Federal President of Austria Van der Bellen arrives in SA for 4-day visit
This is a historic moment as it marks the first time an Austrian head of state visits the country.
Van der Bellen will be welcomed by President Cyril Ramaphosa later on Friday at the Union Buildings in Pretoria, where they will host a joint media briefing.
Trade relations between South Africa and Austria have been described as "mutually beneficial" by both nations.
In 2024, South Africa exported €617 million worth of goods to Austria, while Austria imported €661 million worth of goods from South Africa.
The Presidency said the working visit would focus on improving the bilateral and economic ties between the two countries.
This includes sectors like the arts, agriculture and energy.
The Austrian delegation will be part of a business forum on Friday afternoon with the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
an hour ago
- Mail & Guardian
Public private partnerships can help close Africa's infrastructure deficit
There is a consensus that Africa can increase economic growth by making significant investments in connecting infrastructure. (Photo by EMMANUEL CROSET / AFP) There is a consensus that Africa can increase economic growth by making significant investments in connecting infrastructure — the physical and digital networks that connect towns, cities and countries, enabling seamless trade and data exchange. This includes transport, communication, energy, as well as water and sanitation, which are vital for the free flow of people, goods and services. When this infrastructure operates optimally it facilitates increased trade, communication, commerce and social development — critical pillars in the objectives of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). The Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) in 2023 stated that the Africa infrastructure deficit reduced continental economic growth by 2% annually and reduced productivity by 40%, an alarming state of affairs. To address this infrastructure deficit, the Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (Pida), an African Union initiative, produced the Pida Priority Action Plan (2021-2030) with the support of the United Nations. The plan has a critical list of 69 infrastructure projects to be developed in Africa for about $160 billion. Intra-Africa trade is extremely low at only 15%, compared with 68% in Europe and 59% in Asia. According to the ECA, once fully implemented, the AfCFTA aims to increase intra-Africa trade to 35% by 2040. The objective is to not only increase trade volumes but also promote economic diversification away from reliance on commodity exports towards manufacturing and value-added industries. The changes in the global trade architecture, tariff regimes, aid cancellation, shifting political alliances and elevated geopolitical tensions indicate an urgent need for Africans to increasingly rely on other Africans. This means addressing the critical infrastructure deficits and unlocking intra-African trade is the most important task facing Africa today. Financing connecting infrastructure The technical White Paper, titled Missing Connection: Unlocking Sustainable Infrastructure Financing in Africa and co-published by the Africa-Europe Foundation and African Union Development Agency – NEPAD for the Finance in Common Summit held in Cape Town, South Africa in February 2025, noted the continent needs about $150 billion annually in infrastructure investment to address the infrastructure deficit. Current investment is about $80 billion annually, of which only 40% of this financing comes from governments. About 35% of the financing is from donors and other international partners. The balance of current financing is from the private sector, whose role has taken on increased significance considering the changing donor patterns and decline in China-led financing in recent times. Creating enabling environments for private sector partners to invest in is critical for closing the significant funding gap. Public private partnerships (PPPs) are increasingly viewed as one infrastructure financing modality that should be increasingly considered by African governments. These partnerships are long-term agreements that involve the granting of specific rights to the private sector to build new infrastructure or undertake substantial renovations of existing infrastructure using private financing and at significant private sector risk. In exchange, the private sector investors are granted long-term concessions over the operations of the assets and are remunerated through user charges, government unitary payments, or a blend of the two where revenue viability gaps exist. The assets at the end of the partnership contract are transferred to the state and the state has the option to operate the assets or tender out to the private sector for another contract term. Over the last few years, there has been a huge interest from African governments in using such partnerships to fund their infrastructure deficits. The continent has a low deal flow compared to other regions of the world, but this is set to change if the right policy interventions are applied. McKinsey and Company, in an article titled Solving Africa's Infrastructure Paradox, noted that although Africa has a large pipeline of projects, for example, the Pida Priority Action Plan initiatives, but on average fewer than 10% of these receive funding. There are international funds with an appetite to invest in Africa. So why are so few deals being funded? Some of the reasons for the slow conclusion of public private partnership deals in Africa are: Feasibility studies or business plans are not undertaken in sufficient detail to assess risks or commercial viability. Inadequate enabling legislation, frameworks, and policies tailored for concluding PPP transactions efficiently. The inability of governments to issue guarantees because of weak balance sheets or challenges with credit ratings. A shortage of skilled public servants who possess the necessary experience to conclude PPP contracts. Low liquidity or highly risk averse domestic lenders, thus making foreign lenders the primary option in some markets. Currency fluctuations and other