logo
Pentagon Has Been Pushing Americans to Believe in UFOs for Decades, New Report Finds

Pentagon Has Been Pushing Americans to Believe in UFOs for Decades, New Report Finds

Gizmodo11-06-2025
UFOs have been back in the news a lot lately, and it may be the case that the government wants it that way. Last week, the Wall Street Journal published the first of a two-part series that probes the ways in which the Defense Department has been responsible for creating and fostering the UFO mythology in America.
'The article shows that the government has, at various points over the years, purposefully sown disinformation about UFOs, in an effort to make Americans believe in little green men. This news comes as the result of an internal investigation by Sean Kirkpatrick, the head of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), which was specifically set up within the Pentagon to investigate UFO sightings. Kirkpatrick, who spoke with the Journal, says he's found evidence that the government 'fabricated evidence of alien technology' in an effort to distract from real weapons programs being carried out by the government in secret.
The Journal frames its findings as a 'stunning new twist in the story of America's cultural obsession with UFOs' but, while the story's specific anecdotes are certainly new and quite interesting, its broader findings are not, nor are they particularly stunning. Instead, they parrot what many critics of the UFO narrative have long said: that the UFO mythos grew out of a disinformation campaign created by shadowy defense officials to obscure more terrestrial secrets about America's national security community.
Last year, we wrote a story with very much the same takeaway, having interviewed one prominent UFO critic, Mark Pilkington, who released a documentary in 2014 arguing that the government used disinformation specialists to lie to Americans and thus hide its covert activities.
Still, the Journal's investigation offers fresh details about a number of bizarre incidents that will surely tantalize the most avid UFO researchers. In particular, one episode revealed by Kirkpatrick's investigation involves a UFO sighting at a nuclear bunker that took place in 1967, and seems to show that the government's disinformation efforts were not merely aimed at members of the public but also its own staff. Robert Salas, a now 84-year-old former Air Force captain, says that his former job was to man the bunker, which would have launched a nuclear strike against the Soviet Union in the event of a nuclear war. One night, Salas says that a 'glowing reddish-orange oval' was seen hovering over the front gate of the facility by the building's guard. Not long afterwards, Salas discovered that the missiles at the facility had mysteriously been disabled.
What had happened? Had aliens managed to disable the base's nuclear capabilities? The Journal notes that a less supernatural—if still quite crazy—explanation for the episode may exist:
Kirkpatrick's team dug into the story and discovered a terrestrial explanation. The barriers of concrete and steel surrounding America's nuclear missiles were thick enough to give them a chance if hit first by a Soviet strike. But scientists at the time feared the intense storm of electromagnetic waves generated by a nuclear detonation might render the hardware needed to launch a counterstrike unusable.
To test this vulnerability, the Air Force developed an exotic electromagnetic generator that simulated this pulse of disruptive energy without the need to detonate a nuclear weapon. When activated, this device, placed on a portable platform 60 feet above the facility, would gather power until it glowed, sometimes with a blinding orange light. It would then fire a burst of energy that could resemble lightning.
Another intriguing anecdote that is shared in the report involves a bizarre custom that was inflicted upon newly inducted members of highly secretive government programs. Those inductees would be handed a picture of a UFO, Kirkpatrick found:
For decades, certain new commanders of the Air Force's most classified programs, as part of their induction briefings, would be handed a piece of paper with a photo of what looked like a flying saucer. The craft was described as an antigravity maneuvering vehicle. The officers were told that the program they were joining, dubbed Yankee Blue, was part of an effort to reverse-engineer the technology on the craft. They were told never to mention it again. Many never learned it was fake. Kirkpatrick found the practice had begun decades before, and appeared to continue still. The defense secretary's office sent a memo out across the service in the spring of 2023 ordering the practice to stop immediately, but the damage was done.
Officials who spoke with the newspaper dubbed this practice a 'hazing ritual' that spun out of control, but, like most things associated with the UFO phenomenon, it's easy to find a different interpretation of events. Was this really a 'hazing ritual'? Or was it part of an internal disinformation campaign designed to sow confusion and maintain cover for those secret programs, even within the programs themselves? Frankly, there's just no way to tell.
Similarly, there's no way to tell whether the Journal's story hasn't been futzed with in some similar way. The simple truth is that, when it comes to UFOs, it's impossible to trust anything that comes out of the mouth of a government or ex-government official. You're better off just giving up on trying to find the truth of the matter, which is, of course, exactly what the government wants.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Unreleased Epstein files include logbooks for private island, records show
Unreleased Epstein files include logbooks for private island, records show

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Unreleased Epstein files include logbooks for private island, records show

Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Federal Bureau of Investigation in February released what was then described as the "first phase of the declassified Epstein files." That initial release -- which was delivered to a group of prominent right-leaning influencers and journalists -- included 341 pages of documents related to the disgraced financier. But 118 pages of those files were duplicative of one another. The vast majority of those documents were previously made public through the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein's former associate Ghislaine Maxwell or civil lawsuits, including flight logs from Epstein's plane, a redacted version of Epstein's so-called "black book" of contacts and a heavily redacted seven-page list of masseuses. The only newly-released document in "phase one," which received little public attention, was a three-page catalog of evidence that appears to be an accounting of evidence seized during the searches of Epstein's properties in New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands after his arrest in 2019, and a search of his Palm Beach mansion a dozen years earlier. That little-noticed index offers a roadmap to the remaining trove of records that President Donald Trump's administration has declined to release, including logs of who potentially visited Epstein's private island and the records of a wiretap of Maxwell's phone. MORE: The times Trump's name appeared in the Epstein files the DOJ has already released The three-page index is a report generated by the FBI that lists the evidence inventoried by federal law enforcement during the multiple investigations into his conduct. According to that index, the remaining materials include 40 computers and electronic devices, 26 storage drives, more than 70 CDs and six recording devices. The devices hold more than 300 gigabytes of data, according to the DOJ. The evidence also includes approximately 60 pieces of physical evidence, including photographs, travel logs, employee lists, more than $17,000 in cash, five massage tables, blueprints of Epstein's island and Manhattan home, four busts of female body parts, a pair of women's cowboy boots and one stuffed dog, according to the list. The unreleased evidence notably includes multiple documents related to two islands Epstein owned in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Little Saint James -- where his compound was located -- and Greater Saint James. According to the index, the files include a folder containing Island blueprints, photographs and other documents. Some of the documents could shed light on who visited the island. According to the index, the files also include a Little Saint James logbook as well as multiple logs of boat trips to and from the island. The evidence also includes multiple lists, one vaguely described as a "document with names" and an employee contact list. Investigators also recovered pages of handwritten notes, multiple photo albums, an Austrian passport with Epstein's photograph and more than a dozen financial documents. The records also include three discs containing the outcome of "court authorized intercept[s]" of a phone number previously belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell. In a joint memo released last week, the FBI and DOJ argued that a "large portion" of the records included photographs of victims and child pornography. According to the DOJ, the evidence includes "images and videos" of victims who appear to be minors, "over ten thousand downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography," and a "large volume" of images of Epstein. Authorities also concluded that Epstein did not maintain a "client list" or blackmail prominent individuals. MORE: Trump, facing MAGA uproar over Epstein files, tries to shift blame elsewhere "While we have labored to provide the public with maximum information regarding Epstein and ensured examination of any evidence in the government's possession, it is the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted," the memo said. The memo argued that "a fraction of this material would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial" and that a court order prohibits further disclosure of the materials. "One of our highest priorities is combatting child exploitation and bringing justice to victims. Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends," the memo said.

Is Coca-Cola changing its US recipe? What we know so far
Is Coca-Cola changing its US recipe? What we know so far

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Coca-Cola changing its US recipe? What we know so far

While Coca-Cola has yet to announce a recipe change, President Donald Trump said the drink-maker agreed to switch a primary ingredient for its U.S. beverages. In a Truth Social post on Wednesday, July 16, the president said he has spoke with the company about using "REAL cane sugar" in its flagship soda, adding that company has agreed to do so. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!" he wrote. For its U.S. products, the soft drink manufacturer currently uses high-fructose corn syrup as opposed to cane sugar, which is used in other countries like Mexico. The announcement aligns with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s efforts to shift American food consumption away from certain ingredients, like artificial dyes. While Kennedy has deemed both sugar and high fructose corn syrup as unhealthy, his Make America Healthy Again initiative combatting chronic health problems has claimed the proposed substitutes are ultimately healthier. Here's what to know about the supposed recipe change. What has Coca-Cola said about the move? Coca-Cola has not yet confirmed a recipe switch, as of Thursday evening, July 17, but the company teased an announcement could be coming. "We appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca‑Cola brand. More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca‑Cola product range will be shared soon," the company said in a statement July 16. A company quarterly earnings call is scheduled for Tuesday, July 22, 2025 starting at 8:30 a.m. ET. What has Trump, the White House said? The White House has not responded to USA TODAY's requests for comment after Trump initially announced the recipe switch on Truth Social July 16. "I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so," Trump wrote. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better! Wall Street reacts: Stock prices of high fructose syrup producer ADM drop Archer-Daniels-Midland, a major producer of high fructose syrup, saw its shares fall close to 1% on July 17, following Trump's announcement. Meanwhile, ingredients provider Ingredion saw its shares decline by 0.6% after falling as much as 7% ahead of the market's open, CNBC reported. Coca-Cola shares rose nearly 2% on Thursday. Is cane sugar healthier than corn syrup? If consumed in excess, both cane and high-fructose corn syrup, like all sugars, can carry negative health effects including weight gain, diabetes and heart disease. While some studies have suggested that high-fructose corn syrup may be linked to increased fat production and inflammation, the FDA says it is "not aware of any evidence" of a difference in safety between foods containing high-fructose corn syrup and "foods containing similar amounts of other nutritive sweeteners with approximately equal glucose and fructose content, such as sucrose, honey, or other traditional sweeteners." How would the recipe change impact Coca-Cola? Coca-Cola switching from cane sugar to high-fructose corn syrup would pose changes to cost and product labeling, Reuters reported, citing industry analysts. The company would have to significantly adjust its supply chains as the two sweeteners primarily come from different producers. Is corn syrup cheaper than sugar? Ron Sterk, a senior editor at food industry insider SOSland Publishing, said it is cheaper for U.S. food and beverage companies to use corn syrup than cane sugar, Reuters reported. Contributing: Reuters and Mary Walrath-Holdridge, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Is Coca-Cola changing ingredients? What we know after Trump's post

