Double Bay man charged over attempted cocaine collection following AFP operation at multimillion-dollar home
The Australian Federal Police had been investigating since March intelligence concerning an alleged transnational drug trafficking syndicate targeting Australia.
The man was the alleged intended recipient of a 30kg cocaine importation into New South Wales from a criminal syndicate offshore.
He allegedly attended a 'dead drop' in Alexandria on Friday, about 5km from the Sydney CBD, where he was expecting the importation, but the AFP executed a "controlled delivery" and placed 30kg of an inert substance in the package.
"The AFP will allege the man removed a sports bag containing the 30kg of the substitute material from a parked van in Alexandria and then returned to his home in Double Bay," the AFP said in a statement.
Later on Friday, police conducted a raid on a multimillion-dollar home in Double Bay and a nearby unit, where he was arrested after a brief pursuit down the road.
The items seized from the two properties allegedly include multiple encrypted mobile devices, a sports bag which contains the substitute material, and an amount of anabolic steroids.
AFP Detective Superintendent Morgen Blunden said anyone connected to drug trafficking activity in any way was committing a crime.
'The AFP has successfully disrupted a significant drug trafficking syndicate's operations thanks to this investigation,' Det Supt Blunden said.
'30kg of cocaine has an estimated street value of $9.7 million and would have equated to about 150,000 street level deals.'.
'This result should serve as a serious warning to potential drug traffickers in Australia – don't get comfortable - because the AFP is constantly working to target and disrupt your criminal operations and bring you to justice.'
The 40-year-old man was set to appear before Parramatta Local Court at some point on Saturday, charged with one count of attempting to possess a commercial quantity of unlawfully imported border controlled drugs, contrary to section 307.5 of the Criminal Code (Cth).
He faces a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
6 hours ago
- News.com.au
Ukraine covers frontline roads with anti-drone nets
A ravaged car with its engine destroyed and doors riddled with shrapnel lay on the side of the road near Dobropillia, a sleepy town not far from the front line in eastern Ukraine. Hit by a small, remote-controlled drone, the mangled chassis was a stark reminder of why Ukraine is hurrying to mount netting over supply routes behind the sprawling front line to thwart Russian aerial attacks. As Russia's invasion grinds through its fourth year, Moscow and Kyiv are both menacing each other's armies with swarms of cheap drones, easily found on the market and rigged with deadly explosives. AFP reporters saw Ukrainian soldiers installing green nets on four-metre (13-foot) poles spanning kilometres (miles) of road in the eastern Donetsk region, where some of the war's most intense fighting has taken place. "When a drone hits the net, it short-circuits and it cannot target vehicles," said 27-year-old engineering brigade commander Denis, working under the blazing sun. - Threat from above - "We are shifting into a so-called drone war," Denis told AFP. FPV (first-person view) drones have already seriously wounded a few of his men. Some are armed with shotguns to shoot them down. The Russian army has also been deploying nets. "We weave nets like spiders! For extremely dangerous birds without feathers," the Russian defence ministry quoted a soldier with the call sign "Ares" as saying in April. An earlier article by pro-Kremlin media outlet Izvestia also showed soldiers mounting netting close to the front. - Everyone is in danger - Drones are also a worry for towns and cities. Since early July, the town of Dobropillia, around 20 kilometres (12 miles) from the front line, has become a target for Russian FPV drone attacks. During a recent visit to the civilian hub -- where some 28,000 people lived before the war -- AFP journalists saw residents on the streets rush for cover in shops when a drone began buzzing overhead. When the high-pitched whirring had died down and the threat disappeared, one woman exiting a shelter picked up her shopping bags and glanced upwards, returning to her routine. Every day, victims come to the small town's hospital. According to the hospital's director, Vadym Babkov, the enemy FPVs "spare neither medical workers nor civilians". As the roads "are not yet 100-percent covered" by nets, his ambulances have to take long detours, reducing the patients' chances of survival, the 60-year-old said. "We are all under threat," Babkov added. In Russia's Belgorod border region, which frequently comes under Ukrainian fire, authorities have retrofitted ambulances with metal anti-drone cages -- a technology once reserved for tanks and personnel carrier vehicles. - New habits - "Civilians have got used to it," Denis told AFP. Olga, a waitress in a small cafe and mini-market in Dobropillia, has devised her own way to cope with the constant drone threat. "When I drive and feel that a drone is going to attack me, I open all the windows to avoid glass shards hitting me," the 45-year-old told AFP. The atmosphere in the town had become "frightening", Olga said. The shop next to Olga's was recently hit by an FPV drone, leaving its owner in a coma. "Now we jump at every gust of wind," Olga said. "The day has passed -- thank God. The night has passed and we wake up with all our arms and legs intact -- thank God." Despite the roads constantly coming under attack, Olga still receives products to sell in her small cafe, since suppliers take detours along routes away from the front. But she doesn't know for how long. fv-asy/cad/gil


