Yoshua Bengio launches LawZero to advance safe-by-design AI
LawZero was established in response to mounting concerns over the capabilities and behaviours of current frontier AI models, including tendencies toward deception, self-preservation, and goal misalignment.
Its mission is to mitigate risks such as algorithmic bias, deliberate misuse, and the potential loss of human control over advanced AI systems, the organisation said in a statement.
The nonprofit structure of LawZero is intended to shield the organisation from market and political pressures that could undermine its safety objectives.
As president and scientific director at the organisation, Bengio will lead a group of over 15 researchers in developing a novel technical solution, named Scientist AI.
Unlike agentic AI systems currently being pursued by frontier companies, Scientist AI is designed to be non-agentic.
It will focus on understanding the world rather than acting within it, offering transparent and truthful responses grounded in external reasoning.
Potential applications include providing oversight for agentic systems, contributing to scientific discovery, and enhancing the understanding of AI risks.
The initiative launched with $30m in funding from several backers, including a philanthropic arm of former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Skype co-founder Jaan Tallinn, Bloomberg reported.
A professor of computer science at the Université de Montréal, Bengio is recognised as one of the pioneers of modern AI, alongside Geoffrey Hinton and Yann LeCun.
Bengio said: 'LawZero is the result of the new scientific direction I undertook in 2023, after recognising the rapid progress made by private labs toward Artificial General Intelligence and beyond, as well as its profound implications for humanity.
'Current frontier systems are already showing signs of self-preservation and deceptive behaviours, and this will only accelerate as their capabilities and degree of agency increase. LawZero is my team's constructive response to these challenges.
'It's an approach to AI that is not only powerful but also fundamentally safe. At LawZero, we believe that at the heart of every AI frontier system, there should be one guiding principle above all: The protection of human joy and endeavour."
"Yoshua Bengio launches LawZero to advance safe-by-design AI" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
42 minutes ago
- Android Authority
5 reasons why Google's Pixel software is better than Samsung's One UI
Aamir Siddiqui / Android Authority Sorry, Samsung, but I've always been a Pixel fan. Although I've appreciated a Galaxy device here and there and had a soft spot for Samsung's hardware ever since I brought home the Galaxy S10 at the end of college, I've always been happiest with a Google device in my pocket. For a while, I wasn't quite sure why I felt so strongly about preferring Google's experience over Samsung's, but after a few recent updates, I've come around to a simple fact: Google's Pixel software is just so much better than One UI, and here's why. Which Android experience do you prefer? 0 votes Pixel UI NaN % One UI NaN % Give me Google's camera app any day It's no secret that I love Google's approach to image processing. If we've written about it once, we've done it a hundred times. I've hyped it up in Pixel reviews across all price points, and it's been a consistent through line ever since I upgraded to the Pixel 5. What got me in the door, though, was the fact that I never had to think twice about using Google's camera app. The Pixel camera app has been a fire-and-forget way to capture my life for as long as I can remember. Yes, long-overdue manual controls were added along the way, but they never felt quite as essential to the overall experience as Samsung's controls. See, although I'll fiddle with the manual settings on my beloved Fujifilm mirrorless cameras until I get things right, I'd much rather snap a quick photo with my phone and have it back in my pocket. I view my mirrorless options as intentional, while my phone takes on an everyday role. When that's my goal, Google's Pixel software beats Samsung's One UI any day. Google's approach to everything from panoramas to motion is more straightforward, and I know that the image I open in Photos will probably look much closer to what I had in mind. Samsung, on the other hand, tends to add motion blur when I don't want it, and its approach to astrophotography is to make me set a timer and hope for the best, which isn't my forte. I respect that Samsung probably offers a better experience for photographers who want granular control over their shots, but that's not usually me. I only need one of everything, thanks Ryan Haines / Android Authority You'll probably notice a common theme in most of the things I prefer about Google's Pixel UI over One UI: simplicity. Although smartphones are my day job, I still like to keep some of my interactions with them quick and efficient, and it's easier to do that when I only have one of each type of app. That means one email client, one cloud storage platform, and one internet browser. Unfortunately, Samsung just doesn't roll that way. Whenever I set up a new Galaxy phone, I have to stop and take stock of how much bloatware shows up by default. I have to figure out a quick way to push the included Microsoft apps off to the side, dump the extras like Facebook, and ensure that my images back up to Google Photos rather than Samsung's own Gallery. It doesn't usually take too long for me to get things the way I'd like them, but it's more of a hiccup than I've ever had with setting up a new Pixel. Whenever I set up a new Galaxy phone, I have to stop and take stock of how much bloatware shows up by default. I'd extend that simplicity to other parts of my Pixel interface, especially the app drawer. I've always found it easier to swipe up once and know that everything I've installed is perfectly alphabetized, which is much easier in Google's standard interface. Yes, you can finally flip the app drawer from horizontal to vertical on your Galaxy device, but it took far too long for Samsung to pick up what I think is an essential feature — and it took almost as long for me to figure out where that setting was hidden in the app drawer interface. Menus that don't make my head spin I have to give Samsung at least some credit for its nearly endless customization options. I love that I can swap my Galaxy launcher to something cleaner and simpler like LawnChair, which, unsurprisingly, looks and feels like Google's Pixel UI. I also have endless fun with new icon packs whenever I get tired of the default look. However, it usually takes jumping through one or two hoops too many for me to reach such a point. In some ways, Google's Pixel UI is pretty locked down by comparison, and