AI device startup that sued OpenAI and Jony Ive now suing its own ex-employee over trade secrets
By MATT O'BRIEN
A secretive competition to pioneer a new way of communicating with artificial intelligence chatbots is getting a messy public airing as OpenAI fights a trademark dispute over its stealth hardware collaboration with legendary iPhone designer Jony Ive.
In the latest twist, tech startup iyO Inc., which already sued Ive and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman for trademark infringement, is now suing one of its own former employees for allegedly leaking a confidential drawing of iyO's unreleased product.
At the heart of this bitter legal wrangling is a big idea: we shouldn't need to stare at computer or phone screens or talk to a box like Amazon's Alexa to interact with our future AI assistants in a natural way. And whoever comes up with this new AI interface could profit immensely from it.
OpenAI started to outline its own vision in May by buying io Products, a product and engineering company co-founded by Ive, in a deal valued at nearly $6.5 billion. Soon after, iyO sued for trademark infringement for the similar sounding name and because of the two firms' past interactions.
U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson ruled last month that iyO has a strong enough case to proceed to a hearing this fall. Until then, she ordered Altman, Ive and OpenAI to refrain from using the io brand, forcing them to take down the web page and all mentions of the venture.
A second lawsuit from iyO filed this week in San Francisco Superior Court accuses a former iyO executive, Dan Sargent, of breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets over his meetings with another io co-founder, Tang Yew Tan, a close Ive ally who led design of the Apple Watch.
Sargent left iyO in December and now works for Apple. He and Apple didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
'This is not an action we take lightly,' said iyO CEO Jason Rugolo in a statement Thursday. 'Our primary goal here is not to target a former employee, whom we considered a friend, but to hold accountable those whom we believe preyed on him from a position of power.'
Rugolo told The Associated Press last month that he thought he was on the right path in 2022 when he pitched his ideas and showed off his prototypes to firms tied to Altman and Ive. Rugolo later publicly expanded on his earbud-like 'audio computer" product in a TED Talk last year.
What he didn't know was that soon after, Ive and Altman would begin quietly collaborating on their own AI hardware initiative and give it a similar name.
'I'm happy to compete on product, but calling it the same name, that part is just amazing to me. And it was shocking,' Rugolo said in an interview.
The new venture was revealed publicly in a May video announcement, and to Rugolo about two months earlier after he had emailed Altman with an investment pitch.
'thanks but im working on something competitive so will (respectfully) pass!' Altman wrote to Rugolo in March, adding in parentheses that it was called io.
Altman has dismissed iyO's lawsuit on social media as a 'silly, disappointing and wrong' move from a 'quite persistent' Rugolo. Other executives in court documents have characterized the product Rugolo was pitching them as a failed one that didn't work properly in a demo.
Altman said in a written declaration that he and Ive chose the 'io' name two years ago in reference to the concept of 'input/output' that describes how a computer receives and transmits information. Neither io nor iyO was first to play with the phrasing — Google's big annual technology showcase is called I/O — but Altman said he and Ive acquired the io.com domain name in August 2023.
The idea was 'to create products that go beyond traditional products and interfaces,' Altman said. 'We want to create new ways for people to input their requests and new ways for them to receive helpful outputs, powered by AI.'
A number of startups have already tried, and mostly failed, to build gadgetry for AI interactions. The startup Humane developed a wearable pin that you could talk to, but it was poorly reviewed and the startup discontinued sales after HP acquired its assets earlier this year.
Altman has suggested that io's version could be different. He said in a now-removed video that he's already trying a prototype at home that Ive gave him, calling it 'the coolest piece of technology that the world will have ever seen.'
What Altman and Ive still haven't said is what exactly it is. The court case, however, has forced their team to disclose what it's not.
'Its design is not yet finalized, but it is not an in-ear device, nor a wearable device,' said Tan in a court declaration that sought to distance the venture from iyO's product.
It was that same declaration that led iyO to sue Sargent this week. Tan revealed in the filing that he had talked to a 'now former' iyO engineer who was looking for a job because of his frustration with 'iyO's slow pace, unscalable product plans, and continued acceptance of preorders without a sellable product.'
Those conversations with the unnamed employee led Tan to conclude 'that iyO was basically offering 'vaporware' — advertising for a product that does not actually exist or function as advertised, and my instinct was to avoid meeting with iyO myself and to discourage others from doing so.'
IyO said its investigators recently reached out to Sargent and confirmed he was the one who met with Tan.
Rugolo told the AP he feels duped after he first pitched his idea to Altman in 2022 through the Apollo Projects, a venture capital firm started by Altman and his brothers. Rugolo said demonstrated his products and the firm politely declined, with the explanation that they don't do consumer hardware investments.
That same year, Rugolo also pitched the same idea to Ive through LoveFrom, the San Francisco design firm started by Ive after he left Apple. Ive's firm also declined.
'I feel kind of stupid now,' Rugolo added. 'Because we talked for so long. I met with them so many times and demo'd all their people — at least seven people there. Met with them in person a bunch of times, talking about all our ideas.'
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
2 days ago
- Japan Times
Mizuho partners with SoftBank on AI to boost efficiency
Mizuho Financial Group said Friday that it has signed a strategic partnership agreement with SoftBank to introduce cutting-edge artificial intelligence to streamline operations and improve customer service. Mizuho will be the first in the financial sector to introduce "Cristal intelligence," which is being developed jointly by SoftBank and OpenAI, the U.S. developer of the ChatGPT generative AI tool. Mizuho expects the latest AI technology, which optimizes corporate tasks, to help the company increase revenue and cut costs, resulting in positive effects totaling ¥300 billion by fiscal 2030. Using the technology, Mizuho plans to analyze transaction data and market trends to quickly provide corporate customers with management advice. The financial group also expects the technology to help boost productivity in its sales activities more than twofold and reduce low-value operations by up to 50%. Mizuho and SoftBank will also conduct research and development on a large language model dedicated to the financial sector.