political risk factors discourage investment because of the elevated perceived risks. The African Legal Support Facility (ALSF) based at the African Development Bank undertook a study in 2024 to assess the progress in the development of public private partnership frameworks and supporting legislation. The study, titled Public Private Partnerships, Legal and Institutional Frameworks in Africa: A Comparative Analysis, produced some key findings: Out of 54 countries in Africa, 42 have enacted PPP legislation. Out of the 42 countries, 24 have civil law, 13 have common law and five have mixed legal systems. Western and Central Africa have the highest percentage of economies that have enacted specific PPP laws, with all countries in the region having laws in place, except for Equatorial Guinea and The Gambia. Eastern and Southern Africa have enacted the least specific PPP laws. Among the 12 countries that make up the Southern Africa region, four remain without a specific PPP law: Botswana, eSwatini, Lesotho and South Africa. Annual trends showed that the highest rate of enacted laws was from 2015 to 2017 with 16 laws passed over the three years. The first African country to enact a specific PPP law was Mauritius in 2004, while the most recent is the Republic of Congo in 2022. The restricted tendering method is the most common form of PPP procurement. South Africa had concluded the most public private partnership deals in Africa as of the end of 2024, raising nearly $5 billion, with Nigeria in second place. South Africa appears to have had better success in PPP deal closure because of an advanced financial market, stable economic policy, favourable legal framework and a perceived transparent procurement process according to various studies. The country uses Treasury Regulation 16 under the Public Finance Management Act for national and provincial governments and the Municipal PPP Regulation 309 under the Municipal Finance Management Act for local government. These regulations have been undergoing amendments, with Regulation 16 amendments complete and coming into effect on 1 July 2025 and Regulation 309 amendments still need finalisation. Donor agencies and development finance institutions have directed funding to support the training and institutional building of PPP capabilities in African governments. The Public Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility, a World Bank programme, has successfully implemented institution-building activities to enhance the capacity of government officials around the world. This technical assistance helps to catalyse the adoption of PPP laws, regulations and guidelines in a streamlined manner to facilitate investments. 2025 and beyond Attracting both domestic and global private sector investors to Africa is a critical part of closing the financing gap and making inroads to closing the infrastructure deficit that prevents Africa from growing at a rate fast enough to create meaningful opportunities, especially for its burgeoning youth population. One of the attractive features of PPPs is the transfer back to the state of the asset at the end of the agreement. We have seen many privatisations of state-owned enterprises, usually accompanied by opposition from political parties or civil society because of the more permanent transfers of state assets to the ownership and control of the private sector. Governments have raised debt capital in private markets or by tapping into pension funds to fund infrastructure — another at times controversial route because of perceived risks to pensioners of the funds being mismanaged. Public private partnerships are, however, not a silver bullet to the funding deficit because of the complex nature of the agreements and the real risk of African governments assuming contingent liability exposures inadvertently because of a shortage of skilled bureaucrats. It is incumbent upon our governments to develop the necessary legal frameworks and innovative de-risking mechanisms that will allow the successful conclusion of private sector investments. Dr Mthandazo Ngwenya is a managing director at Bigen Africa Group and has also served as Africa director of Intellecap Advisory Services.
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
‘Still room for engagement' says Parks Tau as Trump's tariff deadline looms
South Africa has been pushing to negotiate a trade deal with the US in order to prevent US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs. Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition Parks Tau says the US has signalled that there's 'still room for engagement' on South Africa's request for an extension of the 90-day pause on new US tariffs. This comes as US President Donald Trump said on Friday morning, 4 July, that the White House will begin notifying countries about new tariffs being imposed on them. Some tariffs, Trump said, could be even steeper than originally announced, according to a report from The New York Times. Trump imposed a 30% tariff on SA in April, as part of his global 'reciprocal' tariffs, before agreeing to suspend their application for 90 days, saying he would hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners. The 90-day pause on Trump's tariff hikes will end on 9 July. SA, and other countries around the globe, have been pushing to negotiate trade deals with the US in order to prevent Trump's sweeping tariffs. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) said this week that SA has requested an extension of the 90-day pause, to enable it to revise its proposed deal in accordance with the Trump administration's new template for US trade with sub-Saharan Africa. 'In this regard, we are of the view that South Africa may need to resubmit its Framework Deal in accordance with the new template. It is thus expected that the deadline may be shifted,' said Tau in a statement on Tuesday, 1 July. 'We urge the South African industry to exercise strategic patience and not take decisions in haste and that government will continue to use every avenue to engage the US government to find [an] amicable solution to safeguard South African interests in the US market,' he added. The US's plan to introduce a new trade template with countries in sub-Saharan Africa emerged in engagements between Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry, Zuko Godlimpi, and the Assistant US Trade Representative for Africa, Connie Hamilton, on the sidelines of the US-Africa Summit in Luanda, Angola, in June. 