Fraud investigation into Venezuelan man accused of posing as teen at Ohio high school is ‘tip of the iceberg,' says police chief
Perrysburg Police Chief Pat Jones told FOX 8 News on Wednesday that a big part of the department's investigation is now focused on interactions the man may have had with minor students while attending the school, where his alleged deception went undetected by local, state and federal agencies for more than a year and a half.
Local humane agents give health update on puppy that was brutally stabbed
'We're kind of taking a very deliberate deep dive into everything. This is a unique case. We haven't seen anything like this before,' Jones said.
'Obviously, one of our concerns is we have a 24-year-old man who is in school with teenagers. We're looking at what type of interactions were there and what type of relations were formed,' he continued. 'We're trying to talk to different students and see what information we have. There are a lot of rumors around, so we have to figure out what's fact or fiction.'
Federal immigration authorities and the FBI are now involved, as numerous questions abound, like how the man appears to have obtained two Ohio driver's licenses — one of a type given to residents under 18, and another given to adults, each with a different birth date, Jones said.
A state lawmaker who lives in the school district on Wednesday called it a 'deeply troubling breakdown of safeguards' against this kind of fraud. He said he's now seeking answers from state public safety and federal immigration officials.
Anthony E. Labrador Sierra, arrested by city police on Monday, is a 24-year-old Venezuelan national who's been in the United States illegally since March 24, 2020, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The department announced Wednesday that U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, has ordered him to be detained.
Perrysburg Schools Superintendent Tom Hosler, in a Wednesday update to district families, said Labrador Sierra 'went to extraordinary lengths to conceal his identity,' using forged documents to obtain an Ohio driver's license and a Social Security number and working with immigration attorneys to receive Temporary Protected Status through U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
A previous police report states his work visa expired in 2023. That's when he enrolled at Perrysburg High School, claiming to be homeless. The Wood County Juvenile Court placed him in guardianship with a local family.
Labrador Sierra worked with immigration attorneys to get Temporary Protected Status, which was granted through U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Labrador Sierra reportedly told the school he had been a victim of human trafficking when enrolling at the high school, claiming to be a homeless 16-year-old.
'What's most heartbreaking is how our staff and community responded to a young person who said he was in need — with compassion. They believed they were helping a child who had suffered trauma,' Hosler wrote on Wednesday. 'That trust was broken — but how we responded says everything about who we are.'
Labrador Sierra was enrolled in the school district from Jan. 11, 2024, to May 14, 2025. That's when the school district began questioning the man's identity, after a woman contacted his guardian family, claiming he was not a teenager and was actually an adult and the father of her child, according to police.
School officials investigated social media posts from people claiming to be his family members. They then contacted Perrysburg police, leading to his arrest on Monday, May 19.
'That's crazy': Struggling CMSD sent kids to Disney World, I-Team learns
Hosler said Wednesday that a decades-old federal law ensuring children experiencing homelessness are granted a public education requires schools to bypass the usual paperwork when enrolling unaccompanied minors, like Labrador Sierra claimed to be.
The district sought out his birth certificate, even though it wasn't required to, Hosler said. They also located his former school, which he claimed to have attended in Venezuela, and found it had closed.
'I want to emphasize this: Immediately upon learning that this student may have concealed his identity and misled us, we acted. We met with the student and he was then not permitted on any school property while we investigated. Very shortly after, we contacted law enforcement,' Hosler said.
'Nothing is more important than the safety and security of our students. When we learn of a concerning situation, we act.'
The school district has enrolled more than 100 international students over the last three years, said Hosler, and its cases are often complex. In Labrador Sierra's case, the district's attorneys assured school officials were following the law.
The man even played on the school's JV soccer and swim teams, according to the school district. That was reported to the Ohio High School Athletics Association.
In a statement to FOX 8 News on Wednesday, the association said the school 'had no way of knowing/combating this falsification.'
Labrador Sierra's birth certificate, now believed to be fake, is what landed him in the Wood County jail on Monday on a felony count of forgery, Jones said. But there's much more ground to cover in the criminal investigation, he said.
'We believe that's just the tip of the iceberg,' he said.
Jones added the police department hasn't received any direct reports of misconduct involving Labrador Sierra.
'I get goosebumps when I hear that my 16-year-old daughter could be in the same class as a 24-year-old man,' said immigration attorney Margaret Wong, speaking to FOX 8 News on Wednesday.
County, city withdraw from several GCP committee meetings after group endorses proposed Brook Park stadium
State Rep. Haraz Ghanbari (R-Perrysburg), who resides in the school district, said he's heard his neighbors' concerns and he now has several questions for state public safety and federal immigration officials.
