Key parts of Iran's nuclear program still intact, says Pentagon report disputed by Trump
WASHINGTON — The core components of Iran's nuclear program appear to remain intact after the June 21 U.S. attack, according to a U.S. official who has been briefed on the Defense Intelligence Agency's initial assessment.
President Donald Trump and members of his administration have stated that Iran's nuclear program had been 'obliterated' in the airstrikes and have cast doubt on the report's conclusions.
The report was based on intercepted communications and other intelligence sources in the 96 hours after the U.S. attack spearheaded by U.S. Air Force B-2 bombers dropping the world's most potent conventional weapon – the 30,000-pound, bunker-busting GBU-57.
The U.S. attack, which included submarine-launched cruise missiles, caused extensive damage to infrastructure on the surface, according to the source who discussed the report's findings on condition of anonymity. Less certain is the amount of damage that was done Iran's deeply-buried nuclear facilities.
But intelligence sources indicate that some of the Iranian nuclear program's core components – its centrifuges and enriched uranium – remain intact, the report found. The attack set back Iran's quest to create a nuclear weapon anywhere from six to 12 months, the source said.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in a statement, dismissed the contention that Iran's nuclear program as politically motivated.
'Based on everything we have seen — and I've seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons," Hegseth said. "Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target — and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the president and the successful mission.'
CNN first reported findings of the Pentagon intelligence agency's report.
The bombs hit two key Iranian nuclear facilities – Fordow and Natanz – on June 21. A third facility, Isfahan, was struck by Tomahawk missiles fired from a U.S. Navy submarine, Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters the next morning. An assessment of the damage would take some time, he said.
Trump dug in on his dismissal of the assessment's findings in his comments at a NATO summit in the Netherlands on June 25, comparing the impact of the strikes to the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II.
"It's destroyed," he said of Iran's nuclear program.
Hegseth has said there was "low confidence" in the assessment, which was produced by the Pentagon's intelligence agency. But the official briefed on the report said only portions of the report were labeled low confidence.
More: War of words? Trump hints at changing name of Defense Department
"If you want to make an assessment of what happened at Fordow, you better get a big shovel and go really deep, because Iran's nuclear program is obliterated," he said.
Some researchers and experts have disputed the intelligence assessment's conclusions that Iran's nuclear program is mostly intact.
David Albright, president and founder of the Institute for Science and International Security, said in a social media post the DIA report is "hard to believe."
Fordow "is likely severely damaged or destroyed" and Natanz "is likely destroyed and knocked out of operation" following the U.S. strikes, according to a report from the institute. At Isfahan, the main uranium conversion facility was "severely damaged" and tunnel entrances were collapsed, the report found.
Trump also brushed aside concerns voiced by nuclear officials and experts over whether Iran was able to move its nuclear equipment beforehand and what happened to the enriched uranium stored in tunnels deep underground.
"We think we hit them so hard and so fast, they didn't get to move," he said.
Israel's military said on June 23 it had bombed routes to the Fordow facility to prevent Iran from removing any material.
