9 Korean Sunscreens For Achieving That Glass Skin Glow
K-beauty has been dominating the beauty scene thanks to its skin-first philosophy, especially when it comes to sunscreen.
Korean sunscreens go beyond basic protection — they hydrate, brighten and help you achieve that signature glow-from-within look. From hydration-packed SPF sticks to silky finishes that layer perfectly under makeup, these SPFs are designed to leave your skin looking radiant — no filter needed.
This convenient SPF stick
With a sunscreen stick like this one from Belif, there's really no excuse to skip re-application. And why would you? The formula delivers an immediate glow and blurs the look of pores. Plus, the stick format makes it easy to tote around in your bag without the risk of spillage.Get it from Sephora for $28.
This watermelon-infused dewy sunscreen
Gone are the days of chalky, slow-absorbing sunscreens. If you're looking for something that blends to perfection, look no further than this SPF from fan-favorite Glow Recipe. It's infused with watermelon seed oil, which is full of antioxidants, to prevent oxidative stress. Translation: free radicals don't stand a chance.Get it from Glow Recipe for $35.
A skin-soothing pick
Skin lean sensitive? Opt for this super soothing formula, which is made with green tea sourced from Jeju Island in South Korea, known for its unique ecosystem. This, plus cica, help to calm irritation and reduce redness — all while protecting the skin from the UVA and UVB rays.Get it from Amazon for $18+ (available in two sizes).
This two-in-one formula
From South Korea-based brand The Face Shop comes this dual-action sunscreen. It's formulated to not just protect from damaging rays, but to also hydrate the skin so you can skip your morning moisturizer. How's that for efficiency?Get it from Amazon for $18.
This antioxidant-rich luxury option
Chasing luxury? This hard-working formula provides a smooth, hydrating finish without leaving a white cast, making it suitable for daily use and as a base under makeup. It's made with Korean white ginseng to protect from environmental aggressors — plus, a blend of five herbals work to moisturize and balance skin.Get it from Sephora for $75.
A creamy, whitecast-free formula
Creamy and goopy are often synonymous when it comes to sunscreen formulas, but that's not the case with this quick-absorbing option from Mixsoon. It glides on seamlessly and blends even easier, providing a nice hydrating base for the rest of your skincare. Get it from Amazon for $15.
This lightweight, radiant finish SPF
A pioneer in K-beauty, Dr. Jart's science-first approach means you're getting the best of the best when it comes to sun protection. This SPF 50 formula has a liquid-y texture for a smooth application and lightweight coverage — perfect for all skin types, oily included.Get it from Amazon for $44.
A green tea sunscreen
You know the brand for their playful aesthetics and effective sheet masks, but this sunscreen from Tonymoly will quickly earn top-tier status in your skincare drawer. The reason lies in the 0.5% green tea extract, which protects against sun damage, pollution and skin aging. The fact that it's lightweight and layers well underneath makeup doesn't hurt, either.Get it from Ulta for $20.
