AI isn't just standing by. It's doing things — without guardrails
Just two and a half years after OpenAI stunned the world with ChatGPT, AI is no longer only answering questions — it is taking actions. We are now entering the era of AI agents, in which AI large language models don't just passively provide information in response to your queries, they actively go into the world and do things for — or potentially against — you.
AI has the power to write essays and answer complex questions, but imagine if you could enter a prompt and have it make a doctor's appointment based on your calendar, or book a family flight with your credit card, or file a legal case for you in small claims court.
An AI agent submitted this op-ed. (I did, however, write the op-ed myself because I figured the Los Angeles Times wouldn't publish an AI-generated piece, and besides I can put in random references like I'm a Cleveland Browns fan because no AI would ever admit to that.)
I instructed my AI agent to find out what email address The Times uses for op-ed submissions, the requirements for the submission, and then to draft the email title, draft an eye-catching pitch paragraph, attach my op-ed and submit the package. I pressed 'return,' 'monitor task' and 'confirm.' The AI agent completed the tasks in a few minutes.
A few minutes is not speedy, and these were not complicated requests. But with each passing month the agents get faster and smarter. I used Operator by OpenAI, which is in research preview mode. Google's Project Mariner, which is also a research prototype, can perform similar agentic tasks. Multiple companies now offer AI agents that will make phone calls for you — in your voice or another voice — and have a conversation with the person at the other end of the line based on your instructions.
Soon AI agents will perform more complex tasks and be widely available for the public to use. That raises a number of unresolved and significant concerns. Anthropic does safety testing of its models and publishes the results. One of its tests showed that the Claude Opus 4 model would potentially notify the press or regulators if it believed you were doing something egregiously immoral. Should an AI agent behave like a slavishly loyal employee, or a conscientious employee?
OpenAI publishes safety audits of its models. One audit showed the o3 model engaged in strategic deception, which was defined as behavior that intentionally pursues objectives misaligned with user or developer intent. A passive AI model that engages in strategic deception can be troubling, but it becomes dangerous if that model actively performs tasks in the real world autonomously. A rogue AI agent could empty your bank account, make and send fake incriminating videos of you to law enforcement, or disclose your personal information to the dark web.
Earlier this year, programming changes were made to xAI's Grok model that caused it to insert false information about white genocide in South Africa in responses to unrelated user queries. This episode showed that large language models can reflect the biases of their creators. In a world of AI agents, we should also beware that creators of the agents could take control of them without your knowledge.
The U.S. government is far behind in grappling with the potential risks of powerful, advanced AI. At a minimum, we should mandate that companies deploying large language models at scale need to disclose the safety tests they performed and the results, as well as security measures embedded in the system.
The bipartisan House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence, on which I served, published a unanimous report last December with more than 80 recommendations. Congress should act on them. We did not discuss general purpose AI agents because they weren't really a thing yet.
To address the unresolved and significant issues raised by AI, which will become magnified as AI agents proliferate, Congress should turn the task force into a House Select Committee. Such a specialized committee could put witnesses under oath, hold hearings in public and employ a dedicated staff to help tackle one of the most significant technological revolutions in history. AI moves quickly. If we act now, we can still catch up.
Ted Lieu, a Democrat, represents California's 36th Congressional District.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bernstein weighs in on the path ahead for Japanese semiconductor equipment stocks
- Japanese semiconductor production equipment names have risen rapidly over the past month, driven in part by increased demand from artificial intelligence chipmakers for testers of the technology, according to analysts at Bernstein. In a note to clients, the analysts led by David Dai highlighted several of these firms that have seen their share prices rally in recent weeks. Advantest (TYO:6857), a manufacturer of automatic chip testing gear, has been one particular beneficiary, with the stock spiking on expectations for higher demand from firms like Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and TSMC, the strategists said. However, they suggested that investors "take profit now," arguing that revenue in the years to come at the company is "unlikely to present much growth year-over-year due to capacity build out this year." Advantest shares are also richly valued, they flagged, adding that many projections for tester demand "that's been floating around are likely misleading, as they may have confused the old and new testers." Other backend Japanese chip equipment makers have also seen their shares rise, although small cap firms "may still have upside," the analysts said. They especially like Disco (OTC:DSCSY) Corporation (TYO:6146), a precision tools manufacturer, highlighting the business's "long term growth prospects," including drivers such as "backside power, NAND stacking, and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) WMCM packaging." But front end equipment makers provide a "better opportunity" for investors, the Bernstein analysts said. "We continue to like Kokusai (TYO:7722) and Tokyo Electron (TYO:8035) for the growth in memory and China equipment demand. Our recent China WFE tracker suggests strong China WFE demand continues this year," they wrote. "The recent potential restriction on foreign fabs in China would be additional reason to buy Japan front end equipment." The strategists gave Advantest a "market-perform" rating, while Disco, Kokusai and Tokyo Electron were rated as "outperform." Related articles Bernstein weighs in on the path ahead for Japanese semiconductor equipment stocks UBS examines how this year's hurricane season could impact European reinsurers AI growth brings new tests for semi-test duopoly Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Goldman Sachs warns tariffs won't help the U.S. boost manufacturing productivity as tech in American factories continues to lag
