NCC MP Fadiel Adams faces consequences for sexist and racist remarks
Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Newspapers
National Coloured Congress (NCC) MP Fadiel Adams has been found guilty of breaching Parliament's Code of Ethical Conduct and Disclosure of Members' Interests following a nine-minute Facebook video in which he used crude, sexist, and racially charged language.
The Joint Committee on Ethics and Members' Interests tabled its report to Parliament, recommending Adams be reprimanded, suspended for 15 sitting days, and that his salary be docked for the same period.
He is also ordered to issue a public apology and attend a consultation on ethical conduct.
The complaint was lodged by Democratic Alliance Chief Whip George Michalakis and submitted to the Office of the Registrar of Members' Interests on March 5, 2025.
The complaint relates to a nine-minute video Adams posted on February 18, 2025, where he made a series of offensive remarks directed at a female member of the Democratic Alliance, the mayor of Cape Town, and the DA as a party.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
According to the complaint, Adams used explicit and offensive terms referring to race, gender, sexual conduct, and political affiliation.
In addition to personal attacks, he made inflammatory allegations and threats directed at a woman's employer, at the mayor's children, and the City of Cape Town leadership.
In the report, the complainant stated that the content of the social media post is as follows: 'ek weet nie wat makeer sekere coloured mense nie (I don't know what is wrong with some coloured people)', and 'some of us are so desperate to fit white sexual reproduction organs into our mouths … the Mackenzie family has been practising it for years'.
He then refers to an individual as a 'ding' (thing) and 'the Right-Wing love coloureds that are a fit to work in the kitchen but think they can make their way into the office by sucking white genitalia'. He then also calls her a 'coloured mother's p**s', 'naai', 'h***me!d', 'vuil ma se p**s (and if you do not excuse my language, f**k you sommer)', 'smetterige vark (pig)', 'coloured mother f**k', 'this mother n**i' and says that she is so desperate for a white man's recognition.
He then continues: 'I don't care if you are a woman, because you're not a woman as far as I am concerned because a mother doesn't do this' and 'I don't give a p**s, I am not gender biased, jou vuil n**i (you dirty f**k)'.
With regards to members of the DA as 'f**ng agents', he refers to the mayor of Cape Town as a 'piece of sh*t', 'wit god' and to 'his f**ng kids'. He then falsely accuses the mayor and the city of murder and fuelling violence.
He furthermore threatens the female individual that he will approach her employer ('there will be consequences at your workplace') and tell them that 'you're employing a piece of sh*t' and then goes further to threaten the employer himself, stating that if she does not remove a Facebook post that 'your boss will not trade for a day or two', threatening to ignore a High Court order against him for closing business because 'some things are worth going to jail for'.
The complainant also stated that Adams is in breach of items 5(1) and 9 of the Code.
Also, if the complainant's conduct falls foul of the provisions of the Prevention and Combating of Hate Crime and Hate Speech Act, the member could be in breach of his oath of office.
He also indicated that he was willing to ignore a High Court order in pursuit of what he termed justice.
Adams did not dispute the content of the video or that he was the individual who made the remarks.
The committee reviewed footage that was taken from his Facebook page before it was removed and confirmed that the statements were made as described.
In his written response submitted on March 13, 2025, he offered an apology for the outburst and cited personal circumstances as a contributing factor.
He said he had been under considerable stress linked to threats to his children's safety and family-related trauma.
He argued that the post was a reaction to a Facebook post made by a DA member, which, in his view, had placed his children in danger by suggesting gang affiliations.
The committee acknowledged Adams' account of personal stress, but maintained that it did not excuse the severity or public nature of the language used.
It expressed concern about the particularly vulgar, sexist, and racist nature of the remarks, especially those directed at a woman, and stated that "the member brought Parliament into disrepute".
The committee found that the Member had breached items 9(1) and 9(2) of the Code of Ethical Conduct, as outlined under item 16(1)(c). These provisions prohibit members from using racist, sexist, or derogatory language on social media and from bringing Parliament into disrepute through such conduct.
It further noted that members are expected to uphold the integrity of Parliament and act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the institution.
Although the member was informed of the breach and invited to submit written representations regarding a possible penalty, no such representation was received.
The committee has recommended that Adams be formally reprimanded in the House. He should issue an apology in the National Assembly, to the public, and to the woman referred to in the Facebook video for the use of racist, sexist, and vulgar language.
It further recommended that he be suspended from participating in debates and committees for 15 sitting days.
His salary and allowances should be reduced by an amount equal to the same period.