This hydrating yet non-greasy formula
Hydrating but not greasy, lightweight but protective — this sunscreen from Laneige checks all the boxes. Chock-full of nourishing ingredients like glycerin, mineral water and centella asiatica, the cast-free formula will be something you actually look forward to applying.Get it from Amazon for $30.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
The Intersection of Art and Beauty: Discover What Sets Doku Clinic Apart
ISTANBUL, TR / ACCESS Newswire / June 30, 2025 / Aesthetic operations significantly influence self-confidence and quality of life in today's environment, when beauty is increasingly individual and comprehensive. Doku Clinic, located in the center of Istanbul, is one of the top institutes in this discipline. The clinic has grown in popularity among patients from all over the world who are looking for exceptional outcomes in body and nose aesthetics because to its skilled staff, cutting-edge equipment, and personalized approach. Why is Doku Clinic So Popular? The world-renown of Doku Clinic is due to the direction of two famous doctors: The individualized care that patients receive at Doku Clinic is what makes it stand out. Anatomical details, skin type, and aesthetic objectives inform the development of individualized treatment programs for each patient. Every time, you can count on enduring, harmonic, and all-natural results. Dr. Engin Öcal: A Master of Precision in Shaping Beauty Breast augmentation, liposuction, stomach tucks (abdominoplasty), and Brazilian butt lifts (BBLs) are just a few of the popular cosmetic operations that improve patients' physical appearance and sense of self-worth. With each metamorphosis, Dr. Engin Öcal infuses a creative vision with therapeutic accuracy. Patients who want a natural look that complements their body proportions have come to trust Doku Clinic because of his approach to breast augmentation Turkey. To guarantee maximum satisfaction, minimal scarring, and quick recovery, Dr. Öcal takes into account each patient's unique anatomy and lifestyle when choosing implant size, shape, and placement. Restoring one's femininity and self-esteem are important goals for many people undergoing the operation. Dr. Serhan Derin's Functional Beauty Program Rhinoplasty, which aims to restore nasal airflow while simultaneously improving the patient's face features, is one of the most intricate and life-altering cosmetic procedures. Renowned for his skill in customizing each nose surgery to match each patient's unique face anatomy and medical requirements, Dr. Serhan Derin is a frontrunner in this profession. No matter the kind of rhinoplasty -primary, revision, or ethnic-Dr. Derin always aims to create delicate, natural-looking noses that complement the patient's overall characteristics. Simultaneously, he fixes any respiratory problems, which greatly enhances quality of life. His dedication to natural aesthetics and individualized care is right on trend with the current movement away from 'overdone' outcomes and toward embracing one's own unique beauty. What Made Amanda Du Pont, Alessia Spagnulo, and Priscila Da Silva Choose Doku Clinic for Their Breast Aesthetics? A Global Trust-Building Story The worldwide influencers who candidly document their beauty adventures on social media have contributed to the growing international prominence of Doku Clinic. These women, who have millions of followers, opted for a single, game-changing operation at Doku Clinic. Amanda Du Pont, a content producer and actress from South Africa, traveled all the way to Istanbul to have Doku Clinic implant natural breast implants. She was very complimentary of the clinic's welcoming atmosphere, the exceptional quality of service, and the organic outcomes that Dr. Engin Öcal had accomplished. In an honest review, Amanda praised Doku Clinic and encouraged her followers to make an informed decision. Italian fashion influencer Alessia Spagnulo has decided to have breast implants at Doku Clinic after much deliberation. Following the treatment, she enthusiastically recounted how it boosted her self-esteem and physical attractiveness. In particular, she lauded the individualized attention and the flattering effect on her figure. In order to get a more harmonious body type, fitness and lifestyle blogger Priscila Da Silva had breast implants in Turkey. From the initial consultation before the procedure to the healing process, she wrote about how pleasant and reassuring the entire experience was. Doku Clinic, she said, 'makes you feel reborn.' Transforming Your Look Without Incisions: Experience at the Doku Clinic For people from across the world seeking a unique medical tourism experience, Doku Clinic is more than just a place to get medical treatments done. Airport transportation, hotel stays, translation assistance, pre- and post-operative consultations, and individualized follow-ups are all part of their VIP service packages. The cutting-edge operating rooms of Doku Clinic prioritize cleanliness and patient safety, and they have received approval from the Ministry of Health to conduct all surgical procedures. Regular check-ins and medical advice ensure that patients are properly followed throughout their recovery process. Elegance and Self-Assurance, Harmoniously Satisfied Restoring self-esteem and confidence