logo
How Angela Rayner became the power behind the throne

How Angela Rayner became the power behind the throne

Telegraph2 days ago
It was the picture at PMQs that told a thousand words about two women's changing fortunes. While Rachel Reeves wept on Wednesday, Angela Rayner sat beside her, stony faced and resolute. As gilt yields shuddered in the City, the political stock of the Deputy Prime Minister was rising, just as the Chancellor's was falling. In fact, after Sir Keir Starmer's climbdown over welfare reform, in the face of a bruising public battle between ministers and Labour backbenchers, Rayner emerges as the only frontbencher with her stature significantly enhanced.
She has, it seems, played her role to perfection throughout this crisis. In public, she has been the model example of loyalty, dutifully repeating No 10's lines at the despatch box, whatever her private reservations about the scale of welfare cuts signed off by Starmer and Reeves.
Yet after Starmer narrowly avoided a defeat on the Welfare Bill on Tuesday night, by significantly watering down his plans, reports credited her with helping to broker key last-minute compromises with MPs. In the eyes of MPs on the Left of the party, who see Rayner as something of a tribune, she has helped to temper a policy they hated. To colleagues in Government, she has helped also win the day – avoiding an embarrassing defeat on the floor of the Commons.
'Angela's had a good war,' reflected one MP in the parliamentary bar, after the vote. Such sentiments are quietly being echoed across the party, as Labour ruefully reflects on its first year in office.
The steady increase in Rayner's power is an underappreciated story of the last 12 months. Upon entering government, her power base appeared to have been curtailed by Starmer, following a series of skirmishes between the pair in Opposition. Rayner was denied the status she craved: her own department, an 'Office of Deputy Prime Minister', giving her parity with John Prescott under Tony Blair. In the absence of that, allies talked up the extent of her responsibilities in government, having also been put in charge of the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, and given special responsibility for employment rights.
However, Dorneywood, Prescott's old grace-and-favour countryside abode in Buckinghamshire, which is traditionally available to the second most senior member of government, was handed to Reeves, not Rayner ('Rachel wanted Dorneywood, I'm happy for Rachel to be using it,' said Rayner last year). Initially, she was not listed as a permanent member of the National Security Council, despite previous deputy prime ministers being included as standing members.
All that seems very different now. In the coming weeks, she will get her official Office of Deputy Prime Minister, with 30 staff, a new logo and email domain. It will cement Rayner's status at the heart of power, and sharpen her elbow when it comes to coordinating her policy agenda across Whitehall.
As Starmer struggles with plummeting public opinion ratings and increasingly rebellious colleagues, Rayner is increasingly seen by colleagues as the woman who is making much of the running in this administration. While Starmer himself is regarded as insufficiently bold, the reforms for which Rayner is directly responsible, which include relaxing green belt rules and strengthening trade union powers, are giving succour to Labour backbenchers desperate for radical change. 'Planning and trade unions are two things to cheer about,' says one welfare rebel. 'Angela is key to both.'
Planning reform has become one of the great hopes of this Government. Rayner's target of building 1.5 million new homes by 2029 is viewed by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) as one of the few Labour measures that is likely to boost growth. Cheered on by the 100-strong Labour Growth Group, Rayner has become the face of supply-side social democrats in the cabinet. Her promise to build 180,000 social houses wins her kudos on the Left of the party, too.
Then there are her municipal reforms. In December, she announced a 'devolution revolution' – the biggest shake-up of local government since the 1970s. It involved cancelling a swathe of elections across the country, prompting howls of protest from Reform. But the plan bore the hallmarks of a fiercely political minister, stamping her authority on a long-divisive subject. She is showing a similar determination in her plans to radically rebalance council tax to prioritise deprived areas – a move that is likely to see tax bills rising in the South to fund investment in the North. 'She has the guts to do what Boris Johnson never could,' argues one Labour source. 'Actually do proper levelling-up.'
Key to Rayner's growing power within Labour is her brief on employment rights. She is championing the biggest restoration of trade union rights in decades, piloting Labour's flagship legislation through parliament. For her own MPs, who have grown increasingly muted during Starmer's performances at PMQs, it gives them something to cheer about. 'Socialism is what a Labour government does,' declared Herbert Morrison. Increasingly, for frustrated Labour backbenchers, Rayner is one of the few ministers who seems to grasp this.
Such an expansive portfolio gives Rayner plenty of face time with her 400 parliamentary colleagues. Unlike the Prime Minister, who has entered the Commons voting lobbies on just a handful of occasions since the election, Rayner is praised by colleagues as 'accessible' and 'reasonable'. In both age, tastes and background, the 45-year-old Rayner is seen by some younger MPs as a much warmer figure than the somewhat stiff Starmer. A self-described 'vape dragon', karaoke fiend and lover of Venom cocktails (vodka, Southern Comfort, Blue WKD and orange juice, for the uninitiated), she is well-liked across the party. Even Nigel Farage, who has little time for much of the current cabinet, has praised her authenticity: 'At least she is real – none of the rest are.'
Rayner's rise has coincided with the collapse of rivals within the party. Reeves is now, according to Ipsos, the most unpopular politician in the country. Yvette Cooper faces an impossible summer at the Home Office, dealing with an endless stream of small boats across the Channel. Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, and a one-time possible rival from the soft Left, has been besieged by criticism over her changes to academies. Wes Streeting, the Blair-loving Health Secretary, is one of the few to have been enhanced, rather than diminished, by his time in office – not least thanks to his bold start on NHS reform.
Many of Starmer's allies would hope that it is Streeting, not Rayner, who eventually succeeds him. Yet Rayner's union connections and standing among party members would likely give her the edge in any future contest. 'It's a while off – but it will be Angela,' says one minister, confidently.
For now, her allies can take comfort in the fact that it is Rayner's agenda that is driving so much of the current administration. While Reeves and Starmer struggle in Downing Street, Rayner is the one who gives her MPs something to cheer. Her moment could well come next May, when Labour is likely to lose the Welsh parliament elections for the first time since devolution in 1999, as well as suffer heavy losses in Scotland and the London boroughs. Labour MPs – rarely the most regicidal types – could get jolted into action. Should they do so then the red queen, for so-long overlooked, is ready to inherit the throne.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shona Robison urges Prime Minister to follow Scotland on taxation
Shona Robison urges Prime Minister to follow Scotland on taxation

