This is the minimum amount of savings you need to improve your financial well-being
That's why experts recommend putting aside some money in an emergency savings fund. And according to a new survey by Vanguard, even a modest emergency fund can dramatically lower stress and elevate your financial health.
So what's the magic number for improving financial well-being? And what can you do to achieve it?
Vanguard researchers surveyed more than 12,400 Vanguard investors to understand the impact of emergency savings on financial well-being. They found that respondents who had at least $2,000 saved showed a 21% increase in financial well-being, while those with three to six months' worth of expenses saved had another 13% increase, even after accounting for income, debt type, and financial assets.
'People with emergency savings have a higher level of financial well-being, spend less time thinking about and dealing with their finances, and are less distracted at work,' said Paulo Costa, Vanguard's senior behavioral economist, in a statement.
According to the research, investors without emergency savings reported higher levels of financial stress. On average, they spent 7.3 hours per week thinking about and dealing with their finances, compared with just 3.7 hours for those with at least $2,000 in emergency savings.
Although $2,000 isn't a particularly large sum, many Americans have even less than that in their savings accounts — or nothing at all.
According to our 2025 State of Savings Report, one-third (33%) of Americans couldn't cover bills for even one month if they lost their income. Meanwhile, only 26% said they had enough savings to cover one to three months of expenses.
Read more: How much money should I have in an emergency savings account?
If you have competing financial obligations like housing, debt payments, school tuition, etc., saving for emergencies may not be a priority. But that's the thing about emergencies: You can't predict when one will happen, but you can be certain it will happen at some point. When that day arrives, you'll be better prepared to cover the cost, avoid racking up debt, and protect your mental health with an emergency fund in place.
Whether your goal is $2,000 or $20,000, it's never too late to get started. Here are a few best practices for building and maintaining an emergency fund:
Experts typically recommend saving three to six months of essential expenses in an emergency fund, but the right amount depends on your personal situation. For example, if you have an unsteady income, you may want to aim for nine to 12 months' worth of expenses.
Also, keep in mind that the amount of money you're able to comfortably save each month may fluctuate depending on how your income and financial obligations change over time. It's important to be flexible when it comes to your savings strategy and adjust it as your financial situation evolves.
Once you've built a nice financial cushion, you may be tempted to dip into it. But this defeats the purpose of an emergency fund. Be honest with yourself about what constitutes a financial emergency and when it's appropriate to use that money.
If you use your fund for an unexpected expense, make a plan to rebuild it. For example, you might decide to set aside a portion of your next few paychecks or temporarily cut back on discretionary spending to increase your savings contributions.
It's important to have a clear separation between the money you use for everyday transactions and your savings. That means you should keep your emergency savings (and any other type of savings) out of your checking account.
That said, your emergency funds should be easily accessible in a pinch — and ideally, earning interest while sitting in the bank. That's why a high-yield savings account is a great place to keep emergency savings; your money stays safe and grows over time, but can be withdrawn whenever you need it.
Read more: The 4 best (and worst) places to keep your emergency fund
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
12 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Tesla's Autopilot system is in the spotlight at a Miami trial over a student killed while stargazing
NEW YORK (AP) — A rare trial against Elon Musk's car company began Monday in Miami where a jury will decide if it is partly to blame for the death of a stargazing university student after a runaway Tesla sent her flying 75 feet through the air and severely injured her boyfriend. Lawyers for the plaintiff argue that Tesla's driver-assistance feature called Autopilot should have warned the driver and braked when his Model S sedan blew through flashing red lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at nearly 70 miles an hour in the April 2019 crash. Tesla lays the blame solely on the driver, who was reaching for a dropped cell phone. 'The evidence clearly shows that this crash had nothing to do with Tesla's Autopilot technology,' Tesla said in a statement. 'Instead, like so many unfortunate accidents since cellphones were invented, this was caused by a distracted driver.' The driver, George McGee, was sued separately by the plaintiffs. That case was settled. A judgement against Tesla could be especially damaging as the company works to convince the public its self-driving technology is safe during a planned rollout of hundreds of thousands of Tesla robotaxis on U.S. roads by the end of next year. A jury trial is rare for the company, which often settles lawsuits, and this one is rarer yet because a judge recently ruled that the family of the stricken Naibel Benavides Leon can argue for punitive damages. The judge, Beth Bloom of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, issued a partial summary judgement last month, throwing out charges of defective manufacturing and negligent misrepresentation against Tesla. But she also ruled plaintiffs could argue other claims that would make the company liable and ask for punitive damages, which could prove costly. 'A reasonable jury could find that Tesla acted in reckless disregard of human life for the sake of developing their product and maximizing profit,' Bloom said in a filing. The 2021 lawsuit alleges the driver relied on Autopilot to reduce speed or come to a stop when it detected objects in its way, including a parked Chevrolet Tahoe that Benavides and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, had gotten out of near Key West, Florida, to look up at the sky. The Tesla rammed the Tahoe at highway speeds, causing it to rotate and slam into Benavides, tossing her into a wooded area and killing her. In legal documents, Tesla denied nearly all of the lawsuit's allegations and said it expects that consumers will follow warnings in the vehicle and instructions in the owners' manual, as well as comply with driving laws. Tesla warns owners in manuals that its cars cannot drive themselves and they need to be ready to intervene at all times. —— Former AP auto writer Krisher reported from Detroit.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'We Were Not Planning On This Kind Of Expenditure At This Point In Our Lives,' How These Parents Are Dealing With Their 'Boomerang Kid'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Two parents from Sherman Oaks, California, moved their 24-year-old daughter back into the family home in early 2024. In their mid-60s, the parents, who asked to remain anonymous when speaking to CNBC, expected that they'd be closing in on retirement at this point in their lives. Instead, they're canceling vacations and delaying retirement in order to accommodate their daughter's $5,000 a month living expenses. "We were not planning on this kind of expenditure at this point of our lives," the mother told CNBC. "The reason we do it is because we don't want to see her on the street." The family isn't alone in having their plans upended by the unexpected return of an adult child. The phenomenon, which experts have termed "boomerang kids," has been steadily growing over the last few years. Don't Miss: In terms of getting money back, . Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." A Thrivent study on boomerang kids released in 2025 found that 46% of parents report that their adult children, ages 18-35, have moved back home at some point. The reasons for these moves vary from economic factors like debt, stagnant wages, and rising housing costs to personal factors like divorce or illness. While many parents say they are happy to provide a safety net for their children, there's also recognition that it often has a significant and negative impact on their own finances. According to the survey, 38% of boomerang parents say that having their children move back in has impacted their ability to save for long-term goals like retirement. The Sherman Oaks parents say they are feeling that pinch, to the point that it has caused tension in their relationship with their daughter. So they've turned to parenting coach Kim Muench for help navigating their new situation. Trending: Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — The move is a great first step in healing the rifts that boomerang situations can create, Muench told CNBC. "Parents sometimes hesitate to get help for themselves and invest in their health ... because they're already spending more than they would like to support their adult or emerging adult children," she says. Ultimately, though, Muench says open and honest conversations about money and timelines are the only way to ensure the familial bonds won't be permanently affected by a return home. She suggests starting with small financial boundaries, like asking your child to contribute towards a bill or put a set amount of money away in a savings account to mimic paying rent. "When their son or daughter is not taking [financial responsibility] on incrementally, [parents] actually get very worried that they will be financially providing for the rest of their lives," Muench told CNBC. "It takes consistent conversations, because it's probably not going to happen in the first conversation," she continued. "And it takes an emotional maturity level on both the parents and the emerging adult side to figure out how they can work together." Read Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . With Point, you can Image: Shutterstock This article 'We Were Not Planning On This Kind Of Expenditure At This Point In Our Lives,' How These Parents Are Dealing With Their 'Boomerang Kid' originally appeared on
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Telecom Pick: Should You Choose Telus or BCE?
Written by Adam Othman at The Motley Fool Canada Successful dividend investing in the stock market is all about making high-quality picks from the right sectors that can distribute payouts comfortably, supported by solid underlying businesses. Looking into stock from the top companies in industries that can align with your passive income goals is a good way to go about this. The Canadian telecom sector is highly consolidated and well-established, and has a few recession-resistant names that many investors like to own in their portfolios. Most of the top telecom stocks offer shareholders an attractive dividend yield supported by solid fundamentals. Two Canadian telcos are the top considerations for many investors. Each has its own strategic approach to respond to changing market conditions. Dividend-centric investors should consider these carefully to make a well-informed decision before investing in Canadian telecom stocks. Today, we'll take a good look at Telus Corp. (TSX:T) and BCE Inc. (TSX:BCE) to help you determine which might be the better pick for your self-directed portfolio. Telus is one of the Big Three telcos in the country. Boasting a $34.3 billion market cap, it has over 9 million mobile customers across the country, accounting for roughly a third of the market. The company provides internet, TV, and landline services. It has also recently started upgrading from its legacy copper network to fibre optic cables to offer better value for money to customers. Besides this, Telus has several subsidiaries operating across different sectors, including agriculture, healthcare, security, and international business services. As of this writing, Telus stock trades for $22.65 per share and boasts a 7.4% dividend yield. Despite high-yielding dividends, its payout ratio is in the reliable 60–75% of free cash flow range. The company's diversified revenue streams, increased earnings, and sustainable payout ratio make it an attractive investment to consider. BCE is another one of the Big Three, boasting a $29.7 billion market capitalization. It offers wireless and internet services, broadband, landline services, and has a considerable media segment that holds digital media, TV, and radio assets. BCE recently announced a 56% dividend cut, effectively slashing the payouts to relieve itself from double-digit yields that we are seeing of late. The dividend cut did not go well with plenty of investors, but it might be a good decision. Slashing payouts to more sustainable levels means that the company has better financial flexibility to fuel future growth. The more the company can grow, the better returns it can offer to investors in the long run. Being the biggest driving force behind 5G technology in Canada, BCE could benefit from having better financials. As of this writing, it trades for $32.60 per share and boasts a 5.4% dividend yield. Dividend-focused investors seeking immediate returns might not appreciate the dividend cut announced by BCE. However, those with a long-term investment horizon might appreciate the change because it lets the telco improve its financials over time at the cost of lower dividends for the time being. Telus offers the promise of growth through dividends that it does not plan to cut. It also has the backing of several diversified revenue streams that might make payouts more sustainable for the company. Between the two, it is difficult to make the wrong decision for your self-directed portfolio. If you're seeking higher-yielding immediate returns through dividends, Telus wins. If you're willing to invest with plenty of patience for potentially better long-term returns, BCE might be a better pick. The post Top Telecom Pick: Should You Choose Telus or BCE? appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. Before you buy stock in BCE, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor Canada analyst team just identified what they believe are the Top Stocks for 2025 and Beyond for investors to buy now… and BCE wasn't one of them. The Top Stocks that made the cut could potentially produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider MercadoLibre, which we first recommended on January 8, 2014 ... if you invested $1,000 in the 'eBay of Latin America' at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $24,927.94!* Stock Advisor Canada provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month – one from Canada and one from the U.S. The Stock Advisor Canada service has outperformed the return of S&P/TSX Composite Index by 30 percentage points since 2013*. See the Top Stocks * Returns as of 6/23/25 More reading 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2025 [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit A Commonsense Cash Back Credit Card We Love Fool contributor Adam Othman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends TELUS. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025
