logo
Bringing back abducted Ukrainian children a tough assignment for SA

Bringing back abducted Ukrainian children a tough assignment for SA

Daily Maverick06-05-2025
It will be a delicate but critical assignment for South Africa to secure the return from Russia of the 400 abducted Ukrainian children whom Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky last month asked President Ramaphosa to help bring home.
Zelensky gave Ramaphosa the list of 400 children he says Russia abducted and deported to Russia, when they met in Pretoria on 24 April 2025. Ramaphosa accepted what could be a tricky mission. It will require South Africa to walk a fine line between its humanitarian concerns and its friendship with Russia.
Pretoria's concern for the children began as far back as June 2023 when Ramaphosa led a peace mission of African leaders to Kyiv to meet Zelensky and then to St Petersburg to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin, to present a peace plan.
Returning the Ukrainian children was part of the plan, but Putin dismissed this, insisting that Russia had merely moved children out of harm's way in a war zone.
The issue was highly charged politically and remains so as the International Criminal Court (ICC) had issued warrants of arrest for Putin and Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, Russia's Commissioner for Children's Rights, on 17 March 2023, indicting them 'for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation'.
Ramaphosa and Zelensky evidently got on well at their meeting in June 2023 in Kyiv. This began to thaw the relations between the two countries, which had been chilly because of Pretoria's steadfast refusal to condemn Russia's invasion. This was most evident in South Africa's abstention from a series of resolutions in the UN General Assembly in 2022 and 2023, condemning the invasion as a violation of the UN Charter's demands that countries respect one another's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Zelensky invited Ramaphosa to participate in the international discussions on his own 10-point Peace Formula that were just then about to begin. Ramaphosa accepted and sent national security adviser Sydney Mufamadi and director-general of International Relations and Cooperation Zane Dangor to participate in several rounds of talks around the world, culminating in a summit in Switzerland in June 2024.
The return of the abducted children was also one of the points of Zelensky's Peace Formula. To date, Ukraine has verified 19,546 children who were deported or forcibly transferred, though it believes there are more. At last count, it said 1,307 had been returned to Ukraine, either through their families, or through NGOs or governments, particularly Qatar and the Vatican.
SA's mediator role
South Africa has definitely remained interested in the children, says Ukrainian legal expert Kateryna Rashevska, the lead on International Justice and legal analysis at the Regional Centre for Human Rights in Ukraine and also an expert on Ukraine's Bring Kids Back UA task force.
She recalls visiting South Africa in November 2023 and meeting officials in the Presidency and Dirco.
'I saw how this topic really interested the South Africans and how for them, it is also not only a Ukrainian matter, but … for the whole international community.'
There were intermittent later reports about South Africa's efforts to bring back some of the children, but none of any success. Raveshka is not sure why, but she assumes that some preparations were made to mediate.
'In particular, a representative office of Bring Kids Back UA was established in South Africa.'
South Africa's efforts became more formal and focused in October 2024 when it participated, through its High Commissioner to Canada Moe Shaik, in the Ministerial Conference on the Human Dimension of the (Zelensky) Peace Formula in Montreal.
The conference focused on trying to return prisoners of war, unlawfully detained civilians and deported children and included steps to strengthen the International Coalition for the Return of Ukrainian Children, which had been formed in February 2024.
At the Montreal conference, Pretoria offered to serve as an intermediary – alongside the Vatican and Qatar – 'to support and negotiate the return of children'.
Ukraine had wanted South Africa to formally join the international coalition, but the country did not do so.
Asked why not, Chrispin Phiri, spokesperson for Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Ronald Lamola, would say only, 'The coalition is one of the initiatives to address the issue of Ukrainian children. South Africa is working on a separate initiative together with Qatar and the Holy See (who are also not part of the coalition) to address the return of the children. We are engaging with both sides on the matter to ensure the return of the children.'
Raveshka explained why she believed South Africa did not want to join the coalition.
She said that she believed Pretoria's thinking was similar to Qatar's, that most of the members of the coalition were Western nations, 'which are perceived by the Russian Federation as enemy states'.
Joining this coalition could harm South Africa's efforts to get the children back, she said.
However, Raveshka said that even after Montreal, there was no vision about how South Africa could help. 'But after the visit of President Zelensky, after the transfer of this list of 400 children, it became more clear.'
A delicate mission