Glasgow Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Shona Robison urges Prime Minister to follow Scotland on taxation

Ms Robison said that if Labour had followed the Scottish model, where higher earners pay more tax, Labour would not be in the 'complete fiscal mess that they are in now.' Her comments come after Sir Keir Starmer's Government was forced into a last-minute climbdown in order for welfare legislation to pass its first parliamentary hurdle earlier this week. In a late concession on Tuesday evening, ministers shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. These changes are expected to put pressure on other parts of the Government's finances. Ms Robison said: 'People voted for a Labour government last year because they wanted change from the Tories – but after a year of attacks on the incomes of pensioners, the poor and the disabled, they are rightly wondering exactly what, if anything, is different. 'When Keir Starmer took office, he could have chosen to ask people on higher incomes to pay a little more in tax in order to protect public spending. 'Choosing instead to target the vulnerable is not leadership – frankly, it is political cowardice. 'If Keir Starmer had done in England what the SNP have done in Scotland with taxation, Labour would not be in the complete fiscal mess that they are in now. Sir Keir Starmer has been urged to rethink taxation (Lucy North/PA) 'After a year of mistakes, Labour needs a new direction – and they should look to Scotland. By asking people on higher incomes to pay a bit more in tax, we have ensured a majority of taxpayers pay less than they would elsewhere in the UK, and are able to unlock more spending for services like the NHS, as well as cut poverty by introducing a Scottish Child Payment, and ensure that everybody can benefit from important services like free tuition and free prescriptions.' She added: 'Labour used to tell Scotland that we didn't need independence and we just needed to get rid of the Tory government – but the last year has completely demolished that argument. 'No Westminster government will ever deliver the truly fair society which I believe the vast majority of people in Scotland want to live in – and that is why independence is the best future for Scotland.' Scottish Labour's economy, business and fair work spokesperson Daniel Johnson MSP said: 'SNP ministers have a brass neck to think they can lecture anyone after their atrocious financial mismanagement. 'The SNP use higher taxes on Scottish nurses and firefighters as a substitute for economic growth, waste billions on out-of-control prison and ferry projects, and have created multibillion-pound black holes in the public finances. 'Labour is delivering the largest funding settlement in the history of devolution, with £50 billion for Scotland's NHS, schools and public services this year alone. Despite that, the SNP are now gearing up to make cuts to fill their fiscal black hole. 'The SNP government has the money, they have the powers, but they are out of ideas, out of excuses and out of time. 'Next year, we have the chance to kick out this SNP Government that cannot be trusted with taxpayers' money.'

