Job Growth Sputters
According to NFIB's Small Business Economic Trends survey, the percent of firms increasing total employment has languished since 2020. Changes in economic policy have been major drivers of employment. The 2016-2019 period was very different from that of 2020-2025, especially with Covid related business restrictions early on, heavily impacting economic activity.
Overall, while hiring plans are positive, there are plenty of job openings, especially in the transportation, construction, and manufacturing industries, small business employment is also losing steam. The hiring pressures of a few years ago have tapered off. Small businesses are more uncertainty about economic conditions going forward and are holding on tighter to their wallets. The number of owners increasing compensation has eased and fewer are planning to increase going forward. And most telling, labor quality is no longer the top problem for small business owners, it's been replaced by taxes. Sixteen percent of small business owners named labor quality as the single biggest problem compared to 24 percent of owners reporting the same two years ago. Job reductions were strongest in retail, along with cuts in services. Most manufacturing firms in the U.S. are 'small' and specialized, and have the lowest level of employment reductions.
Job openings remain eleveated (JOLTS, NFIB), and owners continue to complain of too few qualified applicants for the openings they are trying to fill. In May, 55 percent reported hiring or trying to hire in May, down 1 point from April. Eighty-six percent of those hiring or trying to hire reported few or no qualified applicants for the positions they were trying to fill. The impact of DOGE reductions is yet to be felt, as compensation will continue until September for most, and even until the end of the year for others. While labor market pressures are easing, it's not signaling any distress alarms so far.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Another federal judge orders AmeriCorps to reinstate workers, restore funds
An AmeriCorps member works in Philadelphia in this 2014 file photo. (Photo courtesy AmeriCorps) A second federal district judge in Maryland has ordered the Trump administration to reinstate AmeriCorps workers who were laid off without notice in April and to restore $400 million in funding and grants to nonprofit organizations. The preliminary injunction handed down Monday by District Judge Matthew Maddox comes a month and two days after a similar ruling in a separate AmeriCorps case in Maryland by U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman — whose ruling is quoted heavily by Maddox. Both judges blocked moves by the Trump administration and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to shut down AmeriCorps programs, including the National Civilian Community Corps (NCCC), Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA) and various state and private grant programs. Boardman ruled in favor of 24 states and the District of Columbia that sued to block the DOGE cuts. Maddox ruled in favor of a number of nonprofits from around the country, members of an AmeriCorps labor union and three AmeriCorps service members. Both cases were a response to DOGE moves in mid-April to immediately terminate all NCCC projects, along with 2,000 NCCC participants, and to put more than 600 AmeriCorps staffers — about 85% of the agency's staff — on administrative leave, to be laid off less than two weeks later. Workers were ordered to immediately stop working and were locked out of AmeriCorps offices, email and other systems. About $80,000 raised to support Maryland AmeriCorps programs gutted by Trump Maddox said the workers and nonprofits that sued the Corporation for National and Community Service, which runs AmeriCorps, were likely to win on their claims that the abrupt government cuts were made without authority, failed to follow appropriate procedures and were likely to cause irreparable harm to the plaintiffs. Maddox wrote that the government 'cancelled approximately $400 million in AmeriCorps grants and terminated funding to both direct grantees and subgrantees of State Service Commission…. These actions have led to significant disruptions in the delivery of services that were previously funded by AmeriCorps and provided by the Nonprofit Plaintiffs.' 'This disruption has included the termination or suspension of assistance with college applications, provision of teachers to Indigenous school districts, housing assistance for low-income families, childhood literacy programs, summer and afterschool learning programs, and neighborhood revitalization programs, among other services,' he wrote. Maddox ordered the return of roughly $400 million in funding to 14 nonprofits that had grants to do AmeriCorps work, the reinstatement of hundreds of AmeriCorps Employees Union Local 2027 members who were put on administrative leave on April 15 and subsequently laid off, and the return of three AmeriCorps members who lost their positions as a result of the cuts. Boardman had ordered much of the same in her June 5 order. Besides Maryland and Washington, D.C., other states that sued, and are subject to Boardman's preliminary injunction, are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Maddox's order affects three unnamed AmeriCorps members as well as about 400 members of AmeriCorps Employees Union, AFSCME Local 2027. It also applies to 14 nonprofits: Elev8 in Baltimore; Red Cloud Indian School in South Dakota; Bur Oak Land Trust in Iowa; Partners for Campus-Community Engagement in Pennsylvania; National College Attainment Network in Washington, D.C.; Michigan College Access Network; North Carolina Housing Coalition; Housing and Community Development Network of New Jersey; Handson Suburban Chicago; Democracy Maine; the Service Collaborative of WNY in New York; Rainbow Labs in California; the SEED Coalition in Minnesota; and the Aspire Afterschool Learning in Virginia. Maddox gave the government 24 hours to file a status report confirming that all parties had been notified of his order and that the government was complying with it. It is to file an updated status report every two weeks.