South Africa will now have to present this list to Russia and ask it to return the children to Ukraine. This delicate mission would seem to imply that Pretoria thinks Russia has done something wrong, or even committed crimes.
But Raveshka said she supposed that South Africa would follow Qatar's approach, and that would be not to use words such as 'deportation' or 'abduction' or 'international crime'.
'It will be like South Africa helps Ukraine to reunify families separated because of war. So, for Ukraine, it is acceptable to use this wording because our first priority is the repatriation of children and then accountability.'
Raveshka said once South Africa handed over the list to Russia, Children's Commissioner Lvova-Belova's office would probably check the information about the children provided by Ukraine to select those who could be returned.
This would include verifying the legal guardians of the children.
Raveshka said several children on South Africa's list were particularly at risk because they had been forcibly removed to Crimea and elsewhere from the Kherson Regional Children's Home and the nearby Oleshky Specialised Boarding School. These well-respected institutions cared for children with special needs, such as orphans or children with disabilities.
Ukrainian media reports have said that parents, guardians and other carers are anxious because many of those removed from the orphanages are now not receiving the special care from the Russians that they need.
They want them sent home.
'Some of them have biological parents in Ukraine, some of them have legal guardians in Ukraine, others have foster families who are ready to care for them after their repatriation,' Rashevska said. 'Ukrainian institutions are also ready to take them in,' she said.
She foresaw problems in the recovery of several children on the list who had already been adopted by Russian families. Ukrainian authorities believe that about half of the children from the Kherson Regional Children's Home, for instance, are now with Russian families. One child was known to have been adopted by a high-ranking Russian official.
'However, this in no way means that South Africa should not focus its efforts on the return of these children. On the contrary, the situation is so complex that only an intermediary state can effectively influence the reunification of these children with their relatives in Ukraine.'
She said the list of 400 names was prepared by competent Ukrainian bodies who had verified all the information. The Russians often claimed the Ukrainian lists were inaccurate, she said.
'But I am sure, I can tell you, because I know people who work on this list, that these are real children who are needed here in Ukraine, who have families, but unfortunately they are in captivity of the Russian Federation. Sometimes Russians are even not confirming where these children are.'
Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha told local journalists in Pretoria that the challenge of identifying the children had been aggravated by Russia changing the names and identities of those it had deported. Moscow then gave them Russian citizenship or handed them over to Russian families, says Rashevska.
Nonetheless, Sybiha was confident that Pretoria would achieve 'positive results' and said it was helpful that Ramaphosa 'has direct communication with President Putin…'
Coordinated approach
Rashevska notes that other countries like Qatar have also been given lists of children to try to bring home. During recent peace talks conducted by the US in Saudi Arabia, Ukraine also gave US officials a list of names.
Rashevska said Russia was not prepared to cooperate with the Biden administration, but they now seemed to be open to discussion on the children with the Trump administration.
It is understood that Saudi Arabia has also been given a list of 500 children.
'So, Ukraine is just trying to use all possibilities in order to return more and more,' said Rashevska.
She said she hoped at least some children on South Africa's list would be returned. Any failures would be attributable to Russia, not to any lack of political will by South Africa. She believed Moscow would be particularly reluctant to return any children old enough to testify in the ICC case.
Rashevska thought it was important to highlight 'that the participation of South Africa in the repatriation of Ukrainian children is very important, not only because it is a chance for families and their children to be reunified, but also because it is a sign that it is not only a matter for Ukraine when children are stolen or abducted during armed conflict,' she said.
'For demonstrating this solidarity with Ukraine, we are very grateful to South Africa.'
Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said: 'The outcome of the process of securing the return of Ukrainian children is going to require the full cooperation of the parties directly affected in the matter and interested parties with an interest in ensuring a lasting peace in Ukraine and the region.
'President Ramaphosa sees the return of the children as one of the key confidence-building measures that will underpin the peace process.
'Therefore, it's not going to be for South Africa alone to determine the process and outcome of such an exercise. It's going to take all parties involved to finally resolve this issue.' DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Africa Energy Forum presents a unique opportunity for African collaboration
Africa Energy Forum presents a unique opportunity for African collaboration

