logo
Columbia and Trump near a deal, with school possibly paying millions

Columbia and Trump near a deal, with school possibly paying millions

Indian Express3 days ago
Columbia University and the Trump administration on Friday were nearing a deal in the contentious fight over allegations that the school had failed to protect Jewish students from harassment, with Columbia potentially agreeing to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to settle the matter, according to two people familiar with the discussions.
The deal, which remains in draft form, would restore at least some of the $400 million in federal research funding the administration canceled. In exchange, Columbia would provide compensation to settle allegations of civil rights violations and increase transparency about admissions and foreign gifts, among other concessions. The existence of a potential deal was confirmed by a third person, who, like the others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive negotiations.
The deal could include $200 million or more in compensation paid by Columbia for alleged civil rights violations. Columbia officials are expected to meet with Trump aides next week at the White House to finalize the deal, said one of the people familiar with the discussions.
A university spokesperson on Friday night did not confirm details of the deal or the potential White House meeting. 'The university is focused on advancing the discussions with the federal government. There is no resolution at this time,' the spokesperson, Virginia Lam Abrams, said.
The current draft of the deal, which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal and The Free Beacon, does not go as far in exerting federal authority over the university as an earlier version that was circulated in April.
That deal would have included a judge-approved consent decree, which is a kind of legally binding performance-improvement plan, according to a copy of that agreement obtained by The New York Times. A consent decree, which would have given the Trump administration significant control over the university for years to come, is not part of the current discussions, the people said.
In March, after the $400 million in funding was cut, Columbia agreed to an initial set of demands from the Trump administration, including empowering campus police to arrest students, exerting more control over its Middle Eastern Studies department and restricting the use of masks at protests. Once those preconditions were met, Columbia continued negotiating over the return of the federal funding.
Columbia's decision to negotiate with the Trump administration rather than sue was widely criticized within academia as a form of capitulation. Harvard University took a different approach, choosing to sue.
Claire Shipman, Columbia's acting president, has defended her strategy, writing in a letter to the university community in June: 'Following the law and attempting to resolve a complaint is not capitulation.'
And Harvard, despite its litigation, has also restarted talks with the Trump administration regarding the return of billions of dollars in federal research funding that have been cut.
While the exact terms of Columbia's agreement are still being negotiated, it could be the first university to come to a resolution with the Trump administration for the return of research funding pulled as a result of antisemitism concerns.
The Trump administration announced March 7 that it was canceling millions of dollars in grants and contracts to Columbia, an extraordinary step that made the university the first to be punished by the administration for what it called unacceptable harassment of Jewish students on campus after the start of the Israel-Hamas war. Punishment for other universities, including Harvard, Cornell and Northwestern, soon followed.
As weeks passed, it became evident that the damage to Columbia's research enterprise went further than the original cut. The National Institutes of Health, the government's premier medical research funder, froze nearly all research funding flowing to Columbia, including for reimbursement of grants that were still active.
Grant Watch, a project run by research scientists who compiled information on the grants pulled by the Trump administration, estimated this week that about $1.18 billion in unspent funding to Columbia from the NIH had been terminated or frozen. Other federal agencies, including the National Science Foundation, also pulled grants.
Columbia was reaching a 'tipping point' of preserving its research excellence, Shipman said in June. Columbia's board met last Sunday to discuss potential terms of a deal, one of the people familiar with the matter said.
The negotiations with Columbia have been directed out of the White House by a team led by a Trump adviser, Stephen Miller, with additional involvement of an interagency task force on antisemitism.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats report says US ceding global influence to China
Democrats report says US ceding global influence to China

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Democrats report says US ceding global influence to China

US- China flags China is increasing its diplomatic reach as the Trump administration pares back America's international presence, Democrats from the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee said in a report Monday. The report was released as the administration makes deep cuts to the state department, including beginning Friday to fire more than 1,350 US-based employees. The administration has also cut billions of dollars in foreign aid. The 91-page report listed ways, from broadcasting to health programmes, that researchers said China is expanding its influence. "China is pursuing a clear vision for the international order while the Trump administration seeks to diminish America's engagement globally. " WH spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: "Under President Trump, America is strong again, and his foreign policy is effective because of his willingness to look anyone in the eye to get better deals for American people." Reuters & NYT