Trump has taken a victory lap over a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that put an end to 12 days of traded aerial strikes between the two countries. "We think it's over," he said at the NATO summit.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Key parts of Iran's nuclear program still intact: Pentagon assessment
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
9 minutes ago
- CBS News
Nuclear watchdog agency's general director says Iran's capabilities suffered "severe damage"
Iran's nuclear capabilities suffered "severe damage" in last week's U.S. airstrikes but not "total damage," said the man in charge of the world's global nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. "One cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there." "It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage, first of all," IAEA director general Rafael Mariano Grossi said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." "And secondly, Iran has the capacities there; industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again." The U.S. launched three strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities on June 21, following more than a week of Israeli attacks, which President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities. But Grossi's comments appeared to support an early assessment by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), which suggested the strikes had only set back Iran's nuclear program by months. The Trump administration has slammed the DIA's assessment as "low confidence," and Hegseth and other officials on Thursday went after the media for reporting on a "leaked" report. At a briefing Thursday, reporters questioned Hegseth repeatedly on whether Iran had moved its stocks of enriched uranium before the Israeli and U.S. strikes began. The defense secretary responded that he was "not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be — moved or otherwise." Grossi on Sunday said Iran did not share that they had any plans to move the enriched uranium, but at the same time "there was no physical time" for Iran to share that information. The IAEA director general also conceded that it's "logical to presume that when [Iran] announce[s] that they are going to be taking protective measures" that moving the enriched uranium "could be part of it." But he also emphasized that "this is why it's so important, first of all, for Iran to allow our inspectors to continue their indispensable work as soon as possible." Brennan pushed Grossi that since it's unclear if the uranium had been moved and all the centrifuges cannot be accounted for, there's an open question that Iran could still "sprint towards a bomb…if they wanted to." Grossi said he didn't want to be an "alarmist," but "we need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened." "Iran had a very vast ambitious program, and part of it may still be there, and if not, there is also the self-evident truth that the knowledge is there," Grossi said. "The industrial capacity is there. Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology, as is obvious. So you cannot disinvent this. You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have. It's a huge country, isn't it? So I think this should be the incentive that we all must have to understand that military operations or not, you are not going to solve this in a definitive way militarily." Grossi confirmed that his IAEA inspectors were never able to verify Iran's claims that its nuclear program was only for peaceful ends and that it was not trying to develop a weapon. "We didn't see a program that was aiming in that direction, but at the same time, they were not answering very, very important questions that were pending," Grossi said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement Saturday that there were calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of Grossi. When asked about alleged threats against nuclear inspectors, Iran's ambassador to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, said in a separate appearance on "Face the Nation" that Iran is not threatening nuclear inspectors, including Grossi. Nuclear inspectors "are in Iran," Iravani said. He said they are in a "safe condition," but "they cannot have access to our site." Iravani also said that since Iran is a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), nuclear "enrichment is our right, and an inalienable right, and we want to implement this right." Iravani added that he did not think the enrichment will "ever stop."
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'The gloves are off': Analysts react to Barrett's jabs against Justice Jackson in birthright ruling
A "travesty for the rule of law" - the words of Justice Sonya Sotomayor as the six conservatives on the high court give Donald Trump another big victory, limiting the use of nationwide injunctions. Michele Goodwin and Mark Joseph Stern join The Weekend to discuss.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Let Bibi go': Trump says US is 'not going to stand' for Netanyahu's prosecution
President Donald Trump lashed out at Israeli prosecutors over the corruption trial facing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying the United States having given billions in aid to Israel is "not going to stand for this." Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 in Israel on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust – all of which he denies. The trial, which began in 2020, involves three criminal cases. He is scheduled to return for cross examination Monday after several delays over the COVID-19 pandemic, Israel's war with Hamas and other conflicts in the region. "How is it possible that the Prime Minister of Israel can be forced to sit in a Courtroom all day long, over NOTHING (Cigars, Bugs Bunny Doll, etc.). It is a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure," Trump said on June 28 in a post on Truth Social. Netanyahu thanked Trump in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. "Together, we will make the Middle East Great Again!" he said. Israel's main opposition leader Yair Lapid criticised Trump's statement, saying he should not "intervene in a legal process of an independent state," the BBC reported. Trump said the trial complicates negotiations with both Iran and Hamas. The United States targeted several nuclear sites in Iran after Israel launched an air war on June 13 and tensions erupted between the Middle Eastern nations. Hamas attacked Israel out of Gaza on Oct. 7, 2023 and is still holding hostages, while Israel has unleashed strikes on the strip for nearly two years. "It was the United States of America that saved Israel, and now it is going to be the United States of America that saves Bibi Netanyahu,' Trump said in a separate post earlier in the week. "THIS TRAVESTY OF 'JUSTICE' CAN NOT BE ALLOWED!" This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump says US is 'not going to stand' for Netanyahu's corruption trial