logo
Find peace in a time of chaos

Find peace in a time of chaos

Fast Company19 hours ago
A sense of unease has settled over the country—a shared anxiety fueled by headlines, social media, and persistent uncertainty about the future. From escalating conflicts in the Middle East to disturbing incidents of political violence here at home, Americans across the spectrum are grappling with instability and disruption. This isn't just partisan fatigue or angst—it's a broader disorientation about who we are as a nation and where we're headed.
As an avid scuba diver, I (Craig) have learned that when seasickness strikes, the best remedy is to focus on the horizon. In times of uncertainty, we need that same kind of long-range perspective.
America, while powerful, is relatively young. History is replete with examples of empires experiencing internal strife. Fareed Zakaria's Age of Revolutions documents this phenomenon with precision. While historical parallels don't alleviate our present anxieties, they can offer a broader context.
One reason this moment feels so disorienting is that there's often a gap between expectations and reality. Many of us grew up with a hopeful, sometimes idealized narrative of American progress and unity. Today's polarized discourse, political violence, and institutional tensions can challenge that view. But rather than disengage, we need to adapt—and recommit.
In moments of uncertainty, our instincts may be to fight, flee, or freeze. But when we try to do all three at once, we risk exhaustion and paralysis. Freezing—tuning out or giving up—feels safe, but it's unsustainable. Instead, we advocate for a balanced approach: fight and flight, both with intention.
Fight: Civic engagement as a steadying force
To fight is to stay constructively engaged. That means seeking out credible, fact-based news. It means voting and encouraging others to do the same. It means participating in civil dialogue and seeking to understand perspectives that differ from our own—empathy can bridge divides.
Leaders in business, nonprofits, and communities all have a role to play. Upholding the rule of law, supporting fair elections, and defending the institutions that sustain our economy and civic life aren't political acts—they're commitments to stability and shared progress.
At Leadership Now Project [DA1], we've mobilized business leaders from both parties to take action, supporting policies that protect democracy, engaging with policymakers, speaking out publicly, defending election officials, and recognizing courageous leadership. These efforts are grounded in principle, not partisanship, because a strong democracy is essential to a thriving economy.
Flight: Protecting peace isn't escapism—it's strategic
Flight doesn't mean tuning out—it means stepping back to preserve focus and clarity. In an era of constant information overload, it's easy to feel overwhelmed. But we can't let the noise drown out the signal.
This means prioritizing what truly matters: health, relationships, and purpose. It means limiting the distractions that drain us and being intentional about how we spend our energy.
Whether through mindfulness, service, or simple moments of joy, finding inner stability helps us stay grounded. It's what allows us to show up consistently, over the long term.
Holocaust survivor and psychologist Viktor Frankl once wrote that while we can't always control our circumstances, we can choose our response. That mindset—anchoring in purpose and positivity even amid chaos—can help us move forward with clarity and resolve.
Find purpose
In short: Even in uncertainty, we can find purpose. Even amid division, we can choose to build. The storm may not pass quickly, but we are far from powerless.
When we anchor ourselves in values—curiosity, leadership, accountability—we become more resilient. And when we come together across differences, we remind ourselves that the story of this country has always been written by people who chose to engage, to hope, and to act.
We are not alone. And the horizon is there to help us refocus.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

State Department increases reward for info on al-Qaeda leader to $10M
State Department increases reward for info on al-Qaeda leader to $10M

UPI

time9 minutes ago

  • UPI

State Department increases reward for info on al-Qaeda leader to $10M

July 29 (UPI) -- The State Department has increased to $10 million its reward for information leading to the identification or location of the leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Sa'ad bin Atef al-Awlaki is the man the State Department says leads AQAP and has called for attacks against the United States and its allies. Al-Awlaki also has led AQAP attacks against the United States and kidnapped Americans and other Westerners in Yemen in his prior role as the amir of the Shabwah province in Yemen, according to a State Department news release issued on Tuesday. The State Department previously offered a $6 million reward for information identifying or locating al-Awlaki's whereabouts via the Rewards for Justice program. Al-Awlaki also goes by the names Sa'd Muhammad Atif and Jalaal al-Sa-idi and was born in Yemen sometime between 1978 and 1983. He stands 5'6" and has a thin build, according to the State Department. The State Department also is offering rewards of $5 million and $4 million, respectively, for information leading to the identification or location of Ibrahim al-Banna and Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud al-Qosi. Al-Banna and al-Qosi are part of the leadership team that assists al-Awlaki in his role as the leader of AQAP. Anyone with information on al-Awlaki, al-Banna or al-Qosi can contact the Rewards for Justice office via Telegram, Signal or WhatsApp at +1202-702-7843. Those using a Tor browser also can contact the Rewards for Justice's Tor-based tipline at Congress created the Rewards for Justice program in 1984, which is administered by the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security. The program offers rewards for information that helps protect American lives, U.S. interests and national security. Since its inception, Rewards for Justice has paid out more than $250 million in rewards to more than 125 people who provided information that helped protect U.S. citizens and end threats to national security. This Week in Washington

California, other states sue Trump administration over bill defunding Planned Parenthood
California, other states sue Trump administration over bill defunding Planned Parenthood

Los Angeles Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

California, other states sue Trump administration over bill defunding Planned Parenthood