Trump Won't Recommend A Special Prosecutor In Epstein Case, White House Says
Trump Won't Recommend A Special Prosecutor In Epstein Case, White House Says

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Won't Recommend A Special Prosecutor In Epstein Case, White House Says

President Donald Trump will not recommend a special prosecutor in the investigation of late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a press briefing Thursday. 'The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case. That's how he feels,' Leavitt told reporters, as she confirmed that the idea had been floated to him by someone in the media. (A special prosecutor is usually relied on in instances where the main prosecutor has a conflict of interest or other issue that would prevent them from being unbiased in a particular case.) Epstein's death and his criminal trial, numerous investigations and lawsuits (collectively known as 'the Epstein files') have been the subject of debate for many right-wingers for years. Many have called for the files to be released — and some have — and for an additional investigation into Epstein and who was involved in his alleged sex trafficking. Trump previously had a relationship with the late disgraced financier, who died in a jail cell in 2019 as he awaited a trial on sex trafficking charges. Last year, while on the campaign trail, Trump claimed at least twice that he would release the Epstein files, but he has since reversed course. Billionaire Tesla CEO Elon Musk, whom Trump has had a rocky relationship with over the years, blasted Trump on his social media platform X over the Epstein files last month. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk said. '[Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' Last week, the Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation said in a memo that they did not find any evidence that Epstein had a so-called 'client list' he had been rumored to have used as blackmail. It also said they would not release any additional information in the future. When prompted by a reporter at Thursday's press briefing, Leavitt rejected the idea that the White House could release the Epstein files with redactions protecting sensitive information. 'In terms of redactions or grand jury seals, those are questions for the Department of Justice. Those are also questions for the judges who have that information under a seal. And that would have to be requested and a judge would have to approve it. That's out of the president's control,' Leavitt said. Trump has largely tried to move away from the publicity surrounding the Epstein case, calling it a 'hoax.' Still, he's drawn the ire of some of his supporters and many of his Republican colleagues who continue to call for more transparency about the Epstein files. Fox News' Jacqui Heinrich asked Leavitt Thursday to 'clarify which part of the Epstein 'hoax' is the 'hoax'' that Trump has referred to. 'The president is referring to the fact that Democrats have now seized on this as if they ever wanted transparency when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, which is an asinine suggestion for any Democrat to make,' Leavitt said. 'The Democrats had control of this building, the White House, for four years, and they didn't do a dang thing when it came to transparency in regards to Jeffrey Epstein and his heinous crimes.' While authorities said in the memo that they 'did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties,' they also confirmed that Epstein harmed more than 1,000 victims and that DOJ officials reviewed included more than 10,000 'downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography.' It also included 10 hours worth of video footage — with one minute missing — of Epstein's prison cell before his death to prove that he died by suicide. Right-wing conspiracy theorists — including Trump, FBI Director Kash Patel and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino — have argued that Epstein did not commit suicide, but was instead killed by powerful figures attempting to keep secrets hidden. 'One of our highest priorities is combatting child exploitation and bringing justice to victims,' the memo read. 'Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends.' The memo directly clashed with Attorney General Pam Bondi's claim to Fox News in February that she obtained the list and planned to review it following 'a directive by President Trump.' Related... Fired Jeffrey Epstein Prosecutor Warns Fear Is The 'Tool Of A Tyrant' Gavin Newsom Mocks Trump's Epstein Diversion With His Sweetest Jab Yet Rep. Jasmine Crockett Has 1 'Very Interesting' Question About Trump's Link To Epstein Trump Melts Down Over 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax' — And The Internet Explodes

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store