQuantum Shift Technologies, led by Realme India's former CEO, Madhav Sheth. All of its products, at least the ones being teased for now, are designed and built in India and will be exclusively sold through Flipkart. The fog of mystery is slowly lifting from the upcoming device lineup, and thanks to a few posts on the company's official Twitter, a Flipkart page and an insider leak, we now have the clearest picture yet. Apparently, the initial launch is scheduled to take place on July 8 in India, as previously expected. The Flipkart exclusive partnership hasn't changed, and neither has the suggested starting price of just INR 5000 ($59/€50). Allegedly, that price was supposed to be for the so-called AI+ Nova 2 5G, which was exclusively leaked to us a while back. Ai+ posts Why Nova 2? Well. We aren't quite sure, frankly, nor is the name set in stone as far as the earlier leak goes, but the new sources only mention an Ai+ Nova 5G moniker instead. Apparently, it will be based on the Unisoc T8200 (6nm) chipset, have a 50MP main camera, expandable storage and a 5,000 mAh battery. Then there is the Ai+ Pulse 4G. According to new sources, it will be a 4G device, featuring the Unisoc T7250 (12nm) chipset and the same 50MP main camera, expandable storage, and 5,000 mAh battery as its Nova 5G sibling. This makes us think that the 4G-only Pulse will probably be the cheapest of the bunch, starting at just INR 5000 and not the Nova 5G, but we'll have to wait and see. There have been two distinct back designs for AI+ phones shared so far, and we believe that the Pulse features a rectangular secondary camera, while the Nova has two round ones. ✅ Officially confirmed : Ai+ smartphones are launching on : 8th July in 🇮🇳Will be under 10K !Ai Nova 5G : likely : Unisoc T8200 (6nm)Ai Pulse 4G : likely : Unisoc T7250 (12nm)Both:• 50MP 📸 • Expandable storage These are designed & made in 🇮🇳 with focus on privacy! — Debayan Roy (Gadgetsdata) (@Gadgetsdata) June 28, 2025 As mentioned, AI+ phones will be designed and built in India. The brand also boasts that it will utilize a significant amount of reclaimed and recycled materials. The brand previously confirmed that AI+ smartphones will run NxtQuantum OS, which, it says, "has been uniquely designed by Indian engineers, offering a user-friendly interface optimized for the Indian market." Additionally, AI+ stated that the NxtQuantum OS, running on its smartphones, is "auditable, policy-aligned, and governed by Indian law." The brand also claimed that "all user data is stored within India on MeitY-approved servers hosted by Google Cloud." The brand is also expected to launch a smartwatch with built-in TWS earphones. An image of the smartwatch's retail box, which we exclusively shared earlier this month, revealed that it would be called "wearbuds Watch 3." We were told AI+ would unveil the smartwatch alongside its smartphones. Source 1 | Source 2 | Source 3
