
China pushes back at US demands to stop buying Russian and Iranian oil
'China will always ensure its energy supply in ways that serve our national interests,' China's Foreign Ministry posted on X on Wednesday following two days of trade negotiations in Stockholm, responding to the U.S. threat of a 100% tariff.
'Coercion and pressuring will not achieve anything. China will firmly defend its sovereignty, security and development interests," the ministry said.
The response is notable at a time when both Beijing and Washington are signaling optimism and goodwill about reaching a deal to keep commercial ties between the world's two largest economies stable — after climbing down from sky-high tariffs and harsh trade restrictions. It underscores China's confidence in playing hardball when dealing with the Trump administration, especially when trade is linked to its energy and foreign policies.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, emerging from the talks, told reporters that when it comes to Russian oil purchases, the "Chinese take their sovereignty very seriously.'
'We don't want to impede on their sovereignty, so they would like to pay a 100% tariff," Bessent said.
On Thursday, he called the Chinese 'tough' negotiators, but said China's pushback hasn't stalled the negotiations. 'I believe that we have the makings of a deal,' Bessent told CNBC.
Gabriel Wildau, managing director of the consultancy Teneo, said he doubts President Donald Trump would actually deploy the 100% tariff. 'Realizing those threats would derail all the recent progress and probably kill any chance' for Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to announce a trade deal if they should meet this fall, Wildau said.
In seeking to restrict oil sales by Russia and Iran, a major source of revenue for both countries, the U.S. wants to reduce the funding available for their militaries, as Moscow pursues its war against Ukraine and Tehran funds militant groups across the Middle East.
China plays hardball
When Trump unveiled a sweeping plan for tariffs on dozens of countries in April, China was the only country that retaliated. It refused to give in to U.S. pressure.
'If the U.S. is bent on imposing tariffs, China will fight to the end, and this is China's consistent official stance,' said Tu Xinquan, director of the China Institute for WTO Studies at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing. WTO is the acronym for the World Trade Organization.
Negotiating tactics aside, China may also suspect that the U.S. won't follow through on its threat, questioning the importance Trump places on countering Russia, Tu said.
Scott Kennedy, senior adviser and trustee chair in Chinese Business and Economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said Beijing is unlikely to change its posture when it sees inconsistencies in U.S. foreign policy goals toward Russia and Iran, whereas Beijing's policy support for Moscow is consistent and clear. It's also possible that Beijing may want to use it as another negotiating tool to extract more concessions from Trump, Kennedy said.
Danny Russel, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said Beijing now sees itself as 'the one holding the cards in its struggle with Washington." He said Trump has made it clear he wants a 'headline-grabbing deal' with Xi, 'so rejecting a U.S. demand to stop buying oil from Iran or Russia is probably not seen as a deal‑breaker, even if it generates friction and a delay."
Continuing to buy oil from Russia preserves Xi's 'strategic solidarity' with Russian President Vladimir Putin and significantly reduces the economic costs for China, Russel said.
'Beijing simply can't afford to walk away from the oil from Russia and Iran," he said. 'It's too important a strategic energy supply, and Beijing is buying it at fire‑sale prices.'
China depends on oil from Russia and Iran
A 2024 report by the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that roughly 80% to 90% of the oil exported by Iran went to China. The Chinese economy benefits from the more than 1 million barrels of Iranian oil it imports per day.
After the Iranian parliament floated a plan to shut down the Strait of Hormuz in June following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, China spoke out against closing the critical oil transit route.
China also is an important customer for Russia, but is second to India in buying Russian seaborne crude oil exports. In April, Chinese imports of Russian oil rose 20% over the previous month to more than 1.3 million barrels per day, according to the KSE Institute, an analytical center at the Kyiv School of Economics.
This past week, Trump said the U.S. will impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, plus an additional import tax because of India's purchasing of Russian oil. India's Foreign Ministry said Friday its relationship with Russia was 'steady and time-tested."
Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff and a top policy adviser, said Trump has been clear that it is 'not acceptable' for India to continue financing the Ukraine war by purchasing oil from Russia.
'People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil,' Miller said on Fox News Channel's 'Sunday Morning Futures.' He said the U.S. needs 'to get real about dealing with the financing of this war.'
Congress demands action
Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, is pushing for sanctions and tariffs on Russia and its financial backers. In April, he introduced a bill that would authorize the president to impose tariffs as high as 500% not only on Russia but on any country that 'knowingly' buys oil, uranium, natural gas, petroleum products or petrochemical products from Russia.
