Children to be banned from having YouTube accounts as Albanese government backflips on exemption
The decision, to be confirmed by the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, and the communications minister, Anika Wells, on Wednesday, is likely to set off a furious reaction from the Google-owned YouTube, which will hold a major event for politicians in Parliament House on Wednesday night.
YouTube argued it operated differently to other platforms and had been given an exemption to the world-leading under-16s social media ban by the former communications minister Michelle Rowland. But newly installed minister Wells has taken advice from the eSafety commissioner that the video platform should be included in the rules as it poses a threat to young people.
'The Albanese government is giving kids a reprieve from the persuasive and pervasive pull of social media while giving parents peace of mind,' Wells said, in announcing the move.
'There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children.'
YouTube will be included as one of the age-restricted social media platforms, alongside Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, X and others. Last month, the eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, citing a survey of 2,600 children, said nearly four in 10 children had reported exposure to harmful content on YouTube – 'the most frequently cited platform in our research'.
Inman Grant noted that children would still be able to view YouTube videos when logged out as the legislation was limited to preventing children from having accounts.
The under-16s ban comes into force in December, with platforms to face fines of up to $49.5m if they fail to take 'reasonable steps' to stop children from opening accounts.
Some major tech platforms have privately raised concerns about a lack of information about what they must to do to meet the 'reasonable steps' test, including what new barriers or verification methods they must add to their services. The government is expected to share more information and guidance about such steps in coming months.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it,' Albanese said.
'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.'
The government on Wednesday will table a set of rules in parliament about which online services will not be captured under the social media ban, making clear that gaming platforms, messaging apps and health services will not be included.
YouTube had previously been given a carveout from the social media ban, with former minister Rowland telling parliament that the video platform would be lumped alongside the likes of ReachOut's PeerChat, Kids Helpline's MyCircle and Google Classroom, apps 'that can be shown to function like social media in their interactivity but operate with a significant purpose to enable young people to get the education and health support they need'.
Meta, TikTok and Snapchat had strongly criticised the YouTube carveout, arguing that it functioned similarly to their services and should not be treated differently, calling for a 'level playing field'. TikTok called YouTube's exemption a 'sweetheart deal', and saying it was 'irrational and indefensible'.
YouTube last week wrote to the government, vowing to consider legal action if it was included in the ban.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'YouTube is a video sharing platform, not a social media service, that offers benefit and value to younger Australians,' a spokesperson said on Sunday.
Albanese said on Sunday said the government would make its decision 'independent of any of these threats that are made by the social media companies'.
Google on Wednesday night will hold its annual 'Google at Parliament House' event, a popular function spruiking Google products. Previous instalments have featured the Wiggles as entertainment, while invitations seen by Guardian Australia advertise local act the Rubens for this week's lineup.
Invitations spruik that guests can 'hear from partners, businesses and meet some of Australia's most beloved YouTube Creators, including the Mik Maks and Never Too Small'. Large numbers of politicians and political staffers attend the event each year.
Wells said the government remained committed to the legislation.
'We want kids to know who they are before platforms assume who they are,' she said.
'There is no one perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safer online – but the social media minimum age will make a significantly positive difference to their wellbeing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Massachusetts mayoral candidate Geoffrey Epstein has to keep reminding people he's not Jeffrey Epstein
Name recognition can be helpful for prospective political candidates — just look at the Kennedys — but it's been more of a thorn in the side for Framingham, Massachusetts, mayoral candidate Geoffrey Epstein. The Australian -born Epstein said he's been making a point to remind people that he's not the notorious child sex trafficker and former pal of Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein. The infamous Epstein died in 2019 in the Metropolitan Detention Center while he was awaiting trial, but that hasn't stopped angry — and apparently quite out of date — commenters on social media demanding that he "show us the files," referring to the rumored Epstein client list. 'My guy. Might wanna pull out of the race if that's your name. Or, you could show us the files,' one commenter wrote on the mayoral candidate's Facebook page. Thankfully, according to the mayoral candidate, most of his prospective constituents can differentiate the two. He told Politico that "no one locally cares about that at all," noting that the Epstein with the creepy island was "a dead American, and I'm an alive Australian." It's an especially tough time to have Epstein as a surname if you're involved in politics, as the disgraced financier has been front and center in the news due to the Trump administration's failure to produce the sex trafficker's rumored 'client list.' After Trump and Bondi failed to produce the alleged client list, some of Trump's longtime supporters — including podcaster Joe Rogan and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino — criticized the White House's handling of the situation. But it's not all bad news for Geoffrey Epstein; another politician who shares both his first and last names with men accused of horrific crimes not only ran for office, but won. According to Politico, New York state assembly member Harvey Epstein — whose name is the unfortunate combination of disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein's first name and Epstein's surname — feels the Australian mayor-hopeful's pain, but believes there's a lot more to a person than a name. 'My advice to Geoffrey would be to lead with your values and who you are as a candidate,' Harvey said. 'People will support you if you do the work and follow through.' Epstein — who goes by Geoff — told the publication he got into the race to try to tackle issues he's seen with the city's infrastructure, environmental action, and education. He's pitched expanding solar installation on school roofs and parking lots, and using more of the city's funds to pay for education. He's got strong competition in the city's incumbent Mayor Charlie Sisitsky, but if Harvey Epstein can pull it out despite his name, maybe there is hope for Geoffrey.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Pauline Hanson's stunning comeback to Australia's youngest senator, 21, who accused the One Nation leader of being stupid