Rayner's housing quango bosses spend thousands on hospitality and travel
Rayner's housing quango bosses spend thousands on hospitality and travel

Telegraph

time34 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Rayner's housing quango bosses spend thousands on hospitality and travel

Angela Rayner's housing quango has spent nearly a quarter of a million pounds on expenses for directors. Officials at Homes England have spent £240,000 on travel, hospitality, food, accommodation and office supplies since 2021. The revelation comes after Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, allocated £39 billion for affordable and social housing over the next 10 years in the spending review. Homes England, set up in 2018 to fund more affordable housing across England, will distribute 70 per cent of this money. The quango defended the spending as necessary for executives who travel for work and said there was a strict approvals process for expenses. Joanna Marchong, investigations campaign manager of the TaxPayers' Alliance, which obtained the data through Freedom of Information (FoI) requests, said: 'Taxpayers will be dismayed that Homes England bureaucrats are racking up more expenses. 'This is a clear example of a runaway quango. Rather than supporting the Government's new house-building targets, they are piling extra costs onto construction companies making new homes. 'If Labour want any chance of hitting their housing targets, ministers must get a grip on Homes England and focus on getting spades in the ground.'

Met chief calls for ‘mega' forces in push for police reform
Met chief calls for ‘mega' forces in push for police reform

The Independent

time43 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Met chief calls for ‘mega' forces in push for police reform

Metropolitan Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has called for the creation of 12-15 mega forces as part of what he described as 'the first serious reform of our policing model in over 60 years'. Writing in The Sunday Times, Sir Mark said the current system of 43 county forces had not 'been fit for purpose for at least two decades'. He added that bigger forces would be better able to utilise modern technology and would reduce 'expensive' governance and support functions. Sir Mark said: 'The 43-force model was designed in the 1960s and hasn't been fit for purpose for at least two decades. It hinders the effective confrontation of today's threats and stops us fully reaping the benefits of technology. 'We need to reduce the number of forces by two-thirds, with the new bigger and fully capable regional forces supported by the best of modern technology and making better use of the limited funding available.' He characterised Chancellor Rachel Reeves' decision to increase police funding by 2.3% above inflation each year in the recent spending review as 'disappointing'. Gavin Stephens, chairman of the National Police Chiefs' Council, last month warned forces were facing 'difficult choices' and some would 'struggle to make the numbers add up' as the cost of borrowing spirals. Some have increasingly relied on borrowing, and the cost of debt is expected to rise by 49% in the next three years. 'Forces' borrowing costs have been going up because for the last decade, local forces have had no capital investment at all,' he said. 'The main capital investment has gone to big projects at the centre.' Force chiefs want greater say over how they structure their workforces, with the removal of restrictions on ring-fenced funding that was granted by the previous government to replace officers cut during austerity. Mr Stephens said policing needs a variety of workers other than officers, including cyber specialists, crime scene investigators and digital forensic experts, in the same way that 'the health service is much more than just about doctors'. He added: 'We know that the Government had some very difficult choices to make, as a consequence of this, policing is going to have some very difficult choices to make too.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store