
How Today's Human Brain Became so Uniquely Human
How can we be so genetically similar to, say, chimpanzees, and yet be light-years more sophisticated cognitively and behaviorally?
It may just come down to six cells.
Evolutionary biologists who study the human brain and explore questions about why we're so different from other primates are especially interested in the contrasts between humans and chimpanzees.
'We share more than 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees, yet the human and chimpanzee brains are unique. That difference has always been very fascinating to me,' said Soojin Yi, PhD, professor in the Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
Yi and colleagues recently published findings in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ( PNAS ) that help deepen scientists' understanding about what's behind our brain differences. They've found that 'there is more differential gene expression in human brains,' said Yi, referring to the activation of different genes within a single brain cell type that defines that cell's purpose.
What's more, she said, 'Different brain cells follow different evolutionary paths depending on their unique roles in the brain.'
New Findings
While previous studies have suggested that human brain evolution is linked to accelerated changes in gene expression, Yi said many questions still remain. To explore how genes in different types of human brain cells have evolved compared with those of chimpanzees, the researchers used single-cell human and nonhuman primate (chimpanzee and rhesus macaques) transcriptomic data — messenger RNA transcripts present in a specific cell type — to analyze the unique molecular profiles (the gene activity) of six brain cell types.
Yi said many single-cell research approaches had focused primarily on neurons, with relatively small numbers of nonneuronal cells, so their team aimed for a more diverse approach. 'To balance the brain cellular heterogeneity and statistical rigor,' she said that in addition to looking at excitatory and inhibitory neurons, they also looked at four glial cell types — astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells.
Each of these cell types plays an important role in brain function and health. For example, excitatory neurons transmit signals between brain regions, inhibitory neurons help control brain activity, oligodendrocytes contribute to the formation of the myelin sheath around nerve fibers, and microglia are the brain's immune cells, always on the prowl for pathogens. Star-shaped astrocytes play a variety of roles, including maintaining the blood-brain barrier and supporting neurons.
What They Learned
'Compared to chimpanzee brains, the human brain showed significant signs of accelerated regulatory evolution across all of the six major cell types in the brain,' said Yi, explaining that certain genes in human brain cells have evolved to produce more of certain proteins at a faster rate than in other primates. 'It's much more extensive than previously believed,' she said.
Of the 25,000 genes involved in their analysis, Yi and colleagues were able to identify differences in the expression of about 5%-10% of the genes. When they considered cell subtypes, differences in expression leapt to 12%-15%.
While the researchers expected to see more regulation than what was seen in previous studies, as well as some kind of cell-type specificity, Yi said, 'We didn't expect as much cell-type specificity as we saw.'
'What was really interesting to me was that when you compared cell types, genes that are differentially expressed in microglia are very different than genes that are differentially expressed in neurons,' said Yi.
The findings support the belief held among many other researchers that there is 'a tremendous amount of diversity' among even the same types of brain cells in one part of the brain compared with another, Yi said. 'You may have the same cell type [such as a neuron], but it looks a little bit different in terms of transcript profiles depending on where it is located in the brain. I think that we cannot look at the brain from just a molecular perspective. We've got to really appreciate that the brain is an amalgam of many different cell types doing their own things while also working together to do these very complex functions that our brains are capable of,' said Yi.
The authors pointed out study limitations, including the fact that data from nonhuman primates came from individuals living in captive facilities, which could affect their transcriptional profiles.
Another Perspective
In André Sousa's lab at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the assistant professor of neuroscience and his colleagues study human brain development and evolution. 'We try to understand the mutations that have accumulated in human DNA after our split from our closest lineage — chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas — that can alter gene expression,' he said.
Sousa, who was not involved in the PNAS study, said the new research adds another piece to the puzzle. 'I don't think it's an 'aha moment' in the sense that several studies before this had shown this abundance of genes that are more expressed in the human brain. But most of those studies were done at the bulk tissue level. The brain is very heterogeneous, and in bulk tissue studies, you can be diluting lots of signals,' he said.
