logo
The Dja Dja Wurrung lead the way as Victoria edges closer to Australia's first state treaty

The Dja Dja Wurrung lead the way as Victoria edges closer to Australia's first state treaty

SBS Australia16-07-2025
In the sacred country of the Dja Dja Wurrung people in Central Victoria, a historic transformation is underway. In Bendigo, at a traditional meeting place lit by fire and ceremony, cultural dancers move to the rhythm of resilience, welcoming a new chapter in the long struggle for recognition and justice.
Here, where ancestral stories echo through the bush, the Dja Dja Wurrung have become the first Traditional Owner group to formally begin negotiating a local treaty under Victoria's state-led Treaty process.
Their aspirations are bold, grounded in cultural authority and future-focused – not only for the well-being of today's generations, but for their children and the many to come. 'We caught up as a whole group to talk about the treaty late last year,' says Djaran Murray-Jackson, a Dja Dja Wurrung man and board member of DJARRA, the Traditional Owner corporation. 'Our mob really wanted to be one of the first to negotiate a local treaty. We authorised it at our AGM — and now we're here. It's very exciting.' The Dja Dja Wurrung's vision is to elevate their local voice to the same level as state and federal decision-makers. It's about tangible change — home ownership, university education, and cultural pride for young Dja Dja Wurrung people. For Murray-Jackson, this work is also deeply personal. 'I've got a four-month-old daughter,' he says.
'If every Dja Dja Wurrung person feels something from the treaty process, I'll be satisfied we've done the right thing.'
Victoria: The national leader for a treaty While national treaty talks have stalled, Victoria has moved forward. In 2016, it became the first jurisdiction to commit to official treaty negotiations.
Since then, the First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria (the Assembly) has led a pioneering process to redefine the relationship between First Peoples and the state.
Reuben Berg, co-chair of the Assembly, describes the statewide treaty as a way to ensure decisions affecting First Peoples are made by First Peoples. 'The Assembly is a democratically elected group of Traditional Owners. Through this first statewide treaty, we want to see that body play an enhanced leadership role — appointing people to key positions, holding government accountable, and ensuring ongoing truth-telling.' Victoria's Treaty Authority — an independent governing body overseeing the negotiations — is currently engaging with around 40 Traditional Owner groups across the state. Board member Thelma Austin says the appetite for local treaties is growing. 'The interest is definitely out there. Our role is to educate and help communities navigate the process.' Premier Jacinta Allan has thrown her support behind the Treaty process, backing both the collective state treaty and local agreements.
'Our community have been clear — they want action, and they want meaningful treaty negotiations,' she told attendees at the Dja Dja Wurrung cultural gathering.
Local aspirations, global context The push for the Treaty in Victoria is part of a global movement for Indigenous self-determination. Indigenous leaders and legal scholars in the program The Case for a Treaty, airing on SBS's Living Black, highlight how Australia remains an outlier. It is the only British settler colony to have denied the presence of its First peoples to avoid treaty making. In comparison, New Zealand's Treaty of Waitangi — though imperfect and contested and largely ignored between 1841 and the 1970s — it has offered a platform for the Māori political voice, land settlements, and cultural revitalisation. Australia, by contrast, refused to acknowledge Aboriginal sovereignty or negotiate terms of co-existence. As legal expert Professor Megan Davis puts it, 'The British weren't competing with anyone in Australia, so there was no motivation for treaties. And we're paying the price for that today.' Victoria's Treaty process is attempting to correct that legacy. It's complex work, unfolding more than 230 years after colonisation, but it's beginning to come to fruition.
For communities like the Dja Dja Wurrung, this is about reclaiming autonomy and creating lasting impact.
Economic justice and cultural renewal Beyond symbolism, a Treaty is increasingly seen as a powerful mechanism for economic development and cultural strength. Darren Godwell, Chair of Indigenous Business Australia, says treaties offer a way to 'bridge historic disadvantage into inclusion.' 'Each of our sovereign nations is going to need a treasurer and a treasury,' says Godwell. 'Treaty allows Traditional Owners to pursue development on their own terms — whether it's fisheries, agriculture, sustainability or cultural enterprise.'
For the Dja Dja Wurrung, that means having a say in local economic planning, land use and service delivery, with an emphasis on housing, education and language revival.
A national path forward? While Victoria leads, other states lag behind. Queensland and the Northern Territory paused or abandoned their Treaty efforts after changes in government. Tasmania has opted for truth-telling without a formal Treaty process. South Australia has created a First Nations Voice to Parliament, with Treaty talks still emerging. In New South Wales, the Treaty Commission has just begun consultations under the Minns Labor Government. Despite this patchwork approach, leaders like Berg are optimistic. 'We don't need to wait for a national treaty to move forward locally. Victoria is proof that meaningful change can start in the states.' Senator Lidia Thorpe, a vocal advocate for Treaty and a Djab Wurrung Gunnai Gunditjmara woman, believes the real power lies with the grassroots.
'We need clans and nations represented at the local government level. Real change starts in community, not Canberra.'
A promise to the future As the fire crackles on Dja Dja Wurrung country, elders, dancers and young families gather to welcome history in the making. The Treaty journey is still unfolding — fragile, hopeful, contested. But the message is clear: First Nations people are not asking for permission.
They are reclaiming their future. And in Victoria, the road to Treaty has already begun.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ghislaine Maxwell' lawyer said he is ‘finally able to ‘reveal what really happened'
Ghislaine Maxwell' lawyer said he is ‘finally able to ‘reveal what really happened'