I don't mind admitting that. I know I can't load up something like DIY Home to put apps, widgets, and random geometric shapes anywhere I want them, but I don't have the patience for that level of personalizing anyway. I'd much rather tap into one set of menus to swap out the clock on my always-on display and change the lock screen shortcuts than even think about downloading Good Lock or worrying about how my apps will show up on the cover screen of a foldable phone. Perhaps the best example of One UI making my head spin is when Samsung split its notification shade from its quick settings panel. I chose to separate them before I realized what I was doing, only to spend about half an hour looking for the correct option to reunite them — it's the pencil icon in the quick settings menu, if you were curious. Google's Pixel exclusives fit perfectly into my lifestyle Ryan Haines / Android Authority While I know that some Android fans prefer Samsung's carefully customizable extras, I've spent enough time with Google's Pixel exclusives that I'm not sure how I could ever change. I still use Now Playing just as often as I did when I first activated it on my Pixel 5, and I can't even tell you how many spam calls I've escaped with a bit of help from Call Screen. It's gotten so good that even Apple is out to copy Google's style, which is saying something. Apps like Pixel Weather and Pixel Studio are better, too, for my needs. I don't usually like to make AI-generated images out of my friends, so I'm happy to add text prompts and change art styles until Google gives me something I'm pleased with. And yes, I know that Samsung's Drawing Assist has come a long way now that it lets you enter prompts and keeps elements of your original backgrounds, but it still feels more limited for my liking. While I haven't taken a shine to more recent additions like Pixel Screenshots in exactly the same way, I like where Google's head is at. I like having the option to organize my screenshots into easily searchable collections like I can do with Nothing's Essential Space, but I also trust the setup within Google Photos because I'm more of an 'open 30 tabs' guy than a 'take 30 screenshots' guy. Samsung's one-two punch of the Now Brief and Now Bar is fine, but I use one much more than the other. I appreciate the frequent sports updates, media controls, and the status of my routines in the Now Bar, which Google has added to Android 16 as Live Updates, but I can't say I check the Now Brief more than once a day, which isn't enough for an ever-present home screen widget. A Pixel update has never left a bad taste in my mouth Ryan Haines / Android Authority No matter what Samsung does to One UI, I think the one advantage that Google will always have is faster updates. As the creator of Android, it's easier for Google to optimize its Pixel lineup, meaning that new versions like Android 15 and Android 16 can land weeks (or even months) ahead of Samsung. And, if you still doubt that, look no further than the mess that was One UI 7. If you'll recall, Samsung started its Android 15 rollout pretty quickly. Sure, a few months behind Google, but it seemed like it was getting up to speed quickly. Then, it stopped. Bugs began to appear, battery life began to tank, and users started complaining. So, Samsung went back to the drawing board to figure out what might have gone wrong. The rollout started again after a decent little delay, but it felt like the damage was mostly done. My colleague Joe Maring wrote that he wasn't sure he could easily recommend Samsung phones after the stumble, and I tended to agree with him. One advantage that Google will always have is faster updates. These days, I'd say Samsung has fixed its flawed One UI 7 update, but it's done so just in time for everyone to turn their attention to One UI 8. I'm impatiently waiting to see how it handles the stable update (we're only in the second public beta right now), and simply hoping for the best. But, even if all goes well, I'd have to imagine I'll be sticking with the Pixel 9 Pro that's already in my pocket… and already running Android 16.
TechCrunch
an hour ago
- TechCrunch
Google rolls out its new Veo 3 video generation model globally
In Brief Google on Thursday said it has begun rolling out its Veo 3 video generation model to Gemini users in more than 159 countries. Video generation via the new model is available only to paying subscribers of Google's AI Pro plan, and is capped at 3 videos per day. Veo 3, which Google showed off in May, lets users to generate videos up to 8 seconds long using text prompts. Google's Josh Woodward has said that the company is working on adding image-to-video generation capabilities to Gemini.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
The 'late-night decision' that led to ChatGPT's name
"Chat with GPT-3.5" doesn't really roll off the tongue, but it's almost what OpenAI named ChatGPT. On the latest episode of the OpenAI podcast, two leadersinvolved with the chatbot's development, research chief Mark Chen and head of ChatGPT Nick Turley, spoke about the days leading up to the launch that made the tool go viral. "It was going to be Chat with GPT-3.5, and we had a late-night decision to simplify" the name, Turley said on the podcast published July 1. The team made the name change the day before the version's late 2022 launch, he said. "We realized that that would be hard to pronounce and came up with a great name instead," Turley said. They settled on ChatGPT, short for "generative pre-trained transformer." Since then, ChatGPT has gained millions of users who turn to the chatbot for everything from routine web searches to guidance on how to give a friend career advice. Rivals, including Meta AI, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek, have also sprung up. Before ChatGPT's launch, few within OpenAI expected the name to be so consequential, said Andrew Mayne, the podcast host and OpenAI's former science communicator. He said the chatbot's capabilities were largely similar to those of previous versions. The main differences included a more user-friendly interface and, of course, the name. "It's the same thing, but we just put the interface in here and made it so you didn't have to prompt as much," Mayne said on the podcast. After OpenAI launched ChatGPT, though, the chatbot took off, with Reddit users as far away as Japan experimenting with it, Turley said. It soon became clear that ChatGPT's popularity wasn't going to fade quickly and that the tool was "going to change the world," he said. "We've had so many launches, so many previews over time, and this one really was something else," Chen said on the podcast. ChatGPT's success represented another kind of milestone for Chen: "My parents just stopped asking me to go work for Google," he said.