are two of the many benefits of cosmetic surgery, which goes beyond only improving one's physical look. Patients are more than simply another number at Doku Clinic; they are companions on a path to healing and personal growth. Science, artistry, and ethical care come together at Doku Clinic, where patients may have a variety of cosmetic procedures such as breast augmentation, rhinoplasty, body contouring, and non-surgical skin treatments. Finally, Istanbul's Most Reliable Spot for Travelers Seeking Beauty The cosmetic makeover you seek may begin at Doku Clinic if you are seeking natural, balanced, and long-lasting results. As a frontrunner in aesthetic innovation, the clinic has achieved global success in breast aesthetics, achieved technical mastery in nose surgery, and provides an unsurpassed patient experience. Ready to start your aesthetic journey? Meet Doku Clinic -where beauty and confidence meet. Media Contact: Doku Clinic Email: [email protected] Phone: +90 555 140 04 04 Website: Address: Merkez Mah. İstiklal Sok. No:9 Şişli, İstanbul/Türkiye SOURCE: Doku Clinic press release
UPI
5 hours ago
- UPI
Supreme Court tells lower courts to revisit pro-transgender decisions
On Monday, the high court ordered lower courts to review appellate decisions involving transgender people. This came after the justices' ruling last week banned gender-affirming care for minors. File Photo (2024) by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo June 30 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ordered lower courts to review appellate decisions involving transgender people after the justices' ruling last week banned gender-affirming care for minors. On the final day of Pride Month, the high court threw out decisions from Idaho, North Carolina, Oklahoma and West Virginia. Three cases involved gender-affirming care by government-sponsored insurance and sex changes on birth certificates. In a 6-3 opinion on June 18, the Supreme Court issued a ruling on a case from Tennessee. Three transgender adolescents, their families and a Memphis-based medical provider filed suit against a state law banning gender-affirming hormone therapies for transgender people under 18. The appellate courts had determined restrictions on transgender people imposed by the states violate the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause. On Monday, the Supreme Court ordered the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., to review its decision that West Virginia's and North Carolina's refusal to cover certain healthcare for transgender people with government-sponsored insurance is discriminatory. In San Francisco, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was ordered to reconsider voting against a ban on certain surgical procedures for Medicaid recipients. For Kentucky, the justices rejected the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals backing transgender minors and their families challenging that state's ban on gender-affirming care. In Denver, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver must review its ruling blocking an Oklahoma ban on people changing their gender on birth certificates. The justices didn't consider cases from Arizona, Idaho and West Virginia involving the participation of transgender students on school sports teams. By Thursday, the court can decide whether to take up this issue in the next term. Federal appeals courts barred those states from enforcing their bans against students who sued. President Donald Trump in February signed an executive order banning transgender women from competing on women's teams. Trump signed an executive order in January banning transgender individuals from serving in the U.S. military. In February, the Defense Department ordered an immediate pause on gender-affirming medical care for all active-duty service members and said the military will no longer accept transgender recruits with gender dysphoria.
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Insurer Blue Shield of California's new parent company alarms consumer advocates
Last year, regulators approved a request by Blue Shield of California, the state's third-largest health insurer, to restructure and establish a new parent corporation in Delaware. The Oakland-based nonprofit got the go-ahead from the Department of Managed Health Care, or DMHC, to create an entity called Ascendiun Inc., which is now the out-of-state corporate parent of Blue Shield. The insurer said that the restructuring would allow it to better serve its members "with less bureaucracy and faster results, while making health care more affordable." But the transaction has raised alarm among a former high-level Blue Shield executive and consumer advocates, who complain that it was carried out with no public oversight and could allow the insurer to transfer money to a Delaware parent company with few strings attached. The activists claim that some of that money could be used to boost its spending on charitable endeavors. The company has accrued a surplus of more than $4 billion over the decades as it benefited from its former tax-exempt status, according to a regulatory filing. "The move guts the ability of the DHMC to enforce Blue Shield's nonprofit obligations to the California public and gives Blue Shield's directors ... a virtually free hand