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Ghislaine Maxwell' lawyer said he is ‘finally able to ‘reveal what really happened'

Ghislaine Maxwell will 'finally be able to say what really happened,' her lawyer has said as the convicted sex trafficker meets with a top White House official for a second day. There are questions about the aim of the meetings with a Democrat saying it 'really stinks'. Donald Trump had earlier said if she had incriminating information 'the Justice Department will hear what she has to say'. As the US President left for a visit to the UK on Friday, he was asked if he was considering pardoning Maxwell, the accomplice of the late Jeffrey Epstein. He replied he 'hadn't thought about' it but also said the he was 'allowed to do it'. The comments comes as the Wall Street Journal, which last week claimed that Mr Trump had written a happy birthday note to Epstein in 2003, has now reported that former president Bill Clinton did the same. The tumult over the Epstein files has consumed the Trump administration for three weeks after the Justice Department said it would not release any more files on the matter and there was no Epstein 'client list'. It's split the MAGA base, many of who have consumed years of rumours and theories about who and what is contained within the files and whether it's the tip of a wider scandal. Yet no evidence has emerged to suggest that was the case. Last week, more images emerged of Donald Trump with the pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. A newspaper also reported the US president was told his name was in the files. The White House has pushed back on the reports. Due to how many people Epstein knew, it's likely many people's names are contained in the files and there is no suggestion of wrongdoing simply by being mentioned, that includes Mr Trump. Despite the Justice Department saying there was no 'client list,' as he boarded Air Force One for Scotland on Friday, Mr Trump said there was a 'list' of Epstein associates. 'You should focus on (Bill) Clinton. You should focus on the (former) president of Harvard, you should focus on some of the hedge fund guys. I'll give you a list,' he said. Again there is no evidence of any wrongdoing by those Mr Trump mentioned. On Friday, US deputy Attorney-General Todd Blanche said he would meet Ghislaine Maxwell for a second day of questioning at a federal courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida, close to where she is imprisoned for sex trafficking including that of a minor among other crimes. After Thursday's meeting, Mr Blanche, who was previously Mr Trump's personal lawyer, said on X that 'The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time'. Maxwell 'finally able to say what really happened' Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, told reporters after the meeting with Mr Blanche that 'she answered all of the questions truthfully, honestly and to the best of her ability.' He said that 'if you looked up scapegoat in the dictionary,' Maxwell's face would be there. 'We're grateful for this opportunity to finally be able to say what really happened, and that's what we're going to do, yesterday and today. 'We just ask that folks look at what she has to say with an open mind, and that's what Deputy Attorney-General Todd Blanche has promised us, and everything she says can be corroborated, and she's telling the truth. 'She's got no reason to lie at this point, and she's going to keep telling the truth,' Mr Marcus claimed. Maxwell meeting 'really stinks' On Capitol Hill, Democrat Senator Richard Blumenthal said it was a 'secret meeting' that 'really stinks' and looked like 'some kind of cover up'. There have been calls for the meeting to be recorded. Democrat Congressman Robert Garcia, who is on the House Oversight Committee, said the meeting was 'incredibly suspicious' and 'dangerous' and he was concerned no members of the committee were present. 'She probably wants a pardon from Donald Trump, and so her meeting with Trump's Department of Justice cannot be trusted, and anything she says must be corroborated with documents and records from the actual Epstein files,' he said. Claim Clinton also sent Epstein birthday message On Thursday, US time, the Wall Street Journal reported that Bill Clinton, who was US president during much of the 1990s, also sent Jeffrey Epstein a message for his now infamous 50th birthday album. His reported message read: 'It's reassuring isn't it, to have lasted as long, across all the years of learning and knowing, adventures and (not legible word) and also to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference and the solace of friends'. Mr Clinton has not commented but a spokesman said he stopped associating with Epstein years before his arrest and was not aware of his claims. Mr Trump, who has denied he also sent a message for the book, has also said he cut ties prior to Epstein's; legal issues and in fact barred him from Mar-a-Lago. It's been reported that many other notable people wrote notes for the birthday book including fashion designer Vera Wang.