'Very good' engagement According to Tau, Godlimpi had a 'very good' engagement with Hamilton, where there was an 'indication that there is still room for engagement'. He told Daily Maverick on Friday that he believed discussions with the US will continue beyond 9 July. 'We submitted a draft Framework Agreement and they [the US] have not responded. They indicated that they are not in a position to finalise that right now, so it is their intention that discussions would go on beyond the 9th. So at this point we are awaiting an announcement from them,' Tau said. SA initially submitted a proposed Framework Deal to the US on 20 May, a day before President Cyril Ramaphosa and Trump met at the White House in Washington, DC. The initial proposal included deals on agriculture, critical minerals, automotives and other exports. 'The Framework Deal addresses US concerns relating to, among others, non-tariff barriers, trade deficit, and commercial relations through two-way procurement or import of strategic goods. It aims to also resolve long-standing market access issues of interest to both sides and to promote bilateral investments in a mutually beneficial manner,' read the DTIC statement this week. SA is also seeking to have some of its key exports exempt from the Sections 232 duties, including autos, auto parts, steel and aluminum. It is also seeking a maximum tariff application of 10% 'as a worst case scenario', according to the DTIC. 'The Framework also seeks exemption for Small and Medium Enterprises, counter-seasonal products and products that the US does not have productive capacity for,' it said. What's at stake? The US is South Africa's second-largest trading partner after China. More than 600 American firms are operating in SA. In 2024, trade between SA and the US totalled $20.5-billion, with South African exports consisting largely of precious metals, cars and auto parts, iron and steel, and aluminium products, Daily Maverick reported. SA has benefited immensely from the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) which has enabled it to export a range of products and goods to the US market duty-free. But Trump's new tariff regime would upend the country's long-standing arrangement under Agoa. Professor Bob Wekesa, director of Wits University's African Centre for the Study of the United States, said he believed SA has tried its best to reach a bilateral agreement with the US. 'I don't think we should dismiss the efforts of the Government of National Unity… I think they've done their best,' he said. 'The tricky part is that Trump has refined the art of raising the bar; raising so many issues that you come kneeling before him, you come to the negotiations on the back foot.' He said that while countries such as the UK and Vietnam have both reached trade agreements with the US in recent weeks, South Africa was bound to struggle because 'it's being targeted on other fronts, which are political [and] diplomatic'. Nevertheless, Wekesa said it would be 'disastrous' for SA if Trump's tariffs were to come into effect again. 'It would mean that South African goods and services are impacted – almost a cessation of trade – particularly in critical areas like agricultural products, and specifically the citrus market, in areas of manufacturing, particularly in motor vehicles, and of course, related fields,' he said. He added that it would be a 'big hit' for SA's economy. This will have an 'immediate impact' on the budgets and resources that the government can use for service delivery, according to Wekesa. 'This will of course be on top of the cessation of funding that was coming through USAID [United States Agency for International Development],' he said. Wekesa noted that South Africa is 'not the only country' that has certain critical minerals, like platinum and hydroxide. Next week, Trump will host leaders from five African nations in Washington to discuss 'commercial opportunities', according to a Reuters report. 'These countries also have critical minerals. So the idea that [the] US will lose out on the export of those minerals [from SA], I don't think, is a very strong one… The leaders of Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Gabon, Mauritania, and Liberia are heading to the US. When you look at all the critical minerals from those countries they include all these minerals… One wonders if the US is actually divesting away from South Africa, or reliance on South Africa, by going to these countries to see if it can strike a deal. 'In many of these countries they don't have proper critical minerals policies or strategies – they are essentially weak countries, so the US can strike deals quite fast there,' he said. DM
Eyewitness News
16 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa says DA showing 'hypocrisy' by pulling out of National Dialogue
JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa said that the Democratic Alliance (DA) was showing "hypocrisy" and what he called "poverty of good principles" by pulling out of the National Dialogue. Ramaphosa was speaking in Pretoria on Friday during a joint media briefing with his Austrian counterpart, Alexander van der Bellen. The DA recently announced it would be boycotting the upcoming National Dialogue in protest of Ramaphosa's decision to fire the party's Andrew Whitfield as a deputy minister and for not taking action against African National Congress (ANC) ministers embroiled in controversy. ALSO READ: • Mbeki says it's good Zille is displaying her arrogant, contemptuous view of SAns • Zille unfazed by suggestion DA ministers could face consequences for National Dialogue withdrawal • ANC believes DA's criminal complaint against Nkabane part of its grievance over Whitfield's axing • Withdrawal from National Dialogue likely to see Steenhuisen in hot water On a day of diplomacy and bilateralism, President Ramaphosa delivered a scathing 10-minute rebuke of the DA's decision to boycott the National Dialogue.
