Josh Hawley Says Trump Tariff Rebate Checks Won't Go to ‘Biden Voters'
The administration's tariffs are unprecedented in modern economic history and are currently generating revenue for the U.S. government by taxing U.S. businesses on their imports. Critics have noted that the administration is just asking many companies to pass along the higher cost of doing business to consumers. No matter what Trump says, there's just no avoiding the fact that tariffs will drive up the cost of electronics, including video games, laptops, graphics cards, cars, smartphones, and practically every other imported good.
To allow everyday people to 'benefit' from this bizarre system, Hawley has proposed sending a $600 rebate to Americans, in a fashion somewhat similar to the Covid-era stimulus checks that came with the CARES Act. Hawley previously said that his legislation 'would allow hard-working Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump's tariffs are returning to this country.' However, it would appear that he was only talking about hard-working Americans who agree with Donald Trump.
In an interview with Trump acolyte Steve Bannon, Hawley claimed that his legislation was only designed to send money to people of a particular economic and political persuasion. 'Well, you wouldn't give it to everybody, you'd give it to the working people,' the Senator told Bannon on Tuesday. 'You'd give it to our people.' Who counts as 'our people'? From Hawley's comments, it doesn't exactly sound like a representative sample of the country.
'I mean, you know, the rich people don't need it … what I mean by that is all those Democrat donors of Wall Street, all these hedge fund guys, who all hate the tariffs, by the way,' Hawley said. 'My view is, we ought to give a portion [of] that back to our working-class blue-collar voters who powered the Trump revolution, who got this president into office multiple times, and who are the backbone of this nation.'
During his conversation with Bannon, Hawley provided other vague details about his supposed plan. 'It'd be $600 for every adult and child, so if you've got a big family, you're gonna get more,' he claimed. 'And you'd phase it out for income, you know? So again, the wealthy—you start making six figures, you get into the big six figures—you'd phase the thing out.' He continued: 'So this is not going to the hedge fund managers or all the Biden voters. This is not going to the Wall Street kingpins. So they don't need any of it.'
It's worth noting that some 81 million people voted for Biden during the 2020 presidential election. Nearly 75 million voted for Kamala Harris last year. The number of people who make six-figures in this country is significantly smaller, but still represents a significant chunk of the population pie. In other words, it sounds like the target demographic for Hawley's rebate program is actually quite small, and would mostly be: MAGA. Surprise, surprise.
Of course, it seems more than likely that the rebates won't ever materialize, which means that nobody is going to be getting any money and Hawley is just engaging in a bit of theater to seem like he's doing something to alleviate the harms of rising prices. If that's the case, it's just one more example of the MAGA brand of faux-populism—a largely rhetorical program in which economic elites lambaste their own class while sucking up to the poor. Meanwhile, Washington continues with business as usual, the rich get richer, and we're all just a little bit more confused by what our leaders are doing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
a minute ago
- USA Today
What does TACO mean? What to know when Trump issues new tariffs after 2 delays
President Donald Trump signed an executive order to issue a new slate of tariffs on July 31, the latest in a long saga of policy changes for imports from countries around the world. Reciprocal tariff rates for 70 countries will range from 15% to 41%, set to go into effect seven days from the order. Trump also separately raised the tariff rate on imports from Canada from 25% to 35%, which is set to go into effect Aug. 1. Tariffs are a tax on goods from other countries that importers pay, and economists generally agree it leads to higher prices for consumers. Trump began imposing tariffs on imports from the U.S.'s top trade partners in February, only to change their effective date, scope or rate over the following months. The on-again-off-again tariffs have been a theme of Trump's second term, leading to the creation of the term TACO. Here is what to know: Live updates: Trump fires head of labor statistics bureau after weak jobs report What does TACO mean? Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined "TACO trade" in May, describing how some investors anticipate market rebounds amid Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policies. The acronym stands for "Trump always chickens out." Armstrong describes TACO trade as many investors' strategy to buy into the market that dips when Trump announces steep tariffs on the assumption that he will back off his tariff order, and the market will rebound. Trump hit back at a reporter who asked about the term on May 28, saying, "you ask a nasty question like that. It's called negotiation." Trump's tariffs have been on-again-off-again Back in February, Trump announced a 25% tariff on goods from top trade partners Mexico and Canada and 10% on goods from China. Such was the start of a series of delays and negotiations that left Canada and Mexico relatively untouched when Trump expanded steeper tariff orders to the rest of the world in April. China and the U.S. were caught up in an intense trade war where the economic powerhouses retaliated until both sides issued tariffs in the triple digits. They reached a truce in May and have discussed extending the 90-day pause while they work out a deal. Trump on April 2 announced widespread tariffs in what he called "Liberation Day." Shortly after, he paused the climbing rates for 90 days. That pause was set to expire on July 9, but instead of the tariffs going into effect, Trump extended the deadline. That deadline was Aug. 1, and Trump had said the deadline would not change, but the recent order gives it another week. Mexico remains at 25% while it continues to work on a trade deal for the next 90 days, Trump said. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @
CNN
a minute ago
- CNN
White House monitors coverage of Epstein controversy and can't make it disappear
