logo
Will first hear on maintainability issue on August 6 on pleas seeking review of PMLA verdict: SC

Will first hear on maintainability issue on August 6 on pleas seeking review of PMLA verdict: SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday said it would first hear arguments on August 6 on the issue of maintainability of the petitions seeking a review of its July 2022 verdict that upheld the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) powers to arrest, attach properties allegedly involved in money laundering, and carry out search and seizure under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
A three-judge bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh noted that the ED has proposed three preliminary issues that primarily deal with the question of the review petitions' maintainability. The bench said the review petitioners have proposed 13 questions for its consideration.
It noted the submissions of the questions raised by both parties and fixed the matter for further hearing on August 6.
'Since the proposed issues are arising in the review proceedings, we propose to first hear the parties on the issue of maintainability of the review petitions, followed by a hearing on the questions proposed to be raised on behalf of the review petitioners. Eventually, the questions that would finally arise for consideration will also be determined by us if we hold that the review petitions are maintainable,' the bench observed.
The Supreme Court had on 4 May 2025 reconstituted a new bench to hear a batch of review petitions filed against the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (VMC) judgment, which upheld certain provisions of the PMLA.
The VMC judgment was delivered on 27 July 2022 by a three-judge bench headed by Justice A M Khanwilkar, and Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and C T Ravikumar (all now retired). It upheld certain provisions of the PMLA. 'Sections 5, 8 (4), 15, 17 and 19 of PMLA, relating to the Directorate's power of attachment, search and seizure, and arrest is upheld,' the top court had said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ED makes first arrest in loan fraud case linked to Anil Ambani
ED makes first arrest in loan fraud case linked to Anil Ambani

Economic Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

ED makes first arrest in loan fraud case linked to Anil Ambani

New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) late Friday evening arrested the managing director of an Odisha-based company - its first arrest in an alleged bank loan fraud case involving the Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (ADAG). Partha Sarathi Biswal, MD of Biswal Tradelink Pvt Ltd (BTPL), is accused of arranging a fake bank guarantee of ₹68 crore for an ADAG firm. According to the ED, its investigation has revealed that BTPL fraudulently arranged and submitted the fake bank guarantee along with forged SBI endorsements and fabricated confirmations on behalf of Reliance Nu Bess Ltd for a tender floated by Solar Energy Corporation of India Ltd (SECI). For this, BTPL received ₹5.40 crore from Reliance Nu Bess' parent, Reliance Power Ltd, ED has ED carried out searches against Biswal Tradelink on Friday. Agency sources said the evidence gathered by ED confirmed the use of fake documents in the name of certain banks and fake email IDs in the name of SBI."Probe reveals BTPL, a small company incorporated in 2019, maintained multiple undisclosed bank accounts and carried out transactions disproportionate to its declared turnover. Many violations of the Companies Act are found," the probe agency said in a news release on Saturday. Statutory records such as books of accounts and shareholders' registers were not found at the registered address, it said, adding: " Dummy directors are found to be used just to sign the documents."At least seven undisclosed bank accounts of the company were found and "proceeds of crime, of crores of rupees, have been traced to these accounts", it claimed. Biswal was produced before a Delhi court, which sent him to ED's custody till August 6. ET was the first to report on Friday that the ED had summoned Anil Ambani for questioning in connection with its investigation into the ₹17,000 crore alleged loan fraud case. Ambani has been asked to appear before the agency on August 5. According to the Enforcement Directorat, Biswal Tradelink ran a racket that issued fake bank guarantees to business groups. As per the agency, the Delhi Police filed the first information report in the case based on a Reliance Nu Bess company, accusing Biswal Tradelink of cheating it by promising to arrange bank guarantees for a fee and then providing a fake bank guarantee. According to the ED, Reliance Nu Bess wrongly claimed that it was cheated. "Documentary evidence reveals that apparently the two parties acted in collusion. The directors of Biswal Tradelink were found to be previous directors of Reliance group," a senior official had told ET.A statement issued by the Reliance Group on Friday said: "The company and its subsidiaries acted bonafidely and have been a victim of fraud, forgery and cheating conspiracy. The company has made due disclosure on this to the stock exchanges on November 7, 2024," it further said "a criminal complaint in this regard has already been lodged with the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police against the third party on October 16, 2024" and that the "due process of law will follow".