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Africa Energy Forum presents a unique opportunity for African collaboration

In the rural village of Gwanda, Zimbabwe, a mother walks several kilometres each day to find firewood so she can cook for her children. She's never had access to reliable electricity, and her story is not unique. Across Africa, 600 million people still live without energy access – a fact that affects every aspect of their lives. The former United Nations Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, summarised Africa's biggest challenge when he said: 'Energy is the golden thread that connects economic growth, increased social equity, and an environment that allows the world to thrive'. Without electricity, communities cannot run clinics, power schools, or create jobs – all of which are fundamental to dignity and development. That is why I attended the Africa Energy Forum in Cape Town recently, a milestone that marked the first time in the event's 27-year history that it was hosted in South Africa. This year's theme, 'Africa United', could not be more fitting. As the global investment meeting for Africa's power, energy, infrastructure and industrial sectors, it was attended by stakeholders who hold the key to accelerating energy access - African presidents, ministers, policymakers, continental executives, the World Bank, African Development Bank and DFIs. With South Africa chairing the G20 this year, the continent must use the momentum of the Africa Energy Forum (AEF) and the G20 Summit to amplify a cohesive African voice in global energy governance. As geopolitical instability rises, with trade wars and fractured alliances, it's more urgent than ever to ask: Can Africa present a united energy agenda? And can it do so on its terms? To seize this opportunity, Africa must first agree on a set of shared energy priorities. These must include scaling up renewable resources like solar, wind and hydro, where the continent has a competitive advantage, while also affirming the sovereign right to include coal, gas and nuclear in the energy mix where needed. This is not a contradiction, but a necessity. Industrialised countries built their economies using all available energy sources. Africa must be afforded the same space to grow. Some of the critical arguments at this year's event will be around balancing the need for energy access and economic development with plotting a sustainable energy future that includes an abundance of Africa's renewable energy resources. Favourable terms for the financing of African energy projects will also be another important topic of debate. Although there are hundreds of initiatives to ensure the achievement of universal energy access on the continent, more than half the continent still lacks access to modern energy, which is why African energy stakeholders believe that amid the drive for reducing carbon emissions, Africa should have a sovereign right to include coal, gas and nuclear as part of its energy mix in line with how developed nations built their economies. What will the US role be in Africa's energy future? The first Power Africa Summit was launched by former US President Barack Obama in June 2013 as a private sector-led initiative with the ambitious goal of doubling electricity access on the continent. Through USAID, 12 US government agencies implemented Power Africa activities by providing financing and technical assistance to support the power sector in 40 African countries. Though different US administrations advised countries on electricity access for years, Power Africa's approach was different in that it took a demand-driven, transactional approach by reviewing actual transactions between private-sector players like investors, entrepreneurs, and manufacturers, and with governments and then identified obstacles that were preventing transactions from moving forward. A large reason for the success of Power Africa in the past was the power of diplomacy to level the playing field for U.S. investments in the energy sector. US President Trump and his administration announced that Power Africa would be dismantled, after more than a decade of successful work on the continent. With almost all of Power Africa's programmes listed for termination, the diminishing role of the US in Africa's energy sector opens opportunities for new alliances and greater intra-African collaboration. Energy financing must be favourable The challenge for Africa is that it needs to industrialise and electrify its economy, but at the same time, it needs the finances to do so in a sustainable way. Africa has also been most severely affected by climate change, and so its infrastructure development needs to be climate-resilient. Most African nations don't need an energy transition, but energy accessibility. Many African countries are grappling with rising inflation, which has also impacted the amount of developmental finance available to African nations. But America may want to maintain its presence and footprint in Africa's energy sector, especially as China seeks to play a leading role in the continent's infrastructure development. Despite the challenging global environment, Africa needs its member states and voices to unite with a collective vision to fund Africa's energy revolution with international financing mechanisms that are just. After all, Africa is responsible for less than 3% of the world's carbon emissions and home to massive, unlocked energy potential, while also being home to 1.2 billion youth aged between 15 to 24 years that account for 16% of the global population (according to the UN). Greg Nott is Director Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc

C20 Summit in Sandton champions inclusive development and African unity
C20 Summit in Sandton champions inclusive development and African unity

