&w=3840&q=100)
BPSL case: JSW Steel likely to cite NCLT 2019 order in SC review plea
Separate review petitions will also be filed by the lenders and the resolution professional, people familiar with the matter said.
The top court had invalidated JSW's resolution plan, citing the resolution professional's failure to file Form H and a lack of upfront equity infusion from JSW Steel. The judgment has thrown into uncertainty a high-profile insolvency resolution once hailed as a success under India's bankruptcy framework.
JSW's legal team is likely to argue that the funding structure — based on compulsory convertible preference shares — was effectively an equity infusion, according to a legal source. The review petitions, expected to be filed by the company, its lenders, the resolution professional, and the government, will aim to highlight what they describe as 'errors in the judgment'.
JSW Steel declined to comment.
Senior Advocate Nalin Kohli, speaking on the broader context, said, 'The company not only turned around but also expanded capacity and doubled its workforce — fulfilling the IBC's objectives.' He added that BPSL was among the 'dirty dozen' companies flagged by the Reserve Bank of India in 2017 for fast-track insolvency resolution and that the latest verdict reopens the case after four years of stability.
Sanjay Singhal, the former promoter of Bhushan Power, has already filed an application with the NCLT's New Delhi Bench seeking to enforce the SC order and push the company into liquidation. The move threatens to undo JSW's ₹19,700 crore acquisition and subsequent investments, which increased BPSL's steelmaking capacity from 2.5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) to 4.5 mtpa.
The SC had found JSW Steel ineligible under Section 29A of the IBC due to an undisclosed joint venture with an entity linked to BPSL's former promoters. It ruled that the resolution professional failed in his statutory duties, including vetting eligibility under the Code.
Bhushan Power, which owes lenders more than ₹47,200 crore, was among the first 12 companies sent for insolvency proceedings under the IBC in 2017. The upcoming legal battle is expected to be protracted, with major financial implications for both lenders and JSW Steel, say legal sources.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
NCLT approves Adani Properties' bid for two HDIL assets in Mumbai
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has approved the resolution plans of Adani Properties for two HDIL assets, including Project BKC in Bandra Kurla Complex and Shahad Maharal Lands in Thane district as part of its insolvency process. This was part of the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP), with Adani Properties being the sole bidder meeting the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) requirements for the two assets of Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited (HDIL). The Mumbai bench of NCLT approved the resolution plans under Section 31 of the IBC, 2016, on June 27. The committee of creditors (CoC) had cleared both plans, which are valued at over Rs 2,000 crore, with a 66.08 per cent voting share in November 2022. Initially, HDIL's resolution professional sought interest in resolving the entire company in February 2020, but received no proposals. Due to unfinished residential properties, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) allowed a project-wise resolution plan. The CoC initially rejected this proposal, however, reversed its stance in September 2021 after objections from home buyers. Home buyers sought a stay on liquidation proceedings and a consideration of project-wise resolution, after which CoC authorised the RP to explore project-wise resolution. The resolution amount for the BKC project is Rs 3 crore, while the resolution amount for Shahad Maral project is Rs 64 crore. HDIL has been undergoing insolvency since August 2019, with liabilities of around Rs 7,800 crores. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
SBI marks Reliance Com loan as 'fraud', reports Anil Ambani to RBI
Reliance Communications has disclosed to the exchanges that the country's largest lender, State Bank of India (SBI), has decided to classify its loan account as 'fraud' due to irregularities in the conduct of the account. It has also decided to report both the account and Anil Dhirajlal Ambani, who was a director at the company, to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in accordance with the central bank's guidelines. 'We have taken cognisance of the responses (wherever received) to our SCN (show-cause notice) and after due examination of the same it is concluded that sufficient reasons have not been provided by the respondent to explain the non-adherence to the agreed terms and conditions of the loan documents or the irregularities observed in the conduct of the account of Reliance Communications to the satisfaction of the bank,' SBI said in a letter to Reliance Communications on June 23, which the company received on June 30. The company, however, clarified that the classification of 'fraud' by SBI is not expected to have any impact on its operations. It is also seeking legal advice on the way forward with respect to this development. The company, which is currently undergoing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and has a resolution plan approved by its Committee of Creditors—currently