California and a coalition of other liberal-led states sued the Trump administration Tuesday over a provision in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' that bars Planned Parenthood and other large nonprofit abortion providers from receiving Medicaid funding for a host of unrelated healthcare services. The measure has threatened clinics across the country that rely on federal funding to operate. California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, who is helping to lead the litigation, called it a 'cruel, backdoor abortion ban' that violates the law in multiple ways. The states' challenge comes one day after Planned Parenthood won a major victory in its own lawsuit over the measure in Boston, where a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking the ban from taking effect against Planned Parenthood affiliates nationwide. Federal law already prohibits the use of federal Medicaid funding to pay for abortions, but the new 'defund provision' in the bill passed by Congressional Republicans earlier this month goes further. It also bars nonprofit abortion providers that generated $800,000 or more in annual Medicaid revenue in 2023 from receiving any such funding for the next year — including for services unrelated to abortion, such as annual checkups, cancer screenings, birth control and testing for sexually transmitted infections. Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Justice have argued that the measure 'stops federal subsidies for Big Abortion,' that Congress under the constitution is 'free to decline to provide taxpayer funds to entities that provide abortions,' and that Planned Parenthood's position should not hold sway over that of Congress. In announcing the states' lawsuit Monday, Bonta's office echoed Planned Parenthood officials in asserting that the provision specifically and illegally targets Planned Parenthood and its affiliate clinics — calling it 'a direct attack on the healthcare access of millions of low-income Americans, disproportionally affecting women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and communities of color.' Bonta's office said the measure threatened $300 million in federal funding for clinics in California, where Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider, and 'jeopardized the stability' of Planned Parenthood's 114 clinics across the state, which serve about 700,000 patients annually — many of whom use Medi-Cal, the state's version of Medicaid. During a virtual news conference Monday, Bonta noted that federal funds already don't cover abortions. He said the new provision was 'punishment for Planned Parenthood's constitutionally protected advocacy for abortion' and 'a direct attack on access to essential health care for millions who rely on Medicaid.' 'The Trump administration and Congress are actually gutting essential life-saving care, like cancer screenings and STI testing, simply because Planned Parenthood has spoken out in support of reproductive rights,' Bonta said. 'The hypocrisy is really hard to ignore. A party that claims to be defenders of free speech only seem to care about it when it aligns with their own agenda.' Bonta added: 'Rest assured, California will continue to lead as a reproductive freedom state, and will continue to defend healthcare as a human right.' In their lawsuit, the states argue that the measure is unlawfully ambiguous and violates the spending powers of Congress by singling out Planned Parenthood for negative treatment, and that it will harm people's health and increase the cost of Medicaid programs for states by more than $50 million over the next decade. In its lawsuit, Planned Parenthood also argued that the measure intentionally singled it and its affiliates out for punishment, in violation of their constitutional rights, including free speech. In granting Planned Parenthood's request for a preliminary injunction, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani wrote Monday that she was 'not enjoining the federal government from regulating abortion and is not directing the federal government to fund elective abortions or any healthcare service not otherwise eligible for Medicaid coverage.' Talwani, an Obama appointee, wrote that she also was not requiring the federal government 'to spend money not already appropriated for Medicaid or any other funds.' Instead, Talwani wrote, her order blocks the Trump administration from 'targeting a specific group of entities — Planned Parenthood Federation members — for exclusion from reimbursements under the Medicaid program,' as they were likely to prove that 'such targeted exclusion violates the United States Constitution.' In a statement to The Times Tuesday, White House spokesman Harrison Fields said the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' was 'legally passed by both chambers of the Legislative Branch and signed into law by the Chief Executive,' and Talwani's order granting the injunction was 'not only absurd but illogical and incorrect.' 'It is orders like these that underscore the audacity of the lower courts as well as the chaos within the judicial branch. We look forward to ultimate victory on the issue,' Fields said. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for additional comment on the states' lawsuit. Jodi Hicks, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, joined Bonta during his news conference. She welcomed the states' lawsuit, saying 'an attack this severe requires a multi-pronged response with both short and long term strategies.' Hicks said it's particularly important that California is helping to fight back, given the huge stakes for the state. 'California is the most impacted state across the country because of the volume of patients that we have, but also because of the amount of Medicaid that our state takes,' she said. 'It speaks to our values. And this defund provision is certainly [an] attack on values — most heavily on California.' Bonta is leading the lawsuit along with the attorneys general of Connecticut and New York. Joining them are Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and the attorneys general of Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia. Bonta noted the lawsuit is the 36th his office has filed against the Trump administration in the last 27 weeks.

Acknowledge Trump Was Right on the Border
Acknowledge Trump Was Right on the Border

Wall Street Journal

time39 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Acknowledge Trump Was Right on the Border

Neera Tanden should have noticed that it was conservatives who have been trying to draw the distinction between legal and illegal immigration, while liberals have refused to consider them separate issues ('How Democrats Can Win on Immigration,' op-ed, July 28). She cites a poll figure that 79% of Americans believe that immigration strengthens the country, but it fails to distinguish between legal and illegal immigration. Let's solve both the legal and illegal immigration problems, and if the Democrats want to win on immigration, they can start by recognizing that these are two separate issues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store