Cheek Media boss Hannah Ferguson planning 2028 independent Senate tilt
Speaking for the first time to the National Press Club, the content creator vowed to run as an independent senator for New South Wales in 2028 – though, she added, 'not because I think I would win'.
'Running a campaign and losing, I think, is a powerful thing to do to show other young women that they can do the same thing and that it's not embarrassing,' Ferguson said.
'It's actually a triumph that you attempted to challenge a system and establishment.'
The room was filled with young women, some within the political space, including Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young (who Ferguson endorsed to become the next leader of the minor party) and members of independent senator David Pocock's office.
Ferguson was part of a growing wave of content creators who dominated the social media space during the 2025 election. She is the CEO of the independent news commentary platform, which publishes short reels on politics attracting tens of thousands of views. She also hosts a podcast, Big Small Talk.
After she was invited to cover the federal budget earlier this year alongside other creators – some of whom had travel expenses covered – Ferguson was criticised by some media outlets.
Highlighting in her speech that she had not accepted payment for political content during the election, she later said she was 'concerned' about being 'lumped together' with paid creators.
'I said 'no' to money from multiple political organisations that offered it to me this election cycle, and that was why so much of it was offensive, because I actively ensured I was a commentator that was freed from [bias] ... Everything was my bias, but I was forthcoming with this.'
While criticising traditional media for perceived bias on Wednesday – and pointing the finger directly at the Murdoch press – Ferguson also acknowledged the social media space should be regulated for its political content.
'I believe that there should be structural accountability for people online … there's guidelines to be changed [and] I think there should be enforceable standards,' she said.
'We have to have frameworks in place to regulate this kind of work. But regulation should be uniform. Let's force the Murdoch media to do the same.'
Ferguson backed a royal commission into Australia's media concentration, but going even further than one proposed by the former prime minister and current US ambassador, Kevin Rudd.
She said a commission should also look at new media.
'A government that will pass a world-first ban on social media for under-16s should establish a royal commission into Australia's media concentration,' she said, 'examining not only Murdoch, but the entire industry, including unregulated space and social media for which I form part.'
Ferguson, who between her personal and Cheek Media pages has a combined following of around 275,000 , called for stronger rules around transparency and accountability for paid content.
'A lot of tests need to be put in place. I'm not an expert but I think in the media landscape there needs to be a fit and proper person test. At a social media level, there needs to be clear regulations and guidance when it comes to authorisations, endorsements, collaborative posting,' Ferguson said.
'There's not really that many limitations to who can advertise on different forms of media and what they can say and how they can lie.'
Ferguson said she considered herself a commentator, rather than a journalist. But she was adamant she and her peers should not be labelled as 'influencers', accusing mainstream media and politicians of trying to 'undermine' their work.
'Influencer has been the dirtiest word of this campaign,' she said.
'They want to invalidate and undermine a group of powerful young women who developed the ability to communicate with audiences in a way that traditional media can't.'
'The idea that influencers is an umbrella term that applies to me and [to] someone being paid by the Greens or a particular candidate, when I refuse to do that, that's my concern. Because it delegitimises me in the process.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
23 minutes ago
- Times
Kate Forbes choosing family over Holyrood leaves a vacuum in the SNP
T here are not many public figures in Scotland whose loss to politics can be regarded as a calamity. Kate Forbes's decision to stand down as deputy first minister and MSP at the next election, is not just a blow to the SNP — a party singularly lacking in sound business sense and independent thinking — it diminishes Holyrood as well. Hers was a voice in parliament worth listening to, whether explaining the balance between religious belief and political affiliation, or setting out the path for a faltering economy. Her partnership with the first minister John Swinney was a strong one, and together, in the run-up to next year's Scottish elections, they would have offered a powerful challenge to their opponents, including a rampant Reform party.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Talking politics has bartenders on edge in Trump's Washington DC
Deke Dunne relocated to Washington DC from Wyoming in 2008 to pursue a career in politics. Though a progressive himself, he worked as a legislative aide for Republican senator Mike Enzi and spent many nights at local watering holes, guzzling $10 pitchers and eating wings with fellow broke staffers from both sides of the aisle. Long before he began moonlighting as a bartender, he learned that talking politics in DC bars was always a recipe for disaster. 'When I used to work in politics, I would spend a lot of time in bars near Capitol Hill,' said Dunne, 'so I was exposed to more political professionals. In those spaces, you often find yourself witnessing knockdown, drag-out arguments about politics.' Today, Dunne is one of DC's most influential mixologists, having abandoned politics almost a decade ago for a hospitality career. Serving drinks in a city that is more ideologically divided than ever, Dunne says he exercises more diplomacy behind the bar now than he ever did working in politics. There has always been an unspoken rule among Washington DC bartenders, according to Dunne, that political conversations across the bar should be avoided at all costs. It is generally understood that maintaining neutrality is critical to ensuring that guests of all political persuasions feel welcome. But the partisan rancor in Washington during the early stages of Donald Trump's presidential encore has created palpable tension in hospitality spaces, placing undue strain on staff to manage the vibes. 