logo
Few were insured against Helene's floods. Those that were faced delays, frustrating hurdles

Few were insured against Helene's floods. Those that were faced delays, frustrating hurdles

Yahoo22-04-2025
Depot Street in Asheville flooded during Hurricane Helene. Among those storefronts damaged was Ashewell Medical Group, Dr. Carly Brown's primary care clinic. (Photo: Courtesy of Carly Brown)
Just a fraction of homes and businesses in western North Carolina were insured against the floodwaters that deluged the region during Hurricane Helene.
An estimated 10.2% of commercial properties had FEMA-backed flood insurance, and just 5.2% of homes were protected.
The low figures had devastating implications in the face of Helene, a lower-windspeed, heavy-rain storm that hit mountainous communities poorly acquainted with flooding. When the water subsided and recovery began, it became clear that many wouldn't be reimbursed for the kind of damage their buildings had suffered.
But even for those that were protected, it's been a long road. Six months after Helene, some property owners looking for a bounce back through insurance have struggled to access it.
It took until late March for one business owner to see any payment — and when it came, it was just a fraction of what she had expected. Another was able to recoup some flood money, but was bewildered when he was denied payment on other parts of his policies. And a larger group of business owners in the region's largest city are considering going to court to pursue money they believe they qualify for.
Bryan and Angela King, who own 12 Bones Smokehouse & Brewing, filed claims on both of their locations: one on the river by Asheville's downtown River Arts District, and the other further south.
The Kings had been paying into their insurance on the south location since it opened in 2019; they had put down around $300,000 total there, Bryan King estimated.
They were able to get about $100,000 from flood insurance, he told NC Newsline, but they were denied reimbursement on two other policies: contents and business disruption. Contents insurance covers flood damage to movable objects within a building; business disruption insurance covers lost income, often after a disaster.
King kept in frequent contact with other business owners in the area. He heard similar stories — particularly as others tried to navigate those same contents and business disruptions policies. Now, he told NC Newsline, a group of them are considering going to court over the matter.
'There's discussion of trying to pursue a class-action lawsuit,' King said in a late March interview. 'I honestly think that's basically going to be the only way that we get anything out of this.'
North Carolinians who have sought insurance payouts in the months since Helene described other similar frustrations and bureaucratic hurdles that complicated an already fraught process.
That includes homeowners who told the Asheville news station WLOS that they had received cancellation notices from their providers months after the storm.
Among the other layers of complexity: adjusters who live out of state, multiple subcontractors and extensive documentation requirements.
Carly Brown, who runs Ashewell Medical Group in Asheville, told NC Newsline her provider had subcontracted out to another group, which had then subcontracted out to another adjuster.
When Brown finally received a flood insurance payment in late March — six months after the storm — it was a 'fraction of our losses.' Her practice's office had filled with 11 feet of flood water during the storm. She, too, has now engaged with a law firm.
'They just nickel and dime you after paying faithfully on a flood policy for eight years,' Brown said. 'You think you're doing everything right, being a responsible business owner and citizen. Then the insurance companies essentially keep all their profits, without upholding their responsibilities.'
The Kings ran into other barriers as they filed their claims.
They were told by their Utah-based adjuster that as part of their documentation, they needed a letter from Duke Energy testifying that the damage to their south Asheville location was from wind, and not water.
That seemed unnecessary, Bryan King said — there was no real flooding in that area, but there were plenty of downed trees and power lines to show for the whipping winds.
'You definitely get the sense that it's like they're trying to make it as hard as possible,' he said. 'So that people just give up. Like, you know, 'screw it — I don't have time to work on this, I've got a business to run, and I don't think we're going to get it anyway.''
Duke Energy said customers could request a power outage verification letter by contacting the company's customer care team.
'During significant weather events, multiple factors can contribute to outages, making it difficult to identify a single cause of a power outage,' a Duke Energy spokesperson said in a statement to NC Newsline. 'Our primary focus is restoring power as quickly and safely as possible for our customers and communities.'
The chair of the North Carolina House Insurance Committee, Rep. Jennifer Balkcom (R-Henderson), said she had heard from constituents about slogging through insurance in the region — specifically on business disruption claims, some of which are denied outright.
'I'm asking the insurance commissioner to kind of help me look into what's going on, and we're trying to get some specifics so that we can work with those individuals,' said Balkcom, whose district was among those that were hardest hit by Helene.
There are around 150,000 flood insurance policies in place in North Carolina, according to FEMA and NC Department of Insurance data. The vast majority of those (around 130,000) are federal policies; the rest are private.
Many of those policies are for properties in eastern North Carolina, which has been struck multiple times in recent decades by deadly hurricanes. The extent of the mountainous west's coverage pales in comparison: according to FEMA data, there are a total of just 1,295 federal policies in the region's most populous county of Buncombe and its communities, including Asheville.
A total of 1.8 million North Carolinians live in the 25 counties that were part of Helene's disaster zone.
Jason Tyson, communications director for the NC Department of Insurance, said in an interview that Helene had brought about 'a whole variety of situations and scenarios' in the region. The minimal flood coverage, he said, combined with early communication struggles and a host of different providers, often led to confusion.
'I think the industry and the carriers have done the best they can, in light of difficult circumstances,' Tyson said.
The department has asked providers to report updated data on claims periodically in the months after Helene.
The scope of that information is limited, as it does not include federal flood policies. And only data from one reporting deadline — January — is available publicly. NC Newsline requested and received claims data from October 2024. Data from the department's other reporting deadlines, in November and December, are not posted publicly and were not provided.
But the data that is available gives a sense to how complex — and long — some flood claims can be.
As of January, 32.4% of those private flood claims were closed. That's a far lower closure rate than other types of claims made after Helene. Residential property claims had closed at an 84.4% rate; just over 70% of business interruption claims had closed as of January.
Those 547 reported private flood claims account for more than a half-billion dollars in damage, according to DOI's data. Just over $240 million had been paid as of January.
The department is expected to have updated data from providers in the coming weeks.
FEMA's federal flood insurance program (NFIP) paid out almost $214 million to North Carolinians in 2024, across more than 2,500 claims. That's roughly 20% of the total paid out by the program to the state over the last decade.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FEMA plans to release nearly $1 billion in security funding after CNN report on proposal to slash it
FEMA plans to release nearly $1 billion in security funding after CNN report on proposal to slash it

