Councils will have to set targets to improve number of children ready for school
Bridget Phillipson will decry 'a national scandal' when she speaks at a Government regional improvement conference on Friday.
Ministers have previously set a target of 75% of school children being 'school-ready' by 2028.
As part of the Government's plans, Ms Phillipson will confirm that all local authorities will have to work with Whitehall to agree targets that could improve school readiness in their area.
Officials have pointed to wanting to bring down the number of children starting school in nappies or unable to hold a pencil as part of their plans.
A tool focused on school readiness data will also be launched this autumn, designed to help schools support children through their Reception year, and will be demonstrated at the conference.
Ms Phillipson is expected to tell school leaders: 'How can there be a fair race to success in our society when whole groups of children start so far behind?
'Nearly half of the disadvantage gap at age 16 is already there by age 5.
'It breaks my heart that, for these children, here in our country, a quarter of the way through the 21st century, background still means destiny. It's a national scandal.'
She will also say that, as well as Government and school leaders, 'parents have responsibilities too'.
'To make sure their children arrive at school ready to learn. Whether that's their first day in reception, or last day in year 11.'
The head of a school leaders' union has welcomed the Government's focus on early years but said 'targets alone won't solve the problem, and targets must not become another stick to beat schools with'.
Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'We hope that today's announcement will be followed shortly with further information about the tangible actions government will take to ensure every young child and family gets the support they need.'
A poll of primary school teachers in May found that a majority believe that the Government will miss its target of three in four being ready for school in the coming years.
A poll of more than 2,500 primary school teachers in England found 80% do not think the Government is likely to meet its goal of 75% of children being 'school ready' by 2028.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
James McMurdock says ‘business dealings' compliant after he resigns Reform whip
MP James McMurdock has said 'all' of his 'business dealings' complied with regulations after he resigned the Reform UK whip amid questions related to Covid loans. The MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock 'removed the party whip from himself' pending the outcome of an investigation relating to allegations around 'business propriety during the pandemic'. The Sunday Times published a story on Saturday which alleged two businesses connected to Mr McMurdock took out Covid-19 loans totalling £70,000 during the pandemic. In a statement posted on X on Saturday afternoon, Mr McMurdock said he had been contacted by a reporter. 'I confirmed to the journalist that all my business dealings had always been conducted fully within the law and in compliance with all regulations and that appropriately qualified professionals had reviewed all activity confirming the same.' He added: 'As a precautionary measure, and for the protection of Reform UK, I have asked to have the whip suspended temporarily.' According to Companies House, Mr McMurdock is listed as the current director of Gym Live Health and Fitness Limited, and a former director of J A M Financial Limited, a position he resigned in 2021. Both firms are shown to have overdue accounts and confirmation statements, and both have an 'active proposal to strike off'. Reform's chief whip Lee Anderson had earlier said that the allegations against Mr McMurdock which led to him removing the whip 'relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before he became an MP'. Mr Anderson said Mr McMurdock has 'agreed to co-operate in full with any investigation'. In a statement published on Reform's X account on Saturday afternoon, Mr Anderson said: 'I have today received a call from James McMurdock who has advised me, as chief whip, that he has removed the party whip from himself pending the outcome of an investigation into allegations that are likely to be published by a national newspaper. 'The allegations relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before he became an MP,' Mr Anderson said. The statement said Reform would not be commenting further for the moment. Mr McMurdock has represented South Basildon and East Thurrock since last July's general election. He won the seat by 98 votes, beating Labour into second place, and taking the seat from the Conservatives.