Nvidia's CEO says it has US approval to sell its H20 AI computer chips in China
Nvidia's CEO says it has US approval to sell its H20 AI computer chips in China

New Indian Express

time25 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Nvidia's CEO says it has US approval to sell its H20 AI computer chips in China

Huang recently met with Trump and other U.S. policymakers and this week is in Beijing to attend a supply chain conference and speak with Chinese officials. The broadcast showed Huang meeting with Ren Hongbin, the head of the China Council for Promotion of International Trade, host of the China International Supply Chain Expo, which Huang was attending. Nvidia is an exhibitor. Nvidia has profited enormously from rapid adoption of AI, becoming the first company to have its market value surpass $4 trillion last week. However, the trade rivalry between the U.S. and China has been weighing heavily on the industry. Washington has been tightening controls on exports of advanced technology to China for years, citing concerns that know-how meant for civilian use could be deployed for military purposes. The emergence of China's DeepSeek AI chatbot in January renewed concerns over how China might use the advanced chips to help develop its own AI capabilities. In January, before Trump began his second term in office, the administration of President Joe Biden launched a new framework for exporting advanced computer chips used to develop artificial intelligence, an attempt to balance national security concerns about the technology with the economic interests of producers and other countries. The White House announced in April that it would restrict sales of Nvidia's H20 chips and AMD's MI308 chips to China. Nvidia had said the tighter export controls would cost the company an extra $5.5 billion, and Huang and other technology leaders have been lobbying President Donald Trump to reverse the restrictions. They argue that such limits hinder U.S. competition in a leading edge sector in one of the world's largest markets for technology. They've also warned that U.S. export controls could end up pushing other countries toward China's AI technology.

Make peace in 50 days, or face 100% Tariff, Trump tells Russia
Make peace in 50 days, or face 100% Tariff, Trump tells Russia

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Make peace in 50 days, or face 100% Tariff, Trump tells Russia

US President Trump announced new weapons for Ukraine on Monday, and threatened to hit buyers of Russian exports with sanctions unless Russia agrees a peace deal in 50 days, a major shift in policy brought on by frustration with Moscow. Sitting side-by-side with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters that he was disappointed in Russian President Putin. "My conversations with him are very pleasant, and then the missiles go off at night," said Trump, who indicated that Putin had repeatedly backed out of deals to bring an end to the three-year war with Ukraine. "He's fooled a lot of people," Trump said of Putin, who he called a "tough guy. " "He fooled Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden - he didn't fool me," Trump said. Trump then said that billions of dollars in weapons would be distributed to Ukraine. "We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to Nato," Trump said, adding that Washington's Nato allies would pay for the weapons. The weapons would include Patriot air defence missiles, which Ukraine has urgently sought to defend its cities from Russian air strikes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Get ₹2Cr life cover@ ₹700 p.m. ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan Get Quote Undo "It's a full complement with the batteries," Trump said. "We're going to have some come very soon, within days... a couple of the countries that have Patriots are going to swap over and will replace the Patriots with the ones they have." Some or all of 17 Patriot batteries ordered by other countries could be sent to Ukraine "very quickly", he said. His threat to impose so-called secondary sanctions on Russia, if carried out, would be a major shift in Western sanctions policy. Lawmakers from both political parties in the US are pushing for a bill that would authorise such measures, targeting other countries that buy Russian oil. Throughout the more than three-year-old war, Western countries have cut off most of their own financial ties to Moscow, but have held back from taking steps that would restrict Russia from selling its oil elsewhere. That has allowed Moscow to continue earning hundreds of billions of dollars from shipping oil to buyers such as China and India. "We're going to be doing secondary tariffs," Trump said. "If we don't have a deal in 50 days, it's very simple, and they'll be at 100%." A White House official said Trump was referring to 100% tariffs on Russian goods as well as secondary sanctions on other countries that buy its exports. Russia sells very little to the US, less than $5 billion in 2023, and smaller amounts since then, so tariffs would make little difference to Russia. Sanctions that punish Russia's energy sector and its customers, as a proposed Senate bill would do, would hurt Moscow much more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store