SAHRC reports Operation Dudula's activities to Hawks
The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) says it has alerted the National Commissioner of Police, Fannie Masemola, and the Hawks regarding Operation Dudula's planned activities for 16 June.
On Friday, Operation Dudula took to their Facebook page, calling on the public to join their operation in Rosettenville, 'as we will be reclaiming Rosettenville hijacked properties from illegal foreigners'.
'It has been discovered that one illegal Nigerian foreigner has hijacked over 100 properties, while an undisclosed number of white people have allegedly been murdered in the process,' it claimed.
ALSO READ: Operation Dudula vows to remove foreign shop owners from Ekurhuleni
'We are fighting for space with our siblings in small houses, yet foreigners are comfortable in hijacked properties. Those are our RDPs.'
The meeting point for the operation is Rosettenville at the Moffettview police station at 9am.
SAHRC: 'We alerted police'
The SAHRC said on Sunday that it had taken note of the social media posts and alerted Masemola.
'We have already alerted the National Commissioner of Police and will keep these calls under close watch, reserving the right to pursue charges under the Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020 should they amount to criminal incitement,' it said.
'While the Commission does not dismiss genuine grievances about crime or service delivery, we remind the public that freedom of expression does not extend to speech that incites hatred or violence.
'Citizens are encouraged to report any alleged criminal or unlawful activity to Saps and other competent authorities rather than taking the law into their own hands, and to consult the SAHRC Social Media Charter for guidance on responsible online conduct.
ALSO READ: Operation Dudula tells immigrants to get healthcare 'in their own countries'
'Together with law-enforcement agencies and civil-society partners, the SAHRC will continue to safeguard the dignity, equality and security of every person in South Africa.
'The Commission is encouraged by the confirmation by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation, Hawks, that it will urgently look into this matter.'
However, Operation Dudula says it is not a violent organisation.
'We just want to remind SAHRC that Operation Dudula is a peaceful organisation helping illegal foreigners go back to their countries and develop them. We are good Samaritans,' it said in response to the SAHRC.
Case against Operation Dudula
Last week, the High Court in Johannesburg heard arguments presented on behalf of Kopanang Africa Against Xenophobia (KAAX), the South African Informal Traders Forum (SAITF), the Inner City Federation (ICF), and Abahlali baseMjondolo, challenging the alleged xenophobic and racist speech and conduct of Operation Dudula.
Legal counsel Jason Brickhill, for the NGOs, accused Operation Dudula of harassing and intimidating foreigners by demanding to verify identity documents, forcing businesses to close, preventing informal traders from operating, evicting people from their homes without a court order, wearing uniforms that resemble those of the police or the military, denying people access to health care or education by removing students and teachers from schools based on of nationality.
The applicants also challenged the constitutional validity of Section 41 of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002, to the extent that its application is not confined to public spaces, authorising warrantless searches in private places that include the home and places of study, work, and/or business; and to the extent that it does not require an immigration officer or police officer to hold a reasonable suspicion that a person is unlawfully in South Africa before requesting such persons to identify themselves as a citizen, permanent resident, refugee, asylum seeker or undocumented migrant.
Judgment was reserved.