Times
44 minutes ago
- Times
More than 20 arrested at Palestine Action protest in London
Police arrested more than 20 protesters in central London on Saturday on suspicion of supporting Palestine Action within hours of the organisation being banned by the government as a terrorist outfit. Among those detained was an 83-year-old vicar from Bristol. She was part of a group of activists gathered in Parliament Square holding placards that stated: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' The protesters were affiliated to Defend Our Juries, a civil liberties organisation, who had arrived at 1pm for a 'silent vigil' next to the statue of Mahatma Gandhi, the Indian independence leader. They had notified the Metropolitan Police of their protest in advance. Officers gave the group a 30-minute grace period to register their dissent before they started making arrests, handcuffing each protester before marching them over to a row of blue police vans parked nearby. They included the Rev Sue Parfitt, a retired Anglican priest, who had travelled to London from the west of England. She took part in the protest sitting on a fold-away seat and was holding a walking stick when she was led away by officers. • MPs like Corbyn won't be prosecuted for Palestine Action support Speaking before her arrest, Parfitt, 83, described herself as a 'long-standing supporter of Palestine' who has repeatedly visited the West Bank. 'I feel the Israeli government is committing genocide in Gaza and practising apartheid in the occupied West Bank,' she said. Asked if she thought Palestine Action was a terrorist group, Parfitt said: 'Of course not. Civil disobedience has a long and honourable history in this country. Our government is cowering to the powerful Israeli lobby.' She said she had been arrested almost 30 times for taking part in climate change protests. The Home Office ban on Palestine Action came into effect at midnight after the failure of a last-minute legal challenge by the direct action group to stall its proscription. The move to designate it as a terrorist organisation was announced by Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20. Palestine Action claimed responsibility for the stunt, which involved red paint being sprayed into the engines of the planes. Police estimate the damage to have cost £7 million. Four people have been charged in connection with the Brize Norton attack followed acts of vandalism at the premises of UK defence companies, which Palestine Action accuses of being involved in supplying the Israeli military. • Undercover with Palestine Action: 'Damage as much as possible' Those detained in Parliament Square are believed to have been arrested under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. This relates to 'wearing clothing or carrying or displaying articles in public in such a way as to arouse reasonable suspicion that the individual is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation'. One protester arrested was wearing a Palestine Action T-shirt, while other members of the group were holding supportive placards. More than 50 officers were involved in the police operation, which was largely peaceful. As officers moved in, one supporter shouted 'shame on you' as another yelled: 'British police, off our streets!' There were also chants of 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free'.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
I nearly wept in Tim Davie's office over BBC anti-Israel bias
As Rachel Reeves can uncomfortably attest, resisting the urge to cry at inconvenient moments can end in failure. I discovered this myself, one afternoon, in Tim Davie's office. The situation arose following an email I had sent to the Director General in an entirely personal capacity and at a moment of bleak despair. This was at the end of 2023. Despite the atrocities of October 7, the Jewish community was bleeding: antisemitism in the UK was spiralling, oxygenated, I and many fellow Jews felt, by the BBC's skewered anti-Israel coverage. Writing more to vent my own feelings, I asked Davie to come and address the Jewish community directly – and in Manchester, where I lived. Since the Jews in the North – far from London and BBC accountability – were feeling especially vulnerable. To his credit and my amazement, he replied. Following further emails and out of – what? decency or tick box obligation (probably both) – he agreed to meet me. When I made the case in his office he seemed at first inscrutable. Was it the cracking in my voice or the fact I was fighting back tears which made him relent? I can't verify (as the BBC might say). Either way, Davie promised that though he couldn't attend such an event in person, he would send senior executives. And so under the aegis of the Northern Advocacy Group (NAG) – a Manchester-based organisation committed to holding institutions accountable for manifest anti-Israel bias – the event was arranged. What followed was unprecedented. More than 500 Jewish community members gathered in Manchester (double the number attending a similar event in London) for what would be the largest 'live' public forum to date in which BBC executives were challenged, face to face, on the reporting of our public funded broadcaster – and its consequences. The audience was respectful but the questions were unflinching. Why won't you call Hamas terrorists? What about the factual inaccuracies? Do you understand what your bias and prejudice does to us? Having been asked to chair the event I watched the executives closely as they nodded, listened, and gave carefully worded answers to make their case. But when I asked for a show of hands from those who still didn't trust the BBC, 500 arms spiked in the air. After the event, three more intimate roundtable discussions followed, giving community members the chance to air further grievances with senior BBC figures. The process stretched out over a year. It ended last March. And still after listening to the Jewish people make their unsparing case, the BBC insisted it had found no evidence of institutional bias. The experience surely lifts the bonnet on why accusations of anti-Israel bias – and, at times, naked antisemitism – continue to dog the BBC. Namely a culture of weakness that runs right to the top. A spineless, craven unwillingness to offer a concrete and consequential response in the face of first-hand testimony – whether from anguished Northern licence payers or, in the case of Glastonbury, unequivocal death chants. Indeed, it goes some way to explaining the Director General's lack of meaningful reaction after Bob Vylan's repugnant behaviour. Stating that the broadcast was 'deeply offensive and totally unacceptable', he barely landed a blow. Nor, I suspect, will a reported hastily arranged meeting with Jewish staff. Tim Davie is doubtless a decent man. He may well be sincere in his regret. But limp deflection, rueful apologies, and the tired mantra of 'lessons learned' are no longer enough. If the BBC is to have any hope of regaining credibility, its leadership must find its backbone – starting with the immediate and public dismissal of those responsible for failing to pull the plug on that toxic Glastonbury broadcast. The tears that threatened to fall in Tim Davie's office were real. His – and those of his executives – will remain crocodile, unless there is swift, transparent, and decisive action when prejudice towards Israel and the Jewish people presents itself. Manchester won't be the only part of the world hoping to hear it will be so.