Justice Dept to meet Epstein accomplice Maxwell on Thursday
Justice Dept to meet Epstein accomplice Maxwell on Thursday

News.com.au

timea day ago

  • News.com.au

Justice Dept to meet Epstein accomplice Maxwell on Thursday

A top Department of Justice official was expected to meet on Thursday with Ghislaine Maxwell, the imprisoned accomplice of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as President Donald Trump struggles to quell fury over his handling of the notorious case. The former British socialite is serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted in 2021 of sex trafficking minors on behalf of Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial in his own pedophile trafficking case. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche -- Trump's former personal lawyer for his hush money trial and two federal criminal cases -- was to interview Maxwell at a federal courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida, multiple US media reported. "If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say," Blanche said in a statement on Tuesday. "No one is above the law -- and no lead is off-limits." Maxwell, the daughter of the late British press baron Robert Maxwell, is the only former Epstein associate who was convicted in connection with his activities, which right-wing conspiracy theorists allege included trafficking young models for VIPs. But Joyce Vance, an ex-federal prosecutor who now teaches law at the University of Alabama, said any "'new' testimony (Maxwell) offers is inherently unreliable unless backed by evidence." "Trump could give Ghislaine Maxwell a pardon on his last day in office, in exchange for favorable testimony now," Vance said in a post on X. "She knows he's her only chance for release." The meeting with Maxwell marks another attempt by the Trump administration to defuse anger among the Republican president's own supporters over what they have long seen as a cover-up of sex crimes by Epstein, a wealthy financier with high-level connections. - 'A creep' - A Wall Street Journal report on Wednesday hiked up that pressure as it claimed Trump's name was among hundreds found during a review of DOJ documents on Epstein, even if there was no indication of wrongdoing. Trump spokesman Steven Cheung called the report "fake news" and said Trump had long ago broken with Epstein and "kicked him out of his (Florida) club for being a creep." The same newspaper claimed last week that Trump had penned a sexually suggestive letter to Epstein, a former friend, for his birthday in 2003. Trump has sued for at least $10 billion over the story. Many of the president's core supporters want more transparency on the Epstein case, and Trump -- who has long fanned conspiracy theories -- had promised to deliver that on retaking the White House in January. But he has since dismissed the controversy as a "hoax," and the DOJ and FBI released a memo this month claiming the so-called Epstein files did not contain evidence that would justify further investigation. Epstein had committed suicide while in jail, did not blackmail any prominent figures, and did not keep a "client list," according to the FBI-DOJ memo. - Diversion - Seeking to redirect public attention, the White House has promoted unfounded claims in recent days that former president Barack Obama led a "years-long coup" against Trump around his victorious 2016 election. The extraordinary narrative claims that Obama had ordered intelligence assessments to be manipulated to accuse Russia of election interference to help Trump. Yet it runs counter to four separate criminal, counterintelligence and watchdog probes between 2019 and 2023 -- each of them concluding that Russia did interfere and did, in various ways, help Trump. Epstein was found hanging dead in his New York prison cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges that he sexually exploited hundreds of victims at his homes in New York and Florida. Among those with connections to Epstein was Britain's Prince Andrew, who settled a US civil case in February 2022 brought by Virginia Giuffre, who claimed he sexually assaulted her when she was 17. Giuffre, who accused Epstein of using her as a sex slave, committed suicide at her home in Australia in April.