U.S. manufacturing has decelerated recently, both as a result of increased competition from China and as part of a broader manufacturing productivity slowdown. Goldman Sachs analysts argue tariffs will not lower supply chain and labor costs enough to boost reshoring, and instead, increased automation will be the most likely driver of a manufacturing productivity boost. As China continues to best the United States in manufacturing capabilities, tariffs may not be America's best bet to boost factory productivity. Instead, the U.S. should look to AI and automation to gain an edge in manufacturing, Goldman Sachs analysts argue. President Donald Trump aspires to return factory jobs to American shores by imposing steep tariffs on U.S. manufacturing rivals, but the taxes can only incentivize reshoring so much, analysts said in a note published Thursday. Instead, manufacturers should look to automation and the ever-more-accessible artificial intelligence as their best chance for boosting domestic manufacturing. 'A pickup in the pace of innovation—potentially from recent advances in robotics and generative AI—therefore remains the catalyst most likely to reverse the long-run stagnation in manufacturing productivity,' analyst Joseph Briggs and colleagues said in the note. As China capitalizes on automation and cheaper labor to grow its export footprint, the Bank of America Institute has found mounting evidence of a recent U.S. manufacturing slowdown, including U.S. Census Bureau data showing new orders for manufactured durable goods decreasing 6.3% in April. The Institute of Supply Management Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) has fallen since March, also indicating a contraction. The U.S.'s productivity woes are part of a larger manufacturing productivity slowdown happening over the last two decades as a result of investment pullback following the global financial crisis, as well as a slowdown in the burst of technological advancements of the early 2000s, according to Goldman Sachs. Trump's tariff plans for China—which the president has not disclosed, despite touting a new trade deal—aim to help the U.S. claw back manufacturing opportunities from its economic rival. But while they make consumers' lives more expensive, they are not a panacea for manufacturers, the bank argued in its note. 'Tariffs are unlikely to result in much reshoring because production costs in other countries are well below the U.S.' for most products (even after accounting for tariffs), and China will likely continue to grow its exports on the back of cost advantages and industrial policy support,' the note said. Instead, analyst Briggs said, the U.S. should focus on another area in which it's lagging: automation. The U.S. has trailed other manufacturing giants in implementing AI into factory operations, according to a Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Henderson Institute report released earlier this month. Only 46% of U.S. respondents of BCG's Global Manufacturing Survey of 1,000 manufacturers reported multiple use cases of AI in their plants, falling short of the 62% average and lagging behind China's 77%. 'This is one of the key technologies that I think could drive productivity growth in a cost-competitive manner,' Briggs told Fortune. 'And we just haven't seen that occur on a meaningful scale yet.' The U.S. did not previously invest in factory automation as a result of a 'hangover' from the global financial crisis, Briggs said, but the U.S. now has a real shot at prioritizing factory technology updates, given the growing ubiquity and therefore affordability of automation and AI. Companies such as aviation precision parts-maker MSP Manufacturing have already begun to adapt accordingly. MSP president and chief operating officer Johnny Goode recently learned of an AI-powered software able to program the machine building the precision parts, reducing production time from an hour and a half to seven minutes per part—plus 15 minutes necessary for a human operator to refine it. 'I was like, holy snap, this is going to be a game changer,' Goode told Fortune's Jeremy Kahn this week. 'Going from 90 minutes to 22 minutes is a big deal, and we've seen that get even better as we've learned to use the software more.' Goldman Sachs analysts conceded that while automation provides the largest area for growth in manufacturing productivity in the U.S., it is unlikely to solve the broader manufacturing slowdown, which is global. The slowdown is 'historically unusual,' Briggs said, with the maturation of the tech sector the likely culprit. Any hope for a global uptick in productivity would come from mass advancement and adoption of AI and robotics on a large scale. 'The main thing that would drive a large pickup in manufacturing productivity and manufacturing growth would be a sharp increase in the pace of innovation,' Briggs said. 'And this type of inflection upwards and technological progress are very hard to predict.' Advancement in tech could have a two-fold benefit for domestic manufacturing productivity, both in driving factory investments and in bettering technology to be installed in factories to automate tasks. But with the specifics of the future of AI and automation applications still unknown, it's difficult to predict whether a reversal of a domestic manufacturing slowdown is truly possible. 'We just need to see it happen before we have a lot of confidence in that dynamic being a big driver,' Briggs said. This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Authors call on publishers to limit their use of AI
An open letter from authors including Lauren Groff, Lev Grossman, R.F. Kuang, Dennis Lehane, and Geoffrey Maguire calls on book publishers to pledge to limit their use of AI tools, for example by committing to only hire human audiobook narrators. The letter argues that authors' work has been 'stolen' by AI companies: 'Rather than paying writers a small percentage of the money our work makes for them, someone else will be paid for a technology built on our unpaid labor.' Among other commitments, the authors call for publishers to 'make a pledge that they will never release books that were created by machine' and 'not replace their human staff with AI tools or degrade their positions into AI monitors.' While the initial letter was signed by an already impressive list of writers, NPR reports that another 1,100 signatures were added in the 24 hours after it was initially published. Authors are also suing tech companies over using their books to train AI models, but federal judges dealt significant blows to those lawsuits earlier this week.