READ NEXT: NGOs say foreigners in SA told to return to their countries when opening cases against Operation Dudula
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
R3 million dating scam case postponed after lawyer's no-show in court
Gabriel Okori, Justice Motsamai Khanyapa, and Thabo Derrick Mnguni were arrested in connection with a scam where a woman lost R3 million to an online love. Image: Hawks Three men have appeared in court after they were arrested by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation, also known as the Hawks, for defrauding an unsuspecting woman of her R3 million in a dating scam. Last week, IOL reported that a third suspect was arrested for an intense scam where an unidentified woman lost R3 million in the name of love, back in 2024. The victim, whose identity is withheld to protect her from victimisation, said she developed an online relationship with a person she believed was a white man called 'Mark Hermanus', whom she had met on Facebook. Gauteng Hawks spokesperson Warrant Officer Thatohatsi Mavimbela said after exchanging numbers, the woman and the scammer started chatting on WhatsApp, and once they had 'gotten to know each other", the scammer asked her to lend him money to pay the medical bills of his sick son. But these weren't modest medical bills, and the unsuspecting woman eventually parted with R3 million, which she deposited into two bank accounts. After the crime was reported to the Hawks' Serious Commercial Crime Investigation Unit, an investigation ensued and the first suspect, Gabriel Okori, was arrested in Cape Town in October 2024. Okori, a Nigerian national, was in November released on bail of R5,000 in November. Okori has been attending his court appearances on charges of fraud and theft. In March, IOL reported that a second suspect, Justice Motsamai Khanyapa, was arrested in connection with the scam. Khanyapa was arrested in Orange Farm, Johannesburg, and he was released on bail of R1,000 by the Pretoria Magistrate's Court. A third suspect, Thabo Derrick Mnguni, was arrested on 23 June. Thabo Derrick Mnguni was arrested on 23 June as the third suspect. Image: Hawks All three accused men - Okori, Khanyapa, and Mnguni have appeared before court on Tuesday, and the case was postponed as Mnguni did not have legal representation. Mnguni was schduled to apply for bail. Okori and Khanyapa are already on bail. "The lawyer for the third suspect did not show up in court. The matter was postponed to 9 July 2025," said Mavimbela. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel According to the Hawks, the money defrauded from the unsuspecting woman had been deposited into the bank accounts of Khanyapa and Mnguni. Meanwhile, head of the Hawks in Gauteng, Major General Ebrahim Kadwa, commended the 'meticulous investigation' conducted by the investigating team, and cautioned members of the public to be vigilant and safeguard themselves against such scams.
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Fixing SA's water crisis starts with accountability
Sabotage, failing infrastructure and poor municipal oversight are pushing South Africa towards a full-blown water disaster. Blairgowrie residents collect water from a water tanker, 12 March 2024, across the road from the Blairgowrie Plaza, as large parts of Johannesburg struggle with no water for a number of days. Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen In a country where access to water is a constitutional right, South Africans are increasingly finding themselves at the mercy of dry taps, leaking and bursting pipes and failing infrastructure. Behind localised water crisis lies a story of growing deliberate sabotage, entrenched corruption and systemic neglect. The SA Human Rights Commission (SAHRC), in its recent policy brief, paints a grim picture of how 'water mafias,' vandalism and institutional failures have combined to erode the water systems and public trust. According to the latest statistics, 77.1% of households have access to an improved water source (2024) – down from 80.4% in 2023. For many communities, even this access is unreliable or nonexistent for months due to theft, nonfunctioning infrastructure and even failure to deliver water tanks. Some in the City of Joburg have gone without water for weeks with poor communication regarding the location of stationary or roaming water tankers. Compounding the issue is high water demands and non-revenue water – treated water lost to leaks, illegal connections and poor revenue collection. Estimates suggest that 40%-50% – or more – of water is lost before reaching consumers, a staggering inefficiency. ALSO READ: Joburg's water woes continue with some reservoirs at critical levels The Presidential Water And Sanitation Indaba and the recent SAHRC report highlight a troubling trend: the deliberate destruction and manipulation of water infrastructure by criminal syndicates for profit. These 'water mafias' exploit infrastructure failures for profit. In parts of Gauteng, syndicates are reportedly closing valves, damaging pipelines and disrupting pump stations – only to resell water through tankers at inflated prices. Residents are forced to pay these informal suppliers