logo
Debate delayed on proposal to more frequently change Nebraska lawmaker compensation

Debate delayed on proposal to more frequently change Nebraska lawmaker compensation

Yahoo17-03-2025
State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair, left, leans in to listen to State Sen. Danielle Conrad of Lincoln at a legislative retreat in Kearney on Friday, Dec. 13, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — A legislative proposal to let an independent, nonpartisan commission set the compensation of future Nebraska state senators is now 'on pause' and will fall to the bottom of legislative priorities in 2025.
State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair, the sponsor of Legislative Resolution 25CA, announced the decision Monday after multiple senators spoke against the proposal during its first two hours of debate on Friday. Hansen said much of the opposition focused on issues that didn't pertain to the proposal itself, and he wanted to move forward.
'In the good nature of not holding up the session for I don't know how many more hours, I think we have some other work that needs to get done,' Hansen said.
Hansen said he still hopes to address the proposal later this year, or early next year, which if passed would send the final decision to voters at the November 2026 general election.
Proposed legislative compensation commission advances from Nebraska committee
The intent of the commission is to remove lawmakers' annual $12,000 salary from the Nebraska Constitution. Because it is in the Constitution, pay increases, or decreases, can't happen without a statewide vote, unlike other state officials. The commission could also consider health care benefits, per diems or reimbursement rates.
Any compensation changes could occur no earlier than 2029, after lawmakers' current terms.
Lawmakers ultimately would need to appropriate funds to cover any pay increases, Speaker John Arch of La Vista and Hansen said during debate. State Sen. John Fredrickson of Omaha suggested tightening the commission's authority to make it a requirement.
Voters last approved a salary increase in 1988, bumping salaries up from $400 each month ($3,600 annually) to $1,000 each month ($12,000 annually).
'It's not dead by any means,' Hansen said of his LR 25CA. 'Just want to bring it up later and get the people's work done first.'
During Friday's debate, State Sens. Machaela Cavanaugh of Omaha, Danielle Conrad of Lincoln and Megan Hunt of Omaha said lawmakers didn't deserve raises if they wouldn't support working families.
Cavanaugh said 'we are not doing our jobs,' and she graded the Legislature's work an 'F.'
'We are nickel and diming people of Nebraska on everything,' Cavanaugh said. 'I don't feel that, in good conscience, I can support something to raise our own salary, as measly as our salary is, so long as we can't also raise resources we give to people who are 50% of the poverty level, who make less than $12,000 a year.'
The progressive lawmakers pointed to proposals that they said could hurt workers or weaken protections for minimum wage, child care, affordable housing, transportation, food or education.
'They think that legislators deserve more than everyday working families, and I disagree,' Conrad said.
Conrad and Hunt said supporters speaking about reinforcing institutional strength and integrity were hypocritical, with Conrad saying they were only doing so 'when it has an opportunity to benefit yourself, personally, financially, individually.'
Hunt said strength comes from lawmakers with the personal integrity to stand up for the legislative branch and their constituents, 'not from a paycheck.'
'Pay raises are not going to make any lawmakers fight executive overreach,' Hunt said. 'That takes leadership and courage.'
State Sen. Myron Dorn of Adams, whose LR 7CA would increase legislative salaries up to $30,000, said he worked with Hansen on the commission idea. Dorn and Hansen will be term-limited in January 2027.
Dorn said lawmakers work an hourly wage of about $5.67 during the session and devote two to three days each week full time later in the year. He and others said it very much limits who even considers running for office.
In the lead-up to the debate, Dorn said emails echoed the comments from Cavanaugh, stating: 'You're not doing a good job, you're not worth the pay that you have now.'
Dorn said he turned that around in his replies based on a philosophy his dad taught him, that 'you get what you pay for.'
'When we're answering those emails, I'm telling those people that if you're complaining about the senators and low quality of people we have up here, just remember, you get what you pay for, and that happens quite often in life,' Dorn said.
State Sen. Christy Armendariz of Omaha said that when she was considering running for office for the 2022 election, she approached her predecessor, former State Sen. Brett Lindstrom, and told him she needed to keep her full-time job.
Lindstrom hesitated, she said, but told her he thought she could pull it off. And she did for her first two years, working 6:30 a.m. to 8 p.m. during the week and working weekends.
But this year, she said she realized that wasn't a sustainable path and that she wasn't giving '100%' to either her constituents or her full-time position. So, she quit.
'It just isn't my nature to do anything part way,' Armendariz said.
Armendariz said she would still run again, knowing it is a volunteer position, but 'we're really, really far away from getting super valuable people on the floor, unless they are self-funded in some other way.'
'I do think it is fair, since the people are the ones that are the recipients of what is done on this floor, the people should be the ones to make a decision whether they want to expand that pool of people that can be elected,' Armendariz said.
State Sens. Terrell McKinney and Ashlei Spivey, both of Omaha, as well as Cavanaugh and Hunt said the Legislature needs more diversity in its membership.
Similar to Armendariz, Spivey said she puts in 18 hours of work each day into her legislative duties and paid work outside the Capitol, while still needing to be a mother and wife. She said LR 25CA was a 'weird dichotomy' between what lawmakers say versus what they do.
'I would love to have more women in the body that are parents, more folks of color, working people that can really bring perspectives and advocate for Nebraskans in a way in which I think that doesn't always happen currently, or in our history,' Spivey said.
McKinney said something needs to change, which could help people 'who care' decide to run.
State Sen. Rob Dover of Norfolk said the proposal was a good idea but was 'probably the right bill at a wrong time.'
He pointed to the state's $457 million projected budget shortfall for the next two years, prior to any legislative action. Dover asked why the proposal was coming up while the state is considering cutting dollars for public health, the University of Nebraska, cancer research, dual credit reimbursement and affordable housing.
'It makes no sense to me whatsoever,' Dover said.
Dover, who will be term-limited in January 2029, warned his colleagues running for future office that if they voted for the proposal, it was a matter of when, not if, they'd have a mailer attacking them for doing so.
Conrad agreed and pointed to former State Sen. Tony Vargas of Omaha who was blasted for a similar 2018 proposal. Conrad said LR 25CA was 'nothing more than another political trap.'
'It's not a good faith effort to strengthen the institution,' she said. 'It's an effort to force Nebraska legislators to continually vote on their own pay raise and to use it against them at election time.'
Hansen said that if lawmakers do a 'crappy job,' which he said he feels has happened in some years, the commission could decide to cut compensation.
'They could actually lower our pay, that's what I love about this,' Hansen said. 'The onus is on us, as representatives of the people of Nebraska to do a good job, to listen, to do the people's work. And if we don't, we could be SOL.'
It will ultimately be up to Speaker Arch whether he reschedules the measure. The proposal has about six hours left on first-round debate and would face two more debates, if advanced. At least 30 lawmakers would need to approve the bill on final reading.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Democrats dig in as Abbott promises fines, extradition and arrests
Texas Democrats dig in as Abbott promises fines, extradition and arrests