The Mainichi
3 days ago
- The Mainichi
OpenAI's advisory board calls for continued and strengthened nonprofit oversight
(AP) -- OpenAI should continue to be controlled by a nonprofit because the artificial intelligence technology it is developing is "too consequential" to be governed by a corporation alone. That is the message from an advisory board convened by OpenAI to give it recommendations about its nonprofit structure -- delivered in a report released Thursday, along with a sweeping vision for democratizing AI and reforming philanthropy. "We think it's too important to entrust to any one sector, the private sector or even the government sector," said Daniel Zingale, the convener of OpenAI's nonprofit commission and a former adviser to three California governors. "The nonprofit model allows for what we call a common sector," that facilitates democratic participation. The recommendations are not binding on OpenAI, but the advisory commission, which includes the labor organizer Dolores Huerta, offers a framework that may be used to judge OpenAI in the future, whether or not they adopt it. In the commission's view, communities that are already feeling the impacts of AI technologies should have input on how they are developed, including how data about them is used. But there are currently few avenues for people to influence tech companies who control much of the development of AI. OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, started in 2015 as a nonprofit research laboratory and has since incorporated a for-profit company with a valuation that has grown to $300 billion. The company has tried to change its structure since the nonprofit board ousted its CEO Sam Altman in Nov. 2023. He was reinstated days later and continues to lead OpenAI. It has run into hurdles escaping its nonprofit roots, including scrutiny from the attorney generals in California and Delaware, who have oversight of nonprofits, and a lawsuit by Elon Musk, an early donor to and founder of OpenAI. Most recently, OpenAI has said it will turn its for-profit company into a public benefit corporation, which must balance the interests of shareholders and its mission. Its nonprofit will hold shares in that new corporation, but OpenAI has not said how much. Zingale said Huerta told the commission their challenge was to help make sure AI is a blessing and not a curse. To grapple with those stakes, they envision a nonprofit with an expansive mandate to help everyone participate in the development and trajectory of AI. "The measure of this nonprofit will be in what it builds, who it includes, and how faithfully it endures to mission and impact," they wrote. The commission toured California communities and solicited feedback online. They heard that many were inspired by OpenAI's mission to create artificial intelligence to benefit humanity and ensure those benefits are felt widely and evenly. But, Zingale said many people feel they are in the dark about how it's happening. "They know this is profoundly important what's happening in this 'Age of Intelligence,' but they want to understand better what it is, how it's developed, where are the important choices being made and who's making them?" he said. Zingale said the commission chose early on not to interact with Altman in any way in order to maintain their independence, though they quote him in their report. However, they did speak with the company's senior engineers, who they said, "entered our space with humility, seriousness, and a genuine desire to understand how their work might translate into democratic legitimacy." The commission proposed OpenAI immediately provide significant resources to the nonprofit for use in the public interest. For context, the nonprofit reported $23 million in assets in 2023, the most recent year that its tax filing is available. The commission recommend focusing on closing gaps in economic opportunity, investing in AI literacy and creating an organization that is accessible to and governed by everyday people. "For OpenAI's nonprofit to fulfill its mandate, it should commit to more than just doing good - it should commit to being known, seen, and shaped by the people it claims to serve," they wrote. The commission suggested opening a rapid response fund to help reduce economic strains now. Zingale said they specifically recommended funding theater, art and health. "We're trying to make the point that they need to dedicate some of their resources to human to human activities," he said. The commission also recommend setting up a requirement that a human lead the nonprofit, which Zingale said is a serious recommendation and "a sign of the times."
Asahi Shimbun
4 days ago
- Asahi Shimbun
SoftBank to have 1 billion ‘AI agents' up and running by 2026
Masayoshi Son, chairman and president of SoftBank Group Corp., and Sam Altman, CEO of U.S.-based OpenAI, discuss projects at an event held in Tokyo on July 16. (Naoko Murai) SoftBank Group Corp. plans to have 1 billion 'AI (artificial intelligence) agents' working in place of humans by the end of this year, the company's chairman and president said on July 16. Masayoshi Son announced the plan at a company event in Tokyo for corporate clients. According to Son, these AI agents can answer questions and make suggestions, as well as perform tasks such as replying to emails, making reservations at stores and repairing systems. Son said that in a future with AI agents, they could, for example, perform maintenance and inspections on the hundreds of thousands of system devices in Japan. 'Until now, sensors have detected (problems) and people have given instructions, but AI agents will make individual judgments and take action for each device,' Son said. The plan is to have each employee of SoftBank Group create more than 1,000 AI agents, building up to 1 billion. The AI agents, customized for each employee, will be responsible for some of the day-to-day decisions and negotiations. With that, each employee will become like Senju Kannon, a Buddhist deity depicted with a thousand arms, Son said. The company will also create an operating system (OS) to allow the AI agents to cooperate with each other, he said. Sam Altman, CEO of U.S.-based OpenAI, also participated in the online event. OpenAI is working with SoftBank Group on Stargate, a project to build a network of massive data centers in the United States, and Altman said the project is making good progress. In February, the two companies announced that they will provide an AI service called Cristal Intelligence for businesses in Japan. At the event, Son expressed concern that the use of generative AI in Japan is lagging behind that of the United States and China. 'I also feel that (Japanese) society as a whole is getting a little old,' he said. 'The most important thing for Japan today is to take this evolution head-on and participate in it on its own.'