'It's always been an accepted truth in DC that every four to eight years, you get a whole new swath of people in from a different political ideology and if you want to have a strong, viable business, you don't talk politics,' said Dunne. 'Trump broke that rule.' According to local bar professionals in the nation's capital, the 'tending' part of bartending has never been more challenging. 'Politics in DC is not only something that a lot of people care about, but it's also a lot of people's livelihoods,' said Zac Hoffman, a bar industry veteran who until recently managed the restaurant inside the National Democratic Club near the Capitol. 'When you're talking about work, you're talking about politics. That's just the reality of where we live. It's a company town.' At Allegory, where Dunne oversees the beverage program, the bar has always taken a progressive approach, which occasionally provokes more conservative-minded guests who stay in the Eaton, the boutique hotel and cultural hub in downtown where the bar opened seven years ago. Its aesthetic and cocktail menu reimagines Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland, but featuring a young Ruby Bridges, the iconic civil rights activist who faced a jeering mob when she desegregated a Little Rock elementary school. 'Our very presence as a mission-based bar has sparked many conversations surrounding our concept, but also gender-neutral bathrooms, provocative art and advocacy,' he said. 'We've had people that are clearly uncomfortable with our concept leave and then post a negative review but frame it about something else.' The resurgent, and often strident, brand of conservatism that dominates the political sphere in Washington today has many of the city's more progressive bar owners on edge. At The Green Zone, a Middle Eastern cocktail bar in Adams Morgan on the city's north side, politics have always been integral to the bar's identity since it opened in 2018. Bar owner Chris Hassaan Francke, whose mother is Iraqi, has earned a reputation for being outspoken about political conflicts, especially those in the Middle East. But since Trump's return to office, he admits to having toned down some of the rhetoric. 'We changed the name of one of our most infamous cocktails [which contained an incendiary reference to the current president],' said Francke. 'It kills me that I can't always say everything I want to say, but ultimately the safety and wellbeing of my staff [are] more important than that.' While the city may be under Republican rule at the moment, DC itself is still overwhelmingly liberal (Kamala Harris won over 90% of the vote in the 2024 election), which means that a majority of its hospitality workers are liberal, too. 'I know some bartenders who will say the opposite of what they believe around customers they don't agree with politically,' said Hoffman. 'There are plenty of socialists who make great tips talking shit about liberals with Republicans.' It isn't only the more progressive venues around town that have become targets. After recent articles in the New York Times and Washington Post championed upscale Capitol Hill bistro Butterworth's as a haven for Maga sympathizers, backlash ensued. According to chef and co-owner Bart Hutchins – who, like Dunne, also left a career in politics to work in hospitality – being perceived as pro-Trump has attracted crowds to his fledgling restaurant, which opened last fall. But it's also created some unwanted operational challenges. For one, a serial provocateur with an air-horn routinely disrupts his weekly dinner service by sounding it through the front entrance, often multiple times a week. Despite Butterworth's reputation for being a sanctuary for high-profile Trump supporters such as Steve Bannon, not every political conversation at the bar is peaceful. 'I've broken up at least three political arguments since we opened,' said Hutchins. 'It always starts with somebody who's really, really insistent that everyone agrees with them, someone who's watching way too much cable news who's really determined to have their Sean Hannity or Rachel Maddow moment.' Another unfortunate byproduct of being known as a right-leaning restaurant in a left-leaning town, Hutchins says, has been difficulty hiring and retaining staff. 'There have been times where it's been really hard to hire people,' he said. 'Early on, we had some servers self-select out and say: 'I don't want to serve these people.' But a lot of those people have moved on.' Over time, the staff has found ways to put their political convictions aside for the good of the restaurant. 'Our No 1 rule that's written on a door in the back is: 'Everybody's a VIP,' said Hutchins. 'We're not interested in using politics as a measuring device for whether or not someone deserves great service.' For DC bars, proximity to Capitol Hill has historically increased the likelihood that the conversations inside them will revolve around politics. And while some bars on the Hill may welcome these spirited conversations, many older, legacy bars prefer that patrons leave their partisanship at the door. Tune Inn, a well-loved dive bar that originally opened a few blocks from the Capitol in 1947, outwardly discourages political conversations of any kind. 'You can always tell the newbies because they want to come in and immediately start talking about politics,' said Stephanie Hulbert, who has worked as a bartender, server and now general manager at the bar for more than 17 years. 'They get shut down very quickly.' To keep the peace and maintain nonpartisan decorum inside the bar, she and her staff regularly intervene and admonish guests to keep their politics to themselves. These interventions occur at least two or three times every week, according to Hulbert, which is why the TVs inside the bar are deliberately set to sports channels rather than news outlets. 'I'll argue about sports all day long with you,' she said. 'But I won't argue about politics.' Despite the heightened anxiety in Washington, Dunne is optimistic that healthy dialogues in more progressive bars including Allegory can effect positive change. In January, Trump's inauguration drew conservative revelers to the Eaton, where inclusivity and multiculturalism is essential to its brand and mission. That led to some uncomfortable conversations with Republican patrons about the bar's progressive ethos. 'I don't know how effective the conversations were, but they were constructive,' he said. 'We found middle ground about the fact that what Ruby [Bridges] went through was tragic. It's common ground you don't find very often around here anymore.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
We know the Sydney Harbour Bridge march against the killing in Gaza was huge – but just how big was it?
