logo
GSK's Sluggish Shares Seen at Risk of New Activist Campaign

GSK's Sluggish Shares Seen at Risk of New Activist Campaign

Yahoo21-02-2025
(Bloomberg) -- GSK Plc is a long-term underperformer among Europe's Big Pharma stocks. And with key drug patents set to expire and vaccine sales falling, some market participants say it may draw in activist investors again.
Trump to Halt NY Congestion Pricing by Terminating Approval
Airbnb Billionaire Offers Pre-Fab Homes for LA Fire Victims
Sorry, Kids: Disney's New York Headquarters Is for Grown-Ups
Trump Targets $128 Billion California High-Speed Rail Project
Child Migrant Watchdog Gutted in DOGE Cuts
Shares in the British drugmaker have fallen about 19% since it spun off its consumer health business in 2022, a move that activists had supported. Analyst sentiment has been turning more negative, as patents for medicines including HIV treatment dolutegravir are set to expire in coming years. GSK said this month that it's making progress in late-stage development of several oncology drugs, though vaccine sales are falling.
'There needs to be material progress on the pipeline or successful M&A to help address the chronic long-term underperformance of the share price,' said Ketan Patel, fund manager at the family office Whitefriars. In the meantime, 'activist investors will be knocking on the front door.'
GSK previously came under pressure from activists Elliott Investment Management and Bluebell Capital Partners. While both broadly agreed with the company's plans to spin off its consumer-health unit, they questioned whether Chief Executive Officer Emma Walmsley was the right leader for GSK. Even so, she has remained at the helm.
During Walmsley's near eight-year tenure, GSK shares have delivered a total annualized return of about 3%, compared with more than 7% for peers, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. GSK has also trailed the UK's benchmark FTSE 100 Index during this time, while AstraZeneca Plc has gone on to become the UK's biggest company by market value.
'We believe the current situation at GSK is ripe for an activist to shake up the business given the chronic underperformance compared to chief rival AstraZeneca,' said Emmanuel Valavanis, senior vice president of equity sales at Forte Securities. That could take the form of M&A, a carve out of the vaccines business or a push for more shareholder returns, he said.
Dominic Rose, an analyst at Intron Health, also sees shareholder activism as a possibility given GSK's share-price underperformance. 'If activists were to step in, they might push for a sharper strategic focus — potentially advocating for a pure-play vaccines business,' he said. Rose also highlighted operational efficiencies, pipeline acceleration, or capital allocation adjustments as other potential angles.
According to David Redfern, president of corporate development at GSK, shareholders 'are very aligned' with what the drugmaker is doing. 'We're pretty focused around building a bigger specialty business, we're focused around our main product areas,' Redfern said in an interview. 'I think all of that is supported — they really just want to see ongoing execution.'
The looming patent expiries and concerns about vaccine sales have kept analysts fairly cautious on the stock. GSK's consensus analyst rating — a proxy for the ratio of buy, hold, and sell recommendations — is currently at 3.27, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That's the lowest score in more than five years, and less than all other major European pharmaceutical companies.
Not all analysts are gloomy on GSK. Redburn Atlantic's Simon Baker increased his price target on the stock to 2,650 pence this week, the highest among those tracked by Bloomberg, after the company boosted its 2031 sales forecast to over £40 billion ($51 billion) earlier this month.
While that announcement and a buyback plan led to a rally in the stock, those gains have mostly faded since since. GSK shares fell as much as 3.1% to 1,402.5 pence on Friday morning.
GSK's new forecast is up from the more than £33 billion it had predicted in 2021. The firm is optimistic about generating sales from drugs it has in development, as well as the potential re-launch of its blood cancer drug Blenrep this year.
The shares have also been under pressure in recent years because of ongoing litigation over GSK's old reflux medication, Zantac. The company agreed last year to pay as much as $2.2 billion to resolve the vast majority of court cases.
All of this has left GSK trading relatively cheaply. The stock's multiple of about 8.4 times estimated earnings compares with AstraZeneca at about 16 times and is roughly half that of the Stoxx 600 Health Care Index.
GSK is 'cheap but challenges persist,' Sarita Kapila, an analyst at Morgan Stanley, wrote in a recent note. The valuation largely reflects longer-term growth challenges, as well as 'the lack of innovation momentum in 2025.'
Despite the pessimism, GSK continues to attract investors looking for steady capital returns. The drugmaker's 12-month dividend yield is the highest among peers, while the £2 billion buyback announced this month is the company's first stock repurchase program in more than a decade.
Another positive is specialty medicines, including cancer and HIV drugs, for which GSK forecasts a low double-digit percentage revenue increase this year. The company's earnings growth continues to look underappreciated, according to Shore Capital analyst Sean Conroy.
For Nick Kirrage, a fund manager at Schroders Plc, GSK has done 'really good work' in terms of restructuring its business. 'They now just have to deliver on the R&D,' he said. 'And I think if you wait five years, they will.'
--With assistance from Ashleigh Furlong.
(Adds Friday's share price performance.)
Japan Perfected 7-Eleven. Why Can't the US Get It Right?
How Med Spas Conquered America
The Undocumented Workers Who Helped Build Elon Musk's Texas Gigafactory
Before DeepSeek Blew Up, Chatbot Arena Announced Its Arrival
Elon Musk's DOGE Is a Force Americans Can't Afford to Ignore
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Sends Message To Iran Over Nuclear Ambitions
Donald Trump Sends Message To Iran Over Nuclear Ambitions

