Campaign to call migrant workers by name spreads in southwest
Regions across the southern part of Korea are joining a growing campaign to encourage calling migrant workers by their names, rather than using disrespectful terms such as 'ya' (hey).
The campaign is part of broader efforts to promote a culture of respect toward residents with diverse ethnic backgrounds.
The initiative was launched by the Jeollanamdo Contingent Workers Center, a human rights group based in South Jeolla Province. Since last year, the center has worked with local corporations and groups to run the campaign, which mostly involves encouraging Korean employers and workers to address their colleagues from other countries by name. One common practice is placing name stickers on the workers' hard hats to support this effort.
Korea has long been considered a homogeneous society. But the latest data by Statistics Korea shows that in 2023, 1.19 million of the country's 51 million population were people from "multicultural families," which refers to families with members who are not ethnic Koreans.
Despite the growing presence of foreign nationals and Korean nationals with diverse cultural backgrounds, many migrant workers in the country are believed to be subject to discrimination based on their race. Last week, a video of a Sri Lankan worker tied to a forklift and being mocked by his colleagues went viral, sparking public outrage over the mistreatment of migrant workers.
The 31-year-old victim of the recent forklift incident said that he had rarely been called by his name by his Korean colleagues, who instead used pronouns and even profanity to refer to him. This practice of not referring to migrant workers by their names is thought to be detrimental to establishing a culture of mutual respect in an ethnically diverse working environment.
Officials from the JCWC said that addressing someone by their name is a starting point for building a relationship based on respect, which will not only help the migrant workers feel more comfortable but also prevent industrial accidents.
South Jeolla Province has one of the highest populations of foreign residents in the country. This figure jumped in 2023 to 86,729, an 18.5 percent increase from the previous year. The provincial government has kicked off a number of policies for the well-being of migrant workers in the region this year, including medical clinics for foreign nationals who are not subscribed to the state-run health insurance program.
It was reported that five companies in Haenam-gun, South Jeolla Province, are currently participating in the campaign, and that hundreds of name tags have been distributed to migrant workers in Jangseong-gun and Muan-gun in the same province.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Kim Seong-kon] Without care, we too, can become abusers](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F08%2F05%2Fnews-p.v1.20250805.ff3930a91f0a481b9e5d7c4089e58346_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Kim Seong-kon] Without care, we too, can become abusers](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Kim Seong-kon] Without care, we too, can become abusers
We tend to think there is a crystal-clear distinction between opposite things. However, it's rarely so simple. Oftentimes, things that at first glance appear contrary instead end up looking surprisingly alike or blend into one another, especially when they are pushed to the extreme. For example, the far left and far right, though technically opposites, bear an astonishing resemblance, as we see when we compare Josef Stalin and Adolf Hitler. Similarly, we think that there is a radical difference between terrorists and ordinary people. Therefore, we naturally believe that we are far removed from terrorists and have nothing to do with violent extremism. We assume there is a particular group of people who can be labeled 'terrorists.' In reality, however, even those of us who think we are the most ordinary of people can become terrorists if we are not careful. The Oxford English Dictionary defines a terrorist as 'someone who uses violence and intimidation to achieve a political and ideological aim.' According to this definition, anyone can fall into the category of a terrorist if they try to impose their political beliefs on others using force. If so, we can find quite a few terroristic people in our society who do not hesitate to use violence for ideological causes. The same goes for 'abusers.' In the Oxford English Dictionary, an abuser is 'someone who treats another person in a cruel, violent or unfair way.' Given the parameters of that definition, anyone can stumble into the category of an abuser if they treat others in an unfair or manipulative way. Although we might firmly believe that we are not doing so, we could be perpetrating abuse without realizing it. We can become abusers if we treat others in a rude, inhumane or manipulative way. It can happen between a father and a child, or between a husband and a wife. It can also happen between a teacher and a student, or between an employer and an employee. What Koreans call 'gapjil' is an example of abuse between people with power and those they have power over. Recently, I saw a poster that said: 'Does someone degrade you in public or private? Does he get angry if you are not submissive? Does he insist you are wrong? Does he blame you for everything? Does he pressure you to do things that make you uncomfortable? Does he force you to drink, or do things that you do not want to do? Does he expose you to danger because of your identity? Then, this is abuse.' If the above things belong to the category of 'abuse,' no one is completely free from the accusation of being an abuser. For example, if we pressure someone to drink against their will in a bar, which is quite common in Korean society, we might be abusing the person. If we ignore or degrade the opinions of our children or students simply because they are young, we might be abusers there, as well. If we provoke, blame or threaten family members, we are abusing them. If we have power, we can easily become abusers. If we do not have power, we may unwittingly turn into a terrorist. Sometimes, a powerful man can become both an abuser and a terrorist. If a political leader tries to impose his ideological beliefs on his people by force, he becomes an abuser and a terrorist. He may think he is doing the right thing, but he is not, because there is only a thin line between right and wrong, and good and evil. In order not to become abusers or terrorists, we should respect different voices, opinions and perspectives. We also should respect and embrace others who are different from us or weaker than us. If we force others to join us or be like us in the name of unity, we are likely to end up becoming terrorists or abusers. Nobody wants to be a terrorist or an abuser. Yet, we can easily become one unless we are extra careful and supercautious. We should know that there is only a thin wall between terrorists and abusers and us.