'I'm asking myself what anyone else is asking: How did this happen?' Ghanbari told FOX 8 News by phone on Wednesday. 'I'm not laying the blame for this at the school — I'm saying this is a systematic failure at the state, local and federal levels.'
He said he penned a letter to Ohio Department of Public Safety Director Andy Wilson questioning procedures to verify documents used to obtain Ohio identification cards — particularly for non-citizens seeking asylum or Temporary Protected Status.
The department told him a response would be forthcoming, he said.
Ghanbari also said he wonders whether the federal government's new REAL IDs, which became required for air travel earlier this month, could also be spoofed in this way by fraudsters.
He issued a statement on Tuesday that read:
If these allegations are verified, they reveal a deeply troubling breakdown in safeguards — locally, statewide and federally. The ability of an adult to embed himself in a public high school, under false pretenses and with apparent access to official documentation and legal support, demands immediate and thorough scrutiny.
Let me be unequivocally clear: the safety and well-being of our students and the wider community is our top priority. I commend those who identified and reported this situation to school officials, and I applaud the swift, decisive actions taken by law enforcement to protect our students.
The Perrysburg School District should continue to cooperate fully with all relevant authorities and support the ongoing investigation in every way possible. Additionally, this requires a careful review of their internal protocols to take every necessary step to ensure our schools remain safe, secure, and worthy of the trust our families place in them.
Furthermore, I am calling upon federal immigration and law enforcement agencies to conduct a full and transparent investigation into how Mr. Labrador Sierra was able to enter the United States, acquire federal and state documentation, and gain access to public education under false pretenses. This case highlights a critical need for enhanced collaboration between local and federal law agencies to prevent similar incidents in the future and to ensure the integrity of our borders and our institutions.
State Rep. Haraz Ghanbari (R-Perrysburg)
The school district has made counselors available to students who want to talk about the incident, said Hosler. The district also urged parents to speak with their children and encourage them to share their feelings about it.
Anyone with information regarding Labrador Sierra can call Perrysburg police at 419-872-8001.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bove vote dogged by new whistleblower complaints
Senate Democrats are seeking clarification about whether there is an ongoing investigation into Justice Department official Emil Bove after three different whistleblowers came forward with information ahead of his confirmation vote for a lifetime appointment to the bench. The request from Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) comes as a third whistleblower filed a complaint against Bove, alleging the nominee misled the Senate Judiciary Committee. Bove, previously one of Trump's personal defense lawyers, serves in the No. 3 role at the Justice Department and has been nominated to sit on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. After clearing an initial procedural hurdle, a vote on his nomination could come as soon as Tuesday night. Schiff and Booker ask the Justice Department's Office of Inspector General to confirm for lawmakers whether they have ignited an investigation into Bove. 'As the Senate approaches a final vote this week on Mr. Bove's nomination to serve as United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, it is imperative that Senators exercise their constitutional duty of advice and consent with full knowledge of Mr. Bove's actions,' they wrote. 'We therefore request that you clarify for Senators whether your office is undertaking any investigations of or related to Mr. Bove. In the event these whistleblower complaints and other reports have not already prompted investigations by your office, we urge you to undertake a thorough review of these disclosures and allegations.' They argue the three different whistleblower complaints 'paint a picture that Mr. Bove likely violated laws and Department regulations, and abused his authority while acting as one of the Department's most senior officials.' According to The Washington Post, a third whistleblower has forwarded new allegations about Bove's role in ending the prosecution of New York Mayor Eric Adams (D) on bribery charges. Prosecutors who worked the case refused to drop the charges and sign onto the dismissal notice, prompting a wave of resignations. Bove said during his confirmation hearing that the Trump administration needed Adams's cooperation on immigration matters, prompting cries from Democrats that the move was a clear quid pro quo. 'Policy reasons made it appropriate to drop the charges,' Bove said at the time. He has already been accused by whistleblower Erez Reuveni of suggesting the Justice Department defy any court orders blocking the Trump administration from deporting migrants to a foreign prison under the Alien Enemies Act, saying DOJ might have to tell the courts 'f–k you.' A second whistleblower has stepped forward with information they say corroborates Reuveni's allegations. A judge has since begun a probe into whether the Justice Department defied his order to halt or turn around flights carrying Venezuelan men deported under the Alien Enemies Act, finding probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt for willfully disobeying his order to immediately halt deportations. Bove has said he could not recall whether he used the expletive but said during his confirmation hearing that he 'certainly conveyed the importance of the upcoming operation.' Details are scarce on the third whistleblower complaint. 'A new whistleblower, whose disclosures have not been publicized, has strong evidence that Emil Bove was not truthful to the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearing for his nomination to serve on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals,' Peter Carr, a spokesman for Justice Connection said in a statement. The group, a DOJ alumni group that assists whistleblowers, was asked to release a statement on the whistleblower's behalf. 