Because the new study analyzed single cells, he said, 'they found way more differentially expressed genes than previous studies. And we need to be a little bit careful because it could be a bias from the methodology because when you are analyzing single cells, you increase your statistical power.'
Sousa said the results of the study left him pondering the fact that 'in general, more genes are more expressed both in chimpanzees and humans than genes that are lower expressed.' And that's interesting.
'I've been thinking about it quite a lot. Why do we see more genes going up than down in all of these species? We still don't know very much about what it means. It's hard to understand what's happening because it's very complex. It can have a lot of justifications, both molecularly, what's happening in the DNA, but also evolutionarily, what are the constraints that allow a gene to be more or less expressed?' he said.
Sousa said he also found it interesting that the researchers subdivided certain cell types into subgroups. 'Even within subtypes, they saw accelerated evolution in terms of more upregulated genes in humans and chimpanzees than downregulated ones, and what the interesting thing they see is that the genes that are differentially expressed in each cell tend to be different. So they speculate that that probably reflects functional specialization of these cells in these species. It's a potential explanation. But it's impossible to know for sure from this data set and will require more research,' said Sousa.
The authors hope to continue studying differential gene expression at the cellular level in both human and primate brains, especially the brain cell subtypes. But Yi said as scientists continue to piece together clues to what makes today's human brain so uniquely human, all animal brain evolution is fascinating. 'There are other species with awesome brains that are doing all these special things, too,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
9 minutes ago
- CBS News
Chinese research ship detected off Alaskan coast, Coast Guard says
A China-flagged research vessel was detected Friday off the coast of Alaska, the U.S. Coast Guard said. The Coast Guard reported Saturday that the Xue Long 2, an icebreaker, was detected about 290 nautical miles north of Utqiagvik, Alaska, in the U.S. Arctic. The Xue Long 2 is operated by China's Polar Research Institute. The ship was in the U.S.'s Extended Continental Shelf, or ECS, which is a portion of the continental shelf that goes beyond 200 miles nautical miles off the coast, according to the State Department. The ship was determined to be 130 nautical miles inside the ECS. "The U.S. has exclusive rights to conserve and manage the living and non-living resources of its ECS," the Coast Guard said in its news release. A Coast Guard C-130J Hercules, a long-range surveillance aircraft, responded to the ship. The Coast Guard also released a photo of the vessel. "The U.S. Coast Guard, alongside partners and other agencies, vigilantly monitors and responds to foreign government vessel activity in and near U.S. waters to secure territorial integrity and defend sovereign interests against malign state activity," said Rear Adm. Bob Little, commander of the U.S. Coast Guard Arctic District, in a statement. CBS News reached out the Coast Guard for clarification on how it was dealing with the vessel. Earlier this week, Canada's CBC News reported that the Canadian military was monitoring the movements of the Xue Long 2 in the Arctic. In a statement provided to the CBC Tuesday, Maj. Alexander Naraine, a spokesperson for the military's joint operations centre said that the Xue Long 2 was "not currently in Canadian territorial waters." Canada was using a Lockheed CP-140 Aurora aircraft based out of Alaska to "actively" monitor the Chinese ship, Naraine said. This comes after four Russian military planes were spotted and tracked flying near the Alaskan coast Tuesday by North American Aerospace Defense Command. The aircraft flew through a section of international airspace called the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone. While the Alaska ADIZ is considered part of international airspace, it is defined as an area where sovereign U.S. airspace ends but "that requires the ready identification of all aircraft in the interest of national security," according to NORAD. In January, American and Canadian fighter jets were scrambled after Russian warplanes were also spotted in the Arctic, NORAD said. The Russian warplanes remained in international airspace. And in July 2024, the U.S. intercepted several Chinese or Russian bombers near the Alaskan coast. At the time, a U.S. defense officials said it marked the first time ever that Russian and Chinese aircraft have jointly entered the Alaska ADIZ, and the first time Chinese H-6s have encroached off Watson, Emily Mae Czachor and Stephen Smith contributed to this report.


Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Cancer Survivors: If You're A Hero, Why Are You Hiding It?
Love, bonding and woman with her mom with cancer hugging, sitting and spending time together. Happy, ... More sweet and sick mature female person embracing her adult daughter with a smile in outdoor garden. Cancer survivors have a great story to tell. They should tell it. I started this campaign 15 years ago – and here's the latest iteration. Over the last few weeks, I spoke with five interesting people who had five things in common. Here are the first four. They are all cancer survivors, they are all returning to the workplace after a long battle, they are all having a monumentally hard time getting a job, and they are all over 55. However, the fifth thing they have in common is why today's column came to be. They are all doing everything they can to hide these facts, especially the first one: the cancer. Now jump to thing five, the difficulty in finding a job. That's why I got their calls and emails. I gave them all the same advice. Tell people about it. Don't hide it. Get it out front and out of the way. This seemed counterintuitive to them – it may to you as well – and when I first laid it out, it made them uncomfortable. By the time we finished our conversations, though, they all agreed. And I'll bet many people reading this disagree initially, too. In fact, the advice these five people had gotten from everyone to whom they had previously spoken was opposite to mine – don't mention it, don't bring it up, don't discuss it, employers are not allowed to ask about that, if employers know they'll never hire you, it's none of their business, your previous employer is not allowed to mention it. And so on, ad infinitum. Well then, if that's the right advice, why are these people unable to find work? If they've hidden these facts, shouldn't that – based on those others' advice – lead to job opportunities? No, because it's bad advice. If you follow that line of strategic (?) thinking, and it goes month after month – in two cases, over a year – doesn't that indicate it might be faulty? This advice came from people who meant well: doctors, social workers, psychologists, religious leaders, people from the state department of labor, lawyers, family, friends, and so on. They just don't know the realities of the job market. In each case, we got around to how these five answered the 'what-have-you-been-doing-since-your-last-job?' and 'why-did-you-leave-your-last-job?' questions. OK, so how did they answer those questions? With every half-baked cockamamie answer you can think of, none of which holds water. Other than the truth, any answer is weak and suspect. If you think otherwise, go ahead; try any other answer and get back to me if you come up with one that sounds convincing – and that sounds like one that will move you to the second round of interviews. Now, one might think this is asking for trouble, that (as they all said) employers would not hire them due to fear they would get sick again and … you know the rest. Underneath it all, what's wrong with all this is that, in the eyes of many – me included – cancer survivors are heroes, and nothing less. They know all about the important things in life, like vision, determination, patience, goals, positive thinking, decision-making, responsibility, team work, bravery, and fortitude. Are these not the characteristics an employer looks for? So why hide this? Is it because you feel you'll get fewer calls or second interviews? Indeed you will, but that's OK. This deception game is the same faulty thinking that goes into the hide-my-age-by-leaving-stuff-off-my-resume fallacy. C'mon, some employers might be unfair to older workers or cancer survivors or anyone else, but they're not stupid. Whatever you try to hide will come out sooner or later. If you do the deceptive dance, they'll just find out later (not sooner), and then you'll just have wasted an awful lot of your time, not to mention keeping your hopes up artificially. So my suggestion is this. Start your cover letters off with a bold statement: 'After spending the last 10 months battling cancer, I have won that battle and am now re-entering the workplace.' Continue your letter as you would normally. You know what's going to happen? For sure, you will get fewer responses. But the ones you get are going to be real – very real. Don't you think there are people who admire what you've done? Don't you think a large number of hiring managers have either had the same experience you did or had a family member who did? Don't you think there are companies who are such avid supporters of cancer research that they sponsor 5K runs, Relay for Life, and other events in which we now all participate? The answers are yes, yes, and yes. And don't you think that, to these companies and managers, you're a hero? Yes again. Well then, let them know! The ones who will disqualify you because of what you've been through are jerks, and if by any slim chance you get this by them initially, what do you think will happen once this comes out? Jerks are always jerks; don't forget that. I'll take fewer calls any day of the week if they're sincere and real, wouldn't you? And if you can create the conditions under which that happens, why wouldn't you? Do not lose sight of one thing. You're a hero. And if you're a hero, why are you hiding it? P.S. I subsequently received letters of thanks from two different offices of the Aamerican Cancer Society, one of which published it in their newsletter. E.