Perth Now
8 hours ago
- Perth Now
Man fined after shock plane arrest
A Brisbane jetsetter has escaped with a $1700 fine for using a fake name to board a flight, after an alleged phone conversation about a bomb led to his dramatic arrest. Bernhard Freddy Roduner, 44, was found guilty of using false identification to obtain a flight ticket on Tuesday. He boarded a Brisbane-bound flight at Sydney Airport on January 14, and was allegedly overheard referring to a bomb during a phone conversation before takeoff. He was escorted off the Virgin Australia plane by police and was found to be travelling under a fake name. Bernhard Roduner has denied allegations he travelled under a fake name and made bomb threats on a Brisbane bound flight. Facebook Credit: Supplied Officers searched the aircraft and confirmed there was no threat of a bomb. Mr Roduner earlier told the Daily Mail a woman sitting in a row in front of him may have misinterpreted him telling a colleague 'Tassie is the bomb', as he was returning from a trip in Tasmania visiting friends and regularly used the phrase. Mr Roduner also suggested his vaguely middle eastern appearance may have played a role in the incident. He was charged with one count of taking a constitutional flight with a ticket obtained with false identity information, one count of using false identification information at a constitutional airport and one count of threatening aviation security. The first charge has a maximum $16,500 fine and the third carries a potential one year prison sentence however Mr Roduner was fined only $1000 for the first and $700 for the second. Mr Roduner's earlier charge of threatening aviation staff was dismissed in June. He appeared in Downing Centre Local Court in March to plead not guilty to the offences. Mr Roduner said the fake name accusation was also the product of an unfortunate mix up, claiming a friend in Tasmania had booked his flight home via Sydney and their name was used on the ticket. It comes after Australian Federal Police Detective Superintendent Morgan Blunden said the AFP would not tolerate threats to aviation. 'Travelling on an aircraft should be a safe experience for passengers and airline crew alike,' Mr Blunden said. 'The AFP will continue to work closely with airline partners to deal with any behaviour that interferes with aviation security.'

News.com.au
19 hours ago
- News.com.au
Mark Latham denies ‘degrading' sex acts with former partner
WARNING: Distressing allegations Former Labor leader Mark Latham's ex-partner has alleged he asked her to call him 'master' and engaged in degrading sexual acts in a shocking apprehended violence application. Businesswoman Nathalie May Matthews, 37, has outlined the claims in an application to the NSW Local Court and is seeking a no-contact order for up to two years. Mr Latham, 64, who is a New South Wales Legislative Council member, has issued an emphatic denial about the claims, telling The Australian newspaper – that first broke the story – that the allegations were untrue. 'The claims you've listed there are absolute rubbish,' Mr Latham said. 'Comical in fact. 'Nothing has been served on me nor has anyone contacted me. 'I haven't had anything to do with her (Ms Matthews) since 27 May, so nearly seven weeks ago. I ended the 'situationship' that night for very good reason.' 'Degrading' sexual acts alleged Ms Matthews, 37, is seeking an order preventing Mr Latham from going within 100m of her, alleging an 'ongoing, reasonable fear of harassment, intimidation, and potential harm'. 'Throughout our relationship, the defendant engaged in a sustained pattern of emotional, physical, sexual, psychological, and financial abuse, including defecating on me before sex and refusing to let me wash,'' the application states. The Australian newspaper has published a story based on allegations from Nathalie Matthews which are comically false and ridiculous. I have scores of documents to show that and will rely upon them to defend myself. As the old saying goes, Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. — Real Mark Latham (@RealMarkLatham) July 14, 2025 The story says that Matthews went to the police and they did not do anything. They certainly haven’t contacted me. In the current environment, that says a lot. She told me in April she had been