'The whistleblower has tried to share this information with Republican senators for weeks and they have not provided any response. We urge the senators to hear from this whistleblower before the final vote on his nomination.' The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment. GOP members have not stopped by Booker's office to review the documents provided by the latest whistleblower, the Post reported. Committee members asked Bove questions on a number of topics. Beyond whether he encouraged defiance of court orders, he was also asked about leading the effort to fire prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and collecting a list of FBI agents who worked on investigations into rioters. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) backed Bove out of the committee, saying that while he will not confirm those who condoned Jan. 6, he did not feel the nominee had condoned the riots. Bove advanced after an initial round of voting where Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) were the only GOP members to vote against him. Democrats previously demanded a hearing with Reuveni, but the panel's Republicans blocked it. 'Another whistleblower has come forward with evidence that raises serious concerns with Emil Bove's misconduct,' Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee said. 'This is another damning indictment of a man who should never be a federal judge—and Senate Republicans will bear full responsibility for the consequences if they rubber stamp Mr. Bove's nomination.'
Washington Post
25 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Justice Dept. escalates attacks on U.S. judge handling deportation cases
The Justice Department is escalating its attacks on the federal judge it has repeatedly clashed with during the Trump administration's efforts to deport accused Venezuelan gang members under a rarely invoked wartime law. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that her office had filed a misconduct complaint against James E. Boasberg, the chief judge of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Explained: The Misconduct Complaint Against Judge James Boasberg
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a formal misconduct complaint against Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, a prominent federal judge in Washington, D.C., accusing him of violating judicial ethics by making improper public remarks about President Donald Trump and his administration. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the move on July 28. Newsweek contacted the DOJ for comment by email outside regular working hours. Why It Matters Boasberg is presiding over Martínez v. Mayorkas, a high-profile case brought by a group of Venezuelan asylum-seekers who allege that their transfer to a Salvadoran detention facility on March 15 violated federal law and international human rights norms. The DOJ filed its complaint days after Boasberg said he was considering disciplinary proceedings against government lawyers for their conduct in that case, Reuters reported. The move raises questions about potential retaliation and the separation of powers between the judiciary and executive branch. Judge James Boasberg, the chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, at an American Board Association panel discussion at the Marriott Marquis in Washington, D.C., on April 2. Judge James Boasberg, the chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, at an American Board Association panel discussion at the Marriott Marquis in Washington, D.C., on April 2. AFP via Getty Images/Drew Angerer What To Know What Is a Judicial Misconduct Complaint? A judicial misconduct complaint is a formal allegation filed against a sitting federal judge claiming behavior that violates the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. These complaints are reviewed by the appropriate judicial council—in this case, likely the D.C. Circuit—and may lead to disciplinary actions, including reprimand, censure or even referral for impeachment in severe cases. However, most complaints are dismissed or resolved confidentially unless clear evidence of serious misconduct emerges. What Boasberg Said That Sparked the Complaint The DOJ complaint cites comments Boasberg made at the Judicial Conference in March, where he expressed concern that the Trump administration would "disregard rulings of federal courts" and trigger "a constitutional crisis." According to the complaint, Boasberg's words and conduct "erode public confidence in judicial neutrality, and warrant a formal investigation under Rule 11," which stipulates how a chief judge of a U.S. Court of Appeals should respond when a judicial misconduct or disability complaint is filed. The department said the judge's remarks undermined the appearance of judicial neutrality and breached ethical standards requiring judges to avoid political commentary. What the Complaint Against Boasberg Says According to the court document obtained by Newsweek, the DOJ has accused Boasberg of violating Canon 1, Canon 2(A) and Canon 3(A)(6) of the judicial code, which prohibit judges from making "public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court" and require them to maintain impartiality and "uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary." The complaint further said Boasberg's conduct had called into question the integrity of pending proceedings and eroded public confidence in the judiciary's ability to fairly adjudicate matters involving the executive branch. What People are Saying Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X on Monday: "Today at my direction, the Justice Department filed a misconduct complaint against U.S. District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg for making improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration. These comments have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will not stand for that." What Happens Next The complaint signals a sharp escalation in the broader institutional conflict between Trump's Justice Department and federal courts handling cases related to his administration's policies.