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

FEMA plans to release nearly $1 billion in security funding after CNN report on proposal to slash it

The Federal Emergency Management Agency is making nearly $1 billion in disaster preparedness and homeland security funding available to communities nationwide, just one week after CNN reported on the agency's proposed plan to slash the programs at the direction of the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA. In a notice sent to states Friday, which CNN obtained from one of the states, FEMA announced it is now taking applications for more than a dozen grant programs 'making nearly $1 billion available to communities across the country.' Just days ago, those grants were on the verge of being cut, according to internal memos signed by acting FEMA administrator David Richardson and approved by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, CNN reported last week. 'This announcement comes after a critical evaluation of all grant programs and recipients to root out waste, fraud, and abuse and deliver accountability for the American taxpayer,' the notice states. 'Unlike the previous administration, recipients of grants will no longer be permitted to use federal funds to house illegal immigrants at luxury hotels, fund climate change pet projects, or empower radical organizations with unseemly ties that don't serve the interest of the American people.' In a statement to CNN, DHS confirmed the plans to release the funding but called the notion that it reversed course 'a load of hogwash.' The funds are being released following a thorough review of grant programs, it said, and 'will enable states to manage their preparation for disasters like fires, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, hurricanes, as well as incidents like terrorist attacks or massive cyber disruptions.' It remains unclear why FEMA decided to release the funds this week after issuing internal memos last week stating that it was seeking to eliminate the programs — a move that would have required approval from the White House budget office and Congress. However, those memos acknowledged in stark terms the potential risks of cutting the programs. The loss of one program that helps communities plan and train for disasters would 'leave state and local governments more vulnerable to catastrophic incidents,' one memo stated. Ending another that bolsters transportation infrastructure and terrorism protections would 'contradict the administration's commitment to a safer and more secure country,' the memo said. The reversal effectively preserves the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) – the largest of the programs previously at risk – which provides more than $500 million to help major cities prepare for catastrophic emergencies. FEMA's own memo warned that axing the program would create 'a less secure nation, especially at the border and in some of the nation's most targeted cities, including Miami, Washington DC, and Dallas,' CNN reported last week. According to Friday's notice, releasing the funds aligns with Noem's revised priorities, which include protecting locations that have a lower level of security, known as soft targets, and crowded places; supporting Homeland Security Task Forces; enhancing cybersecurity; securing elections, including verifying that poll workers are US citizens; and bolstering border response and enforcement. 'FEMA is committed to using these federal funds to empower states to take charge of their own disaster preparedness, response, and recovery,' FEMA said in its notice to states. 'This will strengthen the security and resilience of the entire nation.' The grants listed in Friday's notice include the vast majority of funding that had been marked for potential elimination last week. States can now apply for the grants. FEMA has until the end of September, which is the end of the fiscal year, to allocate the funds. The disaster relief agency is in the midst of an overhaul at the hands of the Trump administration, which is seeking to drastically shrink FEMA's footprint and shift more responsibility for disaster preparedness, response and recovery onto states. At the direction of DHS, FEMA had largely halted its process of selecting new grant recipients in recent months so it could review the programs. Last week, in response to CNN's reporting, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said the department was looking to cut 'unaccountable programs,' and did not dispute that the grant programs were on the chopping block. 'Secretary Noem and this Administration are focused on ending waste, fraud, and abuse across the federal government - and FEMA is no exception,' the spokesperson said at the time. 'For years, taxpayer dollars have flowed to bloated grants, political pet projects, and groups with questionable ties. That ends now.' In a Friday message, the spokesperson said, 'CNN is relying on a supposed leaked internal memo, claiming certain programs were under review, to assert a reversal in course by FEMA.'

