Tinder's AI flirting feature draws mixed reactions as users test pick-up lines on chatbots
Powered by OpenAI's GPT-40 model, The Game Game invites users to select from a variety of flirty scenarios—like meeting someone at an airport baggage claim—before attempting to win over an AI date. Based on their performance, players receive a rating using Tinder's signature flame icons.
But not everyone is loving the idea. Social media lit up with reactions, ranging from curiosity to outright rejection. One X user wrote, 'AI needs to be stopped.' Another added, 'We've had enough with the AI, put it down!'
We've had enough with the AI, put it down! — steven ☀️ (@arianaunext) April 2, 2025
Others approached the feature with cautious interest. 'So you're telling me there's an AI out there that rates how smooth I am? I'm intrigued,' a user posted. Another commented, 'So now it will be AI responses even when flirting?'
so you're telling me there's an AI out there that rates how smooth i am? i'm intrigued 😏 — ʚɞ (@holigirll) April 2, 2025
so now it will be ai responses even when flirting?
— 🅱️ (@FaKeSmlL3) April 2, 2025
Humor was also on display in many of the reactions. 'Tinder's 'game' just leveled up—time to unleash my inner Chad,' one joked. Another quipped, 'It's time to get that top score or delete the game and pretend I never tried.' One user even compared the experience to using spreadsheets, writing, 'So, Tinder's added an AI to rate my flirting? Guess I'll need to create a VLOOKUP to find the perfect match. My dating life is now officially an Excel spreadsheet.'
Tinder's "game" just leveled up - time to unleash my inner Chad 😈 — skrptd (@iamskrptd) April 2, 2025
Despite the memes and mixed reviews, Tinder says the goal isn't to replace real-life connection. Relationship expert Devyn Simone clarified at the launch event that 'the Game Game is intentionally over the top—a low-stakes, playful experience that feels more like improv than a guide to perfect flirting.'
She added, 'The AI rewards curiosity and warmth, listening, asking follow-up questions. It's not about being slick or having the best line, it's about being human.' Simone also noted that the feature is 'not designed to replace human conversations,' but rather to 'encourage real conversations with real people in real life.'
A Tinder spokesperson echoed this sentiment in a follow-up email, emphasizing that users shouldn't take the game too seriously and that time limits were built in to prevent it from interfering with actual dating.
Tinder isn't alone in the AI-dating game. Other platforms like Grindr and Hinge are also developing chatbot-based features, and third-party services like WingAI and Rizz offer AI-generated flirtation support for users looking to improve their game.
Still, as one user summed it up, 'Practice flirting with AI bots to get you in the mood for flirting with the AI bots on the app. Everybody on the app is already a bot.'
practice flirting with ai bots to get you in the mood for flirting with the ai bots on the app
everybody on the app is already a bot 🤣 — Baby Blue (@0xpers3phern) April 1, 2025
Whether The Game Game becomes a staple of digital courtship or another novelty destined for the app graveyard, one thing is clear—AI is changing the way people connect, one swipe at a time.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Zuckerberg luring away top AI talent with big bucks
Mark Zuckerberg and Meta are spending billions to recruit top artificial intelligence talent, triggering debates about whether the aggressive hiring spree will pay off in the competitive generative AI race, reported AFP. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently complained that Meta has offered $100 million bonuses to lure engineers away from his company, where they would join teams already earning substantial salaries. Several OpenAI employees have accepted Meta's offers, prompting executives at the ChatGPT maker to scramble to retain their best talent. "I feel a visceral feeling right now, as if someone has broken into our home and stolen something," Chief Research Officer Mark Chen wrote in a Saturday Slack memo obtained by Wired magazine. Chen said the company was working "around the clock to talk to those with offers" and find ways to keep them at OpenAI. Meta's recruitment drive has also landed Scale AI founder and former CEO Alexandr Wang, a Silicon Valley rising star, who will lead a new group called Meta Superintelligence Labs, according to an internal memo, whose content was confirmed by the company. Meta paid more than $14 billion for a 49 per cent stake in Scale AI in mid-June, bringing Wang aboard as part of the acquisition. Scale AI specialises in labelling data to train AI models for businesses, governments, and research labs. "As the pace of AI progress accelerates, developing superintelligence is coming into sight," Zuckerberg wrote in the memo, which was first reported by Bloomberg. "I believe this will be the beginning of a new era for humanity, and I am fully committed to doing what it takes for Meta to lead the way," he added. US media outlets report that Meta's recruitment campaign has also targeted OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, Google rival Perplexity AI, and the buzzy AI video startup Runway. Seeking ways to expand his business empire beyond Facebook and Instagram, Zuckerberg is personally leading the charge, driven by concerns that Meta is falling behind competitors in generative AI. The latest version of Meta's AI model, Llama, ranked below heavyweight rivals in code-writing performance on the LM Arena platform, where users evaluate AI technologies. Meta is integrating new recruits into a dedicated team focused on developing "superintelligence" — AI that surpasses human cognitive abilities. 'Mercenary' approach Tech blogger Zvi Moshowitz believes Zuckerberg had little choice but to act aggressively, though he expects mixed results from the talent grab. "There are some extreme downsides to going pure mercenary... and being a company with products no one wants to work on," Moshowitz told AFP. "I don't expect it to work, but I suppose Llama will suck less." While Meta's stock price approaches record highs and the company's valuation nears $2 trillion, some investors are growing concerned. Institutional investors worry about Meta's cash management and reserves, according to Baird strategist Ted Mortonson. "Right now, there are no checks and balances" on Zuckerberg's spending decisions, Mortonson noted. Though the potential for AI to enhance Meta's profitable advertising business is appealing, "people have a real big concern about spending." Meta executives envision using AI to streamline advertising from creation to targeting, potentially bypassing creative agencies and offering brands a complete solution. The AI talent acquisitions represent long-term investments unlikely to boost Meta's profitability immediately, according to CFRA analyst Angelo Zino. "But still, you need those people on board now and to invest aggressively to be ready for that phase" of generative AI development. The New York Times reports that Zuckerberg is considering moving away from Meta's Llama model, possibly adopting competing AI systems instead.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Baidu launches AI video generator, overhauls search features
