Members of British Jewish body suspended after criticising Israel to launch appeal
Thirty-six elected representatives to the UK's largest Jewish organisation are to appeal against disciplinary action taken against them after they criticised the Israeli government's operations in Gaza, and have said they remain 'deeply concerned' about the war.
The Board of Deputies of British Jews announced on Tuesday that five of the group would be suspended for two years and 31 would be reprimanded for breaching its code of conduct after a two-month investigation.
In a statement released on Thursday, the group said they would appeal after taking legal advice. They 'remain deeply concerned about the remaining hostages, the appalling humanitarian crisis and ongoing war in Gaza and the further deteriorating situation in the West Bank', they said.
The five deputies who gave media interviews about an open letter that was published by the FT in April had received 'the enhanced punishment of effective expulsion from the board' as they were suspended for the remainder of their terms of office, the statement said.
It was 'the biggest mass disciplinary action in the board's history, with over one in 10 elected board members disciplined', it added.
The open letter caused a furore among British Jews amid growing divisions over the war and distress at the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza. It said that 'Israel's soul [was] being ripped out' by military action that renewed in March, and that the signatories could no longer 'turn a blind eye or remain silent' on the issue.
Statements issued by the Board of Deputies since the war began in response to atrocities committed by Hamas on 7 October 2023 have been broadly supportive of the Israeli government's actions.
The board launched an investigation after receiving complaints from other members. It stressed that it welcomed a diversity of opinions, debate and free speech but that its code of conduct required deputies not to misrepresent the position of the board and not to bring the institution into disrepute.
The reprimanded group's statement said they stood 'in solidarity with the 70% of Israelis that consistently say they want an immediate end to the war in Gaza, which is the perceived price for the return of all the hostages'.
Since writing the open letter, a lack of food and aid had 'engineered conditions of scarcity, which has seen hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of Palestinians being killed week after week in the desperate scramble for survival that has been created'. There was 'no justification for the continuing misery and destruction being wrought on Gazan civilians'.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Harriett Goldenberg, one of those suspended, said: 'So many Jews in the UK agreed with our sadly groundbreaking letter. We were inundated with thanks from those who said we represented them, and that we were their voice. It is tragic that voice is still needed.'
Philip Goldenberg, another suspended deputy, said the board's executive was 'effectively expelling those who spoke inconvenient truth unto power. This is utterly contrary to the Jewish tradition that robust debate is an essential part of a civilised life, and feels more like Putin's Russia.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Prince Andrew and the Chinese millionaire with Communist Party links
A wealthy businessman who has been pictured with Prince Andrew has links to a Chinese government department accused of being a front for spying. Chu Ting Tang, a lobbyist who runs annual Chinese New Year celebrations in Trafalgar Square, was made an OBE in 2021. He was invited to Downing Street on numerous occasions and met senior government officials and members of the royal family. It can now be revealed that he holds a senior position in an organisation run by the United Front Work Department (UFWD), a vast global Chinese foreign influence body accused of espionage. Mr Tang, 71, runs the London Chinatown Chinese Association and has used his influence to campaign for the Conservative Party in London mayoral elections, push for policy change, and promote Beijing's crackdown in Hong Kong. He met Prince Andrew, King Charles, when he was still the Prince of Wales, and Sadiq Khan. He was pictured visiting Downing Street for Chinese New Year several times between 2017 and 2020, with prime ministers Theresa May and Boris Johnson. Mr Tang was awarded an OBE for 'services to Chinese people in Chinatown, Westminster, London' four years ago. But despite his high profile, there are no public references to his ties to the Chinese Communist Party. His links to the UFWD are likely to ring alarm bells in Government and espionage circles, particularly after an alleged Chinese spy who worked with Prince Andrew was also linked to the organisation. New legislation comes into force on Tuesday to make lobbyists linked to foreign governments join a Foreign Influence Registration Scheme. Failing to register and properly disclose such activities could lead to a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a fine. Concerns about Mr Tang's links have been raised by UK-China Transparency, an investigative research group. Mr Tang is linked to a string of Chinese restaurants including in the heart of Chinatown, where the Chinese embassy holds its off-site events and meetings with UK defence officials. Senior defence sources in the UK expressed concerns one of the restaurants could be surveilled and bugged. Mr Tang is thought to have a large property investment portfolio, and UK-China Transparency estimates he is a millionaire. He has a record of lobbying Parliament, and has organised and led rallies in the UK on controversial issues. He demonstrated support of Beijing's illegal extra-territorial claims in the South China Sea, rallied against pro-democracy protests that roiled Hong Kong in 2019, promoted 'reunification' with Taiwan, potentially by force, and campaigned against home office raids on Chinatown. He also campaigned on behalf of Sean Bailey, the former Conservative candidate for London mayor. During Chinese New Year celebrations was pictured with current London mayor Sadiq Khan, as well as Prince Andrew. In 2019, Mr Tang was appointed vice-president of the Chinese Overseas Friendship Association, which falls under the control of the UFWD. He was seen shaking hands with Xi Jinping, the Chinese president, at the event. A report by Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee said the UFWD was 'one of the most important departments of the Chinese Communist Party' in 2023. MI5 was forced to issue an infiltration alert in 2022 about a suspected Chinese spy named Christine Lee, saying she had 'knowingly engaged in political interference and activities on behalf of the UFWD of the Chinese Communist Party'. Ms Lee denies accusations of spying. The UFWD has been described by Mr Xi himself as China's 'magic weapon' it can quietly leverage, for example to shape a host nation's policies to be favourable to Beijing. Hong Kong dissidents who live in Britain, including Nathan Law, have complained that Mr Tang – often touted as a 'representative' of the British-Chinese community – does not, in fact, represent their interests. The Chinese government has sought to silence dissidents like Mr Law and other prominent pro-democracy activists. It even placed a £100,000 bounty on his head. Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, has expressed interest in improving relations with Beijing – challenging China on certain issues but trying to engage in other areas, particularly trade. He has been criticised by some British politicians for not being tough enough on China. Sir Keir was the first UK prime minister to meet his counterpart, Mr Xi, in more than six years, last November at the G20 meeting in Brazil. The last such meeting was with Theresa May in 2018. Sam Dunning, the director of UK-China Transparency, said the government rules should be clearer on Chinese influence. He said: 'In well over 100 pages of government guidance for the scheme there is not one mention of China or the Chinese Communist Party. 'This is a piece of domestic legislation, but there is reason to suspect it has been influenced by diplomatic concerns.' When contacted by The Telegraph on Monday, Mr Tang refused to comment on his links with the Chinese Communist Party.
