US to impose sanctions on Sudan after finding government used chemical weapons
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States will impose sanctions on Sudan after determining its government used chemical weapons in 2024 during the army's conflict with the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, the State Department said on Thursday.
Measures against Sudan will include limits on U.S. exports and U.S. government lines of credit and will take effect around June 6, after Congress was notified on Thursday, Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a statement.
"The United States calls on the Government of Sudan to cease all chemical weapons use and uphold its obligations under the CWC," Bruce said, referring to the Chemical Weapons Convention treaty banning the use of such weapons.
Sudan's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The war in Sudan erupted in April 2023 from a power struggle between the army and the RSF, triggering mass displacement, famine and ethnically-driven killings.
Washington in January imposed sanctions on army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, accusing him of choosing war over negotiations to bring an end to the conflict.
The U.S. has also determined members of the RSF and allied militias committed genocide and imposed sanctions on some of the group's leadership.
The New York Times reported in January, citing four senior U.S. officials, that the Sudanese army had used chemical weapons at least twice during the conflict.
Bruce's statement said the U.S. had formally determined on April 24 under the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 that the government of Sudan used chemical weapons last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Biden's doctor thought cognitive tests were 'meaningless,' ex-aide Bruce Reed told investigators
Former White House physician Kevin O'Connor previously dismissed cognitive tests as "meaningless," ex-Biden administration aide Bruce Reed told House investigators on Tuesday, according to a source familiar with the proceedings. Reed, who served as White House deputy chief of staff for policy, is the ninth member of former President Joe Biden's inner circle to sit down with House Oversight Committee lawyers. A source familiar with his interview told Fox News Digital that Reed attributed Biden's disastrous 2024 debate performance against then-candidate Donald Trump to the former president's stutter, a condition that's been well-documented and Biden himself has publicly acknowledged. But his meandering and seemingly tired demeanor on stage with Trump alarmed both Democrats and media pundits, who saw it as a glaring sign of Biden's advanced age. It precipitated both a public and private push by left-wing lawmakers to get Biden to drop out of the race – which he did in July 2024. When asked whether public concerns about Biden's mental acuity were legitimate, however, the source told Fox News Digital that Reed said he believes Americans should not have had any concerns about the ex-president's mental faculties. Reed also told investigators that "the president's communications team anticipated that the issue of a cognitive test would likely be raised" in Biden's interview with ABC News host George Stephanopoulos following the debate. "Mr. Reed further explained that President Biden's physician, Dr. Kevin O'Connor, dismissed cognitive tests as 'meaningless,'" the source said. O'Connor was among the first former White House officials summoned by House investigators, and sat down with them last month after being compelled via subpoena. But his sit-down lasted less than an hour, with the doctor opting to invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering all questions but his name. His lawyers said at the time that was due to concerns about violating doctor-patient confidentiality. In his own interview Tuesday, Reed also defended the Biden 2024 campaign's preference to hold the debate earlier than typical for a presidential cycle, the source said. "During his interview, Mr. Reed stated that the decision to hold the debate early was a deliberate strategy to get ahead of early voting and the Olympics. He emphasized that the campaign's push for the early debate was unrelated to concerns about President Biden's age," the source said. Excerpts of Reed's opening statement to investigators, obtained by Fox News Digital via a second source familiar with the interview, show he emphatically defended Biden's cognitive abilities. "While I can only speak to my own observations, I had the benefit of working with President Biden nearly every day of his presidency. Despite his age, President Biden maintained an unrelenting work ethic, embraced complex policy issues, and approached decisions with diligence and deliberation," Reed said, according to the source. Reed also described Biden as "a demanding boss who routinely grilled staff members on a topic until he reached the limits of our knowledge so he could judge whether to have confidence in our advice," though "that didn't mean he'd take it." "From the first days in the White House to the last, President Biden governed the same way he'd gotten there, by trusting his own values and instincts," Reed said, according to the source. "There is no tougher test than the presidency: President Biden asked tough questions, made tough decisions, and led his country well in challenging times for the nation and the world." Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., is probing whether Biden's senior aides worked to cover up evidence of mental decline in the former president, and whether that meant Biden was not making the final decision on executive matters signed by autopen. Of particular interest to Comer is the myriad of clemency orders Biden signed in the latter half of his presidency, though the former president told The New York Times last month that he was behind every decision. His allies have also dismissed Comer's probe as purely political. Fox News Digital reached out to Reed's counsel and lawyers for O'Connor for comment but did not hear back by press time.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Nassau County's new state-of-the-art police training village is now open
Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman took House Homeland Security Committee Chair Andrew Gabarino and former Rep. Peter King on a tour of the new David S. Mack Center for Training and Intelligence on Tuesday. It's a state-of-the-art police training village, with all the things one might expect to find anywhere in the country, including a bank, house of worship, school, and a Long Island Rail Road train and platform. Other features include a gas station, split-level home, a courtroom, bar and restaurant, and a police station, all for training purposes. "We can do active shooter [training] in here," Nassau County Police Commissioner Patrick Ryder said of the train station. "Colin Ferguson, the anniversary passed last year." Ryder touted the features of the police station. "It's like any other station house, has a real fingerprint and photograph machine. These are real, certified cells," Ryder said. "We should be bringing people from all over the country to train here. This is a fantastic site," Garbarino said. Blakeman said he has had inquiries from all over the globe. "We also share with other agencies, both domestic and international," Blakeman said. On Tuesday, local, state and federal law enforcement met to share counterterrorism ideas within the sprawling Mack Center. Some in Nassau County criticized spending $70 million on the center rather than addressing the way police work. "It's important for our police officers to be ready in a worst-case scenario situation. But it's also important for them to know how to de-escalate certain situations, and we want to make sure they have those resources," Nassau County Legislator Seth Koslow said. "I'm going to work with our state and local guys to make sure that a 9/11 never happens again," Garbarino said.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brazil, Japan beef talks focus on smaller Brazilian states, upsetting industry
By Ana Mano and Marcela Ayres SAO PAULO (Reuters) -Ongoing talks to open the Japanese market to Brazilian beef are focusing on supplies from three small Brazilian exporting states, upsetting other parts of the South American country's industry that are eager to reach the high-paying customers, according to multiple sources. Brazil, the world's biggest beef exporter, has tried for two decades to crack the Japanese market without success. A deal would give Japan an alternative to its top suppliers, the United States and Australia, at a time when U.S. tariffs are reshaping global food trade. Negotiations gained momentum after a state visit of Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva in March to Japan, one of the world's largest beef importers. But the current state of talks, which focus on states representing less than 4% of Brazil's exports by volume, worries meatpackers in the big beef-producing states of Sao Paulo, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, and Para. Together, they accounted for nearly 60% of Brazil's total beef exports, or 1.72 million metric tons last year. A Brazilian government memo, issued after a technical visit by Japanese officials in June, showed Brasília answered "a questionnaire for the import of beef from the southern part of the Republic Federation of Brazil," naming Rio Grande do Sul, Parana, and Santa Catarina. Those three small exporting states were declared free of foot-and-mouth, a contagious viral disease in cattle, earlier than the other states, although Brazil acquired in May the national status of being free of the disease without vaccination from the World Organization for Animal Health. Brazil's last outbreak of the disease was in 2006, according to the government. The Brazilian Agriculture Ministry did not have an immediate comment on its talks with Japan. A local government source, who asked not to be named, confirmed talks were taking place by region. The person said Brazil initially has no plans to negotiate permits beyond the three states. Beef sector representatives, including exporters, told Reuters they hope more states will be included. "We know talks are difficult," said Paulo Mustefaga, head of beef lobbying group Abrafrigo, which represents Marfrig and smaller beef exporters. "The surprise for us is that this is now moving towards approval for only three states." Japan's Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries said it was aware of Brazil's status of being free of foot-and-mouth disease. It added that Japan is "conducting a risk assessment in accordance with Japanese procedures" ahead of issuing any export permits to Brazilian meatpackers, without elaborating. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
