Google offers to modify policy on gaming apps to avoid CCI probe
The proposal comes after CCI initiated a probe in November 2024 based on a complaint by WinZO Games, a skill-based RMG platform. At the time, the watchdog had found preliminary evidence suggesting Google may have violated Indian competition laws by favouring just two types of games—Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) and Rummy—under a selective pilot programme, while keeping other skill-based games off the platform.
Under the new "Play Commitment Proposal", Google has agreed to scrap the limited pilot and allow all skill-based real-money games that are self-declared by developers as permissible under Indian laws and jurisprudence. These apps will be allowed to distribute on the Play Store in India once the Commission approves the proposal.
Once the proposal is approved, Google will implement the change within 120 days, the CCI said.
'Google will replace the current Pilot Program by allowing the distribution of all real money games self-declared by developers as permissible online real money games as per applicable laws/jurisprudence, on Google Play in India,' CCI stated.
Google submitted the proposal on behalf of itself and other related parties including parent company Alphabet Inc. and two Indian affiliates. The proposal was made under a CCI mechanism that allows companies under investigation to voluntarily correct their conduct and avoid litigation.
The CCI also flagged Google's ad policy, which previously allowed promotions only for DFS and Rummy. In response, Google has offered to revise its advertising policy as well, opening the door for all games of skill to advertise.
In a statement to Mint, a Google spokesperson said:
'We're pleased the CCI is market testing our proposed framework for real-money games in India. This development reflects our constructive discussions with the CCI and the Indian developer community... and our commitment to building a more open and safe ecosystem.'
Queries sent to WinZO on Wednesday seeking comments for the story remained unanswered at the time of publishing. CCI will accept comments till 20 August.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
He has his reasons for saying so...: Shashi Tharoor on Rahul Gandhi's 'dead economy' remark
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Saturday refused to comment on party leader Rahul Gandhi's endorsing US President Donald Trump's 'dead economy' remark about India and said the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha may have had his "own reasons" for saying so. The remarks came after Congress MP Rahul Gandhi on Thursday agreed with US President Donald Trump's statement that the Indian economy is "dead" and said he is "glad" that the US President has stated a fact. Speaking to the mediapersons, Tharoor said, "I don't want to comment on what my party leader has said. He has his reasons for saying so. My concern is that our relationship with the US, as a strategic and economic partnership, is important for us. We are exporting around 90 billion worth of goods to America. We can't be in a position to lose that or have it diminish significantly.""We must wish our negotiators strength to get a fair deal for India. We should also be talking to other regions for exporting our goods. Then we could make up for some of what we might lose in the US. We have to support our negotiators," he added. Congress MP Rahul Gandhi on Thursday agreed with US President Donald Trump's statement that the Indian economy is "dead" and said he is "glad" that the US President has stated a fact. Speaking to reporters, Rahul Gandhi said that the whole world knows the Indian economy is "dead" except for the Prime Minister and Finance Minister."Yes, he is right. Everybody knows this except the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister. Everybody knows that the Indian economy is a dead economy. I am glad that President Trump has stated a fact. The entire world knows that the Indian economy is a dead economy. BJP has finished the economy to help Adani," Rahul Gandhi Wednesday, US President Donald Trump made a shocking statement on his social media platform Truth Social after the announcement of 25 per cent tariffs against India and threatened an additional "penalty" for importing Russian oil.
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
'Recession indicators' flood TikTok in US: Labubus, lipsticks and low-rise jeans trigger panic
AP To be in a recession, the economy has to have two consecutive quarters, or six months, of negative GDP growth The term 'recession indicator' is trending all over social media in the US. Have you ever wondered what do a Labubu toy and the US Treasury yield curve have in common? For Gen Z, everything from the popularity of Labubus to listening to emo music to lipstick sales are a possible indicator of a recession. From Lady Gaga topping the charts to fashionistas stepping out in low-rise jeans and coke bottles with names-- all these are just few hints that social media users see as a sign of recession in US. TikTok is brimming with what users are calling modern-day recession indicators. Among the most talked-about are the hemline index—the theory that skirt lengths tend to get longer as economic downturns loom—and the lipstick index, which links spikes in lipstick purchases or Google searches to the onset of past recessions. ALSO READ: Social Security in August: Recipients to receive their checks on these dates. How can you make the most of it? 'A huge recession indicator nobody is talking about, ready? The club is only getting stronger,' one TikTok post said, reports Seattle Times. 'We have an event here in Seattle at Cha Cha Lounge (where) they throw Latin night on a Wednesday and it gets packed.' 