while municipal systems remain crippled by the very sabotage that created the demand. Vulnerable, poor and rural communities bear the brunt of these disruptions, often going days or weeks without safe, potable water. Public health risks are rising, hygiene suffers and frustration mounts. The effects are not theoretical – they can be deadly. In 2023, a cholera outbreak in Hammanskraal led to at least 20 deaths, traced to contaminated and poorly treated water. In a nation where water infrastructure is failing, with poor oversight at municipal level, the chance for such outbreaks become more likely. Economically, the water crisis undermines productivity, business continuity and investor confidence. ALSO READ: Bottled water demand spikes amid outages, here's how much it costs at 6 stockists When water is scarce or unpredictable, industry slows, agriculture suffers and job security weakens. For a developing economy already facing instabilities, the water crisis adds yet another layer of systemic risk. The SAHRC report rightly identifies persistent dysfunction with 105 water service authorities, legally tasked with ensuring affordable, efficient and sustainable access to basic water and sanitation services. Yet many municipalities' procurement processes remain vulnerable to manipulation and political interference. Maintenance budgets are often cut or diverted and few face consequences for project failures. Sabotage of water systems can be considered as an attack on public safety and human rights, but prosecutions remain low. While the picture is bleak, it is not beyond repair. The SAHRC outlines recommendations that deserve swift and decisive implementation to protect the whole water value chain from threats: Critical infrastructure should be secured and monitored with real-time technology community-based surveillance programmes, The department of water and sanitation and National Treasury, in collaboration with the cooperative governance and traditional affairs department, are implementing the ring-fencing of revenue collected for water, to ensure that funds collected for water and sanitation services are reinvested into infrastructure; Build municipalities' capacity with skilled staff, regular audits and clear consequence management for non-performance; Protect whistle-blowers and investigate major cases through the Special Investigating Unit and the National Prosecuting Authority; and Treat sabotage as organised crime, not petty vandalism, requiring strengthened inter-agency collaboration. ALSO READ: Water outages continue in Gauteng due to maintenance As in all solutions or strategies to be implemented, civil society has a major role to play. Continued public pressure, good quality investigative journalism and legal activism are essential to hold officials and contractors accountable. Greater transparency is needed, particularly around multimillion-rand water tanker tenders. Communities must be engaged, not just as recipients of services, but made to reduce their water use and be co-stewards of public infrastructure. Rebuilding this partnership, however, will be difficult in the face of growing mistrust, driven by frequent and long water outages with little warning or explanation. South Africa's water crisis is a reflection of broader governance failures. Broken pipes are seen as broken promises. Infrastructure can be repaired and legislation amended, but public trust is harder to restore.
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The Frans Mathipa case: Ramaphosa's ultimate hot potato
The arrest last week of seven members of the SANDF for the murder of Hawks investigator Frans Mathipa raises many questions about the real motive for his murder. But it could also lead to incredibly troubling questions about the situation in the SANDF, and whether its current leadership knew the truth when they denied there was a squad in the force that tortured and murdered people. In December 2023, the head of the SANDF, General Rudzani Maphwanya, was categoric. 'For the record,' he said, 'there are no military squads in the defence force that exist to carry out acts of torture and murder, for whatever reasons. The SANDF stands for the defence and the protection of the people and will always act within the confines of the law and the Constitution.' But last week 12 people under his ultimate command were arrested in connection with the murder of Hawks investigator Frans Mathipa. As Open Secrets has explained, Mathipa was investigating the illegal and violent abduction of the Ethiopian national Abdella Hussein Abadiga from the Mall of Africa in December 2022. Open Secrets has also linked cars used in that abduction to vehicles at the Simon's Town dock when the Russian vessel the Lady R docked there. These vehicles are known to be owned by the Special Forces unit of the SANDF. Also, it has been pointed out that Mathipa was shot dead while driving a moving car, a hit that reportedly could only be carried out by someone with military training. There are so many questions around this, some of which may force President Cyril Ramaphosa to act. The importance of this cannot be overstated. This is a group of Special Forces soldiers who are accused of