Newsweek

time26 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Sends Message To Iran Over Nuclear Ambitions

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has warned Iran not to attempt to rebuild their nuclear facilities, after he claimed recent U.S. military strikes in June "completely destroyed" Iran's sites. The President wrote on Truth Social on Saturday: "All three nuclear sites in Iran were completely destroyed and/or OBLITERATED. It would take years to bring them back into service and, if Iran wanted to do so, they would be much better off starting anew, in three different locations, prior to those sites being obliterated, should they decide to do so. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Why it Matters The stakes surrounding Iran's nuclear program remain high for U.S. national security interests and for stability across the Middle East. President Trump's warning comes against a backdrop of ongoing debates about the effectiveness of U.S. strikes and the future of diplomatic efforts to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. What To Know On June 21, the U.S. military—under an operation code-named Midnight Hammer—conducted airstrikes against three of Iran's principal nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. President Trump and defense officials publicly claimed that all three sites were "completely destroyed," saying that Iran would require years to reconstitute its nuclear program if it tried to rebuild. Trump reiterated this with his message on Saturday. But some U.S. intelligence assessments have challenged the administration's narrative. Only one out of three of Iran's nuclear sites was destroyed with the other two surviving enough to be able to resume nuclear enrichment within several months if Tehran wants it, according to NBC News, which cited five current and former U.S. officials familiar with the assessment. The Defense Department and the White House have pushed back, asserting that their own intelligence showed all three facilities were "completely and totally obliterated." Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Purnell said: "President Trump was clear and the American people understand: Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz were completely and totally obliterated. There is no doubt about that." "The credibility of the Fake News Media is similar to that of the current state of the Iranian nuclear facilities: destroyed, in the dirt, and will take years to recover." Iran maintains that its nuclear program serves peaceful purposes, despite long-standing Western suspicions. Iranian diplomats are set to meet in Europe next week for discussions about a possible nuclear deal, according to the Institute for the Study of War. "Iran has not softened its position on its right to enrich uranium on Iranian soil, which makes it unlikely that Iran will accept a nuclear deal that includes a zero uranium enrichment demand," the Institute said in its most recent report. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a press briefing with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room in the White House in... U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a press briefing with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room in the White House in Washington, D.C. on Friday, June 27, 2025—President Trump addressed Iran, the "Big, Beautiful Bill" and tariffs. More AP What People Are Saying Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell previously told reporters that American strikes had "degraded (Iran's) program by one to two years." He said: "We believe, and certainly, all of the intelligence that we've seen have led us to believe that Iran's—those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated." Trump said in an interview on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures: "It was obliterating like nobody's ever seen before. And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions, at least for a period of time." What Happens Next The debate over the true impact of the U.S. airstrikes on Iran's nuclear capabilities is likely to persist, with calls for independent verification of the destroyed facilities. Iran's response to both the military strikes and diplomatic overtures remains uncertain, as tensions in the region continue to simmer.

The Trump-Powell feud keeps heating up. Meet the betting markets' top picks to replace the Fed chief.
The Trump-Powell feud keeps heating up. Meet the betting markets' top picks to replace the Fed chief.

Business Insider

time26 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

The Trump-Powell feud keeps heating up. Meet the betting markets' top picks to replace the Fed chief.

