
If you dial 999 you CAN expect an officer to attend, but we're pretty stretched, says Met Police chief
Sir Mark Rowley spoke on Sky News ' Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, where he attempted to reassure viewers that officers would respond to urgent calls.
'If you are in the middle of the crisis and something awful is happening and you dial 999, officers will get there really quickly,' he said.
'I don't pretend we're not a stretched service.
It comes as Sir Mark has called for better resourcing for police.
He added: 'We are smaller than I think we ought to be, but I don't want to give a sort of message of a lack of hope or a lack of determination.'
'I've seen the mayor and the Home Secretary fighting hard for police resourcing,' he added.
'It's not what I'd want it to be, but it's better than it might be without their efforts.'
The police chief went on to say that racial disparities in the criminal justice system are 'shameful' for London.
He said racial disparity among suspects and victims of crime in the capital was a 'difficult' issue for the force.
The Met Police Commissioner said there was a history between policing and black communities 'where policing has got a lot wrong, and we get a lot more right today '.
'But we do still make mistakes. That's not in doubt,' Sir Mark added.
'I'm being as relentless in that as it can be.'
He continued: 'The vast majority of our people are good people.
'But that legacy, combined with the tragedy that some of this crime falls most heavily in black communities, that creates a real problem because the legacy creates concern.'
'It's not right that black boys growing up in London are more likely to be dead by the time they're 18, far more likely than white boys,' the commissioner said.
'That's, I think, shameful for the city.
'The challenge for us is, as we reach in to tackle those issues, that confrontation that comes from that reaching in, whether it's stop and search on the streets or the sort of operations you seek.
'The danger is that's landing in an environment with less trust.
'And that makes it even harder. But the people who win out of that, all of the criminals.'
He added: 'I'm so determined to find a way to get past this because if policing in black communities can find a way to confront these issues, together we can give black boys growing up in London equal life chances to white boys, which is not what we're seeing at the moment.'
'And it's not simply about policing, is it?' he added.
'I think black boys are several times more likely to be excluded from school, for example, than white boys.
'And there are multiple issues layered on top of each other that feed into disproportionality.'
Sir Mark also said that the criminal justice system was 'close-to-broken' and can be 'frustrating' for officers.
He said: 'The thing that is frustrating is that the system - and no system can be perfect - but when the system hasn't managed to turn that person's life around and get them on the straight and narrow, and it just becomes a revolving door.
'When that happens, of course that's frustrating for officers.
'So the more successful prisons and probation can be in terms of getting people onto a law-abiding life from the path they're on, the better.
'But that is a real challenge. I mean, we're talking just after Sir Brian Leveson put his report out about the close-to-broken criminal justice system.
'And it's absolutely vital that those repairs and reforms that he's talking about happen really quickly, because the system is now so stressed.'
Sir Mark gave the example of Snaresbrook Crown Court in London, which he said had more than 100 cases listed for 2029.
'If it's someone on bail, then who might have stolen your phone or whatever and going in for a criminal court trial, that could be four years away.
'And that's pretty unacceptable, isn't it?' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Gay man subjected to ‘exorcism' at Sheffield church receives compensation
A gay man has been paid compensation from a Church of England parish after he was subjected to an 'exorcism' to purge him of his homosexuality, it has been reported. Matthew Drapper, 37, was a volunteer at St Thomas Philadelphia, a joint Anglican-Baptist congregation in Sheffield, in 2014 when he was invited to an 'encounter God weekend' at the 'contemporary, welcoming church', the Times reported. Drapper was told 'sexual impurity' had allowed demons to enter his body and that an exorcism was to be performed. During the incident he was instructed to 'break agreements with Hollywood and the media' that led him into an ungodly lifestyle. He said he was left deeply distressed after the exorcism, which was conducted by a married couple who were 'prayer leaders'. He felt so depressed and 'empty' that he considered taking his own life. Drapper told the Times: 'Looking back it seems like something out of a horror movie – for someone to be standing over you saying they can see the demons leaving your body is quite terrifying. But when you are deeply tied into the church, as I was at that time, it is easy to believe anything they tell you.' He left the church in 2016 and three years later made a formal complaint about the exorcism and requested an apology from St Thomas Philadelphia, which was supposed to operate under the safeguarding rules of the diocese of Sheffield. St Thomas initially claimed there was no evidence to the complaint but after Drapper pursued the issue, in 2021 the church commissioned Barnardo's to investigate. Last year, the charity published its review, which found it was a 'supported fact' that Drapper was subjected to a prayer session that 'was in our view a form of exorcism'. After publication of the review, Drapper made a legal claim against St Thomas Philadelphia which resulted in an out-of-court settlement and payment of a five-figure sum. The Guardian has contacted St Thomas Philadelphia for comment. After publication of the Barnardo's report, the church said: 'We have accepted the outcomes of the first investigation and are saddened that one of our community was not cared for in the way we would have liked. We sincerely apologised to them for this.'