Pauline Hanson has delivered a tough lesson to Australia's youngest senator, 21, who suggested the One Nation leader is stupid for trying to scrap the nation's net zero target. Hanson, 71, introduced a motion on Monday to scrap Australia's target of net zero carbon dioxide emissions, claiming the policy will 'destroy jobs and the Australian economy.' 'Power bills are out of control. Manufacturing is being wiped out. And ordinary Australians are paying the price, while out-of-touch politicians and inner-city idealists push fantasy policies they'll never have to live under,' Hanson said. 'We are being led by fools. Shame on every politician who continues to push this madness. I will not stand by while Australia is driven into the ground.' But before the vote, new Labor senator for South Australia Charlotte Walker, 21, slammed Hanson as lacking knowledge of the subject. 'All I can say is, are you kidding?' she said. 'The motion put forward on net zero indicates a severe lack of knowledge and a complete disregard for the future of our generation, the future of our country. 'Without a net zero target, there will be no Australian farmers, businesses or industries to support us. 'Net zero is waking up to a reality that Senator Hanson has not been able to grasp. In fact, Senator Hanson seems to be hellbent on exacerbating all of the consequences of climate change.' Following Walker's comments - Hanson fired back. 'Charlotte said she grew up on the farm - a farm that uses diesel and petroleum products to actually do the work. I don't think she really understands about what net zero is. 'She's no sooner out of bloody university and out of her nappies that she's telling me I don't know what the hell I'm talking about when I've been on the floor of parliament for the last nine years. 'I don't take any notice of her who's just trying to make her place in this parliament and congratulations, but don't come in thinking that you're going to tell me what I know or what I don't know when I have been dealing with this for many years.' The motion from Hanson ultimately failed with only the four One Nation senators, United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet and Coalition senators Matt Canavan and Alex Antic voting in its favour. Senator Hanson had not expected the motion to succeed but intended for it to expose the Coalition members who refused to support it. 'Labor, the Greens and the crossbench voted it down. And the Liberals? Cowards. They had the notice. They had the time. And they still ran for the exits. Not one of them had the guts to stand and be counted,' Hanson said. Meanwhile, former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce on Monday launched a separate bid to repeal the net-zero emissions by 2050 target. But his private member's bill is also guaranteed to fail, because it lacks the support of the government which has a majority in the House of Representatives. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley maintains the Coalition will wait until after a review of its disastrous May election loss before making formal policy decisions. Despite a growing number of Liberal politicians speaking out against renewable energy policies which have pushed electricity prices to crippling levels, Ley would not budge from her position of waiting for a review. 'We're going to bring all of those views together ... to flesh out the different perspectives, the expert advice and, of course, focus on this government's miserable failure when it comes to energy policy,' she told Sky News. Asked about the political impact of dumping the climate target, Ley said she would not foreshadow the review's outcome. Many Liberal moderates want the net-zero target retained so the party can win back the wealthy city electorates which have backed Teal candidates. But Joyce said there was no reason why abandoning the targets should be off the table. 'This is not about leadership. This is not about trying to create some sort of discordant note,' he told reporters ahead of the bill's introduction. 'There's not anything in this bill that the Coalition didn't have the same position we voted for.' Joyce has the backing of his former leadership rival Michael McCormack. The two ex-deputy prime ministers are critical of Nationals leader David Littleproud's handling of the aftermath of the election defeat. The National Party briefly split with the Liberals over front-bench representation and policy divisions including energy but Littleproud was later placated and came back into the fold.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Australia adds YouTube to social media ban for children
SYDNEY, July 30 (Reuters) - Australia said on Wednesday it will include Alphabet-owned (GOOGL.O), opens new tab YouTube in its world-first ban on social media for teenagers, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the video-sharing platform. Australia's internet watchdog last month urged the government to overturn the proposed exemption for YouTube after its research found 37% of children aged 10 to 15 reported seeing harmful content on the platform, the most of any social media site. Other social media companies such as Meta's (META.O), opens new tab Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat (SNAP.N), opens new tab, and TikTok had argued an exemption for YouTube would be unfair. "Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement. "Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs." Social media firms will be fined up to A$49.5 million ($32.2 million) from December if they break the law, which passed through parliament in November. A YouTube spokesperson said the company would consider next steps and would continue to engage with the government. "We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms. Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media," the spokesperson said by email. Online gaming, messaging apps, and health and education sites will be excluded from the centre-left government's minimum age rules as they pose fewer social media harms to teens under 16, or are regulated under different laws, Communications Minister Anika Wells said. "The rules are not a set and forget, they are a set and support," Wells said. ($1 = 1.5363 Australian dollars)