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Tax reform misstep
Misguided tax policies threaten to derail South Korea's fragile market rebound The Lee Jae Myung administration's first major tax reform was intended to tackle rising fiscal pressures and address long-standing structural imbalances in South Korea's tax regime. Instead, it has rattled markets, drawn criticism from global financial institutions and exposed fractures within the ruling party. On Friday, just a day after the blueprint's release, the benchmark Kospi and tech-heavy Kosdaq indices each fell by around 4 percent, a sharp reversal for markets that had only recently begun to regain momentum. Investor sentiment, already tentative, swiftly deteriorated. At the heart of the controversy are two measures: raising the top corporate tax rate by 1 percentage point to 25 percent and lowering the threshold for capital gains taxation on large shareholders from 5 billion won ($3.6 million) to 1 billion won. These proposals would reverse cuts introduced under the previous Yoon Suk Yeol administration and are projected to raise 8.2 trillion won in additional revenue next year. Yet the backlash has been swift and pointed. Critics have highlighted the reform's poor timing, lack of strategic coherence and a clear disconnect from the government's stated goal of capital market revitalization. CLSA described the measures as 'only sticks, no carrots.' Citigroup downgraded Korean equities in its emerging markets portfolio, citing misalignment with Korea's "value-up" initiative. JPMorgan similarly warned that any credible rerating of Korean stocks would require more than cosmetic shifts in policy. The irony is difficult to overlook. An administration that campaigned on market revitalization — pledging, no less, to drive the Kospi to 5,000 points — now finds itself accused of undermining its own narrative. Markets reacted unequivocally. Within a single trading session, 116 trillion won in market capitalization was wiped out. This erosion of household and institutional wealth is not merely symbolic; brokerages estimate it could shave more than 8 trillion won off future consumption. Political consequences have been just as swift. At least 13 lawmakers from the ruling Democratic Party of Korea have raised objections, while senior party figures have contradicted one another over whether the capital gains threshold should be reconsidered. Compounding the confusion are mixed signals from the presidential office, which have further heightened investor anxiety. Such incoherence is particularly damaging in a market where foreign investors account for nearly a third of all trading volume. These stakeholders depend not just on fundamentals, but on clarity, consistency and credible policymaking. Many observers argue the reforms stray from international norms. The dual imposition of capital gains and transaction taxes is widely viewed as excessive, particularly in comparison to major markets that opt for one or the other. The revised threshold for large shareholders is also seen as overly aggressive. Meanwhile, long-promised dividend tax relief has proved underwhelming, as it is narrowly targeted and still capped at a steep 35 percent, well above the 25 percent ceiling proposed in April by Democratic Party lawmaker Lee So-young. More fundamentally, the reform poses a critical question: Must fiscal consolidation come at the expense of market stability? In an open, export-driven economy exposed to global volatility, US tariffs and rising geopolitical risk, abrupt shifts in tax policy could alienate the very investors South Korea seeks to attract. President Lee is right to stress the importance of fiscal discipline. But credibility rests not only on budget arithmetic — it also depends on coherence. South Korea needs tax reform. What it does not need is a policy lurch that unsettles markets, contradicts strategic priorities and undercuts investor trust. If the Lee administration is serious about building a more dynamic, investment-friendly economy, it must steer clear of ad hoc reversals and restore clarity to its reform agenda.
Korea Herald
18 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee offers condolences to Korean atomic bomb victims ahead of 80th anniversary of Hiroshima bombing
President Lee Jae Myung on Tuesday offered his condolences to the Korean nuclear bomb victims, a day before Japan's Hiroshima marks the 80th anniversary of the devastating 1945 atomic bombing of the city. In a Facebook post, Lee wrote, "I express my deepest condolences and sympathy to the victims of the atomic bombing and their families who were caught in the tumult of history and suffered unimaginable pain in a place that was not their homeland but in a foreign land. "The two atomic bombs that dropped on Japan 80 years ago claimed countless lives in an instant," he said. "Our fellow Koreans in Japan also endured immense suffering, and the victims and their bereaved families have been suffering for a long time." He noted that a special law enacted in 2017 to support the Korean victims laid the foundation for practical assistance but acknowledged that much remains to be done. The government will continue efforts to "heal the scars left by the atomic bombings," Lee said. Around 50,000 Koreans fell victim to the atomic bombing, including 30,000 killed, after many were brought to Japan to work as forced laborers during its 1910-45 colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula, according to the Korea Atomic Bombs Victim Association. (Yonhap)