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Texas Democrats dig in as Abbott promises fines, extradition and arrests

A White House official told POLITICO Trump's team is taking 'a pretty hands-off approach' to the brewing battle, deferring to Texas Republicans. 'We made our case and now we're counting on them to get it done,' added the person, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss a matter being privately negotiated. State Rep. Ana-María Rodríguez Ramos, chair of the Texas Legislative Progressive Caucus, captured her group's predicament in an interview. 'We really do not have a choice,' she said. 'What is our alternative? Rolling down and rolling over for Trump's economy to continue to destroy America?' The risks are big for Texas Democrats — from $500-a-day fines, to extradition, to the more unlikely scenario of Abbott replacing them with hand-picked legislators, to facing civil arrest for violating the Legislature's rules. They do not, however, face any civil or criminal charges and can only be forced back into the Capitol to take votes. It's unclear who would foot the bill for the hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines members are collectively racking up by abstaining from the legislative session. There are also political risks. Texas Democrats are not just missing votes related to redistricting, but also on legislation that would provide relief following last month's devastating floods. 'No one is fooling around this time in Texas,' said Dave Carney, an adviser to Abbott. 'In the past, it was like, they came back. Everything was forgiven. It was like kumbaya. That's not happening. There's no appetite to say, 'Okay, never mind. We're going to let you do this anytime you fucking want.' Abbott also threatened to arrest Texas Democrats in 2021 when they used the same walkout tactics. If Abbott chooses to call multiple special sessions to pass the redrawn map that would net five GOP-friendly seats, lawmakers could run into time constraints: New lines must be adopted by early December in order to take effect for the 2026 midterm cycle. The Legislature could collide with filing deadlines for the midterms. Under state law, candidates can declare their intent to seek office from Nov. 8 through Dec. 8, but the state legislature has the authority to extend the deadline. Each side lacks good options to resolve the stalemate. Earlier in the day, appearing on the MAGA influencer Benny Johnson's show, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton acknowledged the struggles ahead for Abbott and his fellow Republicans, saying his 'first move would have been to chain them to their desk and not let them out of the door,' before adding, 'I think the governor is going to be forced into calling several special sessions.'