Scott Bessent Who is he: Treasury Secretary Polymarket odds: 23% Market commentary: Bessent is the top pick to replace Powell, but he's in a tricky position as Trump's right-hand man for all things markets. Trump himself has flagged Bessent as a potential candidate for Fed chair, but the president said on Tuesday that he likes Bessent where he is now. When Bessent first assumed the role of Treasury Secretary, Wall Street believed he would promote policies that appeased markets. However, he's often come out on Trump's side when stocks have crumbled, stating that he and the president aren't concerned about a little volatility. Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman wasn't particularly bullish on Bessent in a recent Substack post. "What Trump looks for in his personnel choices is, above all, groveling loyalty. So anyone he chooses will, more or less by definition, be a spineless toady. Even if the appointee looks qualified for the position, we can be sure that he or she will indulge and cheer on every Trump idea, no matter how bad," Krugman wrote. "I call this Bessent's Law because when Trump chose Scott Bessent as Treasury Secretary a number of Wall Street people assured us that he was a good, competent choice." Key quote: Bessent's been tight-lipped about any Powell replacement details. "There's a formal process that's already starting. There are a lot of great candidates and we'll see how rapidly it progresses," Bessent told Bloomberg on Tuesday. Kevin Warsh Who is he: Former Federal Reserve Governor Polymarket odds: 20% Market commentary: Warsh is seriously pulling out all the stops for the chance to take Powell's job. In a twist, he was passed over for Fed Chair in 2017, when Trump picked Powell to replace Janet Yellen. Earlier in July, Warsh appeared on Fox Business, where he pushed for lower interest rates and argued that "tariffs are not inflationary." His current stance is an interesting reversal from his time as a hawkish Federal Reserve Governor from 2006 to 2011, when he expressed concern that aggressive rate cuts could lead to higher inflation. Neil Dutta, head of economics at Renaissance Macro, said he thinks Warsh is one of the worst picks for Fed Chair. Key quote: "I don't think we need continuity when the central bank doesn't have credibility," Warsh said on CNBC on Thursday, criticizing Powell's decision to make a jumbo 50 basis point rate cut last September. "We need regime change at the Fed." Kevin Hasset Who is he: National Economic Council Director Polymarket odds: 16% Market commentary: There's another Kevin in the running. As Trump's current economic advisor, Wall Street strategists think Hasset is likely to follow Trump's orders. When asked about Hasset during a press briefing, Trump said "Kevin is fantastic." Hasset has been critical of the Federal Reserve's renovation project budget and has voiced support toward the idea of firing Powell. But similar to Bessent, Hasset hasn't commented much on whether Trump has asked him to be the next Fed chair. However, he has backed Trump's call to cut interest rates by up to three points. "Kevin Hassett and Scott Bessent are blatant political picks, which may struggle to achieve Senate confirmation," Michael Brown, senior research strategist at Pepperstone Group, wrote in a note late last month. Christopher Waller Who is he: Federal Reserve Governor Polymarket odds: 12% Market commentary: Waller is gaining momentum in the race as a dark horse candidate, receiving a 9% boost on Polymarket early Friday after giving a speech arguing for a July rate cut. Waller cited weak private payroll growth as one of the main reasons for the Fed to lower rates at this month's meeting. Out of all the options, Waller would probably be the one most palatable to investors, as his arguments for cutting are the least political, and he would represent a fairly establishment pick to run the central bank. "He is not talking about cost overruns on the Eccles building or lowering the cost of government finance or 'regime change,' but he is talking about the shifting balance of risks in the economy," Dutta wrote in a note on Thursday. "There is a huge distance from him — someone who has an intellectual consistent/defensible/sound position — and the sycophants (Hassett, Bowman, Warsh) who are extensions of DJT," Warren Pies, founder of 3Fourteen Research, wrote in an X post on Thursday. Key quote: "While the labor market looks fine on the surface, once we account for expected data revisions, private-sector payroll growth is near stall speed, and other data suggest that the downside risks to the labor market have increased. With inflation near target and the upside risks to inflation limited, we should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate," Waller said on Thursday.

From Washington: Congress Claws Back Billions. A Sign of More Cuts to Come?
From Washington: Congress Claws Back Billions. A Sign of More Cuts to Come?

Fox News

time26 minutes ago

  • Fox News

From Washington: Congress Claws Back Billions. A Sign of More Cuts to Come?

This week, Congress passed President Trump's $9 billion rescissions package, codifying cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting. Now, Republicans are eyeing even more cuts to avoid a government shutdown in September. FOX News Senior Congressional Correspondent Chad Pergram explains the process of passing the rescissions package and what it could indicate for future spending cuts. Later, Charles Payne, host of 'Making Money' on FOX Business, discusses the state of the housing market and how the Federal Reserve's decisions are impacting Americans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store