to police seeking an AVO against another man and complained that they did nothing. — Real Mark Latham (@RealMarkLatham) July 14, 2025 'Forcing degrading sexual acts, pressuring me to engage in sexual acts with others, demanding I call him 'master,' telling me I was his property, and repeatedly telling me that my only value to him was for sex to demean and control me.' does not suggest the claims are true, only that they have been made in an application to the NSW Local Court in pursuit of an AVO. In the application, she stated that on May 27, 2025, Mr Latham arrived at her home at some time in the evening after sending her 'abusive and coercive text messages, pressuring and insulting me for not being home with him'. After she returned home later that evening, she alleged he was verbally aggressive and intimidating before leaving. 'Monster' texts revealed Shortly after, she alleged he sent further threatening and coercive messages, falsely accusing her of aggression, calling her a 'monster,' and stating he had gone to his GP to create a record claiming distress and that he had approached Parliamentary Security – given he is currently a member of the New South Wales Legislative Council. In June, she stated she was in the Middle East for several weeks. Ms Matthews owns an e-commerce global logistics firm based in Dubai, Perth and Sydney. But upon her return, the application stated she had been in 'a constant state of fear and hypervigilance due to the defendant's pattern of harassment and intimidation following previous separations'. She also alleged instances of physical violence in the application including 'pushing me against walls, forcing me out the door, throwing a plate at me during an argument, and driving at me with his vehicle, hitting me with the side mirror and causing a bruise'. The application also cites allegations of psychological abuse, including 'constant put-downs comparing me unfavourably to other women, acting as if he would harm himself to manipulate me, monitoring my devices without consent, and systematically undermining my confidence to control and isolate me'. There are also claims of financial abuse, including borrowing $20,000 on four occasions without prompt repayment, forcing her to pay for international holidays under duress, coercing her into expensive purchases, and pressuring her regarding her father's will. 'Intimate videos' 'The defendant has held intimate photos and videos of me, and I have been afraid he would expose them to shame and control me if I attempted to leave or resist his demands,'' the application stated. 'The defendant has repeatedly manipulated and intimidated me into resuming the relationship following separations, creating a cycle of fear and control. Previous breakups in May 2024, June 2024, September 2024, January 2025, and June 2025 were followed by similar intimidation and re-engagement. '(Mr Latham engaged in) physical violence, including pushing me against walls, forcing me out the door, throwing a plate at me during an argument, and driving at me with his vehicle, hitting me with the side mirror and causing a bruise,' the court document claims. The matter will be mentioned at Downing Centre Local Court on July 30. 'Vile' homophobic tweets Last year the Federal Court found Mr Latham defamed independent Sydney MP Alex Greenwich after claiming in a homophobic social media post that Mr Greenwich was not a fit and proper person to be a member of the NSW parliament because he engaged in 'disgusting' sexual activities. He was ordered to pay $140,000 to Mr Greenwich. During the trial, Mr Greenwich's barrister Matt Collins KC said Mr Latham's statements were 'pregnant with innuendo'. 'It is plainly not a tweet about homosexual sex. It's a tweet about a particular and unhygienic sex act,' Dr Collins said. 'People understood Mr Latham to be saying exactly what he said in the tweet: that Mr Greenwich he engages in the particular disgusting and hygienic sexual act.' In the Federal Court, Justice David O'Callaghan found this first imputation was conveyed. But a second imputation, that Mr Greenwich was not a fit and proper person to sit in parliament, was not found to have been conveyed. Justice O'Callaghan found Mr Greenwich had established it had caused or was likely to cause serious harm to his reputation. 'In my view, the ordinary reasonable person would interpret the meaning of the primary tweet to be that Mr Greenwich – not homosexual men generally – engages in disgusting sexual activities,' he said in the 74-page judgment. 'One might be forgiven for being lost for words to characterise many of the tweets and comments,' he said. 'Counsel opted for 'despicable' … but that is barely to do justice to the hate-filled venom that was unleashed …' Last month Mr Latham used parliamentary privilege to reveal confidential information from a psychologist's report prepared for the tribunal as to the case brought by Mr Greenwich. In response, Mr Greenwich told parliament that Mr Latham 'thinks and talks far too much about my sex life'.