Texas Gov. Abbott orders arrest of Democratic lawmakers who fled the state
Texas Gov. Abbott orders arrest of Democratic lawmakers who fled the state

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Gov. Abbott orders arrest of Democratic lawmakers who fled the state

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott ordered the state's Department of Public Safety to arrest Democratic legislators who failed to appear for a special redistricting session on Monday. State-level Democrats have fled the state to deny the GOP-controlled legislature a quorum as they consider new congressional maps. Abbott's order follows a motion passed by Republicans in Austin that allowed civil arrest warrants to be issued for their colleagues. Abbott asked the DPS to 'locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans' and said the order 'will remain in effect until all missing Democrat House members are accounted for and brought to the Texas Capitol.' Abbott's statement is in line with one issued by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton earlier in the day. Paxton accused the Democrats of 'a cowardly desertion of their responsibilities as elected officials.' 'These jet-setting runaways abandoned Texas, abdicated their duties in the House, and sacrificed their constituents for a publicity stunt,' Paxton said in a statement.'It's imperative that they be swiftly arrested, punished, and face the full force of the law for turning their backs on the people of Texas.' The arrest warrants and Abbott's order are largely for show. The governor and state police do not have the authority to arrest the absent Democrats, as they have fled to other Texas GOP is pushing a Trump-approved redistricting map that could add five Republican seats to the state's delegation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Redrawing congressional maps in the middle of the decade is extremely unusual, as redistricting typically occurs around the time of the U.S. Census. The draft map packs Democratic voters into more condensed districts while pushing some voters in safely Republican districts into contested areas currently held by Democrats. The Texas Democratic Caucus spent Monday taunting Abbott and frustrated Republicans. When the governor threatened to remove the absent lawmakers from office, the minority party issued a four-word statement: 'Come and take it.' The post Texas Gov. Abbott orders arrest of Democratic lawmakers who fled the state appeared first on

The Great Gerrymander War: California fires back at Texas power play
The Great Gerrymander War: California fires back at Texas power play

Politico

time3 hours ago

  • Politico

The Great Gerrymander War: California fires back at Texas power play

'I know the last thing Riverside County residents want is to eliminate the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission and replace it with insider Sacramento politicians gerrymandering district lines behind closed doors,' Calvert said in a statement. When Newsom initially floated a California gerrymander to neutralize Texas, the reaction last month was a mix of enthusiasm and deep skepticism about the legal and political hurdles, given California's use of an independent redistricting commission. But as it became clear that Texas Republicans were unlikely to back down, Newsom pressed the issue, making California the tip of the spear for a counteroffensive embraced by Democrats at all levels of the party. Those dynamics make it likely the Democratic-dominated Legislature votes this month to put a new map on the ballot. While some expressed misgivings Sunday about a rushed process — to secure a November election, lawmakers will need to act quickly — several statehouse Democrats predicted they would muster the necessary two-thirds votes in each house. 'It's not a fight any of us want to be in, but we're in it, so we're going to fight,' said Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, a Democrat from Oakland. 'Nothing,' she added, 'unites the California Democratic caucus quite like Donald Trump.' But getting Sacramento Democrats on board is one thing. Persuading California voters will be entirely different — particularly because they would be asked to return line-drawing power to politicians, letting the Legislature craft new lines until the commission takes over again in 2031 after the next census. 'Voters want to weigh in on redistricting because they don't trust politicians,' said Chris Lehman, a political consultant who has worked on redistricting ballot initiatives. A survey conducted by Newsom pollster David Binder found that 52 percent of California voters would approve of state lawmakers redrawing its congressional district lines if Texas Republicans pulled off a similar gambit. The measure becomes more popular if the fight becomes more overtly partisan; 60 percent of voters back 'rejecting Trump's power grab.' Roughly eight in 10 Democrats and six in 10 independents are in favor of the effort, according to a person who was briefed on the poll's findings. The messages tested in the poll underscore how California Democrats will portray this as a fight they have no choice but to take on. The proposed ballot measure would be contingent on Texas' new districts being enacted. 'The polling shows that Californians overwhelmingly reject Trump's blatant power grab in Texas and want to fight back. The basic components of the program we are considering has strong support,' said Los Angeles-area Assemblymember Rick Chavez Zbur, another Democrat. A successful ballot campaign would still require a titanic political effort. Assuming the Legislature acts, Newsom and allies will have just a few months to raise tens of millions of dollars and educate voters on a sudden, off-year election. Republican foes could be motivated to throw down. With little else on the ballot, that could yield an enormously expensive showdown. 'That'll be the big question mark,' said Brandon Castillo, a political consultant who specializes in ballot initiatives. 'Does that national money pour in, on both sides?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store