FEMA plans to release nearly $1 billion in security funding after CNN report on proposal to slash it
FEMA plans to release nearly $1 billion in security funding after CNN report on proposal to slash it

CNN

time2 hours ago

  • CNN

FEMA plans to release nearly $1 billion in security funding after CNN report on proposal to slash it

The Federal Emergency Management Agency is making nearly $1 billion in disaster preparedness and homeland security funding available to communities nationwide, just one week after CNN reported on the agency's proposed plan to slash the programs at the direction of the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA. In a notice sent to states Friday, which CNN obtained from one of the states, FEMA announced it is now taking applications for more than a dozen grant programs 'making nearly $1 billion available to communities across the country.' Just days ago, those grants were on the verge of being cut, according to internal memos signed by acting FEMA administrator David Richardson and approved by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, CNN reported last week. 'This announcement comes after a critical evaluation of all grant programs and recipients to root out waste, fraud, and abuse and deliver accountability for the American taxpayer,' the notice states. 'Unlike the previous administration, recipients of grants will no longer be permitted to use federal funds to house illegal immigrants at luxury hotels, fund climate change pet projects, or empower radical organizations with unseemly ties that don't serve the interest of the American people.' In a statement to CNN, DHS confirmed the plans to release the funding but called the notion that it reversed course 'a load of hogwash.' The funds are being released following a thorough review of grant programs, it said, and 'will enable states to manage their preparation for disasters like fires, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, hurricanes, as well as incidents like terrorist attacks or massive cyber disruptions.' It remains unclear why FEMA decided to release the funds this week after issuing internal memos last week stating that it was seeking to eliminate the programs — a move that would have required approval from the White House budget office and Congress. However, those memos acknowledged in stark terms the potential risks of cutting the programs. The loss of one program that helps communities plan and train for disasters would 'leave state and local governments more vulnerable to catastrophic incidents,' one memo stated. Ending another that bolsters transportation infrastructure and terrorism protections would 'contradict the administration's commitment to a safer and more secure country,' the memo said. The reversal effectively preserves the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) – the largest of the programs previously at risk – which provides more than $500 million to help major cities prepare for catastrophic emergencies. FEMA's own memo warned that axing the program would create 'a less secure nation, especially at the border and in some of the nation's most targeted cities, including Miami, Washington DC, and Dallas,' CNN reported last week. According to Friday's notice, releasing the funds aligns with Noem's revised priorities, which include protecting locations that have a lower level of security, known as soft targets, and crowded places; supporting Homeland Security Task Forces; enhancing cybersecurity; securing elections, including verifying that poll workers are US citizens; and bolstering border response and enforcement. 'FEMA is committed to using these federal funds to empower states to take charge of their own disaster preparedness, response, and recovery,' FEMA said in its notice to states. 'This will strengthen the security and resilience of the entire nation.' The grants listed in Friday's notice include the vast majority of funding that had been marked for potential elimination last week. States can now apply for the grants. FEMA has until the end of September, which is the end of the fiscal year, to allocate the funds. The disaster relief agency is in the midst of an overhaul at the hands of the Trump administration, which is seeking to drastically shrink FEMA's footprint and shift more responsibility for disaster preparedness, response and recovery onto states. At the direction of DHS, FEMA had largely halted its process of selecting new grant recipients in recent months so it could review the programs. Last week, in response to CNN's reporting, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said the department was looking to cut 'unaccountable programs,' and did not dispute that the grant programs were on the chopping block. 'Secretary Noem and this Administration are focused on ending waste, fraud, and abuse across the federal government - and FEMA is no exception,' the spokesperson said at the time. 'For years, taxpayer dollars have flowed to bloated grants, political pet projects, and groups with questionable ties. That ends now.' In a Friday message, the spokesperson said, 'CNN is relying on a supposed leaked internal memo, claiming certain programs were under review, to assert a reversal in course by FEMA.'