'Five things trending this summer that are actually just recession indicators,' one TikTok creator says in a video, going on to point to short nails, minimalism, people quitting fake tanning and a return to natural hair colors as signs of a recession. Some posts suggested that signs of cost-cutting or anything evoking the 2007–2009 era are indicators that the US economy may be headed for a downturn. But experts don't share the same views and assessment as actual economic indicators hold steady despite clouds of uncertainty. Economists use metrics to predict recessions, such as the unemployment rate, now at 4.1%, and weekly unemployment insurance claims. ALSO READ: Stimulus payments August 2025: These US states will receive financial benefit. Do you qualify? The US real gross domestic product increased at a 3% annual rate from April through June, an improvement after contracting 0.5% in the first quarter, according to an advance estimate from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis released this week. To be in a recession, the economy has to have two consecutive quarters, or six months, of negative GDP growth, economist Mark Gertler told The Seattle Times. This means, currently the US economy is not in a recession. The last time the National Bureau of Economic Research, where Gertler works, declared a recession was because of the pandemic. It was the shortest recession in US history, lasting from February to April 2020. Before that, the Great Recession, from 2007 to 2009, was the worst economic downturn in decades, and its impact reverberated through early 2000s culture. 'It could be that Lady Gaga concerts were correlated over a certain period,' Gertler was quoted as saying by Seattle Times. 'But if there's not a fundamental economic reason for that, the correlation will likely break down over time.' The Great Recession was a 'different animal' Gertler said, triggered by a bursting of the housing market bubble. When examining actual recession predictors, the US economy is holding fairly steady. ALSO READ: Social Security eyes massive reform in US: New policy could hit 3.4 million Americans this month Tara Sinclair, chair of George Washington University's Economics Department and an economic forecasting researcher, told NBC Washington while looking for recession indicators may seem strange, some have an underlying validity.'There would be reasons to think that culturally we could come up with a theoretical argument, for example, for the lipstick index, this idea that when you feel like you can't buy a whole new outfit, but maybe you can just buy yourself a new shade of lipstick, that that might somewhat be indicative of people's sense of personal finances,' she said.'I think what's more important is tracking that people are talking about it more. And in general, if people are talking about concerns about the economy, then the next step is for them to pull back on their spending. and if they pull back on their spending, then that can create a self-created recession," she said. ALSO READ: Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ad controversy: How the actress built a $40 million empire from endorsements Labubus are actually recession indicators? 'I mean, it could be that we all get ourselves a little Labubu and if that's all we're getting everybody for Christmas this year, that's probably a signal that we've cut back a lot on our spending by Christmas," Sinclair said. 'Unless, of course, you're getting one of those collectible ones that cost thousands of dollars.'Economists rely on several key indicators to assess the nation's economic health—one of the most significant being the unemployment rate, which currently sits at around 4.1%. That figure has remained relatively stable over the past few spending is another critical measure. A noticeable drop in purchases of nonessential items can be an early warning sign of an impending recession, according to Ana Espinola-Arredondo, an economist and professor at Washington State University.
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
754 and out – Shubman Gill ends stunning series 20 runs short of Sunil Gavaskar's record
Shubman Gill may have scored just 11 runs in the second innings of the fifth Test, after scoring 21 in the first, which may not be noteworthy numbers but they have brought to an end a stunning series with the bat. Gill has ended the series with a tally of 754 runs, which is the second highest tally of all time for an Indian in any Test series, only behind Sunil Gavaskar's 774 against the mighty West Indies in a five-Test series in 1971. Gavaskar had played only four matches in that series, having made his debut only in the second Test. Gill, meanwhile, has achieved this feat on his debut as India's Test captain. He is also just the third Indian to score more than 700 runs in a single series after Gavaskar and his teammate Yashasvi Jaiswal, who had scored 712 runs in a five-Test series at home against England in 2023/24. Gill's tally is also the second highest for a captain in any Test series, only 56 runs behind the record of 810 held by the legendary Don Bradman, who had scored that against England at home in the 1936/37 Ashes. Conversely, it is the highest score by any Indian captain in a Test series by a margin of of 22 runs – Gavaskar held the record previous for the 732 he scored in the six-Test series against the West Indies in 1978/79. Gill fell in the first innings of the first Test after going for a single that was never there. In the second innings, Gill fell off the very first ball of the second session, being trapped in front of his stumps by an inswinger from Gus Atkinson. The only Tests in which Gill failed to score centuries in this series were both in London – the third Test at Lord's and the fifth Test at the Oval. Gill started the series by scoring a century on his captaincy debut. He scored 147 in his very first innings as the skipper, followed by a score of eight in the second innings. Gill then made merry in the second Test, scoring a record 269 in the first innings and 161 in the second as he powered India to a 336-run win at Edgbaston. He then could only manage scores of 16 and six in the third Test and 12 in the first innings of the fourth before grinding out 103 runs off 238 balls as part of a match-saving effort with KL Rahul. Rahul and Gill batted out nearly 70 overs after which unbeaten centuries by Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar helped India draw the match. This was followed by the 21 and 11 he scored at the Oval.