President Donald Trump has begged his base to stop thinking about Jeffrey Epstein. But 25 days after his Justice Department declared it had nothing more to say on the convicted sex offender, the drumbeat for action continues. Some officials acknowledge, at least privately, that the administration will have to release more information on Epstein in an attempt to quiet accusations of a coverup. Administration officials told CNN that they believe the best antidote to the intense public interest in Epstein is time. But they also acknowledge that without the release of more tangible details, the attention may never fully subside. 'Either we release more documents and it's a confirmation of suspicions, or there is some gap between what people think and what we actually have,' a White House official said. 'And you have to address it directly.' The White House has been intensely monitoring cable news and media coverage of the controversy, sources said. Since Attorney General Pam Bondi sparked public uproar by declaring that Epstein's so-called 'client list' doesn't exist, the administration has scrambled to quell the outrage by moving to interview Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell and release sealed grand jury transcripts related to both her and Epstein's criminal cases. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking and is likely one of the only living people who could shed more light on the extent of Epstein's crimes, was moved from her Florida prison to a lower-security facility in Texas on Friday. The Justice Department has not said why Maxwell was transferred. Nor has Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said anything about his two days of closed-door meetings with Maxwell, aside from promising in a statement that the DOJ would share more information about what they learned 'at the appropriate time.' Trump has not been accused of legal wrongdoing related to Epstein. The White House acknowledged but did not provide a response to a request for comment on this story. The story's staying power has partly been an issue of the president's own making. Trump is clearly frustrated by reporters who have him asked Epstein-related questions, but the small snippets of responses he does give — such as saying this week that he fell out with Epstein after the financier 'stole' a young woman, Virginia Giuffre, from working at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort — only serve to reignite the public interest and sow further questions about what Trump knew about Epstein and when. That statement shocked the family of Giuffre, who died by suicide in April. 'She wasn't stolen, she was preyed upon at his property, at President Trump's property,' Giuffre's brother Sky Roberts told CNN. A Trump administration official acknowledged the president's statements have been unhelpful in tamping down the Epstein-related furor but added they are just manifestations of his intense anger about the situation. The posture within the administration, officials said, has been to reassure the public that it is still committed to sharing more information that has been collected and reviewed by the Justice Department. But that could present another dilemma for the administration: any document dump would likely require extensive redactions to protect the identities of children who were victims of Epstein's crimes. And pages full of black ink may serve only to raise the specter of a coverup, administration officials said. The administration is also being careful not to repeat history by overpromising, which would further upset the many high-profile figures in the president's base who have expressed their frustration over the issue. 'The frenzy and criticism we saw has abated somewhat since the first two weeks. That's in large part thanks to the administration making clear this isn't cased closed like they initially said,' a person close to Trump told CNN. 'But the idea that this can be buried, or will go away thanks to some bigger news story, is a fantasy,' this person said. 'Even if a news story sucks up the oxygen for a time, it will pop up again. It won't die until people get some real answers.' Friday was a prime example of the issue popping back up with Maxwell's surprise transfer. And there will be more court filings next week. In theory, August could bring some relief to an aspect of the Epstein news cycle with Congress on recess for the month, limiting actions from Democrats to force Republicans to take a public stand on the matter. And an attempt by House Republicans to interview Maxwell has failed for now. Maxwell made a list of demands, including requesting immunity and to be provided with a list of questions in advance. The House Oversight Committee on Friday rejected those demands. It did agree, however, to delay any deposition until after the Supreme Court weighs her pending appeal, which won't happen until the end of September. Meanwhile, while officials believe Trump's directive to Bondi to move to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the investigations of Epstein and Maxwell, as well as the Justice Department's interview of Maxwell in prison, are steps in the right direction, multiple people inside and outside of the administration maintain there's still recognition that the fury around Epstein will not abide until more substantial material is released. The limits of that information are well-established. For instance, the grand jury transcripts the Justice Department is asking to unseal from its investigation include testimony from only two witnesses, both law enforcement officials, according to a DOJ memo submitted this week. In an order Thursday evening, federal Judge Richard Berman asked for more information from the government regarding their motion to unseal grand jury transcripts from Epstein's case. Berman made several requests, including verifying the dates of all grand jury presentations in the case, providing exhibits shown to grand jurors and stating whether the government wants exhibits unsealed in addition to transcripts. Those answers are due Monday. Tuesday, meanwhile, is the deadline for Epstein's victims and Maxwell to respond to the DOJ's request to release grand jury files. The judge then has pledged to rule quickly. In the White House's version of a perfect world, the American people would be celebrating Trump's trade war successes, the record-low number of migrants crossing the southern border or the renewal of a society that is being shaped to the president's expansive vision. That may happen, but the Epstein story will remain no matter what. 'There is an acknowledgement that this isn't just going to go away,' one White House official told CNN. CNN's Annie Grayer and Casey Gannon contributed to this report.