Miami Herald
28 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Massive sleep study reveals surprising cost of going to bed late
As an avid Oura user, I'm no stranger to *slightly* obsessing over sleep data. I've tracked my deep sleep, REM cycles, HRV, and recovery scores like a mini scientist in a silk sleep mask. I've timed workouts based on my readiness score. When it comes to the link between sleep and performance, I'm not new here. But even with all that tracking and optimization, this new study got my attention. Researchers looked at millions of nights of sleep-over 6 million to be exact-and what they found was something most of us (myself included) tend to overlook. It's not just about how much you sleep. Related: FDA eliminates 52 food standards in sweeping deregulation move It's about when. And more specifically: what happens when you go to bed later than usual. The impact? Subtle at first. But if you're trying to be consistent with your workouts, boost your energy, or just feel better, those late nights might be holding you back. Even if you're still getting 7 to 8 hours of sleep. That's what makes this study different. Because this time, we're not just talking about sleep duration. We're talking about timing-and how it can affect your body and behavior the very next day. The study, published in PNAS, looked at over 6 million nights of sleep data from nearly 26,000 adults using wearable fitness trackers. Specifically, over 19,000 WHOOP users and nearly 6,000 Fitbit device users. Here's what they found: people who went to bed earlier were more likely to exercise the next day. And the difference? Bigger than you'd think. For example, compared to those who went to sleep around 1 a.m., people who consistently went to bed at 9 p.m. logged 28 more minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) the next day. Even more surprising? People who slept less overall, but went to bed earlier, often exercised more than those who slept longer but went to bed later. In other words, timing beat out total sleep when it came to getting people moving. I spoke with Dr. Mark Czeisler, Resident Physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Clinical Fellow at Harvard Medical School, who co-authored the study led by Josh Leota, a Research Fellow at Monash University. Related: These clean food brands are rightfully challenging the FDA He explained why bedtime and not just sleep time matters: "People got the most intense exercise when they preserved their usual sleep amount, but went to bed earlier than they typically do," he said. "That suggests these health behaviors aren't competing with each other. They're best thought of as working in concert." Think about it: if you're staying up late to finish one more episode or scroll TikTok, you could be trading away the energy and motivation you'll need tomorrow. Dr. Czeisler also noted that early sleepers are more likely to get in their workouts before the day gets busy. Morning routines tend to be more reliable-and that consistency matters. While this study tracked people living their normal lives-not under lab conditions-it's truly a big moment for sleep and fitness tech. And it supports something companies like WHOOP, Fitbit, Apple Watch and Oura have been saying for years: when you sleep matters just as much as how much you sleep. The WHOOP data came from users who were already pretty active-averaging 90 minutes of MVPA daily. But the researchers confirmed the same trend in a broader group, using Fitbit data from the NIH's All of Us program. Even people who weren't exercising much still saw a difference. Earlier bedtimes meant more movement the next day. As Dr. Czeisler put it: "The way to guarantee exercise is really to protect the morning. And so going to bed earlier, you know, lends itself to doing that." So if you're trying to get consistent with your workouts, improve your energy, or just build better habits, maybe start by looking at the clock. Going to bed a little earlier might be the simplest, most powerful performance tool you're not using yet. Protect your mornings, people! I know I do... Related: Watch out Fitbit and Apple Watch, Amazon has entered the chat The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.