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
I quit the BBC over Gaza – Glastonbury proves it was the right thing to do
This weekend, if you wanted to watch Kneecap's Glastonbury performance live on the West Holts stage, you wouldn't have found it on the BBC. Instead, you'd have had to find Helen Wilson's TikTok account, where she burnt her fingers holding her phone up in 30-degree heat to livestream the entire set from her spot in the festival audience, knowing that our public broadcaster had decided not to. Thousands were watching. The band was expected to be one of the festival's most anticipated acts, with organisers warning prior that there would be a large crowd for their performance. The BBC announced it wouldn't be broadcasting the set live on TV, but that edited highlights would be offered later, on iPlayer. 'Whilst the BBC doesn't ban artists', it said in a statement, 'our plans ensure that our programming meets our editorial guidelines.' This comes after band member Mo Chara was charged with a terrorist offence, for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a performance in 2024 – a charge that has now been dropped, and with a court hearing scheduled for August cancelled. On the day, the BBC tried to play it safe, choosing to edit Kneecap's performance for iPlayer. Surely this would shield it? During the set, Mo Chara commented on the sheer number of Palestinian flags at the festival, and led crowds in chants of 'Free Palestine'. Another band member wore a T-shirt reading 'We are all Palestine Action ', in reference to the soon-to-be proscribed direct action group. In the end, the BBC's editorial timidity didn't save it. Instead of livestreaming Kneecap's Palestine chants, it livestreamed rap duo Bob Vylan's, whose call-and-response about the Israeli military ('Death, death to the IDF') has resulted in significant criticism – even from the prime minister – and demands that the broadcaster be defunded or prosecuted. For bad-faith critics, censorship – the most extreme editorial choice – will never be enough. Refusing to air band sets at Glastonbury, or editorially sound documentaries like Gaza: Doctors Under Fire, will never be enough. Sacrificing the BBC's dearest editorial standards and values will never be enough. Because censorship is the call of those who don't want reality to be shown – and the reality is that there's growing public support for Palestine, and growing anger at Israel's actions in Gaza. This shows itself in the folk-hero status given to artists who speak up, in the hundreds of thousands who have protested down London streets across 20 months, in the sea of Palestine flags at Glastonbury. Public anger cannot be censored away, no matter how much anyone tries. If an artist shouts 'Free, free' on a Glastonbury stage, the audience will roar 'Palestine'. Showing the reality of this public sentiment should be a priority for our public broadcaster. I want a BBC free of influence, a BBC that is editorially brave in the face of pressure. It's crucial that our public broadcaster makes its editorial decisions freely, not based on the perceived anger of bad-faith critics, but based on accuracy, evidence, human rights, and core principles that must be upheld – principles such as free speech and public service. The BBC that refused to remove a documentary series on Indian prime minister Narendra Modi's role in the 2002 Gujarat riots, despite pressure from his government, is the BBC we need. It's the BBC we deserve. Not the one where a member of the public has to burn her fingers to air what it won't.
BBC News
44 minutes ago
- BBC News
July Tynwald sitting extended for high volume of business
The July sitting of the Manx parliament has been moved forward by a day to accommodate the "extra large volume of business before the court", the President of Tynwald has Skelly confirmed the meeting would start on 14 July, previously scheduled for a day later. It is the final session before members break up for the summer recess. The busy agenda is set to include debates on the Chief Constable's annual report, a £15.3m overspend in health for the last financial year and changes to how the island's minimum wage is calculated. Other items include the regulations governing the introduction of an opt-out system for organ Council of Ministers' updated report on inward migration and a select committee report footpaths, bridleways and green lanes are also expected to be sitting marks the final meeting of parliamentary members with no further House of Keys sittings, before the summer follows the island's national celebration Tynwald Day, which this year falls on 7 July. Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