Gizmodo
a minute ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk Gave Millions to Trump After Publicly Blowing Up Their Bromance
Newly disclosed federal filings show that Elon Musk gave President Trump's super PAC $5 million and congressional Republicans $10 million during the same period when he was experiencing a very public meltdown over the president's One Big Beautiful Bill. Onlookers have interpreted it as a sign that the Tesla billionaire was vacillating between taking shots at Trump and making conciliatory moves designed to mend their fraying relationship. Last year Musk went all-in on Trump, MAGA, and the Republican Party, engaging in an unprecedented spending blitz designed to see the former reality TV star returned to the White House. Musk was successful in that gambit, but the relationship between him and his gold-haired 'buddy' has since soured. After briefly leading the Department of Government Efficiency (a quasi-agency designed to shrink the federal government), Musk began having problems with Trump over provisions in his spending bill that threatened the EV industry (and, you know, Musk's Tesla). At the end of May, Musk formally left the administration in a swirl of controversy, while also sporting a mysterious black eye (he claimed his son, X, had socked him in the face). Politico notes that Musk's contributions to Trump and the GOP took place not long after the blowup between him and the president, when Musk accused Trump of being in the Jeffrey Epstein files. The outlet writes: The contributions came weeks into Musk's public feud with Trump, as the tech billionaire was slamming Republicans for voting for the megabill that he argued would blow up the deficit. Still, the SpaceX CEO donated $5 million each to the Congressional Leadership Fund, the Senate Leadership Fund and MAGA Inc. on June 27, according to the groups' filings with the Federal Election Commission on Thursday. Those are the top super PACs supporting the House and Senate Republicans and the Trump political operation. If the point of the contributions was to try to make amends with Trump and the Republicans, it doesn't appear to have worked. Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill sailed through Congress, and none of the provisions that proved problematic to Musk's businesses were taken out. Since then, Elon's influence in the government has notably waned. This week, Politico reported that the administration was conducting a 'de-Muskification' at the General Services Administration, where DOGE had formerly holed up. One person close to the organization claimed that DOGE had 'lost all remaining influence' at the agency, which is responsible for supporting basic infrastructure (like office spaces and communications) at federal agencies throughout the government. Musk has since launched his America Party—a supposed third party—as revenge against the President and the GOP lawmakers who passed the One Big Beautiful Bill. Theoretically, were the party to ever take off, it could cause serious electoral problems for many Republicans by siphoning off votes from their political races. However, 'America' isn't much of anything yet, having not yet filed any of the proper paperwork necessary for it to be incorporated. It also doesn't seem like many people are interested in joining the America Party, should it ever materialize. Indeed, a recent poll showed that only 14 percent of surveyed participants had any interest in joining a political party created by Musk. The poll, conducted by Yahoo/YouGov survey, found that while nearly 40 percent of Americans are interested in the creation of a third party, 55 percent said they had no interest in such a party founded by the Tesla CEO. Meanwhile, Musk's businesses have also been flailing. Musk recently announced that Tesla—whose sales have recently plummeted all over the world—would start a robotaxi business, claiming that a driverless service would soon be launched. Tesla subsequently launched a ride-hailing service in California, but, instead of robotaxis, the cars are just normal Teslas driven by humans. Musk's behavior over the past year only seems to strengthen the argument that the billionaire class is a grossly inefficient, stupid, and wasteful segment of people, many of whom seem to feel that gobs of money can solve any problem. Elon has definitively proven this assumption to be false, since he reportedly spent close to $300 million on Trump's campaign last year and, now, less than twelve months later, can't be said to have gained much except the burning hatred of tens of millions of Americans. I'd call that a pretty bad deal.