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Fight Between Musk Acolytes and the White House for Control of DOGE
Elon Musk has left the government, but his clout at DOGE lives on. Weeks after the billionaire left his role at the Department of Government Efficiency amid his feud with President Trump, a small band of Musk loyalists is fighting to preserve the legacy—and power—of the government-slashing office.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla is in deeper trouble than you think
Tesla's troubles go far beyond CEO Elon Musk's recent dust-up with President Donald Trump, who accused the former 'first buddy' of going 'completely 'off the rails'' in a social media slap fight over the weekend. But while the battles between Musk and Trump are getting all the attention, the outlook for Tesla's revenue and bottom line have gotten notably worse. And the company could even be back to losing money, for reasons unrelated to Musk's personal politics. Musk was Trump's largest financial supporter during the 2024 campaign, and was a mainstay at Mar-a-Lago and the White House at the start of Trump's second term, with his role in slashing the federal workforce at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But Musk has since announced he was starting a new political party due to his displeasure with the tax and spending bill signed by Trump on Friday — and the barbs on their respective websites have only increased since then. Shares of Tesla closed Monday down 6.8%, as investors were concerned about the implication of Musk's latest political moves, despite his promises to re-focus on the company. It rebounded only 1.3% in Tuesday trading. 'Very simply Musk diving deeper into politics and now trying to take on the Beltway establishment is exactly the opposite direction that Tesla investors/shareholders want him to take during this crucial period for the Tesla story,' wrote Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities who's known for being optimistic about the company. Ives put out a follow-up note Tuesday saying that the Tesla board should set ground rules to limit Musk's political activities because the company is at a 'tipping point' for its future. 'Tesla is heading into one of the most important stages of its growth cycle with the autonomous and robotics future now on the doorstep and cannot have Musk spending more and more time creating a political party which will require countless time, energy, and political capital,' he wrote. Still, Ives maintained his buy recommendation and $500 price target for the stock in his note. But analysts at William Blair cut their recommendation on the stock to 'market perform' or neutral, and also cut their earnings forecast for the company. Because even without the political stink, the Tesla's financial outlook is suddenly looking notably worse. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. But when Ives posted his belief that the Tesla board should tie Musk's future pay package to the amount of time he spends at Tesla and have oversight of his political 'endeavors,' Musk responded with his own post on X, saying 'Shut up, Dan.' Blair's note pointed out that Trump's bill not only removed the $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicle (EV) buyers, but also eliminated the financial penalties for automakers that fail to meet federal emissions targets. Emissions fines have historically forced automakers who still build primarily gasoline powered cars and trucks to buy 'regulatory credits' from EV companies. Removing those fines eliminates 'market demand for Tesla's credits,' said the note from William Blair analysts Jed Dorsheimer and Mark Shooter. The sale of those federal and state credits added $10.6 billion to Tesla's bottom line since 2019 and often enabled the company to post a profit. Without the revenue from those regulatory credits, the company would not have reported a positive annual net income until 2021, and it would have been back in the red again in the first quarter of this year, when its net income plunged 71% compared to a year earlier on sharply lower sales around the globe. Musk has largely downplayed all the recent bad news, saying the company's future rests on robots, artificial intelligence and self-driving taxis. But the company's taxi service is very limited to date, launching only in Austin, Texas, for a select group of customers – mostly Tesla fans – and with a Tesla employee riding in the front passenger seat to monitor the car's performance. That puts Tesla behind the robotaxi service already offered in Austin and three other cities – San Francisco, Los Angeles and Phoenix – by Waymo, the self-driving car unit of Google parent Alphabet. And Tesla's rollout has had its shares of problems, including a video showing a robotaxi traveling on the wrong side of the road for about half of a block and another video of a robotaxi slowly turning its front wheels into a parked car. While Musk has promised his robotaxi service will be expanding soon across many other cities, he has not given any further details. He also hasn't said when the Austin service will be expanded to the general public, nor when the company's human monitors sitting in the front passenger seat will no longer be needed. Meanwhile, Waymo has definitive plans to expand its service to Miami and Washington, DC, next year in partnership with Uber. 'We expect that investors are growing tired of the distraction at a point when the business needs Musk's attention the most and only see downside from his dip back into politics,' said the William Blair note. 'We would prefer this effort to be channeled towards the robotaxi rollout at this critical juncture.' Then there's the problem of Tesla's sales. Or rather, the lack thereof. Global sales were down a record 13% in each of the first two quarters of this year, compared to a year earlier, even though demand for EVs overall continues to climb, a further sign of Tesla's declining market share. Part of the lost EV market share is due to increased competition, both from Western automakers rolling out their own EV offerings, and Chinese automakers that have made a massive push into the market. Chinese automaker BYD is poised to surpass Tesla in global annual EV sales this year for the first time, even though Tesla is a still a major player in China, and BYDs are not sold in the US. Demand is likely to weaken further come October 1, when the $7,500 tax credit for electric car buyers expires. When a previous version of the tax credit was phased out for Teslas in 2019, the company had to cut the price of the car by about half the value of the lost credit. Tuesday Tesla posted on X that 'If there ever was a time to yolo your car purchase, it's now,' referencing the upcoming tax credit expiration and using the acronym for 'you only live once.' But Tesla has also faced missteps of Musk's own doing. There has been backlash against Musk's political activity, which has had a significant impact on Tesla sales. That is likely to continue even as he moves to distance himself from Trump. In the early months of this year, hundreds of protests were held outside Tesla showrooms in the United States, Canada and Europe. Worries about self-inflicted brand damage started the company's shares on their downward slide. It prompted Trump, who was still Musk's ally at the time, to announce he was buying a Tesla for himself. In March, the president hosted an event at the White House urging others to buy the company's cars. At one point, Musk and Tesla investors might have hoped that in a closely divided country, the lost sales to Trump critics might be at least partly made up for by sales to Trump fans. But Musk seems to now face the possibility of backlash from both sides of the political spectrum. 'He's been able to alienate everyone, which many thought was impossible, but he's actually been able to do it,' Ives told CNN Monday. 'And the problem is, this soap opera just keeps going on.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