SC sets aside HC order granting anticipatory bail on condition to resume conjugal life
SC sets aside HC order granting anticipatory bail on condition to resume conjugal life

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

SC sets aside HC order granting anticipatory bail on condition to resume conjugal life

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has set aside an order of the Jharkhand High Court which granted anticipatory bail to a man on a condition that he would resume conjugal life with his wife and maintain her with dignity and honour. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih noted that the man was an accused in a case registered under various sections of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. "While considering the application for pre-arrest bail of the appellant, the court ought to have assessed whether the discretionary relief sought by the appellant for pre-arrest bail deserved to be granted within the settled parameters… but a condition such as the one impugned before us ought not to have been imposed in view of several decisions of this court," the bench said in its July 29 order. It said the high court should have considered the prayer for pre-arrest bail entirely on its own merit instead of imposing a condition, which is not traceable to section 438(2) of the erstwhile Code of Criminal Procedure. The apex court passed the order on a plea challenging a February 2025 order of the high court which had granted the prayer for pre-arrest bail on condition that the man resumes conjugal life with his wife and maintains her with dignity and honour as his lawful wife. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cardiologists: Teaspoon On an Empty Stomach Slims Waist from 36 To 22 Health Wellness Journal Learn more Undo During the hearing before the top court, the counsel appearing for the woman said the man, together with her, had jointly submitted before the high court that he was willing to resume his conjugal life. The lawyer contended that the man cannot now turn around and take a different stand. The bench said the counsel was partly right in the sense that the man had indeed agreed to resume conjugal life. "However, the respondent no.2 (woman) insisted for imposition of a further condition to which we do not find the appellant (man) to have agreed. The spouses seemingly, at one point of time, had drifted apart and resided separately for some time. Imposing a condition that the appellant would maintain the respondent no.2 with dignity and honour is beset with risk in that it can generate further litigation," the bench said. It said an application for cancellation of bail on the ground that such condition has not been complied with, if filed later, is bound to meet opposition from the man and could place the high court in further difficulty. "The impugned judgment and order, accordingly, stands set aside. The appeal is allowed," the bench said. It restored the anticipatory bail application on the file of the high court and asked it to decide it afresh on its own merits, as early as possible. The bench said till such time the matter is decided finally by the high court, the interim protection granted to the man by the top court earlier would continue. In its interim direction passed earlier, the top court had said the man be not arrested in connection with the case subject to his joining investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating officer. PTI Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

ED arrests MD of Biswal Tradelink in fake bank guarantee case
ED arrests MD of Biswal Tradelink in fake bank guarantee case

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

ED arrests MD of Biswal Tradelink in fake bank guarantee case

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has arrested Partha Sarathi Biswal, managing director of Biswal Tradelink Private Limited (BTPL), in connection with an alleged fake bank guarantee case. The arrest was made following searches in Bhubaneswar and Kolkata. The probe is based on a first information report registered by the Economic Offences Wing of the Delhi police, BTPL, its directors, and others, for allegedly providing a fake bank guarantee, which was purportedly submitted to Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited (SECI). 'In a related matter, evidence seized earlier during searches on July 24 in the case of Anil Ambani group companies has direct linkage with the present investigation. A bank guarantee of ₹68.2 crore submitted to Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited (SECI) on behalf of Reliance NU BESS Limited/Maharashtra Energy Generation Limited has been established as fake,' an official had earlier alleged. According to the agency, BTPL fraudulently arranged and submitted fake bank guarantees of ₹68.2 crore along with forged SBI endorsements and fabricated confirmations for a SECI tender. 'For providing this bank guarantee, ₹5.40 crore has been received by BTPL from Reliance Power Limited,' the agency alleged. Multiple accounts 'Evidence confirms the use of fake documents in the name of certain banks and fake email IDs in the name of the SBI. The probe reveals that BTPL, a small company incorporated in 2019, maintained multiple undisclosed bank accounts and carried out transactions disproportionate to its declared turnover,' it said. The ED is alleged to have detected many violations of the Companies Act. Dummy directors were used just to sign documents. At least seven undisclosed bank accounts of the company have been found, according to the agency sources.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store