The member is also expected to attend a consultation with the Speaker of the National Assembly, the Co-Chairpersons of the Committee, and the Acting Registrar to discuss the ethical conduct required of MPs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The Fourth of July and the sad promise of a riotous 250th American birthday party in 2026
The Fourth of July is America's national birthday party, celebrating two-and-a-half centuries of life. But will Donald Trump's truculence mixed with his narcissism turn it into angry, contested territory? One of America's founding patriots, John Adams, a delegate from Massachusetts at the assembly in Philadelphia that had voted to declare their independence from Great Britain, wrote to his wife, Abigail, the day afterwards to describe that momentous decision. With lead drafter Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin, Robert Livingston and Roger Sherman, Adams had helped craft the new country's 'Declaration of Independence'. The document became the foundation for what citizens thought about their new country and what they hoped it could become. As an expression of the political ideas of the Enlightenment, the declaration has had a major influence on the leaders of other liberation movements, including Vietnam's Ho Chi Minh. His declaration of Vietnamese independence in 1945 stated, ''All men are created equal. They are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, among them are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.' This immortal statement was made in the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America in 1776. In a broader sense, this means: All the peoples on the earth are equal from birth, all the peoples have a right to live, to be happy and free.' Despite frequent difficulties in delivering the mail back in the 18th century, John and his wife, Abigail, maintained a correspondence between themselves over decades, even when war or great distances separated them. He quietly relied upon her common sense and astute judgement far more than most people realised at the time. Adams eventually became the country's first vice-president and then president, after George Washington, and his chief confidante remained his wife. (Notably prickly, Adams was also responsible for the Alien and Sedition Acts — statutes embraced by Donald Trump in his own policies. History has its ironies.) In a letter to Abigail on 3 July 1776, in the immediate afterglow of his excitement over that vote for independence, John Adams wrote: The Second Day of July 1776, will be the most memorable Epocha, in the History of America. [The actual vote came on the 2nd of July, but its public dissemination came two days later, on the fourth, thus the annual holiday.] I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated, by succeeding Generations, as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more. You will think me transported with Enthusiasm but I am not. — I am well aware of the Toil and Blood and Treasure, that it will cost Us to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. — Yet through all the Gloom I can see the Rays of ravishing Light and Glory. I can see that the End is more than worth all the Means. And that Posterity will tryumph in that Days Transaction, even altho We should rue it, which I trust in God We shall not. Nostalgia and hope Like most American children, I came to love the Fourth of July, just as Adams had predicted we should. Until I was a teenager, I lived in a small town near Philadelphia, the city where that very declaration had been written. On this holiday, there was a local parade with detachments of fire fighters and their fire trucks, veterans organisations, scout troops and school bands — and maybe a modest military honour guard for the national flag, probably from some local military reservist detachment. During the day, there was a swimming competition at the local community pool, the obligatory picnics and barbecues (braais), and then, to cap off the day, there was a fireworks display once twilight yielded to night. (Because New Year's Eve in America comes in winter rather than mid-summer, naturally that holiday doesn't get the kind of treatment in America that it receives in South Africa.) Perhaps nostalgia is not a flawless guide to memory, but I still recall 4th of July celebrations through the pleasure of a child who could be part of a great national event. Those childhood Fourths of July came along at the peak of the post-war baby boom, during President Dwight Eisenhower's two terms of office. It was during the Cold War, yes, but that was a time largely without shooting wars. And it was a period of what, in hindsight, could have felt like a time of deep national satisfaction: Things were good, and they would certainly get better, so most people believed. In the years that followed, however, the rise of the counterculture, the civil rights and feminist revolutions all exploded on the scene, even as the Vietnam conflict and the growing protests against it greatly roiled the waters of that earlier era. Even so, during those contentious years, around the nation, people still gathered to enjoy their picnics and to watch the fireworks displays, even if angry debates and more threatened a rupture of the national consensus. Still, together with Thanksgiving, the Fourth of July continued to represent one of two nodal points of the nation's historical storyline. Fast forward to 1976. In that bicentennial year of the country's independence, the horrors of Richard Nixon's presidency, and of the Vietnam conflict, had been put aside as the nation strove to forget what those two deep blots on the nation's history had meant. The nation seemed ready to breathe more easily with the bicentennial commemoration. The national calendar was filled with celebrations and events. Those 'tall ships' — the beautiful, classic sailing vessels that serve as training ships for many of the world's navies — arrived in New York City en masse for a breathtaking display; the National Folklife Festival on Washington's National Mall delivered an exciting week that led to a sparkling outdoor