awaiting approval from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)—said the credit facilities referred to by the bank pertain to the period prior to the CIRP. As per the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), such claims are required to be resolved as part of the resolution plan or during liquidation, as the case may be, it said. Meanwhile, Anil Ambani's lawyers, responding to SBI's notice classifying Reliance Communications' account as fraud, said the bank had not responded to Ambani's communication challenging the validity of the SCN for almost a year, and had also not granted him a personal hearing to make submissions against the allegations. Additionally, they stated that the bank had withdrawn SCNs issued to other non-executive and independent directors of the company, but had not done so for Ambani despite his being a non-executive director not involved in the day-to-day affairs of the company. The account was declared a non-performing asset (NPA) by the bank in August 2016. Following this, in October 2020, the bank had identified the account as 'fraud' and reported the name of the borrowing entity and its promoters, directors and guarantors to the RBI. However, this classification was challenged in court and subsequently reversed. The bank later reinitiated the process of fraud identification and served SCNs to the borrower and its promoters, directors and suspended directors in December 2023. In March 2024, SBI sent the forensic audit report to the promoters, directors and suspended directors, offering them an opportunity to make submissions, if any. Meanwhile, Anish Nanavaty, resolution professional (RP) of Reliance Communications, responding to the bank's SCN on behalf of the corporate debtor in January 2024, said the bank could pursue any action against the erstwhile management, employees and personnel of the corporate debtor for any fraudulent action committed prior to the cutoff date. Anil Ambani also responded to the bank's SCNs in January and March 2024, seeking documents and materials relied upon by the bank. In May 2024, Ambani, in his response, challenged the validity of the forensic audit report. According to the bank, Reliance Communications, RITL and RTL received Rs 31,580 crore from banks, of which 44 per cent was used for loan repayments and 41 per cent for payments to connected parties. 'Utilisation of funds obtained from banks was traced and its utilisation was mapped from the sanction letter. Instances were identified where utilisation of loan amount was not as per terms mentioned in the sanction letter,' the bank said. Additionally, there was potential rerouting of bank loan funds and internal transfer of funds among Reliance Communications, RITL and RTL. Further, large portions of the loan proceeds were invested in fixed deposits and mutual funds, among other instruments. Reliance Communications was admitted into CIRP in 2019. Lenders submitted claims amounting to around Rs 49,000 crore. Once among the largest telecom players in the country, Reliance Communications was the flagship firm of the Reliance Group.
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
SBI To Report Anil Ambani To RBI, Classify RCom Account As Fraud
New Delhi: The State Bank of India (SBI) has decided to report the loan account of Reliance Communications as "fraud" in a case dating back to August 2015, the company said in an exchange filing. The state-run lender will also report the name of the company's erstwhile director, Anil Ambani, to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The company received a letter dated June 23, 2025, from the SBI to this effect, Reliance Communications said in a regulatory filing. The firm, which is undergoing insolvency proceedings, is a group firm of the Anil Ambani-led Reliance Group. "This is to inform you that Company has received letter dated June 23, 2025 (received on June 30, 2025) from SBI (marked to he Company and its erstwhile director - Shri Anil Dhirajlal Ambani), inter alia, stating that SBI has decided to report the loan account of the Company as "fraud" and to report the name of Shri Anil Dhirajlal Ambani (erstwhile director of the Company) to the RBI, as per the extant RBI guidelines," the company said in the BSE filing. Reliance Communications and its subsidiaries received a total loan of Rs 31,580 crore from banks, as per the filing. The Fraud Identification Committee of the bank has found a deviation in the utilisation of the loans. The lender apparently found that the company failed to explain why it broke the terms of the loan. The bank also said the company did not satisfy its questions about irregularities in how the account was run. The resolution plan for its insolvency has already been approved by its committee of creditors and is awaiting final approval from the National Company Law Tribunal, the company said. "The credit facilities/loans referred to in the Letter from SBI dated June 23, 2025 (received on June 30, 2025) pertain to the period prior to the CIRP of the Company (as identified within the letter), and are required in terms of the Code, to be necessarily resolved as a part of a resolution plan or in liquidation, as the case may be," it added. The SBI issued show-cause notices to the company earlier in December 2023, March 2024 and again in September 22024. Anil Ambani and the State Bank of India have yet to issue comments on the recent developments.