"The purpose of this legislation is to break the cycle of China — a communist dictatorship — buying oil below market price from Putin's Russia, which empowers his war machine to kill innocent Ukrainian civilians,' Graham said in a June statement.
The bill has 84 co-sponsors in the 100-seat Senate. A corresponding House version has been introduced, also with bipartisan support.
Republicans say they stand ready to move on the sanctions legislation if Trump asks them to do so, but the bill is on hold for now.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Q3 2025 Investor Conference & Events Highlights
Tariffs and taxes dominated the macro narrative to kick off the second half. President Trump's July 9 initial reciprocal tariff deadline came and went, with little stock market volatility and a ho-hum reaction in the bond market. The can was essentially kicked down the road, with August 1 being the key date when significantly higher levies could take effect. We say could because the administration appears willing to negotiate trade deals beyond the first of next month (this Friday). Moreover, with a slew of agreements in place, there's less uncertainty for companies (namely, US importers) to weigh. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Sign with JPM. Perhaps as a result, there is a slightly more upbeat tone as the Q2 earnings season progresses. Top and bottom-line numbers have been healthy, and all eyes will be on mega-cap tech this week. Microsoft (MSFT), Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), and Meta Platforms (META) all report, but the world's most valuable publicly traded company, NVIDIA (NVDA), doesn't serve up numbers until late August. As for taxes, the president's One Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) was signed into law on the 4th of July. While most of its provisions merely extended current policy, a key change was made for companies big and small that have major capex plans. Full expensing of capital investments could be a material growth trigger in the quarters to come. Over the weeks ahead, market participants should closely monitor comments from industry executives at conferences regarding new projects. This bonus depreciation feature only further fuels the AI trade, too, as firms across sectors have an incentive to spend rather than shore up their balance sheets. From a price action perspective, stocks approach the sometimes-volatile August-September stretch with high momentum. Both US and international equities are near record highs, rallying some 30% from their post-Liberation Day lows. There remain concerns, however. President Trump's constant lambasting of Fed Chair Powell threatens the central bank's independence. According to our Economic Calendar, we'll hear the latest policy decision from the Federal Reserve today, July 30, at 2:30pm ET. At the same time, worries about consumer spending as tariffs trickle down to retail goods prices make each economic report potentially pivotal. There are a host of macro crosscurrents. In such a time as this, focusing on what companies are saying can be your edge. We have good news on that front: With many corporate gatherings on tap now through September, you'll have plenty of opportunities to read between the lines and allocate appropriately. Here are the key conferences to watch: Information Technology & Communication Services July 31: Goldman Sachs AI Symposium August 11: Oppenheimer 28th Annual Technology, Internet & Communications Conference August 11: KeyBanc Technology Forum August 12: TD Cowen Communications Infrastructure Summit August 13: J.P. Morgan Hardware & Semis Access Forum August 20: Needham 6th Annual Semiconductor and SemiCap 1X1 Conference August 26: Evercore ISI Semiconductor, IT Hardware & Networking Conference August 27: Deutsche Bank Technology Conference September 3: Deutsche Bank dbAccess European TMT Conference September 3: Citi Global Technology, Media, and Telecommunications TMT Conference September 4: 5th Annual Needham Virtual Crypto Conference September 4: Bank of America Media, Communications & Entertainment Conference September 8: Goldman Sachs Communacopia Technology Conference September 10: Goldman Sachs Technology Conference San Francisco Health Care July 29: BTIG Biotechnology Conference (virtual) August 11: Needham 10th Annual Virtual MedTech & Diagnostics 1x1 Conference (virtual) August 11: Stifel Biotech Summer Summit August 14: UBS Precision Medicine Frontiers Summit September 3: Wells Fargo Healthcare Conference September 3: Goldman Sachs 22nd Annual European Medtech and Healthcare Services Conference September 3: Cantor Fitzgerald Global Healthcare Conference September 8: Morgan Stanley 23rd Annual Global Healthcare Conference September 9: Baird Global Healthcare Conference September 23: Bank of America Global Healthcare Conference September 29: Jefferies Healthcare Services Conference Consumer Discretionary & Consumer Staples July 29: Holiday and Winter Selling Show August 13: JP Morgan Auto Conference September 2: Barclays Global Consumer Staples Conference September 4: Bank of America Gaming and Lodging Conference 2024 Financials & Real Estate August 5: UBS Financial Services Conference August 10: KeyBanc Capital Market Technology Leadership Forum September 3: KBW Insurance Conference September 7: Barclays 23rd Global Financial Services