killing a senior police investigator. It would seem likely the Police Minister Senzo Mchunu would have informed the Defence Minister Angie Motshekga what the Hawks were going to do before they made last week's arrests. And both might well have informed Ramaphosa. For the moment, it appears the system worked, the police were able to make the arrests and faced no violent opposition. Considering that these are members of a Special Forces unit, this is no small victory. But it is only the beginning of where this could lead. What did Maphwanya know? It would appear the best case scenario here is that when Maphwanya issued his denial he genuinely did not know the truth. Even if that is the case, a Commander-in-Chief might well be entitled to demand answers about how he did not know. It might not be enough to rely on reports that are kept secret. A democratically elected head of state would want to know how Maphwanya was unaware, and how he could make sure this would not happen again. But this is the best-case scenario. Most of the others are worse. If Maphwanya knew about these activities then he surely cannot stay in the job. It would be proof that he is prepared to allow people under his command to kill police officers. Important reporting over the weekend by News 24's Erika Gibson shows the SANDF is going to pay for this squad's legal defense, including briefing senior counsel. This might well suggest that Maphwanya, or at least the institution he heads, is either going to argue these men had a proper motive that he sanctioned, or that they are not guilty (in which case, which militarily trained assassin killed Maphwanya?) There are other scenarios that are not as bad as that, but still pose problems. It has been claimed that when Abadiga was abducted, the US Treasury Department had put him on a sanctions list, and that he was seen as a person allegedly affiliated to Isis. Nearly 20 years ago, in 2006, a man called Khalid Rashid was accused of being connected to terrorist networks. He was a Pakistani national who was living in Estcourt in KwaZulu-Natal. When he disappeared the lawyer Zehir Omar launched a series of court cases forcing Home Affairs to reveal where he was. Through a series of court rulings and one or two strange incidents (including a document that mysteriously arrived in Omar's food hamper) it was eventually confirmed that Rashid had been extraordinarily renditioned. In other words, he had been removed from the country at the request of American and British intelligence agencies. Perhaps Abadiga suffered a similar fate. And while that would be illegal, it might well fall under the ambit of the SANDF trying to protect South Africans from threats. Some people might accept that explanation. Maybe. But this still does not explain the other claim against this SANDF unit, that it was involved in torture. The case of Pule Nkomo, who told Open Secrets how he had been tortured, might suggest there is more to this unit than just the Abadiga case. A relatively small incident might well suggest this group has a pattern of breaking the law. Among the charges they face is one of fraud. They lodged a claim with Outsurance claiming the BMW that they used in the alleged hit had been stolen. One might have some sympathy for the insurance investigators at Outsurance. Are they really going to probe what this unit was doing? If it is the same group of people who were involved, this shows a particular pattern. And if it was a pattern, then it would seem incredible that Maphwanya did not know what this group was doing. SANDF vs SAPS Within all of this is another set of complicated dynamics. There is a general perception that the SAPS will deal with people within South Africa, while the SANDF will protect those people from threats from outside the country. Of course, this line is often blurred, and citizens themselves demanded the SANDF help protect them during the violence in July 2021. And the SANDF has a constitutional duty to protect South Africans. The stakes here are incredibly high. The SANDF and the SAPS are the two biggest organisations that employ people and give them firearms. For one to attack the other, as this unit is alleged to have done in killing Hawks investigator Mathipa, may have the potential to spiral out of control. It is important to remember that the fact that the SAPS were able to make these arrests shows this prospect is incredibly unlikely. But it has happened in other countries with disastrous results. In Lesotho the police and the military ended up on opposite sides of a political dispute. In at least one case there was a shootout between members of the two groups. The person who can play the biggest role in ensuring that this does not happen is obviously Ramaphosa. He might well need to ask serious questions around Maphwanya. As usual, the most important questions will probably be: What did Maphwanya know? And when did Maphwanya know it? But for the moment it appears that he is supporting people who are accused of killing a senior member of the police. This issue will not go away. Instead it will require active political management. Ramaphosa may have to make decisions that he, or any leader, would rather avoid. DM