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves' mortgage gamble is the move of a chancellor who is running out of options
According to Treasury sources, Rachel Reeves wants the public to start taking risks again. The analysis she is working from is that the financial crash of 2008 – which saw several banks go under or need to be nationalised – has made the country too risk-adverse. But the biggest risk taker may well be the chancellor herself, with her plans to free up the mortgage market and slash red tape for financial services in the City. Like many gamblers, though, Ms Reeves' spin of the financial services roulette wheel, to be announced in her Mansion House speech this evening, is largely prompted by the fact that she is running out of options. After all, when Labour won the election just over a year ago, Ms Reeves came into office with economic growth as her 'number one mission'. For all of the talk of 'having the best economic growth in the G7', it has actually been negligible and, in fact, in the last quarter it has gone slightly backwards. She also insisted she did not want to raise tax, and even said during the election that she would prefer to cut tax. Once in power, however, she oversaw a massive increase in spending fuelled by £40bn of tax rises in her first Budget, mostly a hike on employer contributions to national insurance which is now impacting the jobs market. Attempts to bring spending under control by tackling welfare has ended with U-turns on winter fuel payment cuts for pensioners, costing her £1.25bn, and planned welfare cuts mostly on disability benefits which has cost her a further £5bn. The frustrations and pressure on Ms Reeves could not have been better illustrated than the tears visibly rolling down her face during a recent session of PMQs, where the prime minister Keir Starmer could not even guarantee her future as chancellor. The one break she got was after that unfortunate incident, Sir Keir was forced to give her a belated vote of confidence to prevent the markets tanking at the thought she might be sacked. But now, faced with the prospect she will have to bring in yet more painful, growth-killing taxes – possibly so-called wealth taxes on pension funds or dividends, or stealth taxes by freezing income tax thresholds, or both – Ms Reeves only has one way to find growth. That is to return to the pre-2008 model on financial services and mortgages to encourage investors and first-time buyers to start taking risks again themselves. It is exactly what fed the high growth which characterised the last Labour government under Tony Blair. Most of the country's economic success was floated on the 'get rich' model of the City. The problem is that the result of that model was 2008 when the deregulated financial services industry took several risks too many, and the blogabl economy was plunged into crisis, taking whole banks with it. Part of the reason for that was because of the mortgage market, where it had become far too easy for people to borrow unsustainable amounts that they could not pay back in so-called sub-prime mortgages. Ms Reeves is nodding back in that direction. By reducing the minimum wage for people to have a mortgage and increasing the ration from 3.5 times salary to 4.5 times she is not quite repeating the mistakes of the 2000s where people could literally self-certify their income. However, she is heading slowly in that direction and it brings an enormous risk, as well as potential for short-term economic growth. Possibly the greater worry for Ms Reeves, though, is if this does not work and her bonfire of red tape does not produce the increase to the nation's wealth that she needs to help fund the bill for public spending increases before the next election. There may not be any more dice for Ms Reeves to throw if that is the case. And, despite his recent assurances, that could mean that the prime minister ends up looking for someone else to do the job.


BreakingNews.ie
19 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Irish jockey Oisin Murphy speaks of ‘nightmare' car crash and drink driving conviction
Oisin Murphy has described his car crash and subsequent conviction for drink driving in England as 'a nightmare for everyone involved'. The four-times champion jockey was fined £70,000 (€80,000) and banned from driving for 20 months having pleaded guilty to one count of driving a motor vehicle while over the prescribed limit of alcohol after the accident in April. Advertisement Murphy drove a grey Mercedes A Class off the road and into a tree in Hermitage, Berkshire, at about 12.05am on April 27th. He had a passenger with him at the time, who was the owner of the car, the court heard. They were both taken to hospital after the crash. Murphy was later discharged to take a breathalyser test at a police station at about 7am, which showed a reading of 66mg per 100 millilitres of breath, 'just shy of twice above the drink-driving limit' at the time of driving. Following the conclusion of those court proceedings, the British Horseracing Authority announced the immediate imposition of 'an extremely strict set of conditions and monitoring requirements' on Murphy's riding licence which 'must be adhered to at all times', although the exact details remain confidential. Advertisement Speaking at Windsor on Monday evening, Murphy told Sky Sports Racing: 'It's very important not to make that error again, it was a nightmare particularly for everyone involved, not just myself, for everyone else and the people who had to pick up the pieces, my support network. Time is a great healer but I won't be forgetting about that mistake. 'They [the BHA] never disclose licence information, I'm not the first jockey to drink and drive or commit offences, it's obviously more high profile because it's me. Due to the profile I have, those incidents should never occur but the BHA have been fantastic to work with and I really appreciate what they have done to help me and I want to repay them.' Murphy said the passenger who was involved in the crash 'is really well, that's the most important thing' and spoke about the counselling he had received both before and after the accident. He added: 'I have been [in counselling] for the last four years and obviously had very good spells due to that support network and I relied on it an awful lot since late April and before it but certainly since late April and I have got to thank those people because they have gone above and beyond when the process hasn't been very easy.' Advertisement However, Murphy criticised the coverage his case had received, saying: 'There was going to be a lot said in the media and it's important not to allow the media to bully you too much because you can get very down, but I had horses to ride and a job to do. It's great to be riding every day and hopefully to the same level I was able to do at Royal Ascot and in the weeks previously. He added: 'Not everyone wants one to achieve, there's a lot of jealousy out there, particularly in the media, but I worked all my life to ride good horses and I'll continue to do that. The only thing that can inhibit me from not progressing further in my career is myself, so that's a realisation.'