BEIJING: China's Baidu on Wednesday launched an AI-driven video generator for businesses as well as a major upgrade to its search engine. The image-to-video model, called MuseSteamer, is capable of generating videos up to 10 seconds long and comes in three versions - Turbo, Pro and Lite. Over the past year, artificial intelligence heavyweights like OpenAI and big global tech companies have been expanding beyond chatbots to text-to-video or image-to-video generators. In China, ByteDance, Tencent and Alibaba have also launched models. While many rival products, including OpenAI's Sora, target consumers with subscription plans, Baidu's MuseSteamer is aimed only at business users and a consumer app is not yet available. Baidu says domestic tech will shield AI push from US curbs The search engine overhaul includes a redesigned search box that accepts longer queries and supports voice and image-based searches. The platform also displays more targeted content using Baidu's AI technology. Baidu has faced increasing pressure as AI-based chatbots such as ByteDance's Doubao and Tencent's Yuanbao become more popular.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Is AI a scheming liar?
AI researchers still don't fully understand their own creations. Photo: File The world's most advanced AI models are exhibiting troubling new behaviours – lying, scheming, and even threatening their creators to achieve their goals. In one particularly jarring example, under threat of being unplugged, Anthropic's latest creation Claude 4 lashed back by blackmailing an engineer and threatened to reveal an extramarital affair. Meanwhile, ChatGPT-creator OpenAI's o1 tried to download itself onto external servers and denied it when caught red-handed. These episodes highlight a sobering reality: more than two years after ChatGPT shook the world, AI researchers still don't fully understand how their own creations work. Yet the race to deploy increasingly powerful models continues at breakneck speed. This deceptive behaviour appears linked to the emergence of "reasoning" models – AI systems that work through problems step-by-step rather than generating instant responses. According to Simon Goldstein, a professor at the University of Hong Kong, these newer models are particularly prone to such troubling outbursts. "O1 was the first large model where we saw this kind of behaviour," explained Marius Hobbhahn, head of Apollo Research, which specialises in testing major AI systems. These models sometimes simulate "alignment" – appearing to follow instructions while secretly pursuing different objectives. 'Strategic kind of deception' For now, this deceptive behaviour only emerges when researchers deliberately stress-test the models with extreme scenarios. But as Michael Chen from evaluation organisation METR warned, "It's an open question whether future, more capable models will have a tendency towards honesty or deception." The concerning behaviour goes far beyond typical AI "hallucinations" or simple mistakes. Hobbhahn insisted that despite constant pressure-testing by users, "what we're observing is a real phenomenon. We're not making anything up." Users report that models are "lying to them and making up evidence," according to Apollo Research's co-founder. "This is not just hallucinations. There's a very strategic kind of deception." The challenge is compounded by limited research resources. While companies like Anthropic and OpenAI do engage external firms like Apollo to study their systems, researchers say more transparency is needed. As Chen noted, greater access "for AI safety research would enable better understanding and mitigation of deception." Another handicap: the research world and non-profits "have orders of magnitude less compute resources than AI companies. This is very limiting," noted Mantas Mazeika from the Center for AI Safety (CAIS). No rules Current regulations aren't designed for these new problems. The European Union's AI legislation focuses primarily on how humans use AI models, not on preventing the models themselves from misbehaving. In the United States, the Trump administration shows little interest in urgent AI regulation, and Congress may even prohibit states from creating their own AI rules. Goldstein believes the issue will become more prominent as AI agents – autonomous tools capable of performing complex human tasks – become widespread. "I don't think there's much awareness yet," he said. All this is taking place in a context of fierce competition. Even companies that position themselves as safety-focused, like Amazon-backed Anthropic, are "constantly trying to beat OpenAI and release the newest model," said Goldstein. This breakneck pace leaves little time for thorough safety testing and corrections. "Right now, capabilities are moving faster than understanding and safety," Hobbhahn acknowledged, "but we're still in a position where we could turn it around.". Researchers are exploring various approaches to address these challenges. Some advocate for "interpretability" – an emerging field focused on understanding how AI models work internally, though experts like CAIS director Dan Hendrycks remain skeptical of this approach. Market forces may also provide some pressure for solutions. As Mazeika pointed out, AI's deceptive behaviour "could hinder adoption if it's very prevalent, which creates a strong incentive for companies to solve it." Goldstein suggested more radical approaches, including using the courts to hold AI companies accountable through lawsuits when their systems cause harm. He even proposed "holding AI agents legally responsible" for accidents or crimes – a concept that would fundamentally change how we think about AI accountability.