to make use of Blue Shield's billions of dollars in charitable assets as they please," wrote Michael Johnson, the insurer's former director of public policy, in a recent letter to Mary Watanabe, director of the department, which was reviewed by The Times. Johnson is calling for the department to rescind its approval and unwind the restructuring. The department maintains that the insurer is not subject to charitable trust rules as a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation. In a statement, the department said it "maintains full regulatory authority and enforcement of all Blue Shield of California health plan operations," and reviewed the transaction to ensure that it will not harm the plan's financial viability. Blue Shield's restructuring is reviving a longstanding debate about whether one of the state's largest insurers is reinvesting enough of its profit to lower its rates, better serve low-income residents and provide coverage for underserved areas of the state. Controversy over the company's role as a nonprofit previously aired in 2015 as it sought approval from the department for its $1.2-billion purchase of Care1st, a Medicaid health plan. Blue Shield has disputed Johnson's claims, noting that the state has determined it is not subject to the rules governing charitable nonprofits. In the Jan. 8 announcement of its restructuring, Blue Shield also disclosed that it was forming a for-profit subsidiary called Stellarus that would provide services to other health plans, such as delivering drugs to patients more inexpensively than pharmacy benefit managers. Ascendiun is structured as a nonprofit and Blue Shield and the company's Medi-Cal insurer, Blue Shield of California Promise Health Plan - the former Care1st - also would continue as nonprofits, the insurer said at the time. "This structure is not uncommon among health plans, as many across the country - including other nonprofit Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies - have made similar corporate reorganizations to better serve their membership," the insurer said in its statement to The Times. A scathing audit Blue Shield was established in 1939 by the California Medical Assn. as the nation's first prepaid health plan to cover physician bills. It followed the creation of the first Blue Cross plan, in Texas, to pay for hospital bills. The California insurer did not pay federal taxes until a change in the law in 1986. And it was exempt from state taxes until the Franchise Tax Board revoked that status in August 2014 after a scathing audit that The Times first reported. The audit found that Blue Shield was operating similarly to a for-profit company, with executives instructed to "maximize profitability." The tax board also found that the insurer had stockpiled "extraordinarily high surpluses" even as it failed to offer enough public benefits, such as more affordable coverage. Blue Shield denied the accusations but ultimately relinquished its tax-exempt status, even as it has continued to pursue an appeal of an order requiring it to pay more than $100 million in back taxes. Johnson contends that the new corporate structure will allow Blue Shield to move its assets around in pursuit of its business goals with little oversight beyond maintaining required reserves - especially given its parent company's incorporation in Delaware, a business-friendly state where most Fortune 500 companies are registered. The DMHC strengthened reserve requirements in approving the deal and it now totals about $2.1 billion, according to a regulatory filing, which Johnson says would allow Blue Shield to transfer about $2.4 billion to Ascendiun. Charles Bell, a healthcare advocate who was involved in last decade's debate over Blue Shield's charitable obligations, is troubled by the decision to establish an out-of-state parent. "I think that the changes in corporate structure that were made are highly concerning, and it should have received a much higher level of public scrutiny and a lot more skepticism by the Department of Managed Health Care," said Bell, advocacy programs director for Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports. The department said in its response to The Times that it "may hold public meetings if a transaction meets certain requirements to qualify as a major transaction. Upon due consideration, the Department determined that the specific facts of this restructuring did not meet the criteria set out in law to hold a public meeting." A long history of restructuring Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans have a long history of restructuring, including Blue Cross of California. That insurer broke ground when in 1993 it spun off a recently established for-profit subsidiary, Wellpoint Health Networks. Blue Cross was later required to distribute $3.2 billion to a pair of new nonprofits, the California Endowment and the California Health Care Foundation, which are still operating. Less than a decade later, Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans in more than dozen other states had converted to for-profits, typically highly controversial proposals, given questions about what was to become of their billions of dollars of assets. More recently, the nonprofits have converted into mutual insurance holding companies. That allows them to