State-affiliated factions, Kurdish-led forces clash again in northern Syria
Civilian killed in 'terrorist cell' attack on Kurdish forces in Rojava
Two dead in Suwayda clashes despite ceasefire
Israeli army seizes weapons in southern Syria raid
Syrian army, Kurdish-led SDF exchange blame over northern Syria attack
A+ A-
ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Clashes broke out again early Monday between the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and Syrian government forces in northern Syria, the SDF said, blaming Damascus for the aggression. The US special envoy for the country calls for calm and dialogue.
The US-backed SDF said in a statement that factions affiliated with the Syrian interim government 'launched an attack on four of our positions' in Deir Hafer in Aleppo province. 'Our forces confronted the attack and responded as necessary in defense of our positions and fighters. Clashes ensued and continued for 20 uninterrupted minutes.'
It held Damascus 'fully responsible' for the attack, stressing that they reserve the right to respond 'with full force and determination.'
The clashes come a day after both sides exchanged blame for an attack in northern Syria's Manbij city. The clashes injured four Syrian government troops and three civilians, according to the state-run SANA news agency.
The renewed attacks are placing a landmark integration deal between Damascus and the Kurdish-led northeast Syria (Rojava) administration at risk.
Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa and SDF chief Mazloum Abdi signed a deal in March to integrate the SDF into the Syrian state apparatus and recognize the Kurds as an integral part of Syria.
The deal, which has largely stalled in recent months, also includes a countrywide ceasefire and stipulates the return of displaced Syrians to their hometowns.
The SDF is insisting on integrating as a unit while Damascus wants individual integrations.
US Special Envoy for Syria Tom Barrack said on X that the recent clashes between the SDF and Damascus forces are 'disturbing' and called on both sides to 'uphold calm and resolve differences through dialogue, not bloodshed. Syria deserves stability. Syrians deserve peace.'
The state-affiliated forces were also engaged in clashes with Druze militants in the southern province of Suwayda on Sunday, days after a US-brokered fragile ceasefire.
Barrack said diplomacy should be sought for resolving both issues.
'Disturbing violence erupted yesterday in Suwayda, and in Manbij. Diplomacy is the best way to stop violence and build a peaceful, lasting solution. The US is proud to have helped mediate a solution in Suwayda and to be co-mediating with France the reintegration of the northeast into a unified Syria,' he said on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
3 hours ago
- Shafaq News
After talks with President Barzani: Bahrain to open consulate in Erbil
Shafaq News – Erbil Kurdistan Region President Nechirvan Barzani met on Tuesday with Khaled Ahmed Al-Mansour, Bahrain's chargé d'affaires in Iraq, to discuss bilateral relations and plans to expand Bahrain's diplomatic presence in the Region. According to a statement from the Kurdish Presidency, talks focused on boosting trade and investment, with an emphasis on cooperation and shared expertise. The meeting also covered relations between Erbil and Baghdad, the political situation in Iraq, and recent regional developments, the statement added. Both sides affirmed their commitment to strengthening ties with Bahrain at the Kurdish and Iraqi levels. سهرۆک نێچیرڤان بارزانی پێشوازی له باڵیۆزی بهحرێن دهکات August 5, 2025
Shafaq News
3 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Syria's Suwayda: New truce violation
Shafaq News - Suwayda Armed tribal factions attacked residential areas in the towns of Atil and Ara, in Syria's southern Suwayda province, with heavy machine guns and mortar shells, Shafaq News correspondent reported on Monday. Residents of Atil reported material damage to several homes and widespread panic, prompting partial displacement from some neighborhoods. Simultaneously, mortar shells struck the town of Ara in the province's southwestern countryside. Locals said the fire originated from areas controlled by tribal and pro-government armed factions on the outskirts of neighboring Daraa province. Meanwhile, Suwayda remains under a fragile ceasefire where several breaches have been documented involving mortars and heavy weapons in recent weeks. While numerous local and human rights organizations accuse the Syrian government of imposing a blockade on the province, the aouthorities in Damascus deny the claims, insisting that "aid deliveries to Suwayda continue regularly."
Shafaq News
5 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's PMF Law: A battle for state control
Shafaq News As Iraq's parliamentary term draws to a close, a controversial draft law to restructure the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) has reignited a complex political battle that reaches far beyond its military implications. While the Shiite-led Coordination Framework seeks to secure formal legal status for the PMF within the national defense architecture, internal divisions, Kurdish-Sunni bargaining, and mounting US opposition have turned the bill into a flashpoint at the heart of Iraq's statehood debate. The Political Stakes Behind the PMF Law The proposed PMF Authority Law, backed by major Shiite factions, is officially framed as part of Iraq's ongoing security reform. It aims to integrate the PMF—a force originally formed to fight ISIS—into the military chain of command. Supporters argue the law is necessary to standardize ranks, regulate funding, and clarify the PMF's relationship with state institutions. But opponents—both foreign and domestic—view it as an attempt to legitimize powerful Iran-aligned factions and institutionalize a parallel command structure, insulated from civilian oversight. The controversy reflects deeper struggles over the nature of the Iraqi state: whether it will consolidate authority through a unified military, or evolve toward a pluralistic security system shaped by competing political and paramilitary actors. Legal Background and Structural Gaps The PMF was formed in mid-2014 by government order in response to Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani's fatwa (al-jihad al-kafa'i) after the fall of Mosul. It drew tens of thousands of fighters, including from pre-existing armed factions. In 2016, Iraq's parliament passed the first PMF law, formally recognizing the force—but leaving its command structure and internal regulation vague. The current draft law, which has faced repeated delays, seeks to address those gaps. According to parliamentary sources, the amendments propose: -Military ranking and formal structures. -Defined administrative ties to the Ministries of Defense and Finance. -An internal inspectorate for discipline and oversight. -Military background requirements for PMF leadership. -Formation of internal military councils. -Unique financial entitlements for specific units. Yet critics argue that the draft preserves the PMF's administrative independence while cementing legal protections for its leadership—effectively creating a parallel army. Fragmented Support Within Iraq's Parliament While Coordination Framework blocs hold significant parliamentary sway—especially after the 2022 resignation of Sadrist MPs—consensus on the PMF law remains elusive. Internal rifts, even among Shiite factions, center on leadership appointments and control over PMF deployments in Sunni-majority areas. Kurdish and Sunni lawmakers, while less vocal in public, have played a pivotal behind-the-scenes role in blocking the bill. During the July session, both blocs withdrew in protest over the bill's inclusion on the parliamentary agenda. Their objections were procedural and political: citing Article 37 of the parliamentary rules, they argued the bill was added without proper notice, while also using the walkout to apply pressure on broader negotiations. Some Kurdish factions, according to Shafaq News political sources, have linked their support for the PMF law to concessions on unresolved federal-regional disputes, including budget allocations, oil revenues, and control of border crossings. Messages were reportedly sent through intermediaries outlining these conditions for cooperation on 'controversial legislation.' Sunni parties are also split. Most are in favor of not passing the bill most notably former Speaker Mohammed al-Halbousi's Taqaddum coalition (37 seats), which has voiced reservations tied to influence distribution and executive authority. Observers note that both Kurdish and Sunni leaders fear the law may consolidate what they see as a 'Shiite army' with disproportionate influence—yet are equally motivated by the opportunity to extract political gains in return for their votes. With Kurdish and Sunni MPs holding over 120 of 329 seats, their coordinated opposition could block passage, despite the Coordination Framework's control of at least 130 seats. The ambiguous positions of independents and small parties further complicate the math, making consensus difficult. US Pressure and Strategic Alarm The United States has expressed firm and repeated opposition to the PMF law. Pentagon officials told Shafaq News they view the draft as a direct enhancement of Iran's influence in Iraq. The US Embassy in Baghdad echoed this stance, with Chargé d'Affaires Steven Fagin warning that the legislation risks legitimizing groups the US classifies as terrorist organizations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in a call with Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, warned that the law would institutionalize Iranian-backed armed groups and undermine Iraqi sovereignty. This message was reiterated in a State Department statement, which called the law 'deeply concerning.' A report by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy argued that the US would respond by sanctioning PMF leaders with ties to Iran, freezing components of the US-Iraq security partnership, or conditioning military aid on security-sector reforms. Despite the US warnings, the Iraqi government has stood by its position. A statement from al-Sudani's office described the bill as a sovereign initiative consistent with previous legislation for other agencies, such as the Intelligence and National Security Services. The PMF, it stated, is a 'formal military institution operating under the Commander-in-Chief.' Independent Voices, Strategic Fears Former Iraqi diplomat Dr. Ghazi Faisal told Shafaq News that the PMF law is evolving from a regulatory tool into a 'ticking political bomb.' He cautioned that enshrining the PMF's autonomy would fracture the military command hierarchy and facilitate dual loyalties within Iraq's security system. Faisal warned that unless national consensus is reached, the law could trigger a serious confrontation with Washington and contribute to the erosion of centralized authority. 'We risk institutionalizing a force whose chain of command is not fully loyal to the state.' Efforts by Shafaq News to solicit formal comments from major Kurdish and Sunni parties were met with silence. Spokespersons declined to give on-record positions, noting only that 'all matters will be resolved legally within parliament through dialogue.' Government in the Crossfire Political analysts interviewed by Shafaq News say Prime Minister al-Sudani is walking a tightrope. On one hand, his administration is beholden to the Coordination Framework's legislative agenda. On the other, it seeks to avoid antagonizing Washington at a time when Iraq remains economically fragile and engaged in sensitive IMF and financial negotiations. Strategic expert Ahmed al-Yasiri noted that the US views the PMF law as part of a larger regional contest for influence. The fear is that codifying PMF independence will entrench a legislative precedent that future governments cannot undo. Between Passage and Paralysis Shafaq News has learned from informed sources that US diplomatic efforts to halt the law remain active. While the draft may still be revived in a future session, its fate now depends on a complex equation: intra-Shiite cohesion, Kurdish and Sunni leverage, and the extent to which foreign pressure can shape Iraq's legislative agenda. Ultimately, the PMF law has become a symbol of Iraq's unresolved struggle between the logic of a unified state and the reality of competing armed power centers.