concert and the inevitable fireworks. And other events, displays and concerts took place all around the nation. In 1976, the holiday was not a partisan affair. Later on, for my family and me, in the years after a three-year period of assignment in the United States from mid-1976 to 1979, we were again living and working abroad in Asia and Africa. While our official celebrations of the Fourth of July in each country we lived in did not include fireworks, we worked to create festive, non-political events designed to be inclusive. These events brought together resident Americans, friends and associates from among the respective host countries' populations, as well as host nation official representatives who delivered messages. While they were generally anodyne words, they spoke to good bilateral relations — as well as hopes for better. Sometimes we could draw upon the talents of a local choir, such as the Asihlabelele Choir in Eswatini (Swaziland), to sing medleys of traditional American patriotic songs at our official receptions, in addition to the two national anthems. (My wife and several of her musical colleagues did similar duty in Japan, drawing upon both an American and a Japanese repertoire to entertain the assembled gatherings.) While there may have been strife in the world, celebrations of the Fourth of July still seemed to be a moment where we could embrace the hopes John Adams had for future generations. Trump's public glorification Sadly, this year feels different, and next year may be worse. Just a few weeks ago, America's incumbent president hijacked what had originally been planned as a restrained celebration of the 250th anniversary of the founding of the American army and attempted to turn it into something else entirely. That may be a foretaste of worse to come. The parade on 14 June became a rather lacklustre affair that supposedly had been designed by Trump to rival the magnificence of Paris's traditional Bastille Day parade, the pomp and ceremony of the changing of the guard at Buckingham Palace in London — or one of those massed parades comprising thousands of uniformed personnel, tanks and missiles on mobile launchers that take place in Pyongyang and Moscow. But the jumped-up parade on 14 June was effectively kidnapped into being a birthday parade in honour of the president, despite subsequent White House denials that anything like that had even been contemplated. Beyond that parade, and looking forward, remember the president has demanded his 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' — a massive budget and tax bill covering nearly the entire government — must be passed by Congress and delivered to him for his ceremonial signing on the Fourth of July. Assuming it passes with both houses of Congress in full agreement of all its provisions by that date — something still uncertain by the time of this writing — Trump will undoubtedly insist upon staging a glitzy signing event to coincide with the nation's birthday — and thus his own public glorification. But we should not forget that next year, Trump will still be president as the country marks its semiquincentennial (250th) birthday. You can be assured Donald Trump will want a gigantic event commemorating both the country's birth — and his own. After all, as one French king once put it, L'etat c'est moi [I am the state], and you can bet Donald J Trump believes in that adage as well for his own land. But any such celebration in 2026 will come amid the mid-term election cycle for the entire House of Representatives, a third of the Senate, and hundreds of state and local offices. Trump will undoubtedly be girded for battle as he excoriates his enemies, and probably will still be blathering on about blaming Joe Biden for all the economic, diplomatic and other problems his administration faces halfway through his term of office. Included in this, almost certainly, will be using that claim for his inability to end the Ukraine War or the conflicts of the Middle East, as well as the dislocations and ructions he himself has brought about in the global trading system, as he constantly changes the nation's tariffs. But on 4 July 2026, Trump almost certainly will be confronting demonstrations against his ICE and deportation policies, and the shrinking social welfare net (including cuts in Medicaid, SNAP, formerly known as food stamps, and many other programmes), and the ballooning national debt and government budget deficit brought on by his 'One Big, Beautiful Bill'. On the Fourth of July itself, he will be wrapping himself in the flag, or as many of them as he can hold, as he attempts to capture the national celebrations on the Mall of the anniversary for his own glorification. He will be unable to resist such a temptation. The country's 250th birthday party will become contested, partisan territory, if Donald Trump has any say in the matter. Remember, he once promised, 'he alone can fix things'. But it may well turn out that he will only be able to devastate them. If he could but know, John Adams' shade would not be pleased as yet one more national symbol becomes coarsened and personalised by this president. DM
IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
SAPS Budget 2025: Mchunu targets GBV, corruption, and high-crime zones with R120 billion plan
Police Minister Senzo announces sweeping reforms to strengthen visible policing, invest in digital tools, and tackle gender-based violence, signalling a bold shift in SAPS strategy for the 2025/26 financial year Image: Tumi Pakkies/Independent Newspapers Police Minister Senzo Mchunu says South Africa's policing system is undergoing a strategic overhaul aimed at improving crime prevention, restoring public trust, and modernising police operations. Tabling the Budget Vote for the 2025/26 financial year in Parliament, Mchunu laid out a R120.89 billion allocation for the South African Police Service (SAPS), Civilian Secretariat for Police Service, and the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID). ''While we welcome and appreciate the allocation, we are under no illusion about the scale of the task ahead. Crime is adaptive, dynamic, and, in many cases, well-financed — and so must our response be.' Mchunu outlined nine key crime-fighting priorities, including reducing the murder rate, fighting gender-based violence, tackling illegal firearms and drugs, and rooting out corruption within the SAPS. "Our commitment is to lead a police service that protects the vulnerable, disrupts criminality, and restores trust," he said. Mchunu noted that four provinces, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Western Cape, and Eastern Cape, remain the primary focus due to high crime levels. ''It is clear that identified high crime zones in all four provinces require intelligence-led targeted deployment of specialised units to combat criminality.' He also confirmed that 225 hotspot police stations have been identified for synchronised interventions. Mchunu said visible Policing will receive over 53% of the total budget, while Detective Services will account for nearly 20%. Compensation of employees remains the largest cost driver, making up more than 80% of the budget. He also confirmed that 5,500 new police trainees will be enlisted in January 2026 to maintain the personnel complement of 188,000. A total of R219.2 million has been allocated for securing the G20 conference in November 2025, R400 million for the 2026 Local Government Elections, and R34.8 million for costs related to the appointment of an additional Deputy Minister. Furthermore, R150 million is being shifted to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) to support its anti-corruption partnerships. Community policing is also getting a boost, with R28 million allocated to Community Policing Forums and R8.5 million for public awareness campaigns, he said. To address Gender-Based Violence and Femicide (GBV+F), a total of R1.6 billion will be spent, including R1.5 billion for Family Violence, Child Protection and Sexual Offences (FCS) Units. Mchunu said, 'The country is gripped and aggrieved by GBV+F, as its prevalence has reached distressing levels.' Moreover, Mchunu said to modernise operations, R670 million will be invested in building and upgrading police stations, while R20 million will fund mobile Community Service Centres. and R45 million on police station maintenance. Mchunu highlighted the role of partnerships with the private sector, particularly with Business Against Crime South Africa. Projects include piloting automated police stations, expanding forensic labs, and integrating SAPS systems with private sector technologies. SAPS will also roll out drones, body-worn cameras, and digital tools to enhance public safety and investigative capacity, he said. Mchunu highlighted the role of partnerships with the private sector, particularly with Business Against Crime South Africa. Projects include piloting automated police stations, expanding forensic labs, and integrating SAPS systems with private sector technologies. "The SAPS continues to advance its modernisation agenda through the deployment of strategic technology solutions aimed at improving operational efficiency, situational awareness, and public safety," Mchunu said. Addressing corruption within police ranks, Mchunu confirmed, 'We have taken a defined stance against corruption within the SAPS and we unequivocally state that there is no tolerance for corruption.' This includes recent arrests of senior officials in Crime Intelligence. Human resources are being restructured, with new recruitment strategies, leadership development, and incentives. A new Detective Critical Skills Allowance of R1,000 per month will be introduced from October 2025 to retain skilled investigators. Additionally, 200 former detectives will be re-enlisted and more contract appointments made, said Mchunu. Furthermore, the DPCI will ramp up efforts against corruption, cybercrime, and unresolved Truth and Reconciliation Commission cases.
Eyewitness News
13 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Mabuza remembered for taking even controversial matters in his stride
CAPE TOWN - Former Deputy President David Mabuza's time in Parliament will be remembered for taking even controversial matters in his stride. Mabuza died on Thursday, aged 64. As the leader of government business, he was expected to crack the whip on errant ministers who did not answer members of Parliament (MPs) questions in time, or failed to show up at committee meetings. But after five years in the house, Mabuza resigned on his own terms. He was last seen in Parliament in February, when he attended the State of the Nation Address (SONA) held in the Cape Town City Hall. The former deputy president was first sworn in as an MP in early 2018, at a controversial time in the African National Congress (ANC)'s history, as the deputy to President Cyril Ramaphosa. Mabuza's interaction with Parliament was largely through quarterly question time in both houses. From his very first question-and-answer session, Mabuza seldom appeared rattled by the tough questions, even when quizzed about political assassinations in his home province of Mpumalanga. 'We must avoid a situation where we go around casting aspersions against people without any due process.' Mabuza was also quick to defend his party comrades when their conduct put them on the wrong side of the law. 'We don't have a dustbin where we throw people. We correct people. We move with them.' READ: Ramaphosa remembers late former Deputy President Mabuza as a leader grounded activism His leave of absence from official duty and his hospitalisation in Russia in 2021 also did not escape Parliamentary interrogation. 'I've covered the costs of my treatment, the travelling, 100%. No money was paid by the South African government towards my treatment.' During the COVID-19 pandemic, Mabuza would mostly communicate with Parliament from a virtual platform, always positioned in front of the national flag. When the writing was on the wall that he planned to step down in early 2023, it was Ramaphosa who confirmed the reports during the SONA debate, raising a glass of water from the podium to salute him. 'I would like to thank him for the work he's done for this nation, and for all of us…..DP, cheers!'