The number of people who joined a pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday exceeded everyone's expectations. But just how many braved the rainy weather to urge the Australian government to do more to pressure Israel to stop the death and destruction in Gaza? That's been a sticking point. New South Wales police said initial estimates put the crowd at 90,000. A spokesperson for rally organisers the Palestine Action Group said police had informed them 100,000 people were in attendance – but the group estimated the figure was closer to 300,000. This article includes content provided by Instagram. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'. Here's what we know. Just after 5pm on Sunday, the acting deputy police commissioner Peter McKenna said police estimated 90,000 people took part – far more than the 50,000 organisers expected. He said it was the largest protest he and the assistant police commissioner Adam Johnson had seen in their time in the force. Johnson also said it was the 'most perilous' in his '35 years of policing'. However organisers estimated it was closer to 300,000. 'It's even bigger than my wildest dreams,' one of the main protest organisers, Josh Lees, said while at the front of the march at the midway point. Lees later said a number of people had come up with a similar figure after crunching the numbers based on widely shared aerial footage. Dr Aldo Raineri, a senior CQUniversity lecturer and expert in crowd safety management, estimated the figure to be significantly higher than what police suggested. Guardian Australia shared drone footage with Raineri that showed the crowd just north of the bridge's midway point, extending back to Wynyard station and Lang Park, where the march began. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The distance from Wynyard station up to where protesters began to be turned back is approximately 2.5km. The roadway along the bridge is 30 metres wide. Based on these dimensions and what appeared to be an occupancy of three or four people per square metre, he estimated between 225,000 and 300,000 people attended. However, he noted 'these figures are really rough, given the variation in density'. Organisers said there were still people at Lang Park, who had not yet started to march, when police sent a message telling protesters to turn back. Lees said many who had gone to Sunday's protest felt it was on par with past major protests they had been to, including the anti-Iraq war protest in 2003, which saw demonstrators march through the CBD, and the walk for reconciliation march in 2000 which went across the Sydney Harbour Bridge. According to the National Museum of Australia, about 250,000 people walked across the bridge in a continuous stream lasting nearly six hours during the reconciliation march. NMA called it the 'largest political demonstration ever held in Australia'. In 2003, police estimated more than 200,000 took part in the anti-Iraq war rally, while organisers put the total at about 300,000, the Sydney Morning Herald reported. The paper said it was 'thought to be the biggest in the country's history'. In 2023, an estimated 50,000 people took part in a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge as part of WorldPride. Chris Nash, who attended Sunday's march, said it 'felt much bigger' than the 2000 reconciliation march he also attended. 'That was much more spaced out,' he said. The former NSW premier Bob Carr marched at the head of the pro-Palestine protest across the bridge. He was the premier during the reconciliation march in 2000. Asked how the crowd sizes compared, he said: 'All that matters was that it was a big, beautiful success. A success with cheerful police cooperation and good-natured people motivated by the horror of Israel's actions in Gaza.' At about 3pm on Sunday, NSW police sent out a mass text message throughout the city ordering the pro-Palestine march to stop due to safety concerns, with authorities turning protesters around at the north end of the bridge. Police sent a second mass text message saying they had consulted with the organisers and were turning everyone around. 'We could not get those people, the number, the significant size of that crowd off that northern egress route without risking crowd crush. We could not allow those numbers to then egress into the northern side, into those train stations without, again, that real risk of crowd crush,' McKenna told reporters. He said there were 1,000 police facilitating the protest. Raineri said allowing the crowd to amass without effective transport to disperse them would have been unsafe. He said the police went about this the right way by using mass text messages and consultating with protesters. However, Legal Observers NSW said the 'confusing and unplanned' directions from police were dangerous and could have caused a crowd crush. 'Police had not adequately planned for the initial route to North Sydney and there did not appear to be a plan if crowd numbers exceeded expectations and made entering and leaving North Sydney difficult,' the group's report on the protest said.