maintain their nonprofit status while funding for-profit ventures, such as in technology, said Brendan Bridgeland, an attorney with the Center for Insurance Research in Cambridge, Mass. What is unusual about Blue Shield of California's restructuring, he said, is that the DMHC allowed it to establish an out-of-state parent company. "Once you reach the point where the subsidiary starts transferring money up to the parent and it gets reallocated, then it's going to be out of their control," Bridgeland said. Johnson's concerns are rooted in efforts last decade by healthcare advocates to have Blue Shield declared a charitable organization and to dig into its assets to improve patient care as a condition of its approval to acquire Care1st. Johnson worked at Blue Shield from 2003 until 2015, when he resigned to mount a public campaign to pressure the insurer over its nonprofit mission. Johnson has been involved in litigation with his former employer, which sued him in 2015 alleging he disclosed confidential information, including Blue Shield's communications with the Franchise Tax Board. In a settlement, he agreed to no longer retain or disseminate such documents. In seeking to retain its state tax-exemption during its audit by the board, which began in 2013, Blue Shield argued that should it dissolve, its assets could be distributed only to another nonprofit. Yet, the insurer told the DMHC, when the agency reviewed the proposed acquisition in 2015, that as a nonprofit mutual-benefit corporation it served only its enrollees and had no such obligations. Ultimately, the department decided that Blue Shield did not have the charitable obligations though it required the insurer, in approving the acquisition that year, to refrain from making "misleading or inconsistent" statements regarding the distribution of its assets if it ever were dissolved. "Through this process there have been inconsistencies in what Blue Shield has said. It was frustrating because we had to spend a lot of time and energy to make sure what was true," the department's then director, Shelley Rouillard, said at the time. A pledge to spend more on patient care The insurer pledged as part of the Care1st acquisition to spend $200 million over the next decade on several initiatives aimed at providing better patient care. Nevertheless, patient advocates criticized the DMHC's finding that Blue Shield did not have charitable obligations, saying the state lost the opportunity to regulate how the insurer spent its billions in assets - and then failed to impose tougher conditions on the insurer, such as limiting its ability to impose rate increases deemed unreasonable. In his March letter, Johnson called on the DMHC to require Blue Shield to spend annually at least 5% of its total assets on community benefits, which might go, for example, to grants to community clinics in underserved areas of the state. Blue Shield defended its charitable spending, noting that it caps its annual profit at 2% and allocates additional revenue to such services as delivering COVID vaccines at no cost to the state, and funding nonprofits that advance mental health. "Blue Shield … has consistently supported its members and California communities throughout the state," the company said. Johnson also contends newly public documents show Blue Shield has continued to argue before state tax authorities that it is a charitable trust. In the opening brief of its back taxes case in 2020, the insurer cites a state Supreme Court case that it said confirms "Blue Shield operates exclusively for the promotion of social welfare," his letter notes. Blue Shield told The Times that it has provided "consistent information to DMHC about its corporate restructuring" and that Johnson's letter provided "no new evidence" regarding Blue Shield's status as a "tax-paying not-for-profit mutual benefit corporation." Johnson and the DMHC traded additional letters last week, with Johnson questioning why the department had not reviewed the new tax appeal documents or why they had not reviewed Ascendiun's articles of incorporation or bylaws prior to approving the restructuring. Janet Rickershauser, a nonprofits lawyer at Hurwit & Associates, said that the bylaws are important to understanding the parent company's operations, including the relationship of the subsidiaries to each other and the holding parent company. In a letter sent June 23 to Johnson, Jonathon Williams, an assistant chief counsel at the DMHC, said the department concluded it was "not necessary or appropriate" to review the tax-appeal documents in its review of Blue Shield's application to restructure nor conduct a "full evaluation of Delaware's corporation statutory scheme." The department told The Times that it conducted a "comprehensive review" of the articles of incorporation of Blue Shield and its Medicaid Promise Health Plan as required by state law. Although it did not review Ascendiun's bylaws or articles of incorporation, the department said it retained its regulatory authority over Blue Shield. Blue Shield said it would not release it bylaws because they are "confidential company documents." However, Rickershauser said that "hiding the ball on the bylaws is preventing transparency into important aspects of how they're operating." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