The Citizen

time19 hours ago

  • The Citizen

C20 Summit in Sandton champions inclusive development and African unity

The first day of the Launch and Mid-Term Policy Dialogue opened with strong momentum, marked by broad-based support and inclusive participation. The event, which served as a platform for reflection, collaboration, and advancing shared priorities on social and economic development across Africa, took place from June 22 to 24 at the Capital Hotel in Sandton. Messages of support were received from Youth 20 (Y20) and Labour 20 (L20), affirming the importance of youth and labour voices in shaping transformative policy within the G20 framework. ALSO READ: Joburg Speaker concludes region D1 Summit as locals Demand Services The dialogue also received endorsement from South Africa's Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO), reinforcing the country's commitment to multilateral engagement and African cooperation. Importantly, the event brought together members of civil society from across the continent. Their presence and contributions grounded the discussions in community realities and citizen-driven solutions. Their active engagement helped ensure that the dialogue reflected a diverse range of perspectives and priorities. As delegates from around the world arrived, the hotel's exterior was transformed into a symbol of unity and purpose. The branding around the venue was bold, inclusive, and rich in symbolism. Young pantsula dancers entertained the audience, underscoring the event's commitment to the G20 principles of equality, global partnership, and a sustainable future. This launch marks a significant milestone for the C20's role in influencing global policy, amplifying the voices of civil society, and ensuring that people and the planet remain at the heart of the G20's agenda. ALSO READ: G20 Summit – the ball gets rolling As discussions unfold, the focus remains clear: to foster inclusive dialogue, champion equity across all nations, and steer global development in a direction that leaves no one behind. The Sandton skyline now stands not just as a financial hub, but as a beacon of global cooperation and civic leadership. June 2025 will formally introduce Civil Society South Africa as a collective movement for social justice and policy advocacy. The event also aims to facilitate dialogue on key socioeconomic and governance issues affecting communities, establish strategic partnerships for sustained impact and community engagement, and develop a roadmap for civil society participation in policy and decision-making processes. In his speech, C20 chairperson Thulani Tshefuta emphasised the need for strategic alignment and a long-term vision. He stated that the work at C20 must align with South Africa's National Development Plan, the Medium-Term Strategic Framework, Agenda 2063 of the African Union, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. 'The challenge before us all is to rise above immediate obstacles and focus on these broader, long-term strategic development instruments. Our strategic approach should reflect the fact that while there are 200 of us in this room, many more are following through various other platforms. We must truly act with purpose and unity to advance these shared goals,' said Tshefuta. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump
Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump

Eyewitness News

timea day ago

  • Eyewitness News

Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump

RIO DE JANEIRO - A summit of BRICS nations will convene in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday and Monday, with members hoping to weigh in on global crises while tiptoeing around US President Donald Trump's policies. The city, with beefed-up security, will play host to leaders and diplomats from 11 emerging economies, including China, India, Russia and South Africa, which represent nearly half of the world's population and 40% of its GDP. Brazil's left-wing President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will have to navigate the absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping, who will miss the summit for the first time. Beijing will instead be represented by its Prime Minister Li Qiang. Russian leader Vladimir Putin, who is facing a pending International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant, will not travel to Brazil, but is set to participate via video link, according to the Kremlin. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, fresh from a 12-day conflict with Israel and a skirmish with the United States, will also be absent, as will his Egyptian counterpart Abdel Fattah al-Sissi, a Brazilian government source told AFP. Tensions in the Middle East, including Israel's ongoing war in Gaza, will weigh on the summit, as well as the grim anticipation of tariffs threatened by Trump due next week. 'CAUTIOUS' "We're anticipating a summit with a cautious tone: it will be difficult to mention the United States by name in the final declaration," Marta Fernandez, director of the BRICS Policy Center at Rio's Pontifical Catholic University, told AFP. China, for example, "is trying to adopt a restrained position on the Middle East", Fernandez said, pointing out that Beijing was also in tricky tariff negotiations with Washington. "This doesn't seem to be the right time to provoke further friction" between the world's two leading economies, the researcher said. BRICS members did not issue a strong statement on the Iran-Israel conflict and subsequent US military strikes due to their "diverging" interests, according to Oliver Stuenkel, an international relations professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation. Brazil, nevertheless, hopes that countries can take a common stand at the summit, including on the most sensitive issues. "BRICS (countries), throughout their history, have managed to speak with one voice on major international issues, and there's no reason why that shouldn't be the case this time on the subject of the Middle East," Brazil's Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira told AFP. 'MULTILATERALISM' However, talks on finding an alternative to the dollar for trade between BRICS members are likely dead in the water. For Fernandez, it is almost "forbidden" to mention the idea within the group since Trump threatened to impose 100% tariffs on countries that challenge the dollar's international dominance. Brazil, which in 2030 will host the COP30 UN climate conference, also hopes to find unity on the fight against climate change. Artificial intelligence and global governance reform will also be on the menu. "The escalation of the Middle East conflict reinforces the urgency of the debate on the need to reform global governance and strengthen multilateralism," said Foreign Minister Vieira. Since 2023, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, Iran and Indonesia have joined the BRICS, formed in 2009 as a counter-balance to leading Western economies. But, as Fernandez points out, this expansion "makes it all the more difficult to build a strong consensus."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store