Jonno Duniam: Childcare bill still needs ‘interrogation' despite fast-track
Jonno Duniam: Childcare bill still needs ‘interrogation' despite fast-track

News.com.au

time2 days ago

  • News.com.au

Jonno Duniam: Childcare bill still needs ‘interrogation' despite fast-track

In an early show of bipartisan goodwill, a Labor childcare Bill is expected to pass through parliament with relative ease, but big issues within the new law are yet to be ironed out by the federal opposition, which is concerned about the children who could be left behind. The new legislation, which was tabled in parliament by federal Education Minister Jason Clare on Wednesday, was proposed in the wake of shocking news out of Victoria where a man is accused of 70 separate instances of child abuse. Joshua Brown, 26, worked at 20 childcare centres between 2017 and May 2025. Addressing parliament, Mr Clare said 'mums and dads of thousands of children' were undergoing immense levels of stress and trauma surrounding the wellbeing of their kids. 'Governments of different colours, state and federal, have taken action but not enough and not fast enough. That's the truth,' he said. 'We have to do everything we can to ensure the safety of our children when they walk – or are carried – through the doors of an early childhood education and care service at centres across the country.' Opposition education spokesman Jonno Duniam said he was 'ultimately satisfied' with the proposed Bill, which he said the opposition 'will not delay the passage of … in any way'. 'We'll get these things through parliament this fortnight, but we now need to focus on state and territory governments and what they do to protect children in health care,' he told the ABC's Sally Sara on Radio National on Thursday morning. 'We've got our party room and other arrangements to consider these laws that have only just been introduced, but soon after that I expect they'll be passed and enforced.' Despite the optimism, Mr Duniam said the opposition still had questions for the government about particular elements of the proposed laws. One issue revolves around 'childcare deserts', parts of the country – usually in regional and remote Australia – that have significantly less childcare options than our nation's urban hubs. One feature of the Bill allows the government to withdraw subsidies for centres that perform their child protection duties poorly, but families with no other options may end up bearing the brunt of the punishment. 'A question I've put to the government was 'well, what happens if the funding is withdrawn?' Either a centre is shut and no services are available or, in some cases, when under these arrangements funding would be withdrawn, (the centre) might then send a bill for 100 per cent of the cost to the parents, and that would be unacceptable,' Mr Duniam said. 'This is something that remains for interrogation.' When asked if mandatory CCTV would be discussed, Mr Duniam said he was 'kind of baffled' that it wasn't already enforced. 'It is in centres but obviously not mandatory in all jurisdictions. I think the government needs to get it right in terms of its deployment,' he said. 'There are privacy concerns. We know CCTV has been used by perpetrators of these horrendous acts, so while it is a safety measure, we need to make sure appropriate safeguards are in place.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store