Conference September 9: Bank of America Global Real Estate Conference September 15: Goldman Sachs Real Estate Equity and Debt Conference September 15: Bank of America Securities 30th Annual Financials CEO Conference September 25: Oppenheimer Insurance Summit (virtual) Industrials August 5: Space & Missile Defense Symposium (SMD) August 12: Deutsche Bank Transportation Conference August 15: UBS Infrastructure & Transportation Conference August 18: Needham 14th Annual Virtual Industrial Tech, Robotics, & Clean Tech 1x1 Conference (virtual) September 2: Morgan Stanley Industrial CEOs Unplugged September 2: Deutsche Bank 15th Annual Aviation Forum September 3: Jefferies Industrials Conference September 16: RBC Capital Markets Global Industrials Conference Energy & Utilities August 17: Enercon Denver 30th Annual Energy Investment Conference September 2: Barclays 39th Annual CEO Energy-Power Conference September 8: ROTH 12th Annual Solar & Storage Symposium September 17: BNP Paribas Power Up Conference Materials August 12: Mizuho Chemical Conference August 12: Citi Natural Resources Conference September 3: UBS Global Materials Conference September 9: Berenberg Food Ingredients & Chemicals Conference September 9: Precious Metals Summit Beaver Creek September 14: Gold Forum Americas Regional August 18: Macquarie ASEAN Conference August 28: Morgan Stanley China BEST Conference Autumn Series September 3: Goldman Sachs Asia Leaders Conference September 3: J.P. Morgan European Leveraged Finance Conference September 8: Bank of America Securities Asia Pacific Conference September 16: JP Morgan 16th Annual U.S. All Stars Conference September 24: Citi's China Industrial, SMID, Transport Conference Investor Specific & Multi-Sector August 12: Canaccord Genuity's 45th Annual Growth Conference August 20: Sidoti August Micro-Cap Conference September 3: JP Morgan - CEO Call series September 4: Piper Sandler 11th Annual Macro Conference September 8: HC Wainwright Global Investment Conference September 9: Piper Sandler 4th Annual Growth Frontiers Conference September 16: JP Morgan Emerging and Frontier Markets Opportunities Conference September 17: Sidoti September Small Cap Conference Copyright 2025 Wall Street Horizon, Inc. All rights reserved. Do not copy, distribute, sell or modify this document without Wall Street Horizon's prior written consent. This information is provided for information purposes only. Neither TMX Group Limited nor any of its affiliated companies guarantees the completeness of the information contained in this publication, and we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in or your use of, or reliance on, the information. This publication is not intended to provide legal, accounting, tax, investment, financial or other advice and should not be relied upon for such advice. The information provided is not an invitation to purchase securities, including any listed on Toronto Stock Exchange and/or TSX Venture Exchange. TMX Group and its affiliated companies do not endorse or recommend any securities referenced in this publication. This publication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor may there be any sale of any securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction. TMX, the TMX design, TMX Group, Toronto Stock Exchange, TSX, and TSX Venture Exchange are the trademarks of TSX Inc. and are used under license. Wall Street Horizon is the trademark of Wall Street Horizon, Inc. All other trademarks used in this publication are the property of their respective owners. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten


Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
We Must Protect American Courtrooms From Foreign Interference
In most American courtrooms today, a party in court could be financed by foreign interests (and other unrelated third parties) without the other party ever knowing it. This alternate funder may be an investor hoping for uncorrelated returns, a wealthy donor with personal or business interests in the case, or an affiliate of an adversarial nation seeking to undermine U.S. competitiveness. The third-party litigation funding industry operates in the Wild West. Any outside group can pay the bills for a party in a legal dispute. They do this often in exchange for a percentage of an eventual settlement. Absent a handful of states that have passed disclosure laws affecting their own state court systems, the vast majority of state and federal courts do not require parties to disclose who's paying their legal costs—not to other parties and not even to the presiding judge. A stone sign for the United States Court House in downtown Los Angeles, Calif. is pictured. A stone sign for the United States Court House in downtown Los Angeles, Calif. is pictured. Getty Images But disclosure is critical and not just for transparency's sake. Incentives matter in the courtroom. The American civil litigation system is premised on fairness, impartiality, and the pursuit of justice. If a party's funders have hidden motives that stray from the desire to fairly resolve a dispute, trust in the system is put at risk. Foreign sources of litigation funding introduce a whole new set of perverse incentives. A foreign funder may finance a case in order to gain access to sensitive intellectual property or even to evade sanctions that prohibit transactions or