Trump's long history of bashing jobs report numbers dates back to 2016: Analysis

time5 hours ago

Trump's long history of bashing jobs report numbers dates back to 2016: Analysis

President Donald Trump's history of criticizing the Bureau of Labor Statistics' jobs report has surfaced in the wake of his decision to fire commissioner Erika McEntarfer on Friday. Trump's public frustrations with the economics and statistics agency appear to date back to his 2016 presidential campaign. "Don't believe those phony numbers," then-candidate Trump said in his New Hampshire victory speech during his first campaign for the White House. Last August, Trump claimed without evidence that former President Joe Biden's administration was "caught fraudulently manipulating" job statistics, when the agency publicly disclosed that the economy created fewer than 818,000 jobs between April of 2023 and March of 2024 than initial estimates suggested. "There's never been any revision like this," Trump said at a campaign rally in North Carolina on Aug. 21, 2024. "They wanted it to come out after the election, but somehow it got leaked," he claimed at the time. Trump did not provide evidence that the information publicly disclosed by the agency was leaked. Then-Labor Secretary Julie Su in November 2024 defended the figures, and also suggested the numbers were impacted by Hurricane Helene's impact on the southeastern United States, and labor strikes. "The labor market remains very strong, and this shows what happens when you have a president and a vice president who are fighting for workers every single day," Su said at the time. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) uses several surveys for estimating employment levels in the U.S. and revisions are common. Every monthly Jobs Report has a blurb at the end that updates the figures from the previous two months based on new data. The revision that Trump was referencing was made public on Aug. 21, and updated with final figures in February 2025, according to the BLS website. The same downward revisions also took place during Trump's first term, under then-BLS commissioner William W. Beach. The agency determined 518,000 fewer jobs were created in March 2019 than it had initially reported. Alternatively, Trump had no complaints about the jobs report produced under McEntarfer -- a Biden appointee -- right before the 2024 election, which showed the U.S. gained 12,000 jobs in October. The then-candidate referenced the low numbers while criticizing the Biden-Harris administration at a rally in Milwaukee. "They did 12,000 jobs," Trump said to boos at the rally on Nov. 1. "It's hundreds of thousands of jobs less than it should be," he added. Trump was also quick to embrace the jobs reports as president -- when they were favorable. In March 2017 -- when the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that the economy added 235,000 jobs the prior month -- then-Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Trump had full faith in the positive report, despite calling it "phony" in the past. "I talked to the president prior to this and he said to quote him very clearly: 'They may have been phony in the past, but it's very real now,'" Spicer said to reporters at the time. Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer on Friday came after the report found the U.S. had added 73,000 jobs in July, according to data from the BLS. The figure marked a slowdown from 147,000 jobs added in the previous month. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2%, keeping it at near-historic lows, according to the report. The report provided new estimates for two previous months, significantly dropping the government's estimate of jobs added in May and June. The fresh data indicated a notable slowdown in hiring as Trump's tariffs took hold over recent months. Trump criticized McEntarfer over the revisions, saying without evidence that the revisions suggested jobs statistics had been "manipulated." ABC News has reached out to McEntarfer for a comment. The Trump administration described the downward revisions as an unwelcome sign for the U.S. economy but did not dispute the data. "Obviously, they're not what we want to see," Stephen Miran, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said on Friday morning. Asked by reporters as he departed the White House on Friday about the reason for McEntarfer's firing, Trump said he believes the economy is doing well and claimed the latest jobs numbers were "phony." "I believe the numbers were phony just like they were before the election, and there were other times," Trump said, pointing to a previous revision in the jobs numbers last year that he claimed, without evidence, was an attempt to benefit Democrats heading into the election. He said this despite using the numbers as a talking point in his campaign.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store