Nebraska State Sen. Bob Andersen pushes to limit who can receive public assistance
LINCOLN — Lincoln resident Andrea Evans said public assistance programs were never easy to navigate, but she was able to build a better life for herself and her family.
'People sometimes hear pieces of my life story and assume that I just want to stay on assistance forever,' Evans said. 'But that's not true. I want financial self-sufficiency.'
Evans testified against a bill Thursday seeking to reduce how long someone could receive cash assistance under the Welfare Reform Act.
State Sen. Bob Andersen of Papillion introduced Legislative Bill 656, which would adjust who is eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, a state and federal government program that provides monthly funds to help people buy groceries at stores.
The bill's significant change would no longer let the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services accept or renew federal waivers making exceptions to work requirements for SNAP, such as living in areas with high unemployment rates or studying in school or training programs.
Andersen said he aims to send a 'clear message' that Nebraska wants to turn Nebraska's 'welfare system into a workforce system and help more Nebraskans regain their independence.'
Andersen also filed LB 379, which would change the maximum length of time someone can receive cash assistance under the public assistance program.
'This bill simply recognizes it does not take five years to learn a skill and get a job,' Andersen said.
Several people who testified against the bills said both would only make it harder for low-income Nebraskans to be financially stable. Some argued lawmakers should focus on expanding social programs, not reducing them. Supporters of the bills pointed to states with similar regulations governing welfare programs there.
'Right now, too many individuals remain on cash welfare for too long, creating a cycle of dependency instead of a bridge to self-sufficiency,' said Clay Rhodes, a State Affairs Director for the Foundation for Government Accountability, a Florida-based conservative public policy think tank.
As of August 2024, 2,965 families in Nebraska were receiving cash assistance, according to a report from the state Legislative Fiscal Office. The bill would require 'all able-bodied dependents between [ages] 18 and 59 to participate in an employment and training program.'
However, LB 656 makes exceptions for 'caregivers of a dependent child or incapacitated individual,' students enrolled at least half-time and individuals ages 16 to 18 who are not heads of households or attending school or training programs half-time.
The state's current SNAP requirements are that any household's gross total monthly income be at or below 165% of the federal poverty level, which fluctuates depending on the number of people in one household, and net monthly income must be at or below 100% of the poverty level. The bills won't change the requirements but will limit how long someone can be on the program.
According to LB 379's fiscal note, the new limit on cash assistance would save Nebraska roughly $1 million in state funds. The Legislature is currently facing a projected $432 million budget shortfall.
The freshman lawmaker said he would be open to amending his bill so that the proposed new guidelines wouldn't affect people already in the program. Andersen is a newly elected lawmaker in suburban Sarpy County's Legislative District 49, after defeating former Democratic lawmaker Jen Day last year. Anderson was one of the two Republicans who flipped Democratic seats and helped the GOP maintain a supermajority in the officially nonpartisan Legislature.
His approach to public assistance differs from Day, the previous District 49 senator, who pursued bills aiming to expand social programs, including a summer feeding program eventually embraced by Gov. Jim Pillen.
The Health and Human Services Committee took no immediate action on either bill.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
How SNAP cuts will hit the Bay Area
With millions of food-insecure people expected to lose benefits, food banks and pantries in the Bay Area are bracing for the worst and rallying community support to continue serving those in need. Why it matters: Roughly 175,000 residents in Bay Area congressional districts are at risk of losing benefits from Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — the nation's largest food aid program — including children and seniors, according to the California Budget & Policy Center. What they're saying: If you add up all of the SNAP recipients at risk of losing some benefits, they'd fill up every major stadium in the Bay Area, San Francisco-Marin Food Bank spokesperson Lisa Gulezian told Axios. "Locally, we are asking the city and county to strengthen their response to food insecurity by protecting CalFresh and SNAP," said the food bank's associate director of policy and advocacy, Marchon Tatmon, who pointed to potential initiatives like pop-up pantries and community funds focused on food insecurity. State of play: Pre-COVID, the food bank served around 34,000 households, according to Tatmon. At the peak of the pandemic, that number hit 56,000. It remains at roughly 53,000 households today. "The need is still there," Tatmon said, noting that over 6,500 people are on their waitlist. "Lines are still long." Volunteers, donations and calls to elected officials will be critical for ensuring the food bank can adequately provide for people in need, Tatmon added. Context: Trump's signature policy bill tightens SNAP work requirements, a move Republicans say will reduce waste, fraud and abuse. It's on track to cut 20% of spending on food stamps, which could result in more than 2 million people losing benefits, per an estimate from the Congressional Budget Office. States could also shoulder more benefit costs, the rate of which would be set by a state's percent of erroneous payments. Benefits are currently 100% federally funded, though states share administrative costs.
Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Mass. Governor: All shelters are closed, state of emergency for shelter system is over
Advertisement 'We're saving taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars and putting families on a path to self-sustainability,' she said. In addition to the closure of hotel shelters, shelters located at the former Bay State Correctional Center and the Chelsea Rapid Shelter site have also closed. Three families were using the hotel shelter system, a Massachusetts experienced a surge of immigrants arriving here beginning in the At the same time, the Advertisement After Healey took office in January 2023, officials drastically expanded the emergency shelter system to house thousands of homeless and migrant families For decades, homeless families have been guaranteed a roof over their heads under to help families at hotels access medical care, find transportation, and enroll their children in school. With costs skyrocketing, Healey and legislators repeatedly sought to tighten eligibility, including by requiring homeless families to prove lawful immigration status, show they have lived in Massachusetts for at least six months, and undergo The number of families in emergency shelter has fallen to Just last month, however, state officials had the cap set by the Legislature, the state still was not able to keep up with the demand. Healey officials say they issued the declaration specifically so they can continue to impose restrictions on shelters, such as limiting who gets priority for beds and how long they can stay. Advertisement Massachusetts Housing Secretary Ed Augustus wrote in The extended declaration is supposed to last until Nov. 9, which is required under rules set out by the Legislature in a 2023 spending bill. It can be extended again if Augustus determines it's necessary. Former MBTA executive Brian Shortsleeve, who is running in the GOP primary for governor, criticized Healey's comments Friday. He slammed the use of public dollars to fund the state's HomeBase program, which provides rental assistance for families transitioning into permanent housing and is credited with helping reduce the emergency shelter population. Shortsleeve said Healey's claim of saving taxpayer dollars has 'got to go done [sic] in the Guinness Book of Records as the biggest lie ever told by a politician,' 'As the next governor, I will stop the flow of our tax dollars to the migrants,' he said. Samantha J. Gross can be reached at
San Francisco Chronicle
5 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Democrats cry foul as Republicans push to redraw Texas electoral maps to gain US House seats
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Democratic lawmakers tried to build a case Friday that Republicans in Texas have engineered a rushed and unfair process for redrawing the state's congressional districts in response to a push by President Donald Trump to win more GOP seats that Democrats fear will spread to other states. Democrats in the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature delayed the start of public testimony during a hearing of a state House Committee on Redistricting by peppering its chair with pointed questions about how quickly GOP lawmakers planned to move and whether the public is getting enough of an opportunity to weigh in. The Republican proposal would give the GOP five more winnable seats in next year's elections, which would make it easier for the party to keep its slim U.S. House majority. Chair Cody Vasut told the committee that he expected it to vote later Friday or Saturday on the bill, which Republicans unveiled Wednesday. He said he expected the full state House to debate the measure Tuesday. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called the Legislature into a 30-day special session and put congressional redistricting on the agenda after Trump called for Texas to redraw lines that Republicans approved in 2021. Republicans hold 25 of the state's seats, to 13 for Democrats, and the plan would create 30 districts that Trump would have carried by at least 10 percentage points had they been in place in 2024. Democratic state Rep. Jon Rosenthal called the public redistricting hearings 'a sham.' The committee quietly released the plan after several public hearings that drew hours of public testimony and scrutiny from residents concerned about new maps they hadn't seen. 'Does the leadership of the state truly think the people of Texas are that stupid?' Rosenthal asked, to which Vasut did not reply. Democrats appear to have few ways to stop the GOP's plans. Some have talked about boycotting the special session to prevent either chamber or both from having a quorum to take action until the special session ends. But Abbott could call another. Republican state Rep. Todd Hunter, the bill's author, dismissed concerns about how quickly lawmakers are moving. He said they've have been discussing the possibility for months. 'Don't be surprised,' he said. 'The topic has been there.' Hunter acknowledged that the lines were being redrawn 'for partisan purposes,' which he said is allowed by the U.S. Supreme Court. He said a law firm was consulted as the map was being drawn. 'I'm telling you,' he said. 'I'm not beating around the bush.' Democrats argue that if Republicans succeed in redrawing the districts in Texas, Trump will push other states to redraw theirs before they'd normally do so, which would be in 2031 or 2032, after the next nationwide census. States are required to adjust the lines at least once every 10 years to keep the districts as equal in population as possible after population shifts. That's led Democrats in California and New York to consider redrawing their states' lines to help Democrats, though each state has an independent commission for drawing the lines. Texas might have no competitive districts Under the exiting lines, which were in place for the 2022 and 2024 elections, Republicans won all of the seats in districts carried by Trump by at least 10 percentage points, and Democrats won all 11 districts carried by Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. In the other two districts, Trump won by less than 10 percentage points, but Democrats won the House seats. Under the new map, there would be no districts won by Trump by less than 10 points. In Austin, a liberal bastion, parts of two districts represented by Democrats would be combined into one that favored Democrats even more strongly. One of the three other districts would include a slice of the city and extend 340 miles (547 kilometers) to the west, to take in the oil city of Midland. 'Some people like it, and some people don't, and that's the nature of redistricting," Hunter said. ___ Hanna reported from Topeka, Kansas.