investments in U.S. capital markets. Also, since litigation funders have their own monetary and non-monetary goals, the funder may push its client to demand steeper settlement terms than the client would otherwise consider. These are not hypothetical situations. In 2024, Bloomberg Law reported that a group of sanctioned Russian billionaires created an investment fund to back bankruptcy lawsuits in New York and London thus allowing the oligarchs to steer (launder) tens of millions into western financial institutions. In another instance, China-based technology firm PurpleVine financed several intellectual property lawsuits against Samsung. This was discovered by a lone overseeing judge in Delaware who luckily requires litigation financing disclosure in his courtroom. Had the case not crossed his desk, the defendants may never have known that their case was hardly a mere legal challenge but, in actuality, a case with national security importance. Foreign donors may also fund lawsuits that advance their personal agendas. Last year, Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) filings revealed that an Australian mining billionaire was paying the legal bills for a coalition of environmental nonprofits in their lawsuit against ExxonMobil. The billionaire, Andrew Forrest, runs a mining empire that he aims to convert into a clean-energy provider—demonstrating both ideological and anticompetitive reasons to target an American oil major that he would not otherwise have standing to sue. This backdoor litigation is getting foreign companies and even foreign governments into American courtrooms they otherwise wouldn't be able to access. Since the third-party litigation funding industry is entirely unregulated, each of these examples only came to light by accident: strong investigative reporting; a lone judge's standing transparency order; and a buried FARA filing. But in each instance, the discovery of foreign funding changed both public perception and legal strategy. Routine civil suits became vehicles for money laundering, corporate espionage, and personal grievance. Unregulated third-party litigation financing is a crucial vulnerability for American competitiveness and national security. In order to secure a just and fair civil justice system, it's only common sense that parties should know who they're up against. We must act quickly as this "hidden party" industry is growing at a pace stressing the non-existent regulatory regime. One estimate values the global market at $17.5 billion in 2025, and it is forecasted to grow to $67.2 billion by 2037. Naturally, it's also becoming more complex. Opportunistic actors are developing secondary markets—a "stock exchange for lawsuits"—which, if left unregulated as well, will only create new avenues for foreign actors to distort the civil justice system and surreptitiously move capital. Regulators can be certain that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and other adversarial nations have taken notice of this influx of cash into the industry. The CCP may be responsible for a significant part of this cash flow, but we cannot be sure. Under the current system, neither national security officials nor legal professionals have any way to discern the source of billions of dollars propping up civil suits from behind the curtain. A number of bills in state legislatures and in Congress have been introduced to require disclosure of any third-party litigation financing—of foreign funding in particular. This is a welcome development. Lawmakers in Washington and in statehouses across the country should move with alacrity and act on this issue before American companies, our justice system, and our capital markets are subjected to further foreign meddling. Former Representative Michael Patrick Flanagan (R-Ill.) previously represented the 5th District of Illinois in the U.S. House of Representatives and sat on the Committee on the Judiciary. An attorney, he previously served in the U.S. Army and retired at the rank of captain. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.


Politico
19 minutes ago
- Politico
Musk-linked PAC spends big to promote newly enacted megabill
President Donald Trump pounds a gavel presented to him by House Speaker Mike Johnson after he signed his signature bill at the White House on July 4, 2025. | Evan Vucci/AP By Gregory Svirnovskiy 08/04/2025 05:55 AM EDT Building America's Future, a PAC that has been supported by Elon Musk, is shelling out more than a million dollars to promote recent White House wins, including a GOP domestic policy package the Tesla CEO and former Trump administration employee once called 'a disgusting abomination.' The 30-second ad, titled 'Independence,' is set to run nationally on Fox News and will congratulate President Donald Trump on the passage of Republicans' 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' which extends his 2017 tax cuts alongside other GOP wins at the expense of nearly $1 trillion in coming Medicaid cuts. 'This Independence Day, President Trump and Congress made the working family tax cuts law,' the spot, which is to debut Monday, will say. 'Freeing Americans from taxes on their tips and overtime, doubling the child tax credit, and cutting taxes for seniors. Republicans know that our country is better off when working